applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Novel Biomaterials in Dentistry

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 November 2025) | Viewed by 2476

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
Interests: ental materials and prosthetic technologies; restorative dentistry; adhesion; oral diseases; aesthetic dentistry; endodontics; teeth; periodontics; dentistry; adhesives; operative dentistry; dental materials; composite resins; dental caries; clinical dentistry; esthetic dentistry; dental education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Modern dentistry is witnessing a transformative evolution through the development and application of novel biomaterials. This Special Issue aims to highlight cutting-edge research, emerging trends, and innovative technologies that are shaping the future of dental biomaterials. Recent advancements in biomimetic materials, bioactive ceramics, nanomaterials, and tissue-engineering scaffolds are redefining restorative, prosthetic, and regenerative dental therapies. These materials offer enhanced mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and aesthetic outcomes while addressing challenges such as biofilm resistance, tooth remineralization, and implant integration. The Special Issue also explores the role of nanotechnology in improving adhesive interfaces, drug delivery systems, and antibacterial coatings. Contributions encompass in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that investigate the performance, durability, and biological interactions of these novel biomaterials. By bringing together interdisciplinary perspectives from material science, dental research, and clinical applications, this Special Issue aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state and future directions in dental biomaterials. Ultimately, it seeks to bridge the gap between research innovation and clinical practice, promoting the development of next-generation materials that enhance oral health outcomes and improve patient care in both preventive and therapeutic dentistry.

Dr. Nicola Scotti
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biocompatibility
  • bioactive ceramics
  • bioactive polymers
  • nanotechnology
  • tissue engineering scaffolds
  • restorative and regenerative dentistry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

22 pages, 704 KB  
Systematic Review
Biocompatibility and Safety of Orthodontic Clear Aligners and Thermoplastic Retainers: A Systematic In Vitro Review (2015–2025)
by Lea Kolenc, Jan Oblak, Maja Ovsenik, Čedomir Oblak and Rok Ovsenik
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(23), 12494; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312494 - 25 Nov 2025
Viewed by 2119
Abstract
Background: Clear aligners have become a common alternative to fixed appliances for tooth movement, and thermoplastic retainers hold the outcome. The prolonged intraoral contact of these devices has made the materials a focus of biocompatibility research. Objectives: This paper aims to summarize laboratory [...] Read more.
Background: Clear aligners have become a common alternative to fixed appliances for tooth movement, and thermoplastic retainers hold the outcome. The prolonged intraoral contact of these devices has made the materials a focus of biocompatibility research. Objectives: This paper aims to summarize laboratory evidence on the biocompatibility of clear aligners and thermoplastic retainers. Materials included thermoformed polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), multilayer polyurethane, and directly printed resins. Primary outcomes were cytotoxicity, endocrine activity, and chemical or particle release. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through 31 May 2025, and we followed the PRISMA 2020 statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We applied predefined eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened records and extracted data in duplicate, including study design, extraction conditions, surface-area-to-volume ratio (SA/V), cell models, endpoints, and analytical sensitivity as the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). We assessed the risk of bias across seven domains and graded certainty by outcome. We did not register a protocol prospectively. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Materials spanned multilayer polyurethanes (SmartTrack, Clarity), PETG sheets (Essix ACE, Duran), and directly printed resins (Graphy TC-85DAC); a subset tested zinc-oxide (ZnO) nanoparticle coatings. Typical extractions immersed 0.1–1 g of material in cell-culture medium or artificial saliva at 37 °C for 24 h to 30 days. Cell viability usually remained ≥80%. Mild cytotoxicity (about 60–70% viability) appeared with harsher extractions, extended soaks, or an inadequate post-curing of printed parts. The estrogen-sensitive proliferation assay (E-Screen) returned negative results. In saliva-like media, bisphenol A (BPA) and related leachables were undetectable or in the low ng/mL range. In printed resins, urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) sometimes appeared in water extracts, and amounts varied with curing quality. Evidence for chemical leaching and endocrine outcomes is sparse. We found no eligible in vitro study that quantified particle or microplastic release while also measuring a biological endpoint; we discuss particle findings from mechanical wear simulations only as the external context. Limitations: The evidence base is limited to in vitro studies. Many reports incompletely described extraction ratios and processing parameters. Risk of bias and certainty: Most studies used appropriate cell models and controls, but the reporting of surface-area-to-volume ratios, LOD/LOQ, and detailed post-processing parameters was often incomplete. Sample sizes were small, and dynamic wear or enzymatic conditions were uncommon. The overall risk of bias was moderate, and the certainty of evidence was low to moderate due to heterogeneity and in vitro indirectness. Conclusions: Under standard laboratory conditions, clear aligners and thermoplastic retainers show a favorable biocompatibility profile. For printed resins, outcomes depend mainly on processing quality, especially thorough washing and appropriate light-curing parameters. To improve comparability and support clinical translation, we recommend harmonized test protocols, transparent reporting, interlaboratory ring trials, and targeted clinical biomonitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomaterials in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop