Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.1
2.4
Journals
Medicina
Special Issues
Recent Research and Trends in Plastic, Aesthetic and Regenerative Surgery
share announcement

Recent Research and Trends in Plastic, Aesthetic and Regenerative Surgery

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2026 | Viewed by 464

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Radu Jecan

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Prof. Dr. Agripa Ionescu Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Interests: plastic surgery
Dr. Cristian-Sorin Hariga

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
1. Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bucharest Clinical Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2. Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Emergency Clinical Hospital Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: plastic surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the field of Plastic Surgery, thorough analysis of the results obtained and innovation are essential. Consequently, sharing the latest conclusions and launching hypotheses contribute essentially to the development of this field. In this Special Issue, we aim to gather the most recent articles from all areas of Plastic Surgery, including interdisciplinary topics, in order to provide evolutionary support. Many of the topics are multidisciplinary in nature, especially those in the area of aesthetic surgery. While maintaining scientific rigor, we want to encourage authors to express their new approaches and results, even preliminary ones, and also to encourage them to build working hypotheses that will be subsequently validated. The presentation of avant-garde works is usually done within scientific events, but dedicating a Special Issue of a journal offers a special opportunity due to the much wider access it offers. Also, the objective of this Special Issue is to analyze some aspects within systematic or comprehensive reviews regarding the fastest evolving topics in the field. Equally important are rare cases that are often missed because they cannot be included in a series with standard statistical significance. For these reasons, we encourage potential authors to publish significant case series of rare pathologies. Finally, the scientifically supported opinions of authors are welcomed, even if they do not fit the mainstream opinion.

What kind of papers we are soliciting:

Article, Review, Systematic Review, Case Series, Hypothesis, Opinion.

Prof. Dr. Radu Jecan
Guest Editor

Dr. Cristian-Sorin Hariga
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • surgical techniques
  • microsurgical techniques
  • soft tissue tumors
  • breast surgery
  • breast implants
  • BIA diseases
  • breast reconstruction
  • tissue regeneration
  • PRP therapy
  • HA therapy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 303 KiB  
Review
The Role of Skin Substitutes in the Therapeutical Management of Burns Affecting Functional Areas
by Matei Iordache, Luca Avram, Ioan Lascar and Adrian Frunza
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61060947 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 311
Abstract
Considered one of the most severe types of trauma with a high impact upon patient survival, burns are the leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and are responsible for high morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, disfigurement and social stigma. Of particular interest are injuries that [...] Read more.
Considered one of the most severe types of trauma with a high impact upon patient survival, burns are the leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and are responsible for high morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, disfigurement and social stigma. Of particular interest are injuries that affect the functional areas: face, neck, hand and fingers, joints, feet and soles and perineum. Burns to these regions highly influence the day-to-day activities of patients due to the formation of vicious scars and contractures, which may affect both quality of life and functional capacity. One of the primary challenges in the management of burn patients is the effective coverage of tissue defects resulting from such injuries. Cases that have a large area of burned surface also have a limited amount of total available skin. As such, the importance of skin substitutes increases, particularly in the treatment of these areas. Skin substitutes are widely utilized in plastic surgery due to their ability to promote wound healing by providing an extracellular matrix. Consequently, ongoing research has focused on developing skin substitutes that can serve as alternatives to autografts, addressing the challenges associated with large-scale tissue loss. This article aims to present and compare the most used skin substitutes, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations. This topic continues to be a subject of significant debate, as an ideal substitute has yet to be created. The cost–efficiency ratio is a practical consideration that must be tailored to each specific medical system. The available data in the literature usually present general guidelines, not rules, and as such, they need to be adapted to each patient’s necessities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research and Trends in Plastic, Aesthetic and Regenerative Surgery)

Other

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 596 KiB  
Systematic Review
Scrotal Flaps for Penile Skin Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
by Sorin V. Parasca, Andrei Dumitrescu, Florin R. Stanescu and Ruxandra D. Sinescu
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 1052; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061052 - 6 Jun 2025
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Infection, trauma, skin cancer, foreign substance injections and lymphedema are among the most frequent causes of penile skin defects. Scrotal flaps are a promising reconstructive option for penile resurfacing, offering improved functional and aesthetic outcomes; however, there is no [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Infection, trauma, skin cancer, foreign substance injections and lymphedema are among the most frequent causes of penile skin defects. Scrotal flaps are a promising reconstructive option for penile resurfacing, offering improved functional and aesthetic outcomes; however, there is no clear consensus on their superiority. Materials and Methods: A review of the literature was performed in PubMed Central and Scopus, and multiple keywords were employed. The initial search retrieved 9181 articles; 32 articles were finally selected, of which 13 were case reports and 19 were case series. Results: A total of 368 patients were included, the majority (71%) consulting for sclerosing lipogranuloma. Seven types of scrotal flaps were used: unilateral scrotal flap (n = 1), bilateral anterior scrotal flaps (n = 149), two-stage scrotal flap (n = 57), bipedicled bilateral anterior scrotal flaps (n = 140), apron-style scrotal flap (n = 1), scrotal pull-up (n = 13), and island dartos musculocutaneous flap (n = 7). Patient satisfaction was high in all studies. Outcome evaluation was typically conducted using subjective questionnaires with 2 or 5 items or visual analog scales. Few studies employed validated sexual function questionnaires, as the IIEF-5 or the EHS. Conclusions: Scrotal flaps provide good quality tissue for penile resurfacing, having the closest resemblance to normal penis skin. For a better understanding of the outcomes of different scrotal flaps, a thorough evaluation of postoperative complications should be made. The LOS and revision surgery rates may serve as surrogates for the financial burden of the procedure. Erectile function should be thoroughly evaluated with a 10-item Likert scale, IIEF-5, EHS, and POSAS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research and Trends in Plastic, Aesthetic and Regenerative Surgery)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop