AI-Enhanced Decision Support Systems

A special issue of Applied System Innovation (ISSN 2571-5577). This special issue belongs to the section "Artificial Intelligence".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 June 2026 | Viewed by 933

Special Issue Editor

College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Interests: artificial intelligence; image processing; computer-aided diagnosis; blockchain

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The field of decision support is undergoing a fundamental transformation driven by the convergence of artificial intelligence and an increase in heterogeneous data. Traditional systems, which often rely on structured data and pre-defined rules, are increasingly inadequate for complex, real-world scenarios, particularly those that involve uncertainty and multi-modal information streams, including, for instance, medical images paired with clinical notes or industrial sensor data alongside maintenance logs. The core challenge, then, lies in moving beyond siloed data analysis and merely passive information delivery, with the aim of creating integrated, prescriptive systems that can effectively synthesize diverse evidence, reason under uncertainty, and provide actionable, context-aware recommendations to human experts. Promising solutions are emerging at the intersection of several key AI disciplines. In particular, the fusion of deep learning for perception (e.g., image processing), causal reasoning for understanding, and, importantly, the contextual capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) provides a pathway for building next-generation Decision Support Systems (DSSs). These systems are positioned to act not merely as tools, but also as collaborative partners that help enhance human expertise across critical domains such as healthcare and industrial operations.

This Special Issue will curate pioneering research that demonstrates this paradigm shift, with a specific focus on the following interconnected areas:

  • Image processing & computer vision for DSSs;
  • Computer-aided diagnosis & clinical decision support;
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) in decision-centric workflows;
  • Industrial predictive maintenance (PDM) & operational intelligence;
  • Multi-modal data fusion: the architectural backbone.

We welcome contributions that address the integration of two or more of these focus areas, presenting end-to-end AI-DSS solutions that are validated on real-world challenges and include critical discussions on deployment, scalability, and human–AI collaboration.

Dr. Lu Meng
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied System Innovation is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • decision support systems
  • medical image processing
  • computer-aided diagnosis
  • deep learning
  • clinical decision making
  • large language models
  • financial risk assessment
  • industrial predictive maintenance
  • smart city management
  • multi-modal data fusion

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 609 KB  
Article
Using Natural Language and Health Ontologies in Hope Recommender System: Evaluation of Use in Medicine
by Hans Eguia, Carlos Sánchez-Bocanegra, Carlos Fernandez Llatas, Fernando Alvarez López and Francesc Saigí-Rubió
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2026, 9(5), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/asi9050086 - 27 Apr 2026
Viewed by 503
Abstract
Objectives: Despite the widespread availability of digital clinical information, timely access to relevant biomedical evidence during routine consultations remains limited in practice. Primary care clinicians, in particular, face significant time constraints that make it difficult to integrate comprehensive literature searches into everyday workflows. [...] Read more.
Objectives: Despite the widespread availability of digital clinical information, timely access to relevant biomedical evidence during routine consultations remains limited in practice. Primary care clinicians, in particular, face significant time constraints that make it difficult to integrate comprehensive literature searches into everyday workflows. This study evaluates whether an ontology-based recommender system can support routine clinical workflows by reducing information retrieval time while preserving the clinically acceptable usefulness of retrieved evidence. We assessed the performance of the HOPE (Health Operation for Personalised Evidence) system compared with realistic manual PubMed searches conducted by physicians. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational evaluation involving 50 primary care physicians, who independently assessed 30 anonymised, rewritten clinical cases representative of common primary care scenarios. HOPE automatically extracted biomedical concepts from case descriptions using natural language processing and mapped them to Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) ontologies to generate ranked PubMed recommendations. A subset of 10 physicians also conducted manual PubMed searches in line with their usual clinical practice. Article relevance was assessed using a predefined binary criterion, and a reference relevance set was established by consensus among three senior physicians using a pooled document set. Retrieval performance was evaluated using Precision@k, relative Recall@k, and Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG@k). Manual search time was measured using a standardised stopwatch protocol, whereas HOPE response time was logged automatically by the system. Results: Inter-physician agreement in relevance assessment was substantial (Fleiss’ κ = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61–0.70). HOPE achieved moderate-to-high precision within the top-ranked results (Precision@3 = 0.72), with relative recall increasing as additional documents were considered. Ranking metrics indicated that relevant articles were generally positioned early in the result lists. The mean total retrieval time for manual PubMed searches was 13.3 ± 1.7 min per case, compared with 17.4 ± 2.1 s for HOPE-assisted retrieval (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a controlled, workflow-oriented evaluation using synthetic clinical cases, HOPE substantially reduced information retrieval time while maintaining clinically acceptable relevance in the retrieved literature. These findings support the use of ontology-based, AI-assisted systems as workflow-support tools to facilitate timely access to biomedical evidence, without replacing clinical judgment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI-Enhanced Decision Support Systems)
Back to TopTop