materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Wound Healing and Membranes for Bone Regeneration

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 November 2021) | Viewed by 2835

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Periodontology & Dental Implantology, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Interests: dental implant surface and its effects on osseointegration; collagen membrane degradation in various systemic conditions; bone and periodontal regeneration; sinus augmentation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Interests: effects of systemic diseases on bone physiology; diabetes and its complications in oral tissues; effects of prostaglandins on cells of the oral cavity; molecular dissection of periodontal disease

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Lack of adequate alveolar bone volume may prevail due to various reasons such as systemic conditions, as well as post-traumatic or post-extraction defects. Augmenting the residual bone for rehabilitation of an edentulous area is a challenging area of clinical practice and, hence, the subject of intense research. The long-term success of dental implants requires adequate bone volume and architecture, and this can be achieved by different surgical techniques either at the time of implant placement or as a preparatory event. Both clinicians and basic scientists have been exploring a wide array of augmentation procedures that will enable the enlargement of bone volume for socket preservation, vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation, and sinus lift.

Different clinical approaches have been described to enlarge alveolar bone volume, including:

  1. Osteoinduction (using bone growth factors);
  2. Osteoconduction (using grafting materials);
  3. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) (using tissue barriers or membranes made of resorbable or non-resorbable materials with or without additional grafts);
  4. Cell transplantation (using various cells capable of becoming osteoblasts); and
  5. Gene therapy (using locally administered genetic materials that will induce osteoblastic differentiation).

In practice, most clinical scenarios utilize combinations of these approaches, namely grafts loaded with cells or genetically engineered cells, grafts loaded with growth factors, etc., and most of these protocols apply GBR principles. As a result, barrier membranes are widely used in bone regeneration procedures.

Regardless of the exact GBR protocol used, there are two critical components that bear major significance for a successful and predictable treatment:

  1. Proper and sustained wound healing that protects the augmented site from the harsh oral environment and from infection, while preserving the esthetics and functionality of the site; and
  2. Membrane longevity and biocompatibility, protecting the defect from invasion of unwanted cells and dissipation of implanted cells or biologics for a long-enough period to induce sufficient new bone formation.

However, different situations and systemic conditions may jeopardize the success of these GBR techniques, by either interfering with adequate wound healing or by reducing membrane integrity and longevity, thus interfering with its functionality. These situations may require the incorporation into GBR protocols of various techniques, molecules, or devices to overcome these detrimental conditions.

The aim of this Special Issue of Materials, entitled “ Wound Healing and Membranes for Bone Regeneration”, is to provide a stage for researchers and clinicians to submit their latest studies dealing with the interplay between barrier membranes, wound healing, systemic diseases, animal augmentation models, and molecular background involved in the success or failure of augmentation procedures and with any type of intervention that will protect the treatment from the adverse influence of these factors and promote the success and predictability of the surgical procedure. Original studies or reviews from a variety of dental disciplines including periodontology, dental implantology, oral and maxillo-facial surgery/reconstruction, cell biology, and material sciences are warmly welcome.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Ofer Moses
Prof. Dr. Miron Weinreb
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bone regeneration
  • wound healing
  • collagen membrane
  • animal model
  • sinus augmentation
  • periodontal regeneration

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 2379 KiB  
Article
Horizontal Augmentation of Chronic Mandibular Defects by the Guided Bone Regeneration Approach: A Randomized Study in Dogs
by Anton Friedmann, Stefan Fickl, Kai R. Fischer, Milad Dalloul, Werner Goetz and Frederic Kauffmann
Materials 2022, 15(1), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010238 - 29 Dec 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2338
Abstract
Various biomaterial combinations have been studied focusing on their ability to stabilize blood clots and maintain space under soft tissue to support new bone formation. A popular combination is Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) placed with a native collagen membrane (NCM) tacked to [...] Read more.
Various biomaterial combinations have been studied focusing on their ability to stabilize blood clots and maintain space under soft tissue to support new bone formation. A popular combination is Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) placed with a native collagen membrane (NCM) tacked to native bone. In this study, we compared the outcome of this treatment option to those achieved with three different graft/membrane combinations with respect to total newly occupied area and the mineralized compound inside. After bi-lateral extraction of two mandibular premolars in five adult beagles L-shaped alveolar defects were created. A total of 20 defects healed for 6 weeks resulting in chronic type bone defects. At baseline, four options were randomly allocated to five defects each: a. DBBM + NCM with a four-pin fixation across the ridge; b. DBBM + RCLC (ribose cross-linked collagen membrane); c. DBBM + NPPM (native porcine pericardium membrane); and d. Ca-sulfate (CS) + RCLC membrane. Membranes in b/c/d were not fixed; complete tensionless wound closure was achieved by CAF. Termination after 3 months and sampling followed, and non-decalcified processing and toluidine blue staining were applied. Microscopic images obtained at standardized magnification were histomorphometrically assessed by ImageJ software (NIH). An ANOVA post hoc test was applied; histomorphometric data are presented in this paper as medians and interquartile ranges (IRs). All sites healed uneventfully, all sites were sampled and block separation followed before Technovit embedding. Two central sections per block for each group were included. Two of five specimen were lost due to processing error and were excluded from group b. New bone area was significantly greater for option b. compared to a. (p = 0.001), c. (p = 0.002), and d. (p = 0.046). Residual non-bone graft area was significantly less for option d. compared to a. (p = 0.026) or c. (p = 0.021). We conclude that collagen membranes with a prolonged resorption/barrier profile combined with bone substitutes featuring different degradation profiles sufficiently support new bone formation. Tacking strategy/membrane fixation appears redundant when using these biomaterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wound Healing and Membranes for Bone Regeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop