Computer-Assisted Learning and Teaching Tools in the AI Era

A Special Issue of Computers (ISSN 2073-431X) belonging to the section "AI-Driven Innovations".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 July 2027 | Viewed by 421

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia
Interests: industrial internet of things; algorithms; web programming; instrumentation; data mining; engineering education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence is transforming the role of computer-assisted tools in learning and teaching across schools, higher education, vocational education, professional training and lifelong learning settings. Traditional educational technologies, such as learning management systems, digital assessment platforms, simulation environments, multimedia resources and computer-based tutoring systems, are now being extended through intelligent automation, natural language interaction, adaptive feedback and data-driven personalization.

Relevant topics include computational tools and relevant practices for students' self-learning, teaching support, AI-assisted feedback, automated assessment, learning analytics, educational data mining, virtual and augmented reality, simulation-based learning, accessibility technologies, academic integrity, teacher workload reduction and human–AI collaboration in educational practice.

The Special Issue also encourages critical studies that address the risks and limitations of these tools, including bias, privacy, transparency, reliability, digital inequality, student overreliance and the changing role of educators. By bringing together current research and practical innovations, this issue aims to advance understanding of how computer-assisted tools can be responsibly designed and used to improve learning outcomes, strengthen teaching practice and support human-centered education in the generative AI era.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Applications of artificial intelligence to education;
  • Computer-assisted blended learning;
  • Impact of large language models on learning and assessments;
  • Adaptive learning systems;
  • Gamification in education;
  • Virtual and augmented reality in education;
  • Mobile learning;
  • Collaborative learning platforms;
  • Smart classroom technologies;
  • Cloud-based learning environments;
  • Wearable technology for learning.

We welcome submissions that investigate the pedagogical, ethical and technological challenges and opportunities posed by these developments, with the aim of understanding their impact on educational outcomes and the future of teaching.

Dr. Ananda Maiti
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Computers is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • generative artificial intelligence (generative AI)
  • artificial intelligence in education (AIED)
  • computer-assisted learning
  • computer-assisted teaching
  • intelligent tutoring systems
  • adaptive learning
  • large language models (LLMs) in Education
  • learning analytics
  • educational data mining
  • automated assessment and feedback
  • blended learning
  • online learning
  • virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in education
  • gamification
  • smart classrooms
  • mobile learning
  • collaborative learning
  • academic integrity
  • human–AI collaboration
  • educational technology
  • wearable technology for learning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

48 pages, 4058 KB  
Article
CreditTrace-LLM: Auditing Rubric-Point Responsiveness and Credit Locality in LLM-Based Automated Grading
by Catalin Anghel, Andreea Alexandra Anghel, Marian Viorel Craciun, Antonio Stefan Balau, Adrian Istrate, Adina Cocu, Constantin Adrian Andrei and Aurelian-Dumitrache Anghele
Computers 2026, 15(9), 571; https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15090571 - 31 Aug 2026
Viewed by 159
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly used for automated grading, but final-score agreement does not reveal whether credit is assigned to the rubric element affected by a response change. This study introduces CreditTrace-LLM, a controlled framework for auditing directional responsiveness, credit locality, paraphrase stability, [...] Read more.
Large language models are increasingly used for automated grading, but final-score agreement does not reveal whether credit is assigned to the rubric element affected by a response change. This study introduces CreditTrace-LLM, a controlled framework for auditing directional responsiveness, credit locality, paraphrase stability, and correspondence with expert evaluations in rubric-guided grading. The evaluation used 500 response families across ten questions, equally divided between technical and argumentative tasks. Each family included a baseline response (C0), a positive intervention adding rubric-relevant evidence (C+), a negative intervention removing or weakening such evidence (C−), and a placebo paraphrase (CP) constructed through lexical or syntactic reformulation with the intention of preserving rubric-relevant meaning. Eight local open-weight LLM graders produced 15,999 structurally valid Gold-point-level outputs from 16,000 expected evaluations. Targeted Gold-point scores changed in the expected direction in 75.7% of C+ comparisons and 50.2% of C− comparisons. Localized directional success was lower under C+ and C−, at 31.5% and 21.3%, respectively, indicating frequent non-target score changes. Under CP, total-score stability was 75.4%, while complete-profile stability was 73.6%. Direction concordance with the mean expert score change was 69.8% for C+, 47.4% for C−, and 18.2% for CP. The CP condition also showed substantial variability in expert scoring, particularly for argumentative responses, indicating that intended rubric-relevant meaning preservation did not guarantee score invariance. Final-score behavior alone is insufficient for validating rubric-guided LLM grading. CreditTrace-LLM therefore evaluates target responsiveness, credit locality, paraphrase stability, and traceable Gold-point-level outputs as complementary diagnostic dimensions rather than as predefined criteria for acceptable grading performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer-Assisted Learning and Teaching Tools in the AI Era)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop