Overcoming Pitfalls in the Detection and Definition of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Strategies to Improve Screening and Diagnosis

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Causes, Screening and Diagnosis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 1069

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
2. Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
Interests: urology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with 1 in 8 men expected to receive a diagnosis during their lifetime. While many of these cases are indolent and do not significantly affect life expectancy, others can progress to aggressive forms with metastatic spreading, significantly impacting both quality of life and survival. Early diagnosis is critical, particularly for younger patients with a family history of prostate or breast cancer.

The definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer is typically established through prostate biopsy. However, before a biopsy is performed, several tests are commonly used, though each has limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing are commonly employed, but their positive predictive values are low, being 18% and 25% respectively.

PSA testing can be refined using different approaches, such as monitoring PSA velocity, the free-to-total PSA ratio, the PSA density, or the Prostate Health Index (PHI). While these methods can enhance sensitivity, their accuracy remains limited.

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic pathway, offering high sensitivity in detecting tumors. However, MRI scans can still miss aggressive cancers, particularly smaller lesions.

Finally, despite advances in imaging and biomarkers, prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. However, false-negative results can occur, and additional diagnostic tools, such as the urine PCA3 test or serum kallikrein-related peptidase 2 combined with PSA, may be necessary for patient selection, especially when considering repeat biopsy in cases of persistent concern.

While the diagnostic approach to prostate cancer continues to evolve, ongoing challenges remain in terms of the sensitivity and specificity of the available exams.

This Special Issue will publish original research articles and comprehensive reviews that address the challenges associated with prostate cancer screening, as well as the diagnosis and definition of clinically significant tumors based on the use of advanced imaging and biomarkers. We are particularly interested in studies exploring the use of novel serum-, urine-, and tissue-based biomarkers before or after prostate biopsy, especially in patients with negative MRI findings. Research for identifying or validating new molecular tests for prostate cancer diagnosis is of high interest. Additionally, studies investigating the innovative use of well-established biomarkers and/or imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis and the identification of aggressive tumors are also welcomed.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Fabio Zattoni
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSA
  • magnetic resonance of the prostate
  • prostatic tissue-based biomarkers
  • prostate biopsy
  • prostate cancer screening

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1747 KiB  
Article
Validation of the Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictive Model for Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Men Undergoing Mapping per 0.5 Mm-Core Targeted Biopsies of Suspicious Lesions and Perilesional Areas
by Nahuel Paesano, Violeta Catalá, Larisa Tcholakian, Xavier Alomar, Miguel Ángel Barranco, Jonathan Hernández-Mancera, Berta Miró, Enrique Trilla and Juan Morote
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030473 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 883
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Validation of predictive models (PMs) is crucial to be implemented in new populations or when advances in diagnostic approaches occurred. The aim of this study is to validate the BCN-MRI PM for sPCa when a highly effective prostate biopsy protocol is used. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Validation of predictive models (PMs) is crucial to be implemented in new populations or when advances in diagnostic approaches occurred. The aim of this study is to validate the BCN-MRI PM for sPCa when a highly effective prostate biopsy protocol is used. Methods: A prospective cohort of 457 men suspected of having PCa, for whom MRI results were reported with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v 2.1, underwent a per 0.5 mm-core mapping targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and perilesional areas, followed by a 12-core-systematic biopsy. These procedures took place between 1 February 2022, and 29 February 2024, at a reference center for prostate biopsy. The individual likelihood of sPCa was assessed through the BCN-MRI risk calculator. Results: The overall sPCa detection rate was 58.3%. The calibration curve of the BCN-MRI PM showed an appropriate accuracy between expected and observed probabilities with a discrimination ability for sPCa yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.862 (95% CI 0.828–0.896) comparable to the AUC of 0.858 (95% CI 0.833–0.883) observed in the development cohort. The application of the BCN-MRI PM provided a net benefit over performing biopsies on all men, avoiding 24.9% of prostate biopsies at 95% sensitivity for sPCa, compared to the 23.7% reduction observed in the development cohort. Conclusions: We conclude that the BCN-MRI PM is ready to be implemented when this biopsy protocol is employed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop