Feminist Genealogies: Specific Political Intersections
A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (9 December 2019) | Viewed by 72109
Special Issue Editors
Interests: feminist theory; feminism and psychology; gender-based violence
Interests: critical theories; Foucauldian perspectives and narrative research
Interests: feminist theory; gendered social power relations; sexuality; violence
Special Issue Information
As a project of sociopolitical transformation, feminism of all kinds are engaged in practices of both critique and prefiguration: or, what has been called, the future perfect tense (Burman, 2016, p.710).
Dear Colleagues,
As we approach the third decade of the 21st Century, it is something of a truism to say that there are multiple feminisms. A post-feminist sensibility (Gill, 2007) establishes contemporary currency for debating feminist sociopolitical activism, for mistaking feminist identities, for rejuvenating backlash or lamenting fragmentation. This special issue aims to openly celebrate the multiplicity of feminist genealogical practices of critique and prefiguration, with respect for enabling tensions and productive problematics.
Our invitation for feminist genealogical writing accepts that there are no boundaries that clearly establish the historical trajectory of feminisms’ political emergence (which century? which women? which counter-movements, contests, continents could we count as feminist?). There are no borderlines delineating feminist subject-matter (who or what is at stake: women? gender? bodies? social hierarchies? human rights? liberation? freedom?). In this context, we aim to resist fabricating a totalising character for feminist genealogy, without foregoing recognisably feminist threads of subversion or disruption to trajectories of gendered social power relations.
We imagine feminist genealogies as transdisciplinary research and writing that engages critical genealogical methods to “travel along rhizomatic pathways, searching for new vantage points… and offer[ing] new ways of seeing the present” (Meadmore, Hatcher, & McWilliam, 2000, p. 470). We appreciate that some may embrace the “painstaking rediscovery of struggles together with the rude memory of their conflicts" (Foucault, 1980, p. 83) while others will initiate genealogy as “a force” storming the cannons of our disciplinary pasts to reconsider “the way we make sense” (Tamboukou, 2016, p. 116). We also acknowledge that not all work we read as feminist genealogy explicitly takes up those terms. We are mindful of projects like Salem’s (2016) theorising of intersectionality as traveling theory that reminds us of the “critical roots” that the concepts’ travels have erased; or Ferrando’s (2013) untangling of posthuman terminologies, including feminist new materialisms, through tracing movements of their emergence. They seem to us to be the kind of implicitly genealogical projects that show “‘something altogether different’ behind things:… the secret that they have no essence or that their essence was fabricated in a piecemeal fashion" (Foucault, 1984, p. 78).
Just as the journal Genealogy opens to multiple genealogical narratives and engagements with genealogical theories and methods, in this special issue we are inviting submissions of feminist transdisciplinary work including, but not limited to, engagements with:
- genealogical methods
- genealogical theory
- local genealogical narratives
- indigenous genealogies
- genealogies of affect
- genealogies of feminism, post-feminism
- becoming feminist, genealogies
- critical intersectionalities of feminism and genealogy
Prof. Dr. Mandy Morgan
Dr. Robbie Busch
Dr. Leigh Coombes
Dr. Ann Rogerson
Guest Editors
References
Burman, E. (2016). Fanon, Foucault, feminisms: Psychoeducation, theoretical psychology, and political change. Theory & Psychology, 26(6), 706–730. doi: 10.1177/0959354316653484
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed. & Trans.; L. Marshall, J. Mepham & K. Soper, Trans.; pp. 78-108). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Gill, R. (2007) ‘Postfeminist media culture. Elements of a sensibility’ European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2): 147-66.
Meadmore, D., Hatcher, C., & McWilliam, E. (2000). Getting tense about genealogy. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 463-476.
Tamboukou, M. (2016). Sewing, Fighting and Writing: Radical Practices in Work, Politics and Culture. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Keywords
- Feminist genealogy
- Feminist theory
- Genealogies of feminism
- Becoming feminist
- Local feminist genealogical narratives
- Feminist genealogical methods
- Critical intersectionalities of feminism and genealogy
- Indigenous, feminist genealogies
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.