Institutions, Corporate Governance, and Internationalisation

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2024) | Viewed by 6185

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CEOS.PP—Centre for Organisational and Social Studies of P. Porto, Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal
Interests: accountability; sustainability; corporate social responsibility; institutions; accounting education; ONGs

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CEOS.PP—Centre for Organisational and Social Studies of P. Porto, Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal
Interests: intellectual capital; knowledge management; accounting; accountability; sustainability; corporate social responsibility; Era 5.0; financial and non-financial reporting
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the current knowledge economy, organisations, which are created under different legal forms, need to be sustainable. Moreover, these legal forms influence the adoption of specific governance and management models, which can be grounded in several theories (e.g., institutional, stakeholder). In fact, organisations increasingly need to be transparent and accountable to their different stakeholders, which stresses the importance of fostering relationships with them.

New challenges, such as organisational sustainability or internationalisation, are now deemed crucial in a global world. Thus, in order to respond to these new challenges, business models must be continuously adapted, and managers must develop new skills. At present, institutions have to create intellectual capital by being innovative in their processes while aiming to be sustainable in their practices. Organisations are now more accountable for their actions due to stakeholders’ pressures, and such processes and practices must be adequately disclosed.

Institutions must adapt to local needs and demands. It is up to managers to adapt their decisions to maximise institutions’ value for their stakeholders in broader terms, and for their shareholders, in a more specific stance.

This Special Issue aims to open a discussion on institutions—more specifically, on how they should adapt their governance models to the challenges posed by internationalisation and sustainability while fostering their relationships with different stakeholders.

Prof. Dr. Rui Bertuzi
Prof. Dr. José Vale
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • institutions 
  • corporate governance 
  • internationalisation 
  • institutional theory 
  • sustainability 
  • institutional ownership 
  • business strategy 
  • CSR 
  • accountability 
  • innovation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 1660 KiB  
Article
Innovative Behavior in Startups: An Empirical Study
by Marisa Leal, Carmem Leal and Rui Silva
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120256 - 12 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2500
Abstract
Considering the SECI model, which emphasizes a modern conception of knowledge management, the main objective of this study is to understand how the socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) dimensions can influence innovative behavior within organizations. The quantitative method was adopted, carrying out [...] Read more.
Considering the SECI model, which emphasizes a modern conception of knowledge management, the main objective of this study is to understand how the socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) dimensions can influence innovative behavior within organizations. The quantitative method was adopted, carrying out a descriptive-correlational study in which 247 individuals participated. For data collection, a questionnaire was used. Their analysis was performed using SPSS software. The results show that of the four dimensions of the SECI model, only three have a positive influence on innovative behavior: externalization, combination, and internalization. This study highlights the importance that the SECI model has in understanding knowledge generated by companies/organizations, in particular, startups. It is possible to state that this model is extremely important to understand innovative behavior in startups, but also issues related to entrepreneurship, thus rendering this study into a guiding reference for companies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Institutions, Corporate Governance, and Internationalisation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1588 KiB  
Article
Liberalization for Sale: Corporate Demands and Lobbying over FTAs
by Michael Plouffe
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13100227 - 22 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2417
Abstract
Firm-based approaches to international trade have revolutionized the study of trade politics. Corporate participation in political processes is costly, limiting access to large, productive, well-resourced, and often internationally engaged firms. This implies a pro-trade bias in corporate lobbying demands over trade policy. I [...] Read more.
Firm-based approaches to international trade have revolutionized the study of trade politics. Corporate participation in political processes is costly, limiting access to large, productive, well-resourced, and often internationally engaged firms. This implies a pro-trade bias in corporate lobbying demands over trade policy. I examine this relationship in the case of three free trade agreements passed by the United States Congress in 2011. I combine public statements from firms on the FTAs with corporate lobbying activities and find that both lobbying firms and those that lobbied and publicly disclosed their policy positions were more productive than the typical publicly traded firm. Likewise, firms with income from foreign affiliates were more likely to be politically active than others. These results contribute to a vibrant body of research into the complex relationships firms hold with policies governing access to international markets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Institutions, Corporate Governance, and Internationalisation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop