Ototoxicity: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment

A special issue of Audiology Research (ISSN 2039-4349). This special issue belongs to the section "Hearing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2026 | Viewed by 1240

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Section of ENT, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
Interests: vertigo; audiology; otorhino-laryngology; ototoxicity

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-Audiology Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Interests: audiology; dizziness; ear; hearing loss and vertigo
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Ototoxicity refers to damage to the inner ear or the vestibulocochlear nerve resulting from exposure to certain drugs or chemicals. Ototoxic agents induce ototoxic hearing loss (OHL) by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cause mitochondrial dysfunction, ultimately leading to cellular injury within the cochlea. This selective targeting of the ear’s sensorineural structures manifests as tinnitus, hearing loss, impaired speech perception, vertigo, and dizziness, depending on the specific cochlear or vestibular toxicity of each compound.

In recent years, the use of novel drugs and combination therapies has increased the incidence of OHL. Known ototoxic substances include aminoglycoside antibiotics, loop diuretics, and platinum-derived chemotherapeutic agents, as well as newer antimicrobial drugs, organic solvents, trace elements from environmental pollution, and new drugs still under investigation. Genetic susceptibility may also contribute to individual vulnerability.

Because ototoxicity can lead to severe and sometimes irreversible effects, prevention, early diagnosis, and timely intervention are essential to safeguard patient health, particularly in adults and children, who may be more vulnerable to ototoxic damage. Therefore, the aim of this Special Issue is to clinically characterize vestibular and cochlear toxicity in both adults and children in whom such toxicity had previously not been considered due to the bilateral and symmetrical nature of the hearing damage, as well as explore new molecular mechanisms, clinical diagnosis, and therapy, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, and new targeted molecules.

Dr. Giacinto Asprella Libonati
Dr. Salvatore Allosso
Prof. Dr. Anna Rita Fetoni
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Audiology Research is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ototoxicity
  • vestibular toxicity
  • hearing loss
  • antioxidant therapy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 6529 KB  
Article
Ototoxicity of a Single Fulminant Episode of Acute Otitis Media in Children: A Long-Term Follow-Up
by Matija Švagan
Audiol. Res. 2026, 16(3), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16030093 - 22 Jun 2026
Viewed by 273
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) in children is known to cause cumulative cochlear and vestibular injury. Whether a single fulminant episode severe enough to require surgical intervention produces an analogous long-term audiovestibular signature, and whether infection severity contributes to outcome independently of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) in children is known to cause cumulative cochlear and vestibular injury. Whether a single fulminant episode severe enough to require surgical intervention produces an analogous long-term audiovestibular signature, and whether infection severity contributes to outcome independently of cumulative episode count, is unclear. The present study addressed this gap. Methods: In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, 65 paediatric patients who had undergone surgical treatment for acute mastoiditis—the fulminant form of AOM—between July 2001 and March 2021 were assessed a median of 11.5 years after surgery. Of these, 35 had undergone mastoidectomy with tympanostomy and 30 had undergone tympanostomy alone because their episode had not been severe enough to require mastoidectomy. Thirty-two age-matched healthy volunteers (one ear each) formed the control group, yielding 97 ears in three groups (Group TM, 35 ears; Group T, 30 ears; Group C, 32 ears). Extended high-frequency pure-tone audiometry (125–20 kHz), distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), single-frequency and wideband tympanometry, ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds, and lateral-canal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain were measured. Results: Both operated groups showed significantly elevated audiometric thresholds in the high- and extended high-frequency ranges compared with controls (HTA: χ2 = 24.25, p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in DPOAE amplitudes (HTA: χ2 = 25.04, p < 0.001). Group TM did not differ significantly from Group T at any frequency band, indicating a negligible additional contribution of mastoidectomy itself. Acoustic reflex thresholds were elevated in Group TM. Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was within reference ranges in all groups. Conclusions: A single fulminant episode of acute middle-ear infection in childhood—whether severe enough to require mastoidectomy or treated by tympanostomy alone—was associated, more than a decade later, with significantly elevated audiometric thresholds closely resembling those reported after multiple recurrent infections, supporting an effect of infection severity independent of cumulative episode count. Long-term audiological follow-up with extended high-frequency audiometry and otoacoustic emission testing is warranted, irrespective of whether mastoidectomy was required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ototoxicity: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 415 KB  
Review
Audiologic Assessment and Management of Teprotumumab-Associated Ototoxicity: An Updated Narrative Review
by John Williams, Alex Elkins, Alp Sarigul, Mary Frances Johnson and Charles E. Bishop
Audiol. Res. 2026, 16(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16030092 - 19 Jun 2026
Viewed by 374
Abstract
Introduction: Teprotumumab (Tepezza®), an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) antagonist, is the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for thyroid eye disease (TED). While effective for reducing proptosis and inflammation, increasing post-marketing evidence has linked teprotumumab to auditory adverse events. IGF-1 signaling is [...] Read more.
Introduction: Teprotumumab (Tepezza®), an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) antagonist, is the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for thyroid eye disease (TED). While effective for reducing proptosis and inflammation, increasing post-marketing evidence has linked teprotumumab to auditory adverse events. IGF-1 signaling is essential for cochlear maintenance and neuroprotection; therefore, systemic IGF-1R inhibition presents a biologically plausible mechanism for ototoxicity. Despite growing recognition of these effects, no standardized approach exists for audiologic assessment or monitoring of patients receiving teprotumumab. This review aimed to (1) summarize proposed mechanisms and the reported spectrum of teprotumumab-related auditory effects, (2) evaluate current methods used to assess and monitor these patients, and (3) identify areas of consensus and ongoing uncertainty. Methods: An updated narrative review of the literature was conducting using PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar using Boolean strings targeting teprotumumab exposure and hearing-related outcomes. Studies from 2022 onward were identified using Boolean search strings targeting teprotumumab exposure and hearing-related outcomes. Peer-reviewed English language studies reporting audiometric findings were eligible for inclusion. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Reported effects most commonly included bilateral high-frequency SNHL, tinnitus, and aural fullness, typically emerging after three to six infusions. Many cases demonstrated persistent deficits despite drug discontinuation. Baseline audiometric assessment was not uniformly reported across studies, and monitoring protocols varied considerably, with inconsistent incorporation of speech testing and immittance measures. Conclusions: Teprotumumab-associated ototoxicity is increasingly recognized and potentially irreversible. Current evidence is insufficient to guide standardized monitoring. Prospective studies are urgently needed to establish evidence-based audiologic surveillance protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ototoxicity: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop