Research on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Dentistry and Oral Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2025 | Viewed by 3638

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical Specialistic and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/A, 60126 Ancona, Italy
Interests: dentistry; oral and maxillofacial surgery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical Specialistic and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/A, 60126 Ancona, Italy
Interests: dentistry; prosthetic dentistry; oral rehabilitation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are honored to be the Guest Editors of this Special Issue, entitled In recent years, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery has experienced significant advancements in materials, techniques, and technology. These significant achievements have resulted in many clinical benefits, that enhanced diagnostic accuracy, allowed to formulate more precise treatment plans, and improved treatment predictability, safety, and efficiency, as well as overall patients’ experience. We have identified four main domains that, as health professionals, we should always consider during our clinical practice: 1. patient centrality, 2. treatment efficacy, 3. treatment effectiveness, and 4. quality of care. These concepts should be applied in all medical fields, including Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

This Special Issue welcomes all kinds of research papers aimed at proposing, describing, and evaluating novel procedures and approaches in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, intended to enhance the above-described domains.

Dr. Luca Aquilanti
Dr. Giorgio Rappelli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • guided bone regeneration
  • CAD–CAM technology
  • digital dentistry
  • digital maxillofacial surgery
  • biomaterials
  • maxillofacial reconstructive surgery
  • novel medical devices

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

9 pages, 259 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Postoperative Bleeding After Oral Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Study
by Jae-Il Lee, Hyejun Seo, Yeong-Cheol Cho, Jang-Ho Son and Iel-Yong Sung
Medicina 2025, 61(3), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030425 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 505
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Patients taking anticoagulants, particularly warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), face an elevated risk of postoperative bleeding during minor oral surgeries, highlighting the urgent need to identify reliable predictors for bleeding complications. In this study, we evaluated the [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Patients taking anticoagulants, particularly warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), face an elevated risk of postoperative bleeding during minor oral surgeries, highlighting the urgent need to identify reliable predictors for bleeding complications. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of predictors of bleeding complications in patients receiving anticoagulants who underwent minor oral surgeries. Materials and Methods: The electronic medical and dental records of 206 patients who underwent oral surgery at the University of Ulsan Hospital between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into those taking warfarin and those taking NOACs, and postoperative bleeding was determined. Risk factors were statistically analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t-test. Results: Among the 206 patients (86 on warfarin, 120 on NOACs), 84 (36 on warfarin, 48 on NOACs) experienced bleeding complications following their procedures. Time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) values were significantly associated with bleeding complications in the warfarin group, while the type of NOAC was associated with bleeding in the NOAC group. Perioperative bleeding was significantly correlated with postoperative bleeding in both groups. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings highlight the correlations between postoperative bleeding and specific factors associated with anticoagulant drugs in patients that underwent oral surgery. Identifying these predictors can improve patient management by enhancing pre- and perioperative assessments, reducing the risk of bleeding, and optimizing surgical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
11 pages, 6307 KiB  
Article
The TACOS Technique: A Stepwise Protocol for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Customized Titanium Mesh
by Mauro Merli, Luca Aquilanti, Marco Merli, Giorgia Mariotti and Giorgio Rappelli
Medicina 2025, 61(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61010058 - 2 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1400
Abstract
Background: Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth loss poses a significant challenge for successful dental implant placement. In cases of severe atrophy, bone augmentation is required to restore sufficient bone volume. This technical note outlines a detailed, stepwise surgical protocol for horizontal and vertical [...] Read more.
Background: Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth loss poses a significant challenge for successful dental implant placement. In cases of severe atrophy, bone augmentation is required to restore sufficient bone volume. This technical note outlines a detailed, stepwise surgical protocol for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using customized titanium mesh. Materials and Methods: The procedure includes precise mesh fitting, autologous bone grafting, and the application of bioactive agents to promote bone regeneration. Emphasis is placed on the technique’s feasibility, predictability, and the critical steps necessary for preventing complications. Results: The use of customized mesh ensures stability and improved bone regeneration outcomes, enabling clinicians to achieve successful implant placement even in severely atrophic ridges. Conclusions: The described protocol has demonstrated predictable results in both clinical and radiographic evaluations, offering an effective solution for complex bone augmentation cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 1995 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Comparative Efficacy of Burs Versus Piezoelectric Techniques in Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review Following the PRISMA Guidelines
by Rocco Franco, Mattia Di Girolamo, Carlo Franceschini, Sofia Rastelli, Mario Capogreco and Maurizio D’Amario
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122049 - 12 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1171
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction is one of the most common surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Traditional rotary instruments and burs have long been the standard tools for this procedure. However, recent advancements in surgical techniques, such [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction is one of the most common surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Traditional rotary instruments and burs have long been the standard tools for this procedure. However, recent advancements in surgical techniques, such as piezoelectric surgery, have gained popularity due to their purported advantages in terms of precision, safety, and postoperative outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of third molar surgery performed using burs versus piezoelectric surgery. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published up until October 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, and comparative studies assessing third molar surgery using either burs or piezoelectric instruments were included. The primary outcomes evaluated were surgical time, postoperative pain, swelling, nerve damage, and healing time. The data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using standardized tools, and any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: A total of five studies met the inclusion criteria, and the meta-analysis revealed that piezoelectric surgery resulted in significantly lower postoperative pain and swelling compared to traditional bur techniques (p < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of nerve injury was lower in the piezoelectric group, though the difference was not statistically significant. Surgical time was found to be longer with piezoelectric devices, but this was offset by improved healing outcomes and patient comfort. Conclusions: Piezoelectric surgery offers a less traumatic alternative to traditional burs for third molar extraction, with reduced postoperative morbidity and enhanced patient outcomes. Although the longer surgical duration may be a drawback, the overall benefits, particularly in terms of pain management and tissue preservation, support the adoption of piezoelectric techniques in clinical practice. Further high-quality randomized trials are recommended to strengthen the evidence base for these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop