Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.8
2.8
Journals
Prosthesis
Special Issues
Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients
share announcement

Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients

A special issue of Prosthesis (ISSN 2673-1592). This special issue belongs to the section "Prosthodontics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 September 2025 | Viewed by 4051

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Maria Maddalena Marrapodi

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialist Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80121 Naples, Italy
Interests: temporomandibular disorders; orofacial pain; artificial intelligence; pediatric dentistry; oncology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Floriana Lauritano

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Medicinal Sciences and Health Products, Telemedicine and Telepharmacy Center, University of Camerino, Madonna delle Carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy
Interests: implant dentistry; dental materials; oral surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The interplay between oral health and overall well-being is complex and significant; oral cancer exemplifies this link with its profound impact on patients’ lives. As oral cancer treatments often necessitate surgical interventions that can alter facial structure and function, prosthetic rehabilitation becomes paramount. This Special Issue titled “Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients” delves into the challenges and innovations within this critical aspect of patient care.

The rise in oral cancer incidence globally necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to rehabilitation, including the use of prosthetics to restore aesthetics, speech, and the ability to chew, which are often compromised following cancer treatment. The World Health Organization underscores the necessity of such comprehensive care strategies in its resolution WHA 53.17, advocating for enhanced prevention and management of oral health issues.

This Special Issue focuses on the latest advancements in prosthetic rehabilitation, addressing the unique needs of oral cancer survivors. It encompasses a range of topics: the evaluation of risk factors associated with lifestyle, the exploration of minimally invasive therapeutic techniques, and the pioneering of biocompatible and eco-friendly prosthetic materials.

Our objective is to foster a collaborative environment where researchers, clinicians, and academic groups can exchange insights, experiences, and breakthroughs. By disseminating original research, clinical reports, and comprehensive reviews, we aim to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life for oral cancer patients through innovative prosthetic solutions.

We invite contributions that broaden the scope of knowledge in this field and pave the way for more effective rehabilitation practices for those affected by oral cancer.

Dr. Maria Maddalena Marrapodi
Dr. Floriana Lauritano
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Prosthesis is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prosthodontics
  • oral health
  • oral cancer
  • oral lesions
  • TMD diagnosis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

13 pages, 3616 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Various Facial Measurements as an Adjunct in Determining Vertical Dimension at Occlusion in Dentate Individuals—A Cross-Sectional Study
by Reecha Bhadel, Manish Sen Kinra, Saurabh Jain, Mohammed E. Sayed, Aparna Aggarwal, Maria Maddalena Marrapodi, Gabriele Cervino and Giuseppe Minervini
Prosthesis 2024, 6(5), 989-1001; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6050072 - 28 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1252
Abstract
Background: For optimal clinical outcomes in full mouth rehabilitations, it is vital to determine the optimal jaw relations and confirm the appropriate vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO). The current study aims to evaluate various facial measurements as an adjunct in determining VDO [...] Read more.
Background: For optimal clinical outcomes in full mouth rehabilitations, it is vital to determine the optimal jaw relations and confirm the appropriate vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO). The current study aims to evaluate various facial measurements as an adjunct in determining VDO in dentate individuals. Methods: A total of one hundred and twenty subjects, sixty males and sixty females, of the age group 19-30 were selected for the study. VDO (chin–nose distance) and other facial measurements like the glabella to subnasion (G-S) distance, both right and left pupil to rima oris (P-R) distance, both right and left corner of mouth to outer canthus of eye (M-E) distance, and both right and left ear to eye (E-e) distance were measured using a Vernier caliper. Results: The mean ± standard deviation of the C-N distance, G-S distance, right P-R distance, right M-E distance, left M-E distance, right E-e distance, and left E-e distance were 67.70 mm ± 3.22 mm, 60.29 mm ± 3.67 mm, 65.99 mm ± 3.72 mm, 66.00 mm ± 3.91 mm, 69.51 mm ± 3.71 mm, 69.48 mm ± 3.68 mm, 69.59 mm ± 3.98 mm, and 69.51 mm ± 3.95 mm, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the C-N distance and M-E distance was found to be 0.739 (right), 0.730 (left); that between the C-N distance and E-e distance was found to be 0.738 (right), 0.732 (left); that between the C-N distance and P-R distance was found to be 0.660(right), 0.670(left); and that between the C-N distance and G-s distance was found to be 0.417. Conclusions: The present study reported a high positive correlation between the chin to nose distance and the distance between both the right and left lateral corner of the mouth to the outer canthus of the eye, and the distance between both the right and left ear to the eye. Hence, these measurements can be used as an adjunct for establishing VDO in the edentulous patient. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 12320 KiB  
Case Report
Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation in a Mandible Osteosarcoma Patient: A Clinical Report
by Lady Arbelaez-Bonozo, Laura Luis-Sanchez, Elena Oliva-Ferrusola, Carlos Fernandez-Morales, Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez and Daniel Torres-Lagares
Prosthesis 2025, 7(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010022 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Introduction: Generally, after an oral oncological therapeutic process in which, unfortunately, surgery plays a fundamental role, a reconstructive and rehabilitative procedure should be initiated, seeking as far as possible to recover the patient’s vital functions (mastication, aesthetics, and phonetics). Case report: We present [...] Read more.
Introduction: Generally, after an oral oncological therapeutic process in which, unfortunately, surgery plays a fundamental role, a reconstructive and rehabilitative procedure should be initiated, seeking as far as possible to recover the patient’s vital functions (mastication, aesthetics, and phonetics). Case report: We present the case of a patient who successfully underwent treatment for mandibular sarcoma. After a disease-free period of one year, following oncological treatment, an intervention was performed for the insertion of dental implants into the fibula to subsequently rehabilitate the patient prosthetically. There were several challenges, including free-end edentulous space in the lower jaw with a depth of 18 mm on peri-implant tissues consisting of osteoseptocutaneous skin graft, hypotonic perioral musculature, and high aesthetic expectations of the patient. An overdenture with a titanium milled bar substructure with retentive prosthetic components was chosen for treatment. This implant-supported removable prosthesis was selected to facilitate cleaning, since the patient did not maintain oral hygiene habits. The patient was educated on using and handling the prosthesis, and the treatment objectives were achieved (to restore aesthetics and masticatory function). Conclusions: Removable prostheses are a valid alternative for oncologic patients and patients with unfavorable conditions for more complex implant-supported rehabilitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 14793 KiB  
Case Report
Prosthetically Driven Approach to Post-Ablative Maxilla Rehabilitation with an Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Case Report
by Tine Malgaj, Andrej Kansky, Alenka Ludvig Ribič, Tom Kobe, Blaž Berce and Peter Jevnikar
Prosthesis 2024, 6(6), 1300-1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6060093 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1436
Abstract
This clinical report details the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient following maxillary ablation to remove a peripheral giant cell granuloma. After a hemimaxillectomy, the defect was reconstructed with a fasciocutaneous radial free flap. Implant placement was digitally planned using the dual scanning technique, [...] Read more.
This clinical report details the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient following maxillary ablation to remove a peripheral giant cell granuloma. After a hemimaxillectomy, the defect was reconstructed with a fasciocutaneous radial free flap. Implant placement was digitally planned using the dual scanning technique, and implants were inserted with the aid of an acrylic surgical guide. After implant osseointegration, a removable implant-supported overdenture with an electroplated secondary structure retained on a titanium bar was fabricated. At the 3-year follow-up, peri-implant tissues remained healthy, showing only mild gingival hyperplasia around the bar, while no prosthesis retention loss or significant technical complications were observed. In conclusion, the reconstruction of the moderate maxillary defect using a soft-tissue flap provided satisfactory functional and esthetic outcomes, significantly enhancing patient satisfaction. However, the limited bone availability necessitated precise implant planning to ensure adequate biomechanical support for the overdenture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop