sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advancements in GNSS Precise Point Positioning Technology and Applications

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Navigation and Positioning".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 1187

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ESTEC, European Space Agency, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Interests: multi-GNSS precise positioning; integer ambiguity resolution; estimation theory
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) precise positioning with either real-time kinematic (RTK) or precise point positioning (PPP) has enabled the realization of a wide range of applications, including, amongst many others, precision agriculture, autonomous driving, structural monitoring, surveying, and inland waterway navigation. Due to the great flexibility offered by the individual corrections delivered in state-space-representation form, the ever-increasing adoption of the PPP technology has placed this technique at the center of attention in both the industrial and the scientific domains. What has been the game changer is its integer ambiguity resolution-enabled variant, namely PPP-RTK, which not only provides RTK-like positioning accuracy but can deliver it in a global sense, with lower correction transmission rates compared to RTK, and without the explicit dependence on nearby reference stations.

Despite the significant advances in PPP technology, it is not considered yet a one-size-fits-all approach for any application requiring cm-level positioning. For instance, the vulnerabilities of GNSS signals in adverse environments and the low measurement quality of mass-market devices pose significant difficulties in successfully resolving the carrier-phase ambiguities as integers. Although preliminary research has been conducted on using complementary sensing devices to augment GNSS-based PPP and PPP-RTK, further investigation is required. It is, therefore, evident that new problems and challenges will come to the fore, which will require the development of theoretical frameworks, models, operational systems, and algorithms to improve the performance achieved with this technology.

The goal of this Special Issue is to highlight such recent developments. The topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Multi-GNSS multi-frequency PPP and PPP-RTK models and algorithms;
  • Precise positioning with high-grade and low-cost receiver/antenna equipment;
  • Integer carrier-phase ambiguity resolution;
  • Observation-level integration of GNSS and other sensors (IMU, cameras, Lidar, etc.) for urban navigation;
  • LEO-augmented PPP and PPP-RTK;
  • Galileo HAS, BDS-3 PPP-B2b, QZSS CLAS.

Dr. Dimitrios Psychas
Dr. Robert Odolinski
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • global navigation satellite system (GNSS)
  • precise point positioning (PPP)
  • integer ambiguity resolution (IAR)
  • low-cost receivers and antennas
  • sensor fusion
  • LEO
  • smartphones

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 7790 KiB  
Article
Pixel 5 Versus Pixel 9 Pro XL—Are Android Devices Evolving Towards Better GNSS Performance?
by Julián Tomaštík, Jorge Hernández Olcina, Šimon Saloň and Daniel Tunák
Sensors 2025, 25(14), 4452; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25144452 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 111
Abstract
Smartphone GNSS technology has advanced significantly, but its performance varies considerably among Android devices due to differences in hardware and software. This study compares the GNSS capabilities of the Google Pixel 5 and Pixel 9 Pro XL (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) [...] Read more.
Smartphone GNSS technology has advanced significantly, but its performance varies considerably among Android devices due to differences in hardware and software. This study compares the GNSS capabilities of the Google Pixel 5 and Pixel 9 Pro XL (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) using five-hour static measurements under three environmental conditions: open area, canopy, and indoor. Complete raw GNSS data and the tools used for positioning are freely available. The analysis focuses on signal quality and positioning accuracy, derived using raw GNSS measurements. Results show that the Pixel 9 Pro XL provides better signal completeness, a higher carrier-to-noise density (C/N0), and improved L5 frequency reception. However, this enhanced signal quality does not always translate to superior positioning accuracy. In single-point positioning (SPP), the Pixel 5 outperformed the Pixel 9 Pro XL in open conditions when considering mean positional errors, while the Pixel 9 Pro XL performed better under canopy conditions. The precise point positioning results are modest compared to the current state of the art, only achieving accuracies of a few meters. The static method achieved sub-decimeter accuracy for both devices in optimal conditions, with Pixel 9 Pro XL demonstrating a higher fix rate. Findings highlight ongoing challenges in smartphone GNSS, particularly related to the limited quality of signals received by smartphone GNSS receivers. While newer devices show improved signal reception, precise positioning remains limited. Future research should explore software enhancements and the use of various external correction sources to optimize GNSS accuracy for mobile users. Generally, a shift from research to user-ready applications is needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3511 KiB  
Article
An Investigation of Real-Time Galileo/GPS Integrated Precise Kinematic Time Transfer Based on Galileo HAS Service
by Lei Xu, Shaoxin Chen, Yuanyuan An, Pengli Shen, Xia Xiao, Qianqian Chen, Jianxiong Wei, Yao Chen and Ye Yu
Sensors 2025, 25(10), 3243; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103243 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 452
Abstract
GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technology has been extensively applied to post-processing international comparisons between UTC/TAI times and real-time time transfer, predominantly in static configurations. However, with the swift advancement of intelligent and unmanned systems, there is an urgent need for research into [...] Read more.
GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technology has been extensively applied to post-processing international comparisons between UTC/TAI times and real-time time transfer, predominantly in static configurations. However, with the swift advancement of intelligent and unmanned systems, there is an urgent need for research into kinematic time transfer. This paper introduces a kinematic model Galileo/GPS integrated PPP time transfer approach leveraging the Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS). The study utilized observational data from seven stations spanning 22 days. The findings indicate that under static conditions, GPS, Galileo, and Galileo/GPS PPP, when supported by the Galileo HAS, can achieve time transfer with sub-nanosecond precision. In kinematic scenarios, the accuracy of single-system PPP time transfer is comparatively lower, with frequent re-convergence events leading to significant accuracy degradation (exceeding 1 ns). However, in cases where re-convergence is infrequent due to a limited number of satellites, sub-nanosecond time transfer is still attainable. The Galileo/GPS integrated PPP time transfer effectively mitigates the issue of re-convergence, ensuring sub-nanosecond accuracy across all links (0.48 ns). Consequently, it is recommended to employ a multi-system integration approach for kinematic PPP time transfer, particularly when utilizing the Galileo HAS. In terms of frequency stability, GPS, Galileo, and Galileo/GPS PPP demonstrate short-term stability (over 960 s) of (5.29 × 10−13, 3.34 × 10−13, and 1.60 × 10−13), respectively, and long-term stability (over 15,360 s) of (1.49 × 10−13, 1.02 × 10−13, and 4.06 × 10−14), respectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop