jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Treatment and Prognosis for Acute Type A and Type B Aortic Dissections

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 March 2026 | Viewed by 1639

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital, Morioka, Japan
Interests: aortic hiatus; TEVAR; EVAR; TAVI; implantable VAD; acute aortic dissection; patient safety

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) often leads to false lumen expansion despite optimal medical treatment (OMT). This occurs in 20–30% of post-Type A and 20–50% of Type B cases, potentially necessitating future thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. Conversely, false lumen expansion does not occur in 70–80% of post-Type A and 50–80% of Type B cases, indicating that stent graft (SG) intervention, including frozen elephant trunk (FET), is unnecessary for these patients.

The challenge lies in identifying which patients will experience false lumen expansion. Various predictive factors, such as tear size, tear number, and initial vessel diameter, have been proposed. However, critical factors like the fragility of the adventitia and patient lifestyle are unmeasurable, making these predictions unreliable. Consequently, regular CT follow-up post-onset is the only way to determine whether false lumen expansion will occur.

Evaluating SG treatment outcomes in AAD requires addressing three critical points:

  1. Effectiveness: Can SG intervention prevent false lumen expansion?
  2. Appropriateness: Are unnecessary SG interventions avoided?
  3. Safety: Are complication rates acceptable?

Our studies (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atssr.2023.05.014 and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.002) were the first to establish a treatment strategy that identifies necessary SG interventions and demonstrated 10-year outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of balancing effective prevention with patient safety in AAD management.

Dr. Katsuhiko Oda
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • acute aortic dissection
  • stent graft
  • false lumen expansion
  • thoracic endovascular aortic repair
  • initial surgery for Type A acute aortic dissection
  • frozen elephant trunk

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 2471 KB  
Article
Felt Versus Pericardium for the Sandwich Technique in Type A Aortic Dissection: A Human Cadaver Study
by Jasmine El-Nashar, Thomas Poschner, Mohamed El Din, Paata Pruidze, Giorgi Didava, Amila Kahrovic, Wolfgang J. Weninger, Daniel Zimpfer, Marek P. Ehrlich and Emilio Osorio-Jaramillo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(21), 7736; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217736 - 31 Oct 2025
Viewed by 314
Abstract
Background: The Sandwich technique is a commonly adopted method for reinforcing the dissected aortic wall during acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, using either felt or bovine pericardial strips. However, complications such as anastomotic bleeding, distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) and persistent [...] Read more.
Background: The Sandwich technique is a commonly adopted method for reinforcing the dissected aortic wall during acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, using either felt or bovine pericardial strips. However, complications such as anastomotic bleeding, distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) and persistent false lumen (PFL) remain major challenges. This study evaluated and compared the sealing efficacy of felt versus pericardium in a human cadaver model. Methods: ATAAD was simulated in 20 fresh human cadavers. Repairs were performed using the sandwich technique with either felt (n = 10) or pericardium (n = 10), followed by end-to-end prosthetic graft anastomosis. Procedure time was recorded. Following the repair, the aortas were perfused at 160/90 mmHg using a glycerol-water solution to assess fluid leakage (mL), DANE and PFL. Results: Median leakage was significantly lower in the pericardium group (67.5 mL [IQR 40–198.8]) compared to the felt group (315 mL [IQR 285–445], p = 0.002). Procedure times were comparable between groups. DANE occurred in 20% (pericardium) and 30% (felt) of cases, while PFL was observed in 30% of cases in both groups; differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The superior sealing properties of pericardium in this study suggest a promising approach for reducing leakage in ATAAD repair. While rates of DANE and PFL were comparable, the advantage of pericardium was confined to leakage reduction. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether this experimental benefit translates into improved clinical outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 382 KB  
Review
Beyond Uncertainty: Establishing the Oda Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection
by Katsuhiko Oda, Makoto Takahashi, Ryuichi Taketomi, Rina Akanuma, Takahiko Hasegawa and Shintaro Katahira
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5509; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155509 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1057
Abstract
Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of acute aortic dissection over the past 90 years, following the first surgical intervention. This review pays tribute to the dedication of pioneers and innovators who developed advanced medical devices and therapeutic strategies to address [...] Read more.
Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of acute aortic dissection over the past 90 years, following the first surgical intervention. This review pays tribute to the dedication of pioneers and innovators who developed advanced medical devices and therapeutic strategies to address this challenging condition. While navigating uncertainties in treatment optimization, the primary focus of the therapeutic strategies has been to save lives by increasing survival rates during the acute phase and to prevent aorta-related lethal events and late-stage thoracoabdominal aortic replacements. From a neutral standpoint, this review traces over 90 years of progress in treating acute aortic dissection. We hope that as many patients as possible will receive treatment rationally, without over- or under-treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop