Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A Future Research Agenda

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2025 | Viewed by 8141

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 73133 Heraklion, Greece
2. Department of Business Administration, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, Cyprus
Interests: CSR; ESG; sustainable finance; eco-efficiency; sustainable development; green accounting
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Economics, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Koila-Kozani, Greece
2. Department of Business Administration, Neapolis University Pafos, 8042 Pafos, Cyprus
Interests: CSR; ESG; agile management; sustainable finance; eco-efficiency; sustainable development; green accounting
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management Science and Technology, School of Economics, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Koila-Kozani, Greece
Interests: sustainable accounting; sustainable finance; CSR; corporate governance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University Pafos, Pafos 8042, Cyprus
Interests: HRM; entrepreneurship; corporate governance; leadership
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The focus of corporate governance has shifted away from agency conflicts and toward concerns of ethics, accountability, openness, and disclosure. Furthermore, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has shifted its attention to corporate governance as a means of incorporating social and environmental issues into company decision making, benefitting not just financial investors but also employees, customers, and communities. Corporate governance is increasingly being connected to stakeholder-friendly company practices and governmental policy.

This Special Issue aims to examine many topics concerning future study areas of CSR, corporate governance, and probable expansions of these scholarly subjects that may arise in light of the expanding interests of multiple academic disciplines and practitioners worldwide. This Special Issue addresses research work on CSR and corporate governance, as well as the fundamental ideas that have led this area of research. In addition, the current Special Issue discusses future directions of drivers that encourage corporations to engage in CSR and corporate governance initiatives, such as ESG considerations.

Therefore, this Special Issue focuses on, but is not limited to, the following topics:

  • CRS and its influence on business performance;
  • CSR and its effects on various corporate performance measurements;
  • CSR and its societal implications;
  • The impact of stakeholders on CSR adoption;
  • CSR practices as seen by various stakeholders;
  • CSR in family businesses;
  • CSR and corporate performance across several industries;
  • ESG reporting;
  • ESG and CSR research across different industries;
  • Trends and future directions of ESG and corporate governance;
  • Systematic interaction between ESG, CSR, and corporate governance.

Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, pp. 54–72.

C. Flammer, B. Hong, D. Minor (2019) Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes Strat. Manag. J., 40 (7), pp. 1097–1122.

I.M. García-Sánchez, J. Martínez-Ferrero (2019) Chief executive officer ability, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance: the moderating role of the environment, Bus. Strat. Environ., 28 (4), pp. 542–555.

A.M. Gerged (2021) Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: the role of corporate governance structures, Bus. Strat. Environ., 30 (1), pp. 609–629.

A.M. Gerged, A.M. Chijoke-Mgbame, R. Konadu, C.J. Cowton (2022) Does the presence of an environmental committee strengthen the impact of board gender diversity on corporate environmental disclosure? Evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa Bus. Strat. Environ.

B. Hong, Z. Li, D. (2016) Minor Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility J. Bus. Ethics, 136 (1), pp. 199–213.

R. Lombardi, R. Trequattrini, B. Cuozzo, M. Cano-Rubio (2019) Corporate corruption prevention, sustainable governance and legislation: first exploratory evidence from the Italian scenario J. Clean. Prod., 217, pp. 666–675.

K. Lopatta, R. Jaeschke, M. Tchikov, S. Lodhia (2017) Corruption, corporate social responsibility and financial constraints: international firm‐level evidence Eur. Manag. Rev., 14 (1), pp. 47–65.

J. Lu, L. Ren, J. Qiao, S. Yao, W. Strielkowski, J. Streimikis (2019) Corporate social responsibility and corruption: implications for the sustainable energy sector Sustainability, 11 (15) (2019), p. 4128.

Karagiannopoulou, S., Sariannidis N., Ragazou K., Passas I., and Garefalakis A. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Strategy That Promotes Energy Environmental Transition and Combats Volatility in the Post-Pandemic World, Energies 16, no. 3: 1102.

Dr. Alexandros Garefalakis
Dr. Konstantina Ragazou
Dr. Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos
Dr. Christos Papademetriou
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • corporate social responsibility
  • corporate governance
  • ESG

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1195 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Executives and Non-Executives’ Impact toward ESG Performance in Banking Sector: An Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method
by Georgia Zournatzidou
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100255 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1054
Abstract
Financial institutions should prioritize the adoption of comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) disclosure policies to improve their market reputation and decrease capital expenditures. The current study’s research objective is to investigate the impact of both inside and outside executives on the [...] Read more.
Financial institutions should prioritize the adoption of comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) disclosure policies to improve their market reputation and decrease capital expenditures. The current study’s research objective is to investigate the impact of both inside and outside executives on the successive adoption of ESG strategies, based on the sustainable leadership theoretical framework and the bottom-up corporate governance theory. Data for the current study were obtained from the Refinitiv Eikon database and analyzed through using the entropy weight and TOPSIS techniques. The research suggests that including fully autonomous board members has the potential to improve the transparency of firms’ ESG criteria. This result was derived from an analysis of data pertaining to the behavior of CEOs and non-executives at the company level in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. The verification of the soundness and dependability of this finding has been carried out by scrutinizing the problem of endogeneity and diverse techniques of data representation. Furthermore, our study has disproven the idea that having CEOs on the board of directors may significantly improve the ESG performance of financial institutions. Consequently, the research proposes that adopting a strict policy of board independence has the capacity to alleviate the environmental, social, and governance repercussions that arise from the control of internal executives, namely CEOs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2057 KiB  
Article
Investigating the Link among Corruption, Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance in Family Businesses: A Future Research Agenda
by Savvina Paganou, Ioannis Antoniadis, Georgia Zournatzidou and George Sklavos
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14070139 - 1 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1978
Abstract
Family businesses have distinct characteristics that differentiate them from other firms. Researchers must meticulously analyze issues, with a specific focus on the interplay of family business dynamics, considering this factor. The main objective of this research was to provide insight into the adverse [...] Read more.
Family businesses have distinct characteristics that differentiate them from other firms. Researchers must meticulously analyze issues, with a specific focus on the interplay of family business dynamics, considering this factor. The main objective of this research was to provide insight into the adverse effects of family companies, particularly how the power dynamics inside these organizations might enable corruption or fraud and how corporate governance can help in mitigating these phenomena. Specifically, family businesses can be investigated by considering unique characteristics such as ownership and control, generational dynamics, and corporate governance. To address the study topic, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using the R statistical programming language and the bibliometric tools Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. Data were obtained from the Scopus database and examined in documents. The lack of unbiased external evaluation, the ineffectiveness of internal audits, disputes between different generations, the dominance of family members, and the narrow extent of governance all contribute to the exacerbation of tensions that promote corruption inside family firms. Moreover, the findings indicate that CEO duality correlates with the occurrence of corruption and fraudulent activities, such as manipulating profits. Furthermore, the findings suggest a correlation between the qualities of the board and instances of corruption and bribery inside family firms. These factors also increase the probability of financial statement fraud. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 650 KiB  
Article
Exploring Attitudes towards Whistleblowing in Relation to Sustainable Municipalities
by Anastasia Cheliatsidou, Nikolaos Sariannidis, Alexandros Garefalakis, Ioannis Passas and Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090199 - 9 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4154
Abstract
There is a consensus in the literature that whistleblowing can operate as an instrument for deterring wrongdoing and promoting transparency in organizations. As such, whistleblowing connects with sustainability, and in particular with the UN sustainable development goals (SDG 16, reducing corruption) for transparency [...] Read more.
There is a consensus in the literature that whistleblowing can operate as an instrument for deterring wrongdoing and promoting transparency in organizations. As such, whistleblowing connects with sustainability, and in particular with the UN sustainable development goals (SDG 16, reducing corruption) for transparency and accountability in public sector entities. The purpose of this study is to explore the attitudes of public servants in Greek municipalities before and after the introduction of the “EU Directive on Whistleblowing”. In particular, we investigate how the political, legal, organizational, and cultural environment within which Greek municipalities operate shapes negative employee attitudes toward whistleblowing. Primary data was collected through in-depth interviews with municipal employees from 2020 to 2023 before and after the incorporation of the “EU Directive on Whistleblowing” into the Greek legal system. Our findings indicate that municipal employees are skeptical and have negative attitudes toward whistleblowing, even if they have witnessed wrongdoing, mainly due to: perceived low protection by the law; limited trust in authorities; absence of an ethical climate; inadequate whistleblowing education; fear of retaliation and social isolation; and concerns that reported crimes will remain unpunished. Important information is generated through this study that can inform practice in relation to political and sociocultural dynamics, and particularly key determinants that negatively influence and undermine the efficiency of the whistleblowing process in certain cultural and organizational contexts. The implications of our findings for regulators, researchers and government authorities are also presented. This study supports the position that whistleblowing is closely related to sustainability as a transparency-promoting mechanism, and should be integrated into strategies in the fight against misconduct, fraud and corruption in public sector entities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop