Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Governance

A special issue of Journal of Risk and Financial Management (ISSN 1911-8074). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability and Finance".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 1895

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University, 4 Cardigan St, Birmingham B4 7BD, UK
Interests: corporate governance; corporate reporting and disclosure; sustainability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
Interests: corporate law and corporate governance, including its legal, business, sustainability and SDGs

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The requirement for sustainability reporting has introduced a significant new issue for corporate governance. Unlike voluntary sustainability reports, non-financial statements must be audited by the supervisory board. This auditing of corporate reports is a critical mechanism for controlling firms, and the new sustainability reporting requirements are closely integrated into corporate governance.

This Special Issue seeks to enhance the existing literature on corporate governance practices regarding sustainability disclosure. In a mandatory setting, however, firms must produce sustainability reports regardless of their actual sustainability performance. This distinction allows for a more in-depth analysis of how corporate governance influences disclosure. The requirement for a supervisory board to audit nonfinancial statements makes this type of mandatory sustainability reporting a specific form distinctly tied to corporate governance. Furthermore, the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability disclosure in mandatory reporting is largely underexplored. It remains unclear which corporate governance mechanisms are relevant and how they impact mandatory sustainability reports. Finally, the role of corporate governance in sustainability and how organizations contribute to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has become a global priority. There are increasing efforts to achieve the SDGs worldwide.

This Special Issue aims to complement the existing literature on corporate governance practices in the context of sustainability reporting, especially their impact on sustainable development, and to address pressing concerns around sustainability in global markets. We hereby invite submissions that use a range of methodological approaches, such as positivistic, interpretive, or critical perspectives. We consider both theoretical and empirical submissions.

Dr. Kashan Pirzada
Prof. Dr. Gabriël Moens
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Risk and Financial Management is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability reporting
  • sustainability disclosure
  • corporate governance
  • corporate social responsibility
  • integrated reporting
  • corporate ethics and accountability
  • sustainability in finance and accounting
  • sustainable development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 349 KiB  
Article
Disclosure of Sustainability Practices in Annual Reports and the Funding Cost of Cooperative Financial Organizations
by Bruno de Medeiros Teixeira, Clea Beatriz Macagnan, Cenaide Francieli Justen and Israel Patiño-Galvan
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2025, 18(4), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040205 - 10 Apr 2025
Viewed by 266
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the level of disclosure of information representing sustainability practices from the stakeholders’ perspective and its relationship with the funding cost of cooperative financial organizations. The level of disclosure was measured using 46 information indicators representing sustainability practices from [...] Read more.
This study aimed to analyze the level of disclosure of information representing sustainability practices from the stakeholders’ perspective and its relationship with the funding cost of cooperative financial organizations. The level of disclosure was measured using 46 information indicators representing sustainability practices from the stakeholders’ perspective, identified in the annual reports of cooperative financial organizations (CFOs) listed in the World Cooperative Monitor 2023, totaling 155 observations. The relationship between disclosure and the cost of financing was analyzed using a random effects estimator with cluster-robust standard errors. The results demonstrate a negative relationship between the disclosure of sustainability practices and the funding cost. When disaggregated by sustainability pillar, the results show that disclosure in the social, environmental, and cultural pillars is negatively associated with funding cost, while the economic pillar shows no statistically significant effect. This suggests that disclosing sustainability-related information from the stakeholders’ perspective reduces the cost of funding and enhances the legitimacy of CFO managers, setting them apart from traditional banks. This study examines the relationship between sustainability disclosure and funding cost in CFOs by adapting validated indicators and applying a robust econometric approach. Unlike existing literature focused on traditional banks, it empirically investigates how sustainability disclosure affects information asymmetry, funding costs, and managerial legitimacy within the cooperative financial sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Governance)
19 pages, 354 KiB  
Article
Decoding Pension Funds: Sustainability Indicators for Annual Report Analysis
by Leticia Martins Medeiros, Clea Beatriz Macagnan and Rosane Maria Seibert
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2025, 18(4), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040174 - 25 Mar 2025
Viewed by 388
Abstract
Pension funds’ growth highlights the need to emphasize fiduciary duty and investment sustainability, considering the current and future participants’ interests (priority stakeholders) and systemic risk reduction (environmental, social, economic, and governance effects). Therefore, this study builds sustainability indicators based on the interests of [...] Read more.
Pension funds’ growth highlights the need to emphasize fiduciary duty and investment sustainability, considering the current and future participants’ interests (priority stakeholders) and systemic risk reduction (environmental, social, economic, and governance effects). Therefore, this study builds sustainability indicators based on the interests of pension fund stakeholders. The methodology comprised five stages: the first consisted of analyzing Annual Information Reports to create a preliminary list of indicators; the second involved examining specific legislation on pension fund disclosure and identifying mandatory information; the third involved submitting the updated list to experts; and the fourth involved submitting it to priority stakeholders for evaluation and validation. After its updates, the indicators list was evaluated using Principal Component Analysis. All these stages allowed for the triangulation of information and the creation of a final list containing 48 sustainability indicators for pension funds, with information requested by priority stakeholders. This allows regulators to adjust disclosure rules, including those required by stakeholders and good governance practices. It also allows pension funds to identify the indicators required by stakeholders, reducing information asymmetry. The adoption of the list of indicators would promote trust, legitimacy, and sustainability for pension funds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Governance)
Back to TopTop