Advances in Clinical Anatomy: Morphometric Analysis and Diagnostic Relevance

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2026 | Viewed by 562

Special Issue Editors

Department of Anatomy, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
Interests: biomarkers; anatomical variation; molecular biology; translational research in cancers

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea
Interests: clinical anatomy; human anatomy; morphometric analysis; anatomical variations; radiological anatomy; surgical anatomy; three-dimensional reconstruction; personal identification

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Special Issue “Advances in Clinical Anatomy: Morphometric Analysis and Diagnostic Relevance” explores the evolving role of anatomical research in enhancing diagnostic precision and clinical outcomes. In modern medicine, understanding human morphology through both cadaveric dissection and advanced imaging is essential for bridging structural anatomy with clinical application.

This Special Issue focuses on studies that investigate anatomical structures and variations through cadaver-based analysis, detailed morphometric evaluations, medical imaging (including CT, MRI, and ultrasonography), and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. Research that integrates quantitative anatomical data with diagnostic interpretation or therapeutic planning, as well as comprehensive or review-based approaches demonstrating clear clinical relevance, is encouraged. Contributions linking morphological findings with radiologic, surgical, or educational perspectives are also of great interest.

By emphasizing cadaveric and imaging-based anatomical research, this Special Issue highlights how contemporary morphometric approaches advance diagnostic accuracy, surgical safety, and evidence-based clinical practice. We invite authors to share work that deepens the understanding of human morphology and strengthens the connection between anatomy and clinical medicine.

Dr. Jae-Ho Lee
Guest Editor

Dr. Kwang-Rak Park
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • clinical anatomy
  • morphometric analysis
  • anatomical variation
  • computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction
  • diagnostic anatomy
  • applied anatomy
  • evidence-based anatomy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 651 KB  
Article
Morphometric Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Orientation and Tibial Footprint Location Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by Esra Babaoğlu, Belgin Bamaç and Kaya Memişoğlu
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050748 - 2 Mar 2026
Viewed by 237
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a key role in knee stability, biomechanics, and proprioception, and is one of the most frequently injured and reconstructed ligaments in both athletes and the general population. The anatomical placement of femoral and tibial tunnels [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a key role in knee stability, biomechanics, and proprioception, and is one of the most frequently injured and reconstructed ligaments in both athletes and the general population. The anatomical placement of femoral and tibial tunnels close to the native ACL insertion sites is critical for long-term clinical outcomes and graft survival. This study aimed to define sagittal and coronal ACL alignment and tibial footprint morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in healthy knees, to explore sex- and side-related differences, and to provide population-specific reference values. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, knee MRIs acquired between 2018 and 2021 were screened, and knees with an intact ACL and without deformity or joint pathology that could alter alignment were included. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 636 knees (320 right, 316 left) from 545 individuals (338 women, 298 men; 15–80 years, mean age 34.87 ± 11.65 years) were analyzed. On sagittal images, the sagittal ACL angle (S-ANGLE) was measured on the slice where the ligament appeared maximally visualized. The midpoints of the ACL were identified on two adjacent sagittal slices, and a line drawn through these midpoints was used to represent the central axis of the ligament; the angle between this line and the tibial plateau was recorded as the S-ANGLE. For anteroposterior localization of the tibial footprint, an anteroposterior reference distance (S-long) was defined as the length measured parallel to the tibial plateau, extending from the midpoint of the tibial tuberosity (corresponding to the insertion site of the patellar ligament and used as a topographic anterior landmark) toward the posterior aspect of the proximal tibia. A perpendicular line was drawn from the anterior end of S-long to establish the anterior reference boundary. The distance from this anterior reference line to the midpoint of the ACL tibial footprint along the same anteroposterior axis was defined as S-short. The sagittal footprint percentage (S-PERCENTAGE) was calculated as (S-short/S-long) × 100, representing the size-normalized sagittal anteroposterior position of the ACL tibial footprint midpoint. On coronal images, the ACL–tibial plateau angle (C-ANGLE), mediolateral tibial length (C-LONG), and distance from the medial edge to the ACL insertion (C-short) were obtained; C-PERCENTAGE was calculated analogously. Medial mechanical proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) was used to confirm physiological coronal alignment. Non-parametric tests were applied, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Women had significantly greater sagittal ACL angles than men, whereas anteroposterior distances measured from the midpoint of the tibial tuberosity (used as an anterior topographic landmark) and oriented parallel to the tibial plateau (S-LONG) and mediolateral tibial lengths (C-LONG) and absolute distances to the ACL tibial footprint were larger in men. In contrast, normalized sagittal and coronal footprint percentages (S-PERCENTAGE, C-PERCENTAGE) did not differ meaningfully between sexes, indicating the preservation of the relative ACL tibial insertion site despite size differences. Small but statistically significant side-to-side differences were observed in some coronal parameters; however, absolute differences were small and did not substantially modify the overall alignment pattern. Conclusions: This study provides large-sample, population-specific reference values for ACL orientation and tibial footprint location in both sagittal and coronal planes in healthy knees. The combination of higher sagittal ACL angles and shorter anteroposterior distances reference measured from the midpoint of the tibial tuberosity and oriented parallel to the tibial plateau (S-LONG) in women may represent a structural substrate contributing to the higher ACL injury rates reported in females. The morphometric data presented here may assist in individualized ACL reconstruction planning, MRI-based assessment of tibial tunnel position, and the design of knee-related biomedical implants and devices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop