Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Interventional Cardiology

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2024 | Viewed by 1623

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dobney Hypertension Centre, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Interests: coronary artery disease; interventional cardiology; thrombosis; precision medicine

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
Interests: coronary artery disease; interventional cardiology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Internal Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Interests: biostatistics; epidemiology; vascular disease; autoimmunity

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past decades, interventional procedures have become fundamental in the diagnosis and treatment of many cardiovascular diseases. The benefits of minimal invasiveness and reduced complications make intervention the therapy of choice in many cases. Interventional cardiology is a rapidly growing field, and the development of newer devices and the improvements in endovascular techniques are substantially improving the outcomes of the procedures available and expanding the use of this approach.

The aim of this Special Issue is to publish the latest evidence and broadcast the status of knowledge regarding novel endovascular techniques, complications management, cutting-edge technologies, and understudied populations that can help to guide medical practice.

We welcome authors to submit original research manuscripts, meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports focusing on the recent advances and challenges in cardiovascular interventions. Topics include, but are not limited to, coronary artery disease, valvular pathology (transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter mitral valve repair) or peripheral endovascular procedures (peripheric artery disease, renal denervation).

Dr. Leslie Marisol Lugo Gavidia
Dr. José Antonio Linares-Vicente
Dr. Warren David Raymond
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • angioplasty
  • endovascular
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1643 KiB  
Article
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures
by Tatsuro Yamazaki, Yuichi Saito, Hideki Kitahara and Yoshio Kobayashi
Medicina 2023, 59(12), 2185; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122185 - 15 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1233
Abstract
Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) as an alternative to wire-based coronary physiological indices for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction. We evaluated trajectories of TFC during IDP and the impact of ACh provocation on TFC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who underwent IDP to diagnose INOCA were included and divided into two groups according to the positive or negative ACh provocation test. Wire-based invasive physiological assessment was preceded by ACh provocation tests and intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). We evaluated TFC at three different time points during IDP; pre-ACh, post-ISDN, and post-hyperemia. Results: Of 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) had positive ACh provocation test. In the positive ACh group, resting mean transit time (Tmn) and baseline resistance index were significantly higher than in the negative ACh group. Post-ISDN TFC was significantly correlated with resting Tmn (r = 0.31, p = 0.002). Absolute TFC values were highest at pre-ACh, followed by post-ISDN and post-hyperemia in both groups. All between-time point differences in TFC were statistically significant in both groups, except for the change from pre-ACh to post-ISDN in the positive ACh group. Conclusions: In patients suspected of INOCA, TFC was modestly correlated with Tmn, a surrogate of coronary blood flow. The positive ACh provocation test influenced coronary blood flow assessment during IDP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Interventional Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop