Submit to IJERPH Review for IJERPH Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers

Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
Published Papers

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Occupational Safety and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 32945

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Albert Nienhaus

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

1. German Social Accident Insurance for the Health and Welfare Services, Department of Occupational Medicine, Hazardous Substances and Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Medicine, 20357 Hamburg, Germany
2. Centre of Excellence for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Interests: preventive medicine; psychosocial medicine; healthcare research
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Gwen Brachman

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

ICOH Scientific Committee on Occupational Health for Health Workers, 20122 Milano, Italy
Interests: occupational health; vaccination of health workers; tuberculosis in health workers
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Antoon De Schryver

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Family Medicine & Population Health, University of Antwerpen, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
Interests: occupational medicine; infectious diseases; epidemiology; occupational infectious agents; prevention; vaccination
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. William Buchta

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Interests: occupational health; tuberculosis testing of health workers; mandatory influenza vaccination of health workers

Dr. Acran Salmen-Navarro

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Bellevue / NYU Occupational Environmental Medicine Clinic, Department of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
Interests: ergonomics; migration and workers health; participative health promotion and protection

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is still increasing worldwide, and to a certain extent, the infection risk is related to work. Health workers experience the highest work-related infection risk as they have close contact to COVID-19 patients. Many countries do have special insurance and compensation systems for work-related diseases. However, the question of how to separate a work-related risk from a private or background risk in a pandemic arises. COVID-19 is a multi-organ disease with long-lasting negative health effects for those who become infected, including workers. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to assess the effect of work-related COVID-19 on health, quality of life and work ability. Rehabilitation programs are needed to improve recovery from COVID-19. For those with long-lasting disability and reduced work ability as a cause of COVID-19 infection, compensation needs to be discussed, depending on the social security system of the country in question. The severity of COVID-19 symptoms depends on the health status of the patient before the infection. Psychological problems in a patient’s personal history seem to predict fatigue or memory problems after COVID-19 infection. Therefore, potential compensation depends on the assessment of a patient’s health status before and after infection with COVID-19. Tools for this assessment are still to be developed. Return to Work (RTW) after COVID-19 infection and assessment of the fitness for the job is another issue to be addressed.

So far, in the literature, the assessment of work ability and the compensation of workers after COVID-19 infection is rarely discussed. With this Special Issue, we want to encourage researchers and experts to contribute to the questions of which workers are most commonly affected and how can these workers be assessed after COVID-19 infection so that fair compensation for long-term effects on health, quality of life, and workability can be granted. Studies describing work-related infection risks in workers or follow-up studies which describe the infection dynamics in workers are also welcome for this Special Issue.

With this Special Issue, we aim to stimulate the discussion between experts on occupational health and workers’ compensation from different countries with different social security systems facing the same problems concerning work-related COVID-19 infection.

The Special Issue is coordinated by members of the

Scientific committee of Occupational Health for Health Workers (SCOHHW) of the ICOH. Other scientific committees or working groups of the ICOH are invited to join the discussion and the Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Albert Nienhaus
Dr. Gwen Brachman
Dr. Antoon De Schryver
Dr. William Buchta
Dr. Acran Salmen-Navarro
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

occupational health
COVID-19
COVID-19 infection
work-related diseases
psychological problems

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 581 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Impact of Rehabilitation on Physical and Neuropsychological Health of Patients Who Acquired COVID-19 in the Workplace

by Katrin Müller, Iris Poppele, Marcel Ottiger, Katharina Zwingmann, Ivo Berger, Andreas Thomas, Alois Wastlhuber, Franziska Ortwein, Anna-Lena Schultz, Anna Weghofer, Eva Wilhelm, Rainer-Christian Weber, Sylvia Meder, Michael Stegbauer and Torsten Schlesinger

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021468 - 13 Jan 2023

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4141

Abstract

Workers, especially healthcare workers, are exposed to an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, less is known about the impact of rehabilitation on health outcomes associated with post-COVID. This longitudinal observational study examined the changes in physical and neuropsychological health and work ability after inpatient rehabilitation of 127 patients (97 females/30 males; age 21–69 years; Mean = 50.62) who acquired COVID-19 in the workplace. Post-COVID symptoms, functional status, physical performance, neuropsychological health, employment, and work ability were assessed before and after rehabilitation. Group differences relating to sex, professions, and acute COVID status were also analyzed. Except for fatigue, the prevalence of all post-COVID symptoms decreased after rehabilitation. Significant improvements in physical performance and neuropsychological health outcomes were determined. Moreover, healthcare workers showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to non-healthcare workers. Nevertheless, participants reported poor work ability, and 72.5% of them were still unable to work after discharge from rehabilitation. As most participants were still suffering from the impact of COVID-19 at rehabilitation discharge, ongoing strategies in aftercare are necessary to improve their work ability. Further investigations of this study population at 6 and 12 months after rehabilitation should examine the further course of post-COVID regarding health and work ability status. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1293 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Healthcare Workers after Two Years of COVID-19: The Consequences of the Pandemic on Psychological Health and Sleep among Nurses and Physicians

by Valentina Alfonsi, Serena Scarpelli, Maurizio Gorgoni, Alessandro Couyoumdjian, Francesco Rosiello, Cinzia Sandroni, Roberto Corsi, Filomena Pietrantonio and Luigi De Gennaro

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1410; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021410 - 12 Jan 2023

Cited by 29 | Viewed by 4774

Abstract

COVID-19 has challenged the health workforce worldwide. In this cross-sectional study with a retrospective assessment, we explored the impact of the pandemic on mental health and sleep among a sample of Italian nurses and medical doctors. A total of 287 healthcare workers (212 nurses and 75 physicians) completed a web survey on socio-demographic, psychological, and sleep-related aspects referring to the period before the pandemic and to the present period of February to June 2022. Comparisons between nurses and physicians revealed that the former had greater distress in response to the pandemic. Consistently, the multivariate analysis of covariance showed that even if both groups were negatively impacted by the pandemic, nurses presented a greater worsening over time regarding several psychological and sleep symptoms. Furthermore, we observed that working on the frontline represented an additional risk factor for nurses. In line with previous evidence, we also found that personal experiences with COVID-19 are significant predictors of the current health status. Our results underscore the urgent need for preventive programs among healthcare operators to increase their coping skills and prevent the long-term consequences of chronic stress, especially for high-risk professionals. Specific attention should also be devoted to programs to improve sleep quality and reduce sleep-related traumatic symptoms. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 2011 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Are We Prepared for the Next Pandemic? Management, Systematic Evaluation and Lessons Learned from an In-Hospital COVID-19 Vaccination Centre for Healthcare Workers

by Ana Zhelyazkova, Kristina Adorjan, Selina Kim, Matthias Klein, Stephan Prueckner, Philipp Kressirer, Alexander Choukér, Michaela Coenen and Sophia Horster

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16326; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316326 - 6 Dec 2022

Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1793

Abstract

Background: the organisation of a COVID-19 vaccination campaign for healthcare workers (HCWs) within a university hospital presents a challenge of a particularly large scale and urgency. Here, we evaluate the in-hospital vaccination process and centre for HCWs at LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany. Methods: We executed a mixed-method process evaluation of the vaccination centre at LMU University Hospital during the first COVID-19 vaccination campaign. In a programme monitoring, we continuously assessed the implementation of the centre’s operational management including personnel resources. In evaluating the outreach to and satisfaction of the target group with the centre and process, we executed two anonymous surveys aimed at the HCWs vaccinated at the in-hospital centre (1) as well as centre staff members (2). Results: staff numbers and process time per person were reduced several times during the first vaccination campaign. Lessons concerning appointment scheduling were learned. HCWs vaccinated at the in-hospital centre were satisfied with the process. A longer waiting time between admission and inoculation, perceived dissatisfying accessibility as well as an increased frequency of observed adverse events were linked to a reduced satisfaction. Comparatively subpar willingness to adhere to non-pharmaceutical measures was observed. Centre staff reported high satisfaction and a workload relatively equal to that of their regular jobs. Our outcomes provide references for the implementation of an in-hospital vaccination centre in similar settings. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 647 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Incidence, Prevalence, and Sources of COVID-19 Infection among Healthcare Workers in Hospitals in Malaysia

by Abdul Aziz Harith, Mohd Hafiz Ab Gani, Robin Griffiths, Azlihanis Abdul Hadi, Nor Aishah Abu Bakar, Julia Myers, Maznieda Mahjom, Rosnawati Muhamad Robat and Muhammad Zulfakhar Zubir

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12485; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912485 - 30 Sep 2022

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4394

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced significant novel risks for healthcare workers and healthcare services. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, trends, characteristics, and sources of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysian hospitals. A cross-sectional study used secondary data collected from a COVID-19 surveillance system for healthcare workers between January and December 2020. Two surges in COVID-19 cases among healthcare workers in Malaysia were epidemiologically correlated to a similarly intense COVID-19 pattern of transmission in the community. The period prevalence of COVID-19 infection and the mortality rate among healthcare workers in Malaysia were 1.03% and 0.0019%, respectively. The majority of infections originated from the workplace (53.3%); a total of 36.3% occurred among staff; a total of 17.0% occurred between patients and staff; and 43.2% originated from the community. Healthcare workers had a 2.9 times higher incidence risk ratio for the acquisition of COVID-19 infection than the general population. Nursing professionals were the most highly infected occupational group (40.5%), followed by medical doctors and specialists (24.1%), and healthcare assistants (9.7%). The top three departments registering COVID-19 infections were the medical department (23.3%), the emergency department (17.7%), and hospital administration and governance (9.1%). Occupational safety and health units need to be vigilant for the early detection of a disease outbreak to prevent the avoidable spread of disease in high-risk settings. The transformation of some tertiary hospitals to dedicated COVID-19 care, the monitoring of new procedures for the management of COVID-19 patients, and appropriate resource allocation are key to successful risk mitigation strategies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 411 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Fear of COVID-19 Impact on Professional Quality of Life among Mental Health Workers

by Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, Lida-Alkisti Xenaki, Ioannis Karagiorgas, Angeliki-Aikaterini Ntigrintaki, Eleni Giannouli, Ioannis A. Malogiannis and George Konstantakopoulos

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 9949; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169949 - 12 Aug 2022

Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3640

Abstract

Several studies have examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers’ mental health, but only a few have investigated its detrimental effect on the mental well-being of mental health workers (MHWs). Background: The current study aimed to explore the effect of the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19) on professional quality of life dimensions, namely compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in MHWs above and beyond sociodemographic and professional factors. Methods: Hierarchical linear regression models were employed to examine the relationship of extreme FCV-19 with CS, BO, and STS in MHWs (n = 224), after considering sociodemographic variables as potential confounding factors. Extreme FCV-19 was operationalized as a binary variable with a cut-off score of ≥16.5 considered as extreme fear. Results: We found that extreme FCV-19 in MHWs is linked with increased compassion fatigue (BO and STS), and this relationship is exacerbated by younger age in regard to BO and by female gender concerning STS. CS remains unaffected by severe FCV-19, and it is higher in older participants. Conclusion: Organizational support is required to protect MHWs’ mental well-being and ensure the quality of care they provide during prolonged crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Measures that intensify a sense of safety, protection, and control against COVID-19 infections in mental health services should be included in the recommendations that may reduce BO and STS among MHWs. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

11 pages, 650 KiB

Open AccessArticle

The Association between Working Hours Flexibility and Well-Being Prior to and during COVID-19 in South Korea

by Nataliya Nerobkova, Yu Shin Park, Eun-Cheol Park and Suk-Yong Jang

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8438; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148438 - 11 Jul 2022

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4061

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the relationship between the flexibility of work schedule arrangements and well-being among full-time workers prior to and after the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in South Korea. Methods: Data from the fifth 2017 and sixth 2020–2021 Korean Working Conditions Survey, including a final sample of 45,137 participants (22,460 males; 22,677 females), were used. Multiple logistic regression was performed to establish the association between schedule arrangement types and the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index. Results: The study found an association between flexible schedule arrangements and good well-being in 2017: “little flexibility” (odds ratio (OR), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27–1.48), “moderate flexibility” (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28–1.71), and “high flexibility” (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06–1.72). During COVID-19, only workers with “high flexibility” were likely to have good well-being (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18–1.88), while the association between well-being and “low flexibility” (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96–1.17) and “moderate flexibility” types (OR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.59–0.75) decreased. This study found that flexible working hours may contribute to better well-being among full-time workers. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on working conditions and employee well-being should be addressed while setting working hours. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2639 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on Workers in Health and Social Services in Germany

by Claudia Peters, Madeleine Dulon, Claudia Westermann, Agnessa Kozak and Albert Nienhaus

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(12), 6983; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126983 - 7 Jun 2022

Cited by 46 | Viewed by 4485

Abstract

Health workers are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infections. What follows the acute infection is rarely reported in the occupational context. This study examines the employees’ consequences of COVID-19 infection, the risk factors and the impact on quality of life over time. In this baseline survey, respondents were asked about their COVID-19 infection in 2020 and their current health situation. Out of 2053 participants, almost 73% experienced persistent symptoms for more than three months, with fatigue/exhaustion, concentration/memory problems and shortness of breath being most frequently reported. Risk factors were older age, female gender, previous illness, many and severe symptoms during the acute infection, and outpatient medical care. An impaired health-related quality of life was found in participants suffering from persistent symptoms. Overall, a high need for rehabilitation to improve health and work ability is evident. Further follow-up surveys will observe the changes and the impact of vaccination on the consequences of COVID-19 among health workers. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1053 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Cumulative Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers at a General Hospital in Germany during the Pandemic—A Longitudinal Analysis

by Martin Platten, Albert Nienhaus, Claudia Peters, Rita Cranen, Hilmar Wisplinghoff, Jan Felix Kersten, Alexander Daniel Bach and Guido Michels

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2429; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042429 - 19 Feb 2022

Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3522

Abstract

Health workers (HW) are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In order to monitor the infection dynamic on the basis of contact with patients, HW at the St. Antonius Hospital (SAH) were tested four times in one year by PCR and serology. The cumulative incidence of infection in HW was calculated. Swab and blood tests were simultaneously performed between April 2020 and April 2021. Risk factors and demographic information were assessed at the beginning of the study. The response rate was above 75% in all rounds of testing. The study comprised 1506 HW, 165 (10.6%) of which tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Working in an ICU or on wards with patient contact were risk factors (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.73–13.6 and OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.27–8.49). At the end of the study, the majority of HW (810 of 1363 (59.4%)) had been vaccinated at least once. A total of 29.1% of unvaccinated HW and 5.3% of vaccinated HW showed an immune response typical for natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 73 HW who provided information on the course of the disease, 31.5% reported that their quality of life continued to be impaired. The cumulative incidence of infection was low in these HW, which may be attributed to vaccination and good hygiene. Nevertheless, a work-related infection risk was identified, highlighting the need to improve protection against infection. A high risk of developing long COVID was found after the infection has subsided. Special rehabilitation programs should be provided and HW should be compensated for reduced work capacity in the case that rehabilitation fails or takes a long time. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

The Burden of COVID-19 in Workers

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI