The Syntax of Child Language

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2025) | Viewed by 1927

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Interests: child language acquisition; child sentence processing; language and cognitive development in autism spectrum disorder; experimental linguistics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are launching a Special Issue entitled “The Syntax of Child Language”. Children’s acquisition of syntax is an amazing feat. How children, exposed to a relatively small sample of language input, come to acquire the complex structures of their language is a central topic both in theoretical linguistics and in psycholinguistics. This question has been extensively investigated over the past 50 years or so. However, research findings on children’s acquisition of sentence structures are sometimes difficult to interpret, because children’s performance reflects a combination of their syntactic knowledge and the processing mechanisms through which they produce behaviour. Therefore, to fully reveal children’s syntactic knowledge, we must carefully examine these processing mechanisms. In addition, children master the syntax of their language through exposure and interaction with caregivers and others but, notably, with no formal instruction. To fully understand the nature of children’s syntactic development, it is also essential to explore the nature of children’s linguistic input and how, in principle, children can deduce correct generalizations about sentence structure in their language based upon this input. This three-way interaction between children’s innate structural knowledge, their processing mechanisms, and the linguistic input that they receive represents a general framework for understanding children’s acquisition of syntax. 

This Special Issue will bring together research that reflects the current state of our understanding of this three-way interaction in children’s acquisition of sentence structures. Submissions are encouraged to address the following questions. 

(1) How much do we know about the nature of children’s linguistic input?

(2) Given what we know about the nature of children’s linguistic input, can children deduce the correct generalizations about the sentence structures of their language? 

(3) What are the roles of the processing mechanisms in children’s deduction of syntactic generalizations?

(4) In what ways does children’s syntactic knowledge exceed the linguistic evidence available to them? 

(5) In what ways can children’s innate structural knowledge make the input more informative, to facilitate children’s acquisition of syntax?   

We hope that this special issue will shed light on major developments in child syntax and can provide the basis for future research in the field. We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editor (zhoupeng1892@zju.edu.cn) or to /Languages/ editorial office (languages@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review. 

Tentative Completion Schedule
Abstract Submission Deadline: 31 May 2025
Notification of Abstract Acceptance: 30 June 2025
Full Manuscript Deadline: 30 November 2025

We look forward to your participation in this project.

Prof. Dr. Peng Zhou
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sentence structures
  • language acquisition
  • innate structural knowledge
  • processing mechanisms
  • linguistic input

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 559 KB  
Article
Dative Clitics as Arguments and Adjuncts: A Developmental Perspective on Sentence Processing in Italian Children, Adolescents, and Adults
by Matteo Greco, Veronica D’Alesio and Anna Teresa Porrini
Languages 2026, 11(7), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11070146 - 10 Jul 2026
Abstract
This study investigates the processing of Italian verb constructions containing preverbal dative clitics that function either as arguments or as adjuncts, adopting a developmental perspective across Italian-speaking children, adolescents, and adults. In a self-paced reading experiment, adults and fourteen-year-old adolescents read trivalent verbs [...] Read more.
This study investigates the processing of Italian verb constructions containing preverbal dative clitics that function either as arguments or as adjuncts, adopting a developmental perspective across Italian-speaking children, adolescents, and adults. In a self-paced reading experiment, adults and fourteen-year-old adolescents read trivalent verbs selecting a dative argument (‘Martina mi ha prestato una bicicletta.’; Eng.: ‘Martina lent me a bicycle.’) faster than bivalent verbs licensing a benefactive dative (‘Martina mi ha riparato una bicicletta.’; Eng.: ‘Martina repaired me a bicycle), in line with the Argument Structure Hypothesis, which predicts lower processing costs for lexically selected arguments than for syntactically computed adjuncts. In contrast, eleven-year-old children showed no processing differences between the two constructions. A second experiment using eye-tracking with ten-year-old children replicated this null effect, indicating that the absence of sensitivity to the argument–adjunct distinction at this age is not due to methodological factors. Instead, the findings suggest a developmental trajectory, with adult-like processing emerging only in early adolescence. Children’s performance appears to be influenced by grammatical competence rather than by verb argument structure per se. Overall, the results highlight the role of grammatical maturation in real-time syntactic processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Syntax of Child Language)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2797 KB  
Article
Global Cues to Spanish Differential Object Marking in Monolingual and Bilingual Child-Directed Speech
by Pablo E. Requena
Languages 2026, 11(6), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11060113 - 2 Jun 2026
Viewed by 633
Abstract
Spanish Differential Object Marking (DOM) is conditioned by well-known local properties of the direct object, but also by clause- and discourse-level factors. In this study, we examine whether these factors are also available as potential learning cues in child-directed speech (CDS). We analyzed [...] Read more.
Spanish Differential Object Marking (DOM) is conditioned by well-known local properties of the direct object, but also by clause- and discourse-level factors. In this study, we examine whether these factors are also available as potential learning cues in child-directed speech (CDS). We analyzed longitudinal naturalistic CDS from two monolingual and three bilingual (heritage) Spanish-learning children, manually extracting transitive clauses and coding DOM presence alongside discourse specificity, verb class, coreferential pronoun (clitic doubling), relative animacy, and DO placement, plus two local cues for comparison. Regression analyses revealed that a wider range of local and global factors conditioned DOM in monolingual than in bilingual CDS. The potential informativeness of these factors as learning cues was quantified using Competition Model measures of availability, reliability, and validity. In monolingual CDS, local cues (+human, pronominal/proper name DOs) were highly reliable, and two global cues (clitic doubling and relative animacy) showed moderate reliability. Whereas discourse specificity and verb class were highly available, they were comparatively unreliable. Validity values were uniformly low; although several global cues matched or exceeded local cues in validity, this pattern largely reflected their greater availability rather than higher reliability. In bilingual CDS, reliability and validity were reduced across nearly all cues, with little differentiation among cues. These findings suggest that Spanish-learning children encounter potentially usable utterance- and discourse-level evidence for DOM in CDS, but that the robustness of this evidence is markedly weaker in bilingual input. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Syntax of Child Language)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop