Control of House Flies and Stable Flies

A special issue of Insects (ISSN 2075-4450).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 31156

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, 1600 S. W. 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
Interests: biology, ecology and control of Synanthropic flies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
USDA-ARS-PA-Agroecosystem Management Research Unit, 251 Filley Hall/Food Ind. Complex, UNL, East Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583 , USA
Interests: population ecology, genetics and management of flies affecting livestock production

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
USDA-ARS-PA-Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, 1515 College Ave., Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Interests: biology of Dipteran disease vectors; fly-microbe interactions; genomics, transcriptomics and microbiome analysis of Dipteran pests affecting livestock and humans

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

House flies and stable flies are of utmost importance nationally and internationally because of the adverse effects they have on people and their animals. House flies are notorious for their ability to transmit pathogens and because of the nuisance factor they create for people and animals alike. Stable flies are known for their persistent blood-feeding behavior and the accompanying pain and discomfort. Both sexes take blood and hosts includes humans, their pets and domestic and exotic animals worldwide. Life-threatening outbreaks in several countries have been attributed to byproducts of large-scale crop and animal agriculture. This special issue will focus on management of these flies through increased knowledge of their biology, behavior, and genetics, and by using devices and techniques which minimize the use of pesticides.

Dr. Jerome A. Hogsette
Dr. David B. Taylor
Dr. Dana Nayduch
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Insects is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • house flies
  • stable flies
  • management
  • physiology
  • molecular biology
  • biological control
  • behavior
  • chemical ecology (attractants and repellents)
  • biology and ecology
  • pathogens and parasites
  • toxicology

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 2115 KiB  
Article
Attractiveness and Specificity of Different Polyethylene Blue Screens on Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae)
by Shukri Sharif, Emmanuel Liénard, Gérard Duvallet, Lucas Etienne, Clément Mongellaz, Christelle Grisez, Michel Franc, Emilie Bouhsira and Philippe Jacquiet
Insects 2020, 11(9), 575; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090575 - 27 Aug 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2173
Abstract
Stomoxys calcitrans is considered as a major pest of livestock worldwide. Insecticides have been extensively used to control this pest but resistance to these chemical compounds is now reported in many countries. Therefore, a more sustainable and efficient control is needed. Seven different [...] Read more.
Stomoxys calcitrans is considered as a major pest of livestock worldwide. Insecticides have been extensively used to control this pest but resistance to these chemical compounds is now reported in many countries. Therefore, a more sustainable and efficient control is needed. Seven different types of blue screens, with reflectances around 460 nm, were tested during summer 2016 in southwestern France to evaluate their attractiveness and their specificity for stable flies. Height of the screen and orientation (east or west) of a blue screen were also considered. High levels of S. calcitrans captures were recorded during this study (from 141 to 7301 individuals per blue screen and per day) whereas the numbers of tabanids and pollinator insects remained extremely low (less than 10 individuals per screen and per day). No significant difference in attractiveness has been shown between the different types of blue screens. The lower half of the blue screens caught significantly more stable flies (70%) than the higher half (30%). The “east” side of the screen attracted 60% of stable flies but this was not significantly different from the west side. These results are highlighting the interest in these blue polyethylene screens for controlling stable flies in cattle farms, in comparison with more expensive blue fabrics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 688 KiB  
Article
Environmental and Sex Effects on Bacterial Carriage by Adult House Flies (Musca domestica L.)
by Saraswoti Neupane, Kotie White, Jessica L. Thomson, Ludek Zurek and Dana Nayduch
Insects 2020, 11(7), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11070401 - 28 Jun 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3772
Abstract
Adult house flies frequent microbe-rich sites such as urban dumpsters and animal facilities, and encounter and ingest bacteria during feeding and reproductive activities. Due to unique nutritional and reproductive needs, male and female flies demonstrate different interactions with microbe-rich substrates and therefore dissemination [...] Read more.
Adult house flies frequent microbe-rich sites such as urban dumpsters and animal facilities, and encounter and ingest bacteria during feeding and reproductive activities. Due to unique nutritional and reproductive needs, male and female flies demonstrate different interactions with microbe-rich substrates and therefore dissemination potential. We investigated culturable aerobic bacteria and coliform abundance in male and female flies (n = 107) collected from urban (restaurant dumpsters) and agricultural (dairy farm) sites. Whole-fly homogenate was aerobically cultured and enumerated on nonselective (tryptic soy agar; culturable bacteria) and selective (violet-red bile agar, VRBA; coliforms) media. Unique morphotypes from VRBA cultures of agricultural flies were identified and tested for susceptibility to 14 antimicrobials. Female flies harbored more bacteria than males and there was a sex by site interaction with sex effects on bacterial abundance at the urban site. Coliform abundance did not differ by sex, site or sex within site. Both male and female flies carried antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria: 36/38 isolates (95%) were resistant to ≥1 antimicrobial, 33/38 were multidrug-resistant (≥2), and 24/38 isolates were resistant to ≥4 antimicrobials. Our results emphasize the role of house flies in harboring bacteria including AMR strains that pose a risk to human and animal health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3189 KiB  
Article
Diurnal Flight Activity of House Flies (Musca domestica) is Influenced by Sex, Time of Day, and Environmental Conditions
by Levi K. Zahn and Alec C. Gerry
Insects 2020, 11(6), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060391 - 23 Jun 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3242
Abstract
House flies (Musca domestica L.) are common synanthropic pests associated with confined animal operations, including dairy farms. House flies can cause substantial nuisance and may transmit human and animal pathogens. Surprisingly little is known about the daily flight activity of house flies. [...] Read more.
House flies (Musca domestica L.) are common synanthropic pests associated with confined animal operations, including dairy farms. House flies can cause substantial nuisance and may transmit human and animal pathogens. Surprisingly little is known about the daily flight activity of house flies. This study examined diurnal house fly flight activity on two southern California dairies using clear sticky traps to capture flies over hourly intervals. Flight activity for both males and females combined started near dawn and generally increased to a single broad activity peak during mid to late morning. Male flight activity peaked earlier than female flight activity and this separation in peak activity widened as mean daytime temperature increased. Flight activity for both sexes increased rapidly during early morning in response to the combined effects of increasing light intensity and temperature, with decreasing flight activity late in the day as temperature decreased. During midday, flight activity was slightly negatively associated with light intensity and temperature. Collection period (time of day) was a useful predictor of house fly activity on southern California dairies and the diurnal pattern of flight activity should be considered when developing house fly monitoring and control programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 927 KiB  
Article
Development of a Mycoinsecticide Bait Formulation for the Control of House Flies, Musca domestica L.
by Dalton Baker, Steven Rice, Diana Leemon, Rosamond Godwin and Peter James
Insects 2020, 11(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010047 - 09 Jan 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4556
Abstract
The control of house flies, Musca domestica (L.), currently relies on the use of chemical insecticide spray and bait formulations. Entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium anisopliae, may provide an alternative to these products. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a mycoinsecticide [...] Read more.
The control of house flies, Musca domestica (L.), currently relies on the use of chemical insecticide spray and bait formulations. Entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium anisopliae, may provide an alternative to these products. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a mycoinsecticide bait formulation containing a virulent M. anisopliae isolate. Five M. anisopliae isolates were screened against M. domestica and isolate M16 was selected for bait development. Bait formulations containing a variety of additives, including (Z)-9-tricosene, were tested for their ability to increase fly visitation. A bait formulation containing M. anisopliae and skim milk powder was found to have the highest house fly visitation and was subsequently compared to a conventional chemical bait in an efficacy assay. The chemical bait (0.5% imidacloprid) caused faster mortality than the mycoinsecticide bait, however, similar levels of mortality were achieved by 4–5 days’ post exposure. These results suggest that M. anisopliae mycoinsecticide baits may offer an alternative to conventional chemical insecticides for the control of house flies in suitable areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1621 KiB  
Article
Interspecific Competition between the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) and Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens (L.) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) When Reared on Poultry Manure
by Chelsea D. Miranda, Jonathan A. Cammack and Jeffery K. Tomberlin
Insects 2019, 10(12), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120440 - 07 Dec 2019
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 5134
Abstract
Few studies have examined the competitive interaction between the house fly (HF) and the black soldier fly (BSF). The fact that the BSF deters HF oviposition is widely cited in BSF literature, but this interaction has not been assessed in over three decades. [...] Read more.
Few studies have examined the competitive interaction between the house fly (HF) and the black soldier fly (BSF). The fact that the BSF deters HF oviposition is widely cited in BSF literature, but this interaction has not been assessed in over three decades. In this study, the competitive interaction of BSF and HF larvae was observed on fresh (day 0) and aged poultry manure (manure aged for two, four, six, or eight days). Specifically, a priority effect study was conducted to determine if colonization sequence influences time to first pupariation (HF) or pre-pupation (BSF), survivorship, and weight. Results show >70% of HFs reached pupariation in all treatments except when placed on manure eight days after the initial inoculation with BSF. However, age of the resource negatively impacted time to first pupariation and puparium weight when HFs were reared alone or introduced two to eight days after BSF. No BSF pre-pupae resulted from treatments in which HFs were the pioneering species. BSFs reached the highest percent pre-pupation when reared alone on fresh manure, but BSFs may be more susceptible to the negative impacts of an aging resource, as no pre-pupae were observed when provided with six- or eight-day-old manure. Similar to HFs, age of the resource may have impacted development and survivorship; other factors such as moisture content, chemical composition, and amount of resource provided may have also impacted our results. These data may be useful in implementing BSFs as biological control agents of the HF, as well provide valuable information for facilities mass-producing HFs or BSFs for food or feed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 239 KiB  
Article
House Flies (Musca domestica) Pose a Risk of Carriage and Transmission of Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD)
by Saraswoti Neupane, Dana Nayduch and Ludek Zurek
Insects 2019, 10(10), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10100358 - 18 Oct 2019
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3253
Abstract
House flies are important nuisance pests in a variety of confined livestock operations. More importantly, house flies are known mechanical vectors of numerous animal and human pathogens. Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an economically important, complex illness of cattle associated with several bacteria [...] Read more.
House flies are important nuisance pests in a variety of confined livestock operations. More importantly, house flies are known mechanical vectors of numerous animal and human pathogens. Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an economically important, complex illness of cattle associated with several bacteria and viruses. The role of flies in the ecology and transmission of bacterial pathogens associated with BRD is not understood. Using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods, we examined the prevalence of the BRD bacterial complex Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida and Histophilus somni in house flies collected in a commercial feedlot from a pen with cattle exhibiting apparent BRD symptoms. Using both methods, M. haemolytica was detected in 11.7% of house flies, followed by P. multocida (5.0%) and H. somni (3.3%). The presence of BRD bacterial pathogens in house flies suggests that this insect plays a role in the ecology of BRD pathogens and could pose a risk as a potential reservoir and/or a vector of BRD pathogens among individual cattle and in their environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
13 pages, 3396 KiB  
Article
Effects of Diet Quality and Temperature on Stable Fly (Diptera: Muscidae) Development
by Melina Florez-Cuadros, Dennis Berkebile, Gary Brewer and David B. Taylor
Insects 2019, 10(7), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10070207 - 16 Jul 2019
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2739
Abstract
The effects of diet quality and temperature on the development time and size of stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), was evaluated. Both development time and size varied relative to diet quality and temperature, and their effects were additive. Diet quality and temperature made [...] Read more.
The effects of diet quality and temperature on the development time and size of stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), was evaluated. Both development time and size varied relative to diet quality and temperature, and their effects were additive. Diet quality and temperature made similar contributions to the variance in size whereas temperature was responsible for >97% of the variance in development time. Regression analysis predicted the shortest development time, egg to adult, to be 12.7 days at 32 °C and 70% nutrients. Egg to adult development varied curvilinearly relative to diet quality and temperature on the degree day 10 (DD10) scale taking 261 DD10 at 30 °C and 50% nutrients. The thermal threshold was 11.5 °C with a thermal constant of 248. Very few stable flies developed to adult on the poorest diet (12.5% nutrients) and adults emerged from fewer than 1% of the puparia at 35 °C. The heaviest pupae (15.4 mg) were produced with the 100% diet at 15 °C and adults had a higher probability of emerging successfully from heavier puparia. The length of the discal-medial cell of adult wings had a cubic relationship with puparia weight and peaked at 21 °C. Egg to pupariation survival was predicted to peak at 27 °C and 71% diet whereas puparia to adult survival peaked at 24 °C and 100% diet. Diet quality and temperature had no effect on sex ratio and the rate of development did not differ between the sexes. Female stable flies were ≈5% larger than males. Composite metrics for egg to pupariation and egg to adult fitness were developed. The optimum for puparia fitness was 29 °C and 78% diet quality and for adult fitness 25 °C and 83% diet quality. Diet accounted for 31% of the variance in pupal fitness and 24% of the variance in adult fitness whereas temperature accounted for 17% and 20%, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

29 pages, 499 KiB  
Review
A Historical Review of Management Options Used against the Stable Fly (Diptera: Muscidae)
by David Cook
Insects 2020, 11(5), 313; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050313 - 15 May 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5472
Abstract
The stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), remains a significant economic pest globally in situations where intensive animal production or horticultural production provide a suitable developmental medium. Stable flies have been recorded as pests of livestock and humans since the late 1800s [...] Read more.
The stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), remains a significant economic pest globally in situations where intensive animal production or horticultural production provide a suitable developmental medium. Stable flies have been recorded as pests of livestock and humans since the late 1800s to early 1900s. Over 100 years of research has seen numerous methodologies used to control this fly, in particular to protect cattle from flies to minimise production losses. Reduced milk production in dairy cows and decreased weight gain in beef cattle account for losses in the US alone of > $2000 million annually. Rural lifestyles and recreation are also seriously affected. Progress has been made on many control strategies against stable fly over a range of chemical, biological, physical and cultural options. This paper reviews management options from both a historical and a technical perspective for controlling this pest. These include the use of different classes of insecticides applied to affected animals as toxicants or repellents (livestock and humans), as well as to substrates where stable fly larvae develop. Arthropod predators of stable flies are listed, from which potential biological control agents (e.g., wasps, mites, and beetles) are identified. Biopesticides (e.g., fungi, bacteria and plant-derived products) are also discussed along with Integrated Pest Management (IPM) against stable flies for several animal industries. A review of cultural and physical management options including trapping, trap types and methodologies, farm hygiene, scheduled sanitation, physical barriers to fly emergence, livestock protection and amendments added to animal manures and bedding are covered. This paper presents a comprehensive review of all management options used against stable flies from both a historical and a technical perspective for use by any entomologist, livestock producer or horticulturalist with an interest in reducing the negative impact of this pest fly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of House Flies and Stable Flies)
Back to TopTop