applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Dental Materials, Instruments, and Their New Applications

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2025 | Viewed by 806

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
Interests: bio-remineralization; hypersensitivity; cracked tooth; zirconia bonding; digital dentistry; wearable diagnostic equipment; laser disinfection; AI applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We invite submissions for original research, reviews, and case studies exploring innovations in dental materials, instruments, and their novel applications. This Special Issue focuses on recent advances in the development, characterization, and clinical use of dental materials, instruments, and novel applications. Topics of interest include new restorative materials and instruments, adhesive technologies, dental ceramics, endodontic materials and instruments, and bioactive or antimicrobial materials and their applications. We also welcome studies on material performance, biocompatibility, and emerging applications in digital dentistry. This collection aims to highlight cutting-edge research that pushes the boundaries of dental science and enhances clinical outcomes.

Prof. Dr. Deog-Gyu Seo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dental materials
  • instruments
  • new applications
  • endodontic
  • restorative
  • digital dentistry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 2822 KB  
Article
Accuracy and Reliability of Smartphone Versus Mirrorless Camera Images-Assisted Digital Shade Guides: An In Vitro Study
by Soo Teng Chew, Suet Yeo Soo, Mohd Zulkifli Kassim, Khai Yin Lim and In Meei Tew
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 8070; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148070 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 647
Abstract
Image-assisted digital shade guides are increasingly popular for shade matching; however, research on their accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reliability of color coordination in image-assisted digital shade guides constructed using calibrated images of their shade tabs captured [...] Read more.
Image-assisted digital shade guides are increasingly popular for shade matching; however, research on their accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reliability of color coordination in image-assisted digital shade guides constructed using calibrated images of their shade tabs captured by a mirrorless camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) (MC-DSG) and a smartphone camera (Samsung, Seoul, Korea) (SC-DSG), using a spectrophotometer as the reference standard. Twenty-nine VITA Linearguide 3D-Master shade tabs were photographed under controlled settings with both cameras equipped with cross-polarizing filters. Images were calibrated using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The L* (lightness), a* (red-green chromaticity), and b* (yellow-blue chromaticity) values, which represent the color attributes in the CIELAB color space, were computed at the middle third of each shade tab using Adobe Photoshop. Specifically, L* indicates the brightness of a color (ranging from black [0] to white [100]), a* denotes the position between red (+a*) and green (–a*), and b* represents the position between yellow (+b*) and blue (–b*). These values were used to quantify tooth shade and compare them to reference measurements obtained from a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V, VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Mean color differences (∆E00) between MC-DSG and SC-DSG, relative to the spectrophotometer, were compared using a independent t-test. The ∆E00 values were also evaluated against perceptibility (PT = 0.8) and acceptability (AT = 1.8) thresholds. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and group differences were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests (α = 0.05). SC-DSG showed significantly lower ΔE00 deviations than MC-DSG (p < 0.001), falling within acceptable clinical AT. The L* values from MC-DSG were significantly higher than SC-DSG (p = 0.024). All methods showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9). The findings support the potential of smartphone image-assisted digital shade guides for accurate and reliable tooth shade assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Materials, Instruments, and Their New Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop