Nutrition Policy and Programs in Educational Settings: Equitable Approaches to Food Security

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Nutritional Policies and Education for Health Promotion".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 May 2024 | Viewed by 1230

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
Interests: public health policy; policy implementation; dissemination; program sustainability; child and youth well-being; federally assisted food programs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
The Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
Interests: social policy; food insecurity; policy and program design; barriers to access; food as medicine; child nutrition programs; federal nutrition assistance programs

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over 1 in 5 children in the United States live in a food-insecure household. Policies and programs within educational settings play a critical role in health and educational outcomes, particularly for young populations experiencing racial and economic inequities. Multiple federally assisted child nutrition programs operating in educational settings aim to provide nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free meals to children across the US. However, significant gaps remain for achieving equity in nutrition security during youth and into early adulthood. This Special Issue welcomes research that documents the design, testing, evaluation, implementation and dissemination of programs and policies with an equitable approach to addressing food insecurity in education settings. Research can be focused in childcare, k-12 or college settings, but should highlight approaches to achiving nutritional equity. Drs. Moreland-Russell and Ferris have focused their research on nutritional equity in the United States and Missouri; nevertheless, submissions from diverse global geographies are encouraged. Dr. Ferris’s work has specifically highlighted the need for innovative service delivery approaches additional to policies that increase meal access. In addition, they have explored inequitable implementation of recent federal meal standard flexibilities resulting in lower quality food being served.

Dr. Sarah Moreland-Russell
Dr. Dan Ferris
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • food insecurity
  • equity
  • school food programs
  • school food policy
  • child and youth well-being
  • school breakfast program
  • national school lunch program

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 250 KiB  
Article
Urban–Rural Differences in School Districts’ Local Wellness Policies and Policy Implementation Environments
by Swati Iyer, Timothy J. Walker, Alexandra L. MacMillan Uribe, Chad D. Rethorst, Rebecca A. Seguin-Fowler and Jacob Szeszulski
Nutrients 2024, 16(6), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16060801 - 11 Mar 2024
Viewed by 714
Abstract
Higher rates of obesity in rural compared to urban districts suggest environmental differences that affect student health. This study examined urban–rural differences in districts’ local wellness policies (LWPs) and LWP implementation environments. Cross-sectional data from two assessments in Texas were analyzed. In assessment [...] Read more.
Higher rates of obesity in rural compared to urban districts suggest environmental differences that affect student health. This study examined urban–rural differences in districts’ local wellness policies (LWPs) and LWP implementation environments. Cross-sectional data from two assessments in Texas were analyzed. In assessment one, each district’s LWP was reviewed to see if 16 goals were included. In assessment two, an audit was conducted to identify the presence of a wellness plan (a document with recommendations for implementing LWPs), triennial LWP assessment, and school health advisory councils (SHACs) on the district website. Rural districts’ LWPs had a smaller number of total goals (B = −2.281, p = 0.014), nutrition education goals (B = −0.654, p = 0.005), and other school-based activity goals (B = −0.675, p = 0.001) in their LWPs, compared to urban districts. Rural districts also had lower odds of having a wellness plan (OR = 0.520, 95% CI = 0.288–0.939), p = 0.030) and a SHAC (OR = 0.201, 95% CI = 0.113–0.357, p < 0.001) to support LWP implementation, compared to urban districts. More resources may be needed to create effective SHACs that can help develop and implement LWPs in rural areas. Important urban–rural differences exist in Texas LWPs and LWP implementation environments. Full article
Back to TopTop