Ecological and Disaster Risk Assessment of Land Use Changes

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Landscape Ecology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2025 | Viewed by 2488

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Interests: ecology; ecological (environmental) economics; natural resource management; human–environment interactions
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Interests: ecological (environmental) geography; remote sensing of resources and environment; geographic information systems; land use and land cover change; environmental assessment

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Interests: human geography; rural transition; land use sustainability; geo-socio-ecological modeling; climate change mitigation and adaptation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, the impact of alterations in land use on ecosystems has significantly intensified, emerging as a pivotal force driving global transformations. Imprudent land utilization has led to a spectrum of ecological threats, encompassing land desertification, soil erosion, substantial depletion of forest reserves, biodiversity loss, pollution concerns, and a decline in the functionality of ecosystem services. Furthermore, it contributes to the heightened frequency of natural disasters and extreme weather events. Given the escalating global tensions between population growth, resource availability, and environmental preservation, there is an urgent imperative for assessing the ecological disaster risks associated with changes in land use. This assessment is crucial for promoting ecological rejuvenation and advancing sustainable development efforts.

The primary objective of this Special Issue is to disseminate the most recent research findings concerning the assessment of ecological and disaster risks associated with changes in land use. Its overarching goal is to mitigate the adverse impacts on ecosystems and promote sustainable development across regional economies, societies, and environments. This Special Issue aims to propose well-reasoned strategies for responding to ecological and disaster risks effectively.

The scope of this issue encompasses a wide range of topics, including, but not limited to, the following:

  1. Analyzing current and future ecological and disaster risks resulting from land use changes at both global and regional scales.
  2. Introducing innovative technologies, frameworks, and methodologies for assessing these risks and predicting their magnitude.
  3. Implementing proactive management, policies, and governance to prevent potential ecological disasters.
  4. Advancing sustainable development in the context of land use.

We welcome submissions that present groundbreaking methodologies for understanding and addressing these environmental challenges, as well as manuscripts that provide empirical case studies exploring the scientific, managerial, and policy dimensions of ecological and disaster risk assessment associated with changes in land use.

Dr. Jianjun Cao
Dr. Asim Biswas
Dr. Jian Zhang
Prof. Dr. Dewei Yang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecological or disaster risk
  • risk assessment
  • risk prediction
  • ecosystem services
  • land use change
  • land use policy
  • sustainable development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 4441 KiB  
Article
The Application of Soil Erosion Models of an Agroforestry Basin under Mediterranean Conditions from a Geotechnical Point of View
by Ana Paula Leite, António Canatário Duarte, Leonardo Marchiori, Maria Vitoria Morais, André Studart and Victor Cavaleiro
Land 2024, 13(10), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101613 - 4 Oct 2024
Abstract
Soil erosion has been causing an imbalance in nature and the environment. It is mainly caused naturally but is also due to human interventions leading to desertification and possible contamination. Therefore, engineering, geography, and cartography have been allies in applying erosion models to [...] Read more.
Soil erosion has been causing an imbalance in nature and the environment. It is mainly caused naturally but is also due to human interventions leading to desertification and possible contamination. Therefore, engineering, geography, and cartography have been allies in applying erosion models to predict, address, and remediate the impacts. Therefore, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) linked to Geographic Information Systems (GISs) could boost decision making as tools to mitigate issues. This study applies the RUSLE and SWAT models from a geotechnical point of view to analyze a sub-watershed at Idanha-a-Nova (Portugal) over 4 years, showing a predominant erosion risk class with losses lower than 5 t.ha−1.year−1 (60 to 86%), characterized as very low risk. The modeling permitted the development of soils erosion susceptibility charts, in addition to material availability and the suitability for construction areas, exposing a replicable methodology that could contribute to minimizing environmental impacts while encouraging a more intelligent use of the land towards a greener exploration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological and Disaster Risk Assessment of Land Use Changes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 13988 KiB  
Article
Landscape Ecological Risk and Drivers of Land-Use Transition under the Perspective of Differences in Topographic Gradient
by Xuebin Zhang, Jiale Yu, Haoyuan Feng, Litang Yao, Xuehong Li, Hucheng Du and Yanni Liu
Land 2024, 13(6), 876; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060876 - 18 Jun 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
Human activities have caused different degrees of land-use change on different topographic gradients, with impacts on the landscape and ecosystem. Effectively preventing and addressing ecological risk (ER) and achieving harmonious coexistence between humans and nature are important aspects of sustainable development. In this [...] Read more.
Human activities have caused different degrees of land-use change on different topographic gradients, with impacts on the landscape and ecosystem. Effectively preventing and addressing ecological risk (ER) and achieving harmonious coexistence between humans and nature are important aspects of sustainable development. In this study, we used Gansu Province as an example, adopted five periods of land-use data in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020, and used the geoinformatic Tupu method and the terrain distribution index to study land-use changes under different topographic gradients, and then constructed the landscape ecological risk assessment (LERA) model based on the landscape pattern index to analyze landscape ecological risk (LER) spatiotemporal changes under different topographic gradients, and finally explored the LER driving factors using the geodetector model. The results showed that (1) the dominant land-use types were unused land and grassland, accounting for approximately 74% of the land. The situation of transferring and changing each type was more drastic. The distribution and changes in cropland and built-up land were easily found in low topographic gradient areas with low elevations and small slopes; the distribution and changes in woodland, grassland and water areas were easily found in high topographic gradient areas with high elevations and large slopes. (2) The landscape ecological risk index (LERI) was 0.018, 0.019, 0.019, 0.019 and 0.020, respectively, with spatial expressions of high in the northwest and low in the southeast. Low LER was concentrated in high topographic gradient ecological reserves; high LER was concentrated in low topographic gradient human interference areas and high topographic gradient natural environmental complex areas. (3) Natural factors mainly acted on the LER on moderate and high topographic position gradients; socioeconomic factors mainly acted on the LER on low topographic position gradients. Human interference interacted with natural factors more than human interference alone on LER. This study can provide a scientific basis for ensuring ecological security and sustainable development in areas with complex topography and geomorphology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological and Disaster Risk Assessment of Land Use Changes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6313 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Uncertainties in Ecological Risk Based on the Prediction of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Evolution
by Chang You, Hongjiao Qu, Shidong Zhang and Luo Guo
Land 2024, 13(4), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040535 - 17 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 849
Abstract
With the rapid progress in urbanization and economic development, the impact of land use change (LUC) on ecosystem services is becoming increasingly significant. However, the accuracy of ecological risk assessment faces challenges due to the presence of uncertainty factors. Using the PLUS model, [...] Read more.
With the rapid progress in urbanization and economic development, the impact of land use change (LUC) on ecosystem services is becoming increasingly significant. However, the accuracy of ecological risk assessment faces challenges due to the presence of uncertainty factors. Using the PLUS model, this study aims to simulate and predict land use changes (LUCs), focusing on the southern hilly regions in southeastern China as a case study, conducting an in-depth assessment of ecological risk uncertainty. Firstly, a spatiotemporal simulation of LUCs in the southern hilly region from 1990 to 2030 was conducted under multiple scenarios. Subsequently, differences in the spatial and temporal distribution of ecosystem service value (ESV) across different years and forecast scenarios in the southern hilly region were revealed, followed by a detailed analysis of the impact of LUCs on ESV. Finally, by calculating the Ecological Risk Index (ERI), the study systematically analyzed the evolution trend of ecological risk in the southern hilly region of China from 1990 to 2030. The main research findings are as follows: (1) the conversion proportions of different land use types vary significantly under different scenarios. Compared to 2020, under the 2030 National Development Scenarios (NDSs), there has been a slight decrease of around 3% in the total conversion area of farmland, forest, and grassland. However, under the Ecological Protection Scenario (EPS) and Urban Development Scenario (UDS) scenarios, there has been an increase in the area of forest and grassland, with a rise of approximately 1.5% in converted built-up land. (2) Western cities (e.g., Yueyang and Yiyang), central cities (e.g., Jiujiang), and northeastern cities (e.g., Suzhou) of China exhibit a relatively high ESV distribution, while ESV significantly decreased overall from 2010 to 2020. However, under the EPS and UDS, ESV shows a significant increasing trend, suggesting that these two scenarios may play a crucial role in ecosystem restoration. (3) The conversion of forest and water bodies to farmland has the most significant inhibitory effect on ESV, especially during the period from 1990 to 2000, providing substantial data support for relevant policy formulation. (4) From 1990 to 2030, ecological risk gradually increased in western, central, and southwestern cities of the southern hilly region, with the highest ecological risk values under the EPS scenario in northern cities (e.g., Chizhou and Tongling). Under the UDS scenario, there has been a significant decrease in ecological risk, providing valuable insights for future ecological conservation and sustainable development. However, a limitation lies in the need for further enhancement of the scenario’s simulation authenticity. This study offers a new perspective for understanding the impact of LUCs on ecosystem services and the uncertainty of ecological risks, providing crucial reference points for land resource management and the formulation of ecological conservation policies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological and Disaster Risk Assessment of Land Use Changes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop