Early Intervention and Treatment Strategies for Diabetes

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with long-term risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Offspring of mothers with GDM also have elevated cardiometabolic risk in their lifetime. This article reviews risk factors that may predict progression to Type 2 or Type 1 diabetes after history of GDM, recurrence risk of GDM in a future pregnancy and discusses what evidence is available for risk mitigation in reducing long-term adverse health outcomes in both mothers with GDM and their children. Full article

This review aims to present an updated, comprehensive analysis of data on the diversity and challenges of current approaches to the screening and monitoring of subjects at risk of T1D, as the earliest interventions during the course of the disease. Previously, screening for T1D was justified only for research purposes. A major turning point occurred when teplizumab, an immunomodulatory drug that delays the onset of overt T1D, was approved. Nowadays, there is a growing number of screening initiatives, and this trend is spreading fast across the world. In this context, novel recommendations emphasize the need for the wider identification of subjects at risk of T1D, suggesting that screening should not include only first-degree relatives of persons with T1D. Furthermore, current experts’ opinions have shifted the detection of T1D risk in the direction of ultimate goal-screening in the general population. Also, subjects at risk should be monitored, undergo metabolic testing, be informed about their risk, and be educated about the disease. Currently, there is a diversity in approaches to the screening and monitoring of subjects at risk of T1D, predominantly in the pediatric population. Several knowledge gaps persist in this area of investigation, especially in recommendations and potential benefits for the adult population. However, the scientific community is focusing on developing and adapting screening and monitoring strategies to suit particular countries, aiming to make them more universal while refining the definition of individual risk for T1D. Nevertheless, the screening and monitoring of subjects at risk should be the earliest interventions focused on delaying T1D. Full article

Sodium glucose-1 cotransporter (SGLT1) is a low-capacity, high-affinity glucose transporter expressed in the proximal renal tubule. It is also expressed in different human tissues and, primarily, in the brush border of the small intestine. At this level, SGLT1 inhibition results in an increase in glucose supply to the distal intestine with a reduction in intestinal pH and a consequent alteration of the intestinal microbiota. Specifically, SGLT1 inhibitors (SGLT1is) lead to an intensification of the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and an enhancement of the incretin pathway. Potential mechanisms by which SGLT1is could reduce the occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction may therefore involve the anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and anti-atherosclerotic effects associated with an increased production of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Full article

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic non-communicable disease that has reached epidemic levels. While there is ample evidence that type 2 diabetes can, for many, be prevented or at least well managed, this disease progresses in most people with type 2 diabetes who are not achieving glucose targets. Those who do not achieve glucose targets have higher rates of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Further, the economic burden of diabetes, its treatment and its complications is substantial. Diabetes management goals should include prevention in those at risk and early intensive control to induce benefits through the legacy effect. However, what is seen more often is therapeutic inertia with delays in the diagnosis and each step of care. This results in reactive diabetes management in which the disease progresses faster than the management. While the use of newer potent glucose-lowering agents continues to expand, the durability of these agents when treatment is stopped is unknown. In this narrative review, the authors explore the impact of achieving diabetes remission on the reduction in cardiovascular complications. Full article

Background/Objectives: Understanding prescribing patterns for type 2 diabetes mellitus, a complex condition affecting over 10% of the global adult population, can optimise prescribing practices, guide policymakers in promoting evidence-based medicine, and help tailor first-line treatments to individual characteristics or specific subgroups, improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors influencing the prescription and non-prescription of metformin, the recommended first-line therapy in Western guidelines, and to evaluate whether these prescribing patterns align with evidence-based recommendations. It also explores factors associated with initial combination therapy, a more recent and controversial approach compared to stepwise therapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on 25 August 2023, without language or time restrictions, to identify observational analytical studies assessing factors associated with the initiation of metformin or combination therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were naïve to antidiabetic medications. Studies involving pregnant or breastfeeding women were excluded. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists (PROSPERO registration number CRD42023438313). Results: Thirty studies were included, evaluating 105 variables, most of which (62%) were assessed in one study. The 25 variables using combination therapy as the outcome were mostly (72%) evaluated also in one study. Initial metformin prescription was strongly and positively associated with younger age, lower glycated haemoglobin levels, higher body mass index, and absence of renal impairment. Initial combination therapy was associated with higher HbA1c levels and a lower burden of comorbidities. Findings also highlighted a discrepancy between clinical practice and evidence-based recommendations. However, concerns were raised regarding both the internal and external validity of the included studies. Conclusions: Our systematic review, which offers insights into real-world clinical practices, indicated that there is a misalignment between clinical practices and evidence-based recommendations, supporting the need for interventions in this field. Full article