Next Article in Journal
A Novel Alignment Method for SINS with Large Misalignment Angles Based on EKF2 and AFIS
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Invasive Electrochemical Biosensors Operating in Human Physiological Fluids
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal and Spatial Focusing in SPAD-Based Solid-State Pulsed Time-of-Flight Laser Range Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Capacitive Field-Effect EIS Chemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Status Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Recent Advances in Noninvasive Biosensors for Forensics, Biometrics, and Cybersecurity

1
Department of Chemistry, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222, USA
2
Department of Environmental Toxicology (ENTX), Texas Tech University, 1207 Gilbert Drive, Lubbock, TX 79416, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(21), 5974; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20215974
Submission received: 27 September 2020 / Revised: 17 October 2020 / Accepted: 20 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors – Recent Advances and Future Challenges)

Abstract

:
Recently, biosensors have been used in an increasing number of different fields and disciplines due to their wide applicability, reproducibility, and selectivity. Three large disciplines in which this has become relevant has been the forensic, biometric, and cybersecurity fields. The call for novel noninvasive biosensors for these three applications has been a focus of research in these fields. Recent advances in these three areas has relied on the use of biosensors based on primarily colorimetric assays based on bioaffinity interactions utilizing enzymatic assays. In forensics, the use of different bodily fluids for metabolite analysis provides an alternative to the use of DNA to avoid the backlog that is currently the main issue with DNA analysis by providing worthwhile information about the originator. In biometrics, the use of sweat-based systems for user authentication has been developed as a proof-of-concept design utilizing the levels of different metabolites found in sweat. Lastly, biosensor assays have been developed as a proof-of-concept for combination with cybersecurity, primarily cryptography, for the encryption and protection of data and messages.

1. Background

Biosensors are widely used in multiple processes today. These include, but are not limited to, clinical diagnostics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], environmental processes [11,12,13], the food industry [13,14,15,16,17,18], and devices for military use [15,19,20]. More recently, the use of biosensors has been noted in other disciplines, namely forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. As biosensors are devices that employ sensing techniques relying on biorecognition elements, they are able to provide specific, rapid results pertaining to bioaffinity-based reactions. The use of biosensors in forensics enables investigators to have another source of information in addition to DNA analysis that also provides worthwhile information quickly for them to narrow down their investigation in a timely manner. Biometrics and biosensors are becoming more closely related as the technology improves in that field. The differentiation of people with more noninvasive biosensors, biosensors that do not involve intrusive procedures, is exceedingly useful. The main procedures used here involve electrochemical and enzymatic assays for analysis. Lastly, with the advent of computers, the use of biosensors in unconventional computing [21] and the combination of computing with chemistry, biology, and physics have become another facet for biosensors.
  • Forensics
In the realm of forensic science, there is an increasing need for new technologies to aid investigators and lab scientists in the pursuit of gathering worthwhile information from evidence. There are many subsections of evidence that are pertinent in the forensic field, but recent research has focused on three: Fingerprints, blood samples, and sweat-based field testing for ethanol and other drugs.
In the history of forensics, fingerprints have been essential in addition to being a widely emblematic feature of the forensic field in pop culture. However, fingerprints are mainly used in the field as a comparative means of identification [22], and if a print cannot be utilized for this pictorial comparison based on ridge structure, size, and shape, it is treated as exclusionary evidence [23]. This can be viewed as a large limitation on the amount of data that one can gain from this relevant piece of evidence. By analyzing the content of a print, namely the amino acids, one can gain some understanding of who the donor of that print was and be able to narrow down the search for the investigators. This is due to the metabolic [24] differences [25,26,27,28] in people due to their gender, age, medications, and lifestyle. By analyzing these types of biomarkers in a fingerprint sample, it would not only allow for one to gain much needed information that would provide additional context for investigators, but would also lead to the reduction in the need to wait for the lengthy analysis of DNA that causes a backlog [29], if any was recovered. According to the NIJ, a backlog is defined as any evidence that was not analyzed for at least 30 days after submission to a laboratory. By analyzing the content of a fingerprint instead of the pictorial fingerprint commonly relied on, it allows for smudged or partial prints, the prints that would not provide ample evidence for comparison, to have value for investigators. The chemical content of fingerprints has been examined as well, mainly focused on laboratory-based equipment such as mass spectrometric (MS) techniques that focus on total fingerprint content [24,30,31], drugs of abuse [32,33], and fatty acids to differentiate individuals based on age [34]. In addition to MS, there were optical techniques, as well using spectrophotometric instrumentation with age differences based on lipids [35], visual representation [36], and explosive content found on prints [37], as well as combined techniques such as desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) and direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) for total content [38,39,40] and for pictorial [41,42,43]. Further analysis of these techniques can be found in a review in Trends in Analytical Chemistry [44].
In addition to fingerprints, blood is another matrix that is commonly obtained as evidence for forensic investigators. In addition to the commonly known DNA matching with a database [45,46], bloodstains are also used for splatter analysis [47,48,49], and there are even techniques to differentiate if there are multiple overlapping stains [50]. An important quality relating to the bloodstain that was missing was the time since it was deposited onto the surface, utilizing a technique that is practical and did not require great sample prep or laboratory instrumentation. This is a vital piece of information as it would allow for corroboration of stories told by possible witnesses and would enable the reduction in irrelevant and unnecessary lab work to be done with blood that is too fresh or too old at a particular scene. Another lapse in analysis of bloodstains is the determination of the age of the person the blood is from, as this can be done with DNA but is a lengthy process [51]. Similar studies using biosensors were to find biological sex and ethnicity [52,53]. Other lab techniques were attempted to be able to perform age deduction; however, they were not applicable, due to serious flaws in the techniques [54].
The third forensic matrix is sweat. Sweat is a viable forensic sample for multiple reasons, as it contains a small amount of DNA [55,56,57,58], and other metabolites and compounds [59,60,61], and people leave traces of it upon contact of surfaces with their skin [62]. As fingerprints contain sweat in addition to other components, it is a comparable matrix to what has been discussed previously. Sweat can be detected in the field utilizing one of the main components in sweat—lactate [63,64,65,66,67]. Lactate is prominent in sweat samples and, even though there are techniques that can be used in order to detect it [68,69,70,71], they require complex laboratory instrumentation and are not viable methodologies for on-site deployment. Some of these techniques rely on a tattoo-like sensing device that consists of a potentiometric sensor with a wireless receiver [70,71], involving the use of a screen-printed electrode on tattoo paper with a microfluidic channel for sweat collection and detection of analytes. By being able to find sweat on surfaces directly at a crime scene, investigators would have additional samples of viable evidence. Building upon this, emerging research has also looked at analysis involving ethanol. Multiple studies have shown that ethanol is excreted into sweat [72,73] and that sweat cannot be tampered with, similarly to how people “trick” breathalyzers. There are wearable technologies that allow for biosensing of metabolites in sweat [74,75]; however, they have a long delay, some up to two hours, that makes them useless for on-site Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) analysis. Similar research has looked into saliva for the identification of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) [76] and an overall approach that analyzes multiple types of legal and illegal compounds in sweat [77].
  • Biometrics
The second main discipline has been the use of biosensors for strictly biometric purposes. Namely, current research has aimed to use bioassays for the identification and differentiation of individuals. As mentioned previously, the content of different metabolites in sweat can be quantified, which can be used to find differences between people. This has implications in both the prior forensics section, biometrics in general, and even cybersecurity, which will be explained below. This method can be used to provide an alternate to DNA testing similar to the other techniques being developed for forensics. This kind of technology is similar to emerging research in biosensors and bioelectronics [78,79]. As mentioned previously, the content within a person’s sweat is a result of metabolic processes [24,25,26,27,59,80] related to what can be a person’s identifying factors such as age, biological sex, diet, and activity level. By taking measurements of and comparing results for multiple biomarkers, one can differentiate a person from others with these fluctuating factors. This can be applied for the unlocking of smart devices as the technology is moving in this direction as well [81,82,83].
As mentioned previously, sweat has been an emerging source of information in both forensics and biometrics. Many studies have been done for the advancement of various methodologies for different compounds found in sweat [84,85,86,87,88]. Further descriptions of some of the recent methodologies that have been developed for sweat analysis can be seen in Table 1 below.
  • Cybersecurity
The third and final discipline has been the use of biosensors for cybersecurity purposes. This is a small transition from biometrics into cybersecurity as they are closely related. This research can be applied in two different areas of cybersecurity—authentication and cryptography. Both are important in our world with the advent of the digital age, so there is a call for innovative and worthwhile technologies across all disciplines to innovate and advance the novel research into cyber technologies. For authentication, biometrics that were mentioned previously can be applied. Ideally, if one can differentiate people, the same technology can be used to identify a person, or at the very least, dismiss an imposter. Cryptography is the use of codes and cyphers in order to encrypt data to keep them safe, either in transmission between people as a message or safekeeping in storage [106,107,108]. Many multidisciplinary researchers have been applying their research to encryption, including, but not limited to, fluorescence [109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [118], bacteria [119], antibodies [120], and molecular computing systems [121,122,123,124], with the heaviest research in DNA applications [125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133].

2. Research

  • Forensics
First, in the forensic field, emerging research has focused on the three areas of study above with fingerprints [44,134,135,136,137], blood [138,139], sweat [140,141], and one general review on the use of biocomputing in forensics [142]. These five fingerprint papers provide novel applications of biorecognition elements that can be used for future biosensing devices. These papers are centralized on the idea that people have different levels of certain L-amino acids, which are related to their metabolism and different traits, allowing them to be differentiated into groups. The blood papers use the degradation of certain enzymes in order to determine the time that a blood spot has been outside the body and to identify the age of the originator from the level of a separate enzyme. The sweat papers use the levels of different compounds in sweat in order to identify sweat and to be able to provide an alternative technique for alcohol intoxication. The methodologies within these papers use different biosensors, some via enzyme assays, some with chemical reactions. A generic enzymatic assay diagram can be seen in Figure 1, where specific substrates for the enzyme are used in the assay to produce byproducts, one of which is a recognition element. The last paper is a review on other trending types of fingerprint analysis such as the use of mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, nanotechnology, and combinatorial methods [44].
A fingerprint paper from 2015 uses an enzymatic cascade utilizing L-amino acid oxidase (L-AAO) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the presence of L-amino acids to produce a visible color by oxidizing the redox dye o-dianisidine, which results in a color that may be analyzed at 436 nm [134]. Due to the fact that women produce a higher amount of these amino acids than men [26,27,28], this assay would allow for the determination of a person’s biological sex. First, the assay was performed utilizing 50 mimicked samples, 25 male and 25 female, containing 23 target amino acids in concentrations based on reported values calculated in R-project software. This resulted in the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 99%, showing a high probability for this methodology to differentiate between the two sexes. This was then repeated with three male and three female volunteers testing both their right and left thumbs in an acid extraction methodology using polyurethane film as a medium that was developed in the same article. These real samples also show definitive differentiation between the male and female prints. Different surfaces around the lab, such as a computer screen and doorknob, were also tested in this manuscript to show viability on different surfaces. An additional paper from 2016 follows the same principles as the L-AAO/HRP assay in order to find an alternative methodology to determine biological sex, this time utilizing a chemical assay [135]. This assay uses ninhydrin, which produces a colorimetric reaction with alpha-amino (α-NH2) acids [143,144]. Ninhydrin is commonly used in forensics already as it produces Ruhemann’s purple as a product in the presence of all α-NH2 acids. The process in this paper is similar to the last: 50 total mimicked samples with designated concentrations of the 23 amino acids from R-project software are analyzed photometrically at 570 nm. The area under the ROC curve in this case was at 94%, showing a high probability to correctly distinguish the two sexes. After this, five male and five female volunteers were analyzed using this technique, resulting in a 91% area under the curve for authentic samples.
Following this trend, a paper from 2017 also uses a chemical assay for the determination of biological sex with the focus being on the Bradford reagent, Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 dye [136]. Bradford is commonly used for quantifying proteins and is less affected by reagents and nonprotein components of samples than other commonly used reagents [145]. The goal of utilizing this assay is that it only targets six specific amino acids with which to form a colorimetric complex, thus enabling a more focused approach to the determination of biological sex with the ideal being the determination of a single amino acid assay to differentiate the sexes. Contrary to the previous papers, only authentic fingerprints were sampled from 50 authentic fingerprint samples from volunteers—25 males and 25 females. This resulted in an area under the curve of the ROC graph of 99%, showing the highest probability of the three methods to correctly identify the biological sex of the fingerprint donor.
The final fingerprint paper to be examined goes one step further, by using two separate tests, each targeting a specific amino acid, in order to differentiate on the basis of biological sex [137]. The two methods used are an enzymatic cascade targeting alanine and a chemical assay that targets arginine. The alanine-targeting assay consists of a three-enzyme cascade with alanine transaminase, pyruvate oxidase, and horseradish peroxidase [146]. In the presence of alanine in addition to the other substrates necessary for the assay, a redox dye is oxidized by HRP and can be spectrophotometrically measured. Following the previously established standard, even though the mimicked samples produced the lowest AUC of the ROC curve with a value of 82%, the authentic samples of 50 total individuals was vastly improved at 99.8%. The second technique in this research consisted of the application of the Sakaguchi Test [147], which involves α-naphthol, NaOH, and sodium hypobromite in order to form a red-colored complex. As in the previous experiments, both mimicked and authentic samples were tested, resulting in both AUCs being 100%.
In order to apply these types of biosensor techniques to other bodily fluids that are forensically relevant, blood is another focus of research. The main topic that research on blood is centered around is the estimation of the time since deposition, TSD, of a blood spot. The first paper focuses on this by measuring the levels of two biomarkers in blood, citrate kinase (CK) and alanine transaminase (ALT), which denature with the passage of time of up to 5 days [138]. The CK assay involves creatine and adenosine triphosphate as substrates for the first enzyme, CK, in a three-enzyme cascade utilizing pyruvate kinase (PK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as the other two enzymes. LDH, the third enzyme in the cascade, is the enzyme involved with production of the recognition element β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide from β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced, which produces a reduction in signal at 340 nm. ALT is a two-enzyme assay that also utilizes LDH to allow for simultaneous determination. ALT recognizes the substrates alanine and α-ketoglutaric acid. By using a two-analyte system, this provides a more reliable system of determination as it has parallel markers being analyzed compared to a single marker. Building upon this, the technique outlined in the second paper uses one assay to determine not only the TSD, but also an estimation of the age of the source individual [139]. By looking at alkaline phosphatase (ALP), this research achieves both goals. This is due to the fact that ALP is a commonly used biomarker in clinical diagnostics for bone growth that relates directly to the age of the individual. To measure this, ALP converts the substrate p-nitrophenol phosphate into p-nitrophenol, which also acts as the recognition element as p-nitrophenol is observable at 405 nm. As ALP is a biomarker for bone growth, and that it degenerates over time when out of the body, one can obtain data about the relative age of the blood donor and the TSD up to 2 days. For the analysis of this methodology, 100 samples were prepared via the R-project software mentioned previously, split evenly between young and old, males and females. The samples provided an AUC for the ROC curve of 99% for males and 100% for the female group in differentiating between old and young.
The third forensic medium that is being researched currently is sweat. As previously mentioned, sweat has many forensic applications but is difficult to identify at a crime scene. To this end, a novel methodology in order to identify sweat by use of a biosensor strip based on the detection of lactate was developed [140]. This method utilized an enzymatic assay in order to detect lactate, a major component in sweat. The assay used involved a two-enzyme cascade of lactate oxidase (LOx) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP). LOx involves the substrates lactate and oxygen, which are used to produce hydrogen peroxide. This hydrogen peroxide is then used by HRP as mentioned previously with a redox dye to produce a signal. This methodology was able to detect sweat with minimal decay for up to two weeks and at low amounts of sweat: Around 50 nL. This technique was even applied onto a paper strip modified with polystyrene for use as a field-deployable device. This optical strip provides a binary YES/NO for the presence of sweat via a color change, which is ideal for preliminary detection of sweat that can itself be analyzed further. Additionally, sweat was further examined in a noninvasive testing methodology for ethanol sensing on the surface of one’s skin [141]. This conceptualizes an alternative method to breathalyzers by relying on an enzymatic assay involving alcohol oxidase (AOx) and HRP that is quantified not only by UV-Vis spectrophotometry but also an optical camera. AOx uses ethanol and oxygen as substrates to produce hydrogen peroxide, which is used by HRP as mentioned previously. This research shows that there is a correlation between both techniques and the currently used breathalyzer. The data were achieved from a 26-volunteer drinking study with people of different ages, biological sexes, and food habits. The sweat samples were obtained through pilocarpine electrophoresis similar to the Gibson and Cooke method [148], which allowed the sweat to be collected in gauze pads and analyzed. A minimum of 3 µL of sweat was required for this method.
These advances with biosensors in the field of forensics have produced a viable way for investigators to receive some information to pursue leads if DNA evidence is backlogged or not applicable using sweat and blood evidence found at the crime scene. Multiple enzymatic assays were developed for the differentiation of biological sex of an individual from fingerprint content, enabling an alternative or additional analysis for fingerprints depending on the clarity of the print for pictorial analysis. Blood was examined, and provides a viable methodology in order to show the time since deposition, TSD, and also an estimated age of the originator of the blood spot. Additionally, a field-deployable testing strip was developed for the determination of sweat, supplying clarity for a difficult-to-detect bodily fluid at crime scenes. Sweat was also tested in a laboratory setting for an alternative to breathalyzers for the detection and quantification of alcohol in sweat utilizing enzymatic assays and a colorimetric response. In the future, different drugs and illicit substances, such as THC, in addition to a more broad analysis of metabolites characteristic to certain habits or biological features can be examined for their use in forensics for providing a more deterministic and rapid analysis for forensic and law enforcement personnel in a sweeping suite of biosensor devices.
  • Biometrics
Currently, biometrics is another avenue of interest for biosensors [149]. This paper from Hair et al. uses the levels of three metabolites found in sweat in order to differentiate people. This analysis is performed using three enzymatic assays that each target the metabolites: Lactate, urea, and glutamate. The assay for lactate is the same one that was outlined in the sweat paper involving the paper strips. The assay for urea involves the enzymes urease and glutamate dehydrogenase. The final assay that is used for glutamate involves only glutamate dehydrogenase. These assays could be measured spectrophotometrically using either a redox dye in LOx/HRP or with conversions involving NADH and NAD+ in the other two. First, 50 mimicked sweat samples were run and compared, which showed that this method was viable as there was no overlap between the samples. Additionally, 25 authentic samples were analyzed, where the sweat was collected according to the same procedure as the Gibson and Cooke method mentioned above [148]. A multivariate analysis of variance statistic test (MANOVA), was performed for both the authentic and mimicked sample sets to determine if the combination of the three analytes were truly unique. Both sets produced p-values of <0.001 each. In addition, six ANOVA tests were performed between each analyte for the mimicked and authentic samples. All six of these tests also produced p-values of <0.001. These statistical values show that there is not only a significant statistical difference between individuals in the combination of the three analytes, but also a significant difference between each individual for a single analyte. The analysis shows that these three metabolites can be used in order to produce an individual’s “sweat profile,” enabling differentiation between individuals. The implications for this research are multidisciplinary as there are many forensic, cybersecurity, and point-of-care diagnostic applications that would benefit from this method.
This use of sweat content for biometric purposes is progressing but further research needs to be done for biometrics to be a reliable form of authentication using biosensor methodologies. The main future aspect that would need to be studied is a long-term study relating to the monitoring of the levels of the chosen metabolites in people and how the levels fluctuate over time relating to different factors such as stress, diet, and other day-to-day habits. For higher security when used for authentication, especially for higher-security systems and cybersecurity, additional metabolites would need to also be concurrently measured as well. This monitoring process would not only assist in the future of biometrics but also in existing disciplines such as clinical diagnostics.
  • Cybersecurity
Lastly, the use of biosensors for cybersecurity is a growing trend. The use of sensors for authentication of an individual and a novel methodology related to cryptography were recently developed [150,151]. The first paper represents a review with the aim of introducing a multi-assay wearable biosensor that would provide continuous tracking of a person’s sweat metabolites for authentication purposes. This review looks at many of the assays previously mentioned: ALT/LDH, ALT/POx/HRP, and GlDH, and some that were not mentioned: Alanine and glutamate assay with ALT, glutamate oxidase, and HRP; aspartate using the aspartate transaminase enzyme; and a combined version with all three of these new analytes in a single assay. By monitoring these assays, one can produce output data that would be beneficial in the authentication of a person with many cybersecurity applications. The second paper illustrates the use of three enzyme assays in order to encrypt a short message using a basic cipher [151]. The three enzymatic assays used involved HRP, lysozyme, and ALP. HRP and ALP were used as previously mentioned. Lysozyme breaks down cell walls from cells added during the assay to produce a reduction in signal at 450 nm, acting as the recognition element. The data resulting from the colorimetric assays are used in the encryption of a message. Provided that the receiver of the message performs the same experiment under the same conditions, the message will be properly decrypted. The data from these enzymatic assays act as “keys” that one use in order to lock and unlock data in relation to encryption.
This brief combination of cryptology and biosensors can have a large impact on the future of user authentication, cryptography, and unconventional computing as a whole. The processes outlined here can be combined with biometrics for user authentication, which is considered just as, or more, important compared to data security through encryption. In cryptography, the further research of other biosensor systems combined with stronger and more robust encryption methods can lead to the advancement of these systems to be used instead of random number generators, which have been controversial for use in cryptography since their inception [152]. Going even further, biosensors can be further researched for direct encryption of data to provide an alternative to the widely researched encryption via DNA [94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,122,123,124,125,126,153,154,155,156,157].

3. Conclusions

Current research in biosensors has led to advancement in the use of biosensors on three fronts: Forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. In the field of forensics, the use of fingerprint material has been demonstrated to be capable of being used to determine the biological sex of a person through multiple methods. These methods relied on the detection of certain amino acids, some methods consisted of a broad detection of 23 amino acids, and some methods were much more selective and targeted down to a single amino acid. Additionally, the use of another medium, blood, allows one to deterministically estimate the amount of time that the blood has been outside the body for up to 2 days by analyzing the degradation of enzymes present in blood. Additionally, it was found that a single assay was able to not only estimate this time since deposition, but to also estimate the age of the originator. Sweat has been the third major medium in forensic endeavors, building upon the fingerprint analysis as fingerprints contain sweat. A novel methodology for a lactate-detecting on-site testing strip was developed in order to identify the presence of sweat due to the high concentration of lactate in sweat. This method was highly sensitive and required extremely small volumes of sweat to produce a tangible response. Sweat has also been examined for other purposes, showing that one can detect the presence of ethanol in sweat, providing another method of determining intoxication levels besides a breathalyzer or invasive blood techniques, in addition to detecting other drugs of abuse. Sweat was further analyzed for biometric purposes by comparing the levels of three metabolites found in sweat to differentiate individuals. Lastly, methods involving biosensors for both the authentication of individuals and for cryptography were developed, benefitting two major establishments of cybersecurity.
In the future, biosensors can further fulfill the expansion of these three fields with additional research. In the field of forensics, a wider array of metabolites may be examined for use in a device that would analyze a certain body fluid and provide more information relating to the habits and identifying information of the originator in addition to the biological sex and age mentioned previously. Additionally, more research can be performed in order to provide for a broad testing kit with higher accuracy and precision for various compounds, illicit and legal, for use in roadside testing to aid law enforcement officers. Biometrics and biosensors are closely related, as shown by the research seen here. Further analysis utilizing monitoring and other metabolite tracking will reinforce not only the strengths in the use of this methodology but also possibly reduce or remove the current unknowns and limitations for this method. Lastly, the use of different bioaffinity-based assay systems for cryptography for the use of different cipher systems will provide a reliable alternative to the random number generator systems used in cryptography today. This work in cybersecurity can also be combined with biometrics for user authentication for digital and evolving systems. Biosensors have been an important facet in the fields of clinical diagnostics, environmental processes, and military devices, and is a strong emerging technique in the fields of forensic science, biometrics, and cybersecurity. In these three fields, biosensors have produced considerable results thus far and have an auspicious future for further research.

Funding

This research was funded by NIJ grant number 2016-DN-BX-0188.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. D’Orazio, P. Biosensors in clinical chemistry—2011 update. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 1749–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Burcu Bahadir, E.; Kemal Sezgintürk, M. Applications of electrochemical immunosensors for early clinical diagnostics. Talanta 2015, 132, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bianchi, V.; Guerra, C.; De munari, I.; Ciampolini, P. Wearable sensors for behavioral assessment. Gerontechnology 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guilbault, G.G.; Palleschi, G.; Lubrano, G. Non-invasive biosensors in clinical analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995, 10, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guilbault, G.G.; Pravda, M.; Kreuzer, M.; O’Sullivan, C.K. Biosensors—42 Years and counting. Anal. Lett. 2004, 37, 1481–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferapontova, E.E. DNA Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Sensors for Nucleic Acids. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 11, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanghavi, B.J.; Wolfbeis, O.S.; Hirsch, T.; Swami, N.S. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensing of neurological drugs and neurotransmitters. Microchim. Acta 2015, 182, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shen, Y.; Tran, T.T.; Modha, S.; Tsutsui, H.; Mulchandani, A. A paper-based chemiresistive biosensor employing single-walled carbon nanotubes for low-cost, point-of-care detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 130, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. García-Arellano, H.; Fink, D.; Muñoz Hernández, G.; Vacík, J.; Hnatowicz, V.; Alfonta, L. Nuclear track-based biosensors with the enzyme laccase. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 310, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tzouvadaki, I.; De Micheli, G.; Carrara, S. Memristive Biosensors for Ultrasensitive Diagnostics and Therapeutics. In Springer Series in Advanced Microelectronics; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Volkov, A.G.; Volkova-Gugeshashvili, M.I.; Osei, A.J. Plants as environmental biosensors: Non-invasive monitoring techniques. In Proceedings of the Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World—Selected Papers from ERTEP 2007, Ghana, Africa, 17–19 July 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Somerset, V. Environmental Biosensors; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; ISBN 978-953-307-486-3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Dorst, B.; Mehta, J.; Bekaert, K.; Rouah-Martin, E.; De Coen, W.; Dubruel, P.; Blust, R.; Robbens, J. Recent advances in recognition elements of food and environmental biosensors: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 1178–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Highly Sensitive Membraneless Fructose Biosensor Based on Fructose Dehydrogenase Immobilized onto Aryl Thiol Modified Highly Porous Gold Electrode: Characterization and Application in Food Samples. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 12131–12136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bahadir, E.B.; Sezgintürk, M.K. Applications of commercial biosensors in clinical, food, environmental, and biothreat/biowarfare analyses. Anal. Biochem. 2015, 478, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alocilja, E.C.; Radke, S.M. Market analysis of biosensors for food safety. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thakur, M.S.; Ragavan, K.V. Biosensors in food processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Siepenkoetter, T.; Salaj-Kosla, U.; Magner, E. The Immobilization of Fructose Dehydrogenase on Nanoporous Gold Electrodes for the Detection of Fructose. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, H.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Y.; Gao, W.; Dou, S.C. Systematic analysis of a military wearable device based on a multi-level fusion framework: Research directions. Sensors (Switzerland) 2019, 19, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Pohanka, M.; Jun, D.; Kuca, K. Amperometric biosensors for real time assays of organophosphates. Sensors 2008, 8, 5303–5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Andrew, A.M. Unconventional computing. Kybernetes 2012, 41, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yamashita, B.; French, M.; Bleay, S.; Cantu, A.; Inlow, V.; Ramotowski, R.; Sears, V.; Wakefield, M. Latent Print Development-Chapter 7 Fingerprint Sourcebook. In The Fingerprint Sourcebook; U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Francese, S.; Bradshaw, R.; Ferguson, L.S.; Wolstenholme, R.; Clench, M.R.; Bleay, S. Beyond the ridge pattern: Multi-informative analysis of latent fingermarks by MALDI mass spectrometry. Analyst 2013, 138, 4215–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thody, A.J.; Shuster, S. Control and function of sebaceous glands. Physiol. Rev. 1989, 59, 383–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beskaravainy, P.M.; Molchanov, M.V.; Suslikov, A.V.; Paskevich, S.I.; Kutyshenko, V.P.; Vorob’ev, S.I. NMR study of human biological fluids for detection of pathologies. Biomeditsinskaya Khim. 2015, 61, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hier, S.W.; Cornbleet, T.; Bergeim, O. The amino acids of human sweat. J. Biol. Chem. 1946, 166, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Coltman, C.A.; Rowe, N.J.; Atwell, R.J. The amino acid content of sweat in normal adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1966, 18, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Croxton, R.S.; Baron, M.G.; Butler, D.; Kent, T.; Sears, V.G. Variation in amino acid and lipid composition of latent fingerprints. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010, 199, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. NIJ DNA Backlog. Available online: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259066 (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  30. Hartzell-Baguley, B.; Hipp, R.E.; Morgan, N.R.; Morgan, S.L. Chemical composition of latent fingerprints by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. An experiment for an instrumental analysis course. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Archer, N.E.; Charles, Y.; Elliott, J.A.; Jickells, S. Changes in the lipid composition of latent fingerprint residue with time after deposition on a surface. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 154, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jacob, S.; Jickells, S.; Wolff, K.; Smith, N. Drug Testing by Chemical Analysis of Fingerprint Deposits from Methadone- Maintained Opioid Dependent Patients Using UPLC-MS/MS. Drug Metab. Lett. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goucher, E.; Kicman, A.; Smith, N.; Jickells, S. The detection and quantification of lorazepam and its 3-O-glucuronide in fingerprint deposits by LC-MS/MS. J. Sep. Sci. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Michalski, S.; Shaler, R.; Dorman, F.L. The Evaluation of Fatty Acid Ratios in Latent Fingermarks by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Antoine, K.M.; Mortazavi, S.; Miller, A.D.; Miller, L.M. Chemical differences are observed in children’s versus adults’ latent fingerprints as a function of time. J. Forensic Sci. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ricci, C.; Phiriyavityopas, P.; Curum, N.; Chan, K.L.A.; Jickells, S.; Kazarian, S.G. Chemical imaging of latent fingerprint residues. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mou, Y.; Rabalais, J.W. Detection and Identification of Explosive Particles in Fingerprints Using Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectromicroscopy. J. Forensic Sci. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morelato, M.; Beavis, A.; Kirkbride, P.; Roux, C. Forensic applications of desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (DESI-MS). Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 226, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ifa, D.R.; Jackson, A.U.; Paglia, G.; Cooks, R.G. Forensic applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 394, 1995–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hazarika, P.; Jickells, S.M.; Wolff, K.; Russell, D.A. Multiplexed detection of metabolites of narcotic drugs from a single latent fingermark. Anal. Chem. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. van Dam, A.; Aalders, M.C.G.; de Puit, M.; Gorré, S.M.; Irmak, D.; van Leeuwen, T.G.; Lambrechts, S.A.G. Immunolabeling and the compatibility with a variety of fingermark development techniques. Sci. Justice 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bradshaw, R.; Rao, W.; Wolstenholme, R.; Clench, M.R.; Bleay, S.; Francese, S. Separation of overlapping fingermarks by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wolstenholme, R.; Bradshaw, R.; Clench, M.R.; Francese, S. Study of latent fingermarks by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huynh, C.; Halámek, J. Trends in fingerprint analysis. TrAC—Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 82, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. An, J.H.; Shin, K.J.; Yang, W.I.; Lee, H.Y. Body fluid identification in forensics. BMB Rep. 2012, 45, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gill, P.; Jeffreys, A.J.; Werrett, D.J. Forensic application of DNA “fingerprints”. Nature 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Flight, C.; Jones, M.; Ballantyne, K.N. Determination of the maximum distance blood spatter travels from a vertical impact. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brettell, T.A.; Butler, J.M.; Saferstein, R. Forensic science. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 3839–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Erbisti, P.C.F.; Gardner, R.M. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis with an Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elkins, K. Forensic DNA Biology, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; ISBN 9780123945853. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bocklandt, S.; Lin, W.; Sehl, M.E.; Sánchez, F.J.; Sinsheimer, J.S.; Horvath, S.; Vilain, E. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e41821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kramer, F.; Halámková, L.; Poghossian, A.; Schöning, M.J.; Katz, E.; Halámek, J. Biocatalytic analysis of biomarkers for forensic identification of ethnicity between Caucasian and African American groups. Analyst 2013, 138, 6251–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bakshi, S.; Halámková, L.; Halámek, J.; Katz, E. Biocatalytic analysis of biomarkers for forensic identification of gender. Analyst 2014, 139, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Meissner, C.; Ritz-Timme, S. Molecular pathology and age estimation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010, 203, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pizzamiglio, M.; Mameli, A.; Maugeri, G.; Garofano, L. Identifying the culprit from LCN DNA obtained from saliva and sweat traces linked to two different robberies and use of a database. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pizzamiglio, M.; Marino, A.; Portera, G.; My, D.; Bellino, C.; Garofano, L. Robotic DNA extraction system as a new way to process sweat traces rapidly and efficiently. Int. Congr. Ser. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sikirzhytski, V.; Sikirzhytskaya, A.; Lednev, I.K. Multidimensional Raman spectroscopic signature of sweat and its potential application to forensic body fluid identification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stouder, S.; Reubush, K.; Hobson, D.; Smith, J. Trace Evidence Scrapings: A Valuable Source of DNA? Forensic Sci. Commun. 2001, 4, 4. [Google Scholar]
  59. Verde, T.; Shephard, R.J.; Corey, P.; Moore, R. Sweat composition in exercise and in heat. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Patterson, M.J.; Galloway, S.D.R.; Nimmo, M.A. Variations in regional sweat composition in normal human males. Exp. Physiol. 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Costa, F.; Calloway, D.H.; Margen, S. Regional and total body sweat composition of men fed controlled diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Pinson, E.A. Evaporation from human skin with sweat glands inactivated. Am. J. Physiol. Content 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. ÅStrand, I. Lactate Content in Sweat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Buono, M.J.; Lee, N.V.L.; Miller, P.W. The relationship between exercise intensity and the sweat lactate excretion rate. J. Physiol. Sci. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kondoh, Y.; Kawase, M.; Ohmori, S. D-Lactate concentrations in blood, urine and sweat before and after exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Derbyshire, P.J.; Barr, H.; Davis, F.; Higson, S.P.J. Lactate in human sweat: A critical review of research to the present day. J. Physiol. Sci. 2012, 62, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meyer, F.; Laitano, O.; Bar-Or, O.; McDougall, D.; Heingenhauser, G.J.F. Effect of age and gender on sweat lactate and ammonia concentrations during exercise in the heat. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ghamouss, F.; Ledru, S.; Ruillé, N.; Lantier, F.; Boujtita, M. Bulk-modified modified screen-printing carbon electrodes with both lactate oxidase (LOD) and horseradish peroxide (HRP) for the determination of l-lactate in flow injection analysis mode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ballesta Claver, J.; Valencia Mirón, M.C.; Capitán-Vallvey, L.F. Disposable electrochemiluminescent biosensor for lactate determination in saliva. Analyst 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jia, W.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Valdés-Ramírez, G.; Windmiller, J.R.; Yang, Z.; Ramírez, J.; Chan, G.; Wang, J. Electrochemical tattoo biosensors for real-time noninvasive lactate monitoring in human perspiration. Anal. Chem. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bandodkar, A.J.; Molinnus, D.; Mirza, O.; Guinovart, T.; Windmiller, J.R.; Valdés-Ramírez, G.; Andrade, F.J.; Schöning, M.J.; Wang, J. Epidermal tattoo potentiometric sodium sensors with wireless signal transduction for continuous non-invasive sweat monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Buono, M.J. Sweat ethanol concentrations are highly correlated with co-existing blood values in humans. Exp. Physiol. 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nyman, E.; Palmlöv, A. The Elimination of Ethyl Alcohol in Sweat. Skand. Arch. Physiol. 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, J.; Jeerapan, I.; Imani, S.; Cho, T.N.; Bandodkar, A.; Cinti, S.; Mercier, P.P.; Wang, J. Noninvasive Alcohol Monitoring Using a Wearable Tattoo-Based Iontophoretic-Biosensing System. ACS Sens. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Swift, R. Transdermal alcohol measurement for estimation of blood alcohol concentration. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 422–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mishra, R.K.; Sempionatto, J.R.; Li, Z.; Brown, C.; Galdino, N.M.; Shah, R.; Liu, S.; Hubble, L.J.; Bagot, K.; Tapert, S.; et al. Simultaneous detection of salivary Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and alcohol using a Wearable Electrochemical Ring Sensor. Talanta 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Teymourian, H.; Parrilla, M.; Sempionatto, J.R.; Montiel, N.F.; Barfidokht, A.; Van Echelpoel, R.; De Wael, K.; Wang, J. Wearable Electrochemical Sensors for the Monitoring and Screening of Drugs. ACS Sens. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jeerapan, I.; Sempionatto, J.R.; Wang, J. On-Body Bioelectronics: Wearable Biofuel Cells for Bioenergy Harvesting and Self-Powered Biosensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sempionatto, J.R.; Jeerapan, I.; Krishnan, S.; Wang, J. Wearable Chemical Sensors: Emerging Systems for On-Body Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2019, 92, 378–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mickelsen, O.; Keys, A. The composition of sweat, with special reference to vitamins. J. Biol. Chem. 1943, 149, 479–490. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lemonick, S. You Could Unlock Your Phone with Sweat. Forbes 2017. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/samlemonick/2017/11/15/you-could-unlock-your-phone-with-sweat/#7225db7849ae (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  82. French, L. Virtual Case Notes: Sweat, Skin Secretions Could Contain Chemical ‘Password’ for Future Mobile Authentication. Forensic Magazine, 16 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  83. Murphy, M. Sweat Could Soon Unlock Your Phone. Available online: https://nypost.com/2017/11/14/sweat-could-soon-unlock-your-phone/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  84. Nagamine, K.; Nomura, A.; Ichimura, Y.; Izawa, R.; Sasaki, S.; Furusawa, H.; Matsui, H.; Tokito, S. Printed organic transistor-based biosensors for non-invasive sweat analysis. Anal. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bandodkar, A.J.; Jeang, W.J.; Ghaffari, R.; Rogers, J.A. Wearable Sensors for Biochemical Sweat Analysis. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 12, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gao, W.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Shahpar, Z.; Tai, L.C.; Wu, E.; Bariya, M.; Ota, H.; Fahad, H.M.; Chen, K.; Javey, A. Wearable sweat biosensors. In Proceedings of the Technical Digest—International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  87. Bandodkar, A.J.; Wang, J. Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: A review. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Heikenfeld, J. Non-invasive Analyte Access and Sensing through Eccrine Sweat: Challenges and Outlook circa 2016. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 1242–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bandodkar, A.J.; Hung, V.W.S.; Jia, W.; Valdés-Ramírez, G.; Windmiller, J.R.; Martinez, A.G.; Ramírez, J.; Chan, G.; Kerman, K.; Wang, J. Tattoo-based potentiometric ion-selective sensors for epidermal pH monitoring. Analyst 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Guinovart, T.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Windmiller, J.R.; Andrade, F.J.; Wang, J. A potentiometric tattoo sensor for monitoring ammonium in sweat. Analyst 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. He, X.; Xu, T.; Gu, Z.; Gao, W.; Xu, L.P.; Pan, T.; Zhang, X. Flexible and Superwettable Bands as a Platform toward Sweat Sampling and Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Hauke, A.; Oertel, S.; Knoke, L.; Fein, V.; Maier, C.; Brinkmann, F.; Jank, M.P.M. Screen-Printed Sensor for Low-Cost Chloride Analysis in Sweat for Rapid Diagnosis and Monitoring of Cystic Fibrosis. Biosensors 2020, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. He, X.; Yang, S.; Pei, Q.; Song, Y.; Liu, C.; Xu, T.; Zhang, X. Integrated Smart Janus Textile Bands for Self-Pumping Sweat Sampling and Analysis. ACS Sens. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Oh, S.Y.; Hong, S.Y.; Jeong, Y.R.; Yun, J.; Park, H.; Jin, S.W.; Lee, G.; Oh, J.H.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.S.; et al. Skin-Attachable, Stretchable Electrochemical Sweat Sensor for Glucose and pH Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lee, H.; Choi, T.K.; Lee, Y.B.; Cho, H.R.; Ghaffari, R.; Wang, L.; Choi, H.J.; Chung, T.D.; Lu, N.; Hyeon, T.; et al. A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Koh, A.; Kang, D.; Xue, Y.; Lee, S.; Pielak, R.M.; Kim, J.; Hwang, T.; Min, S.; Banks, A.; Bastien, P.; et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Khodagholy, D.; Curto, V.F.; Fraser, K.J.; Gurfinkel, M.; Byrne, R.; Diamond, D.; Malliaras, G.G.; Benito-Lopez, F.; Owens, R.M. Organic electrochemical transistor incorporating an ionogel as a solid state electrolyte for lactate sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Emaminejad, S.; Gao, W.; Wu, E.; Davies, Z.A.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Challa, S.; Ryan, S.P.; Fahad, H.M.; Chen, K.; Shahpar, Z.; et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Mark, H.; Harding, C.R. Amino acid composition, including key derivatives of eccrine sweat: Potential biomarkers of certain atopic skin conditions. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Imani, S.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Mohan, A.M.V.; Kumar, R.; Yu, S.; Wang, J.; Mercier, P.P. A wearable chemical-electrophysiological hybrid biosensing system for real-time health and fitness monitoring. Nat. Commun. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Y.; Guo, H.; Kim, S.B.; Wu, Y.; Ostojich, D.; Park, S.H.; Wang, X.; Weng, Z.; Li, R.; Bandodkar, A.J.; et al. Passive sweat collection and colorimetric analysis of biomarkers relevant to kidney disorders using a soft microfluidic system. Lab Chip 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H.M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Schazmann, B.; Morris, D.; Slater, C.; Beirne, S.; Fay, C.; Reuveny, R.; Moyna, N.; Diamond, D. A wearable electrochemical sensor for the real-time measurement of sweat sodium concentration. Anal. Methods 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Glennon, T.; O’Quigley, C.; McCaul, M.; Matzeu, G.; Beirne, S.; Wallace, G.G.; Stroiescu, F.; O’Mahoney, N.; White, P.; Diamond, D. ‘SWEATCH’: A Wearable Platform for Harvesting and Analysing Sweat Sodium Content. Electroanalysis 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tai, L.C.; Gao, W.; Chao, M.; Bariya, M.; Ngo, Q.P.; Shahpar, Z.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Park, H.; Sun, J.; Jung, Y.; et al. Methylxanthine Drug Monitoring with Wearable Sweat Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tanenbaum, A.S.; Wetherall, D.J. Computer Networks. World Wide Web Internet Web Inf. Syst. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Schneier, B. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kaufman, C.; Perlman, R.; Spencer, M. Network Security Private Communication in a Public World; Prentice Hall: Westford, MA, USA, 2002; ISBN 0-13-046019-2. [Google Scholar]
  109. Kishimura, A.; Yamashita, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Aida, T. Rewritable phosphorescent paper by the control of competing kinetic and thermodynamic self-assembling events. Nat. Mater. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mutai, T.; Satou, H.; Araki, K. Reproducible on-off switching of solid-state luminescence by controlling molecular packing through heat-mode interconversion. Nat. Mater. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Perruchas, S.; Goff, X.F.L.; Maron, S.; Maurin, I.; Guillen, F.; Garcia, A.; Gacoin, T.; Boilot, J.P. Mechanochromic and thermochromic luminescence of a copper iodide cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yoon, S.J.; Chung, J.W.; Gierschner, J.; Kim, K.S.; Choi, M.G.; Kim, D.; Park, S.Y. Multistimuli two-color luminescence switching via different slip-stacking of highly fluorescent molecular sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yan, D.; Lu, J.; Ma, J.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Reversibly thermochromic, fluorescent ultrathin films with a supramolecular architecture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, K.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Hu, R.; Tong, A.; Tang, B.Z. Reversible photochromic system based on rhodamine B salicylaldehyde hydrazone metal complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sun, H.; Liu, S.; Lin, W.; Zhang, K.Y.; Lv, W.; Huang, X.; Huo, F.; Yang, H.; Jenkins, G.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Smart responsive phosphorescent materials for data recording and security protection. Nat. Commun. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Wu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, H.; Zhu, W.; Li, A.D.Q. Quantitative photoswitching in bis(dithiazole)ethene enables modulation of light for encoding optical signals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2090–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sarkar, T.; Selvakumar, K.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. Message in a molecule. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Ratner, T.; Reany, O.; Keinan, E. Encoding and processing of alphanumeric information by chemical mixtures. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 3303–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Palacios, M.A.; Benito-Pena, E.; Manesse, M.; Mazzeo, A.D.; LaFratta, C.N.; Whitesides, G.M.; Walt, D.R. InfoBiology by printed arrays of microorganism colonies for timed and on-demand release of messages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kim, K.W.; Bocharova, V.; Halámek, J.; Oh, M.K.; Katz, E. Steganography and encrypting based on immunochemical systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shoshani, S.; Piran, R.; Arava, Y.; Keinan, E. A molecular cryptosystem for images by DNA computing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2883–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Poje, J.E.; Kastratovic, T.; Macdonald, A.R.; Guillermo, A.C.; Troetti, S.E.; Jabado, O.J.; Fanning, M.L.; Stefanovic, D.; Macdonald, J. Visual displays that directly interface and provide read-outs of molecular states via molecular graphics processing units. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ling, J.; Naren, G.; Kelly, J.; Moody, T.S.; De Silva, A.P. Building pH Sensors into Paper-Based Small-Molecular Logic Systems for Very Simple Detection of Edges of Objects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3763–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Ling, J.; Naren, G.; Kelly, J.; Fox, D.B.; Prasanna De Silva, A. Small molecular logic systems can draw the outlines of objects via edge visualization. Chem. Sci. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Sun, M. DNA based random key generation and management for OTP encryption. BioSystems 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Clelland, C.T.; Risca, V.; Bancroft, C. Hiding Data in DNA Microdots. Nature 1999, 399, 533–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lustgarten, O.; Carmieli, R.; Motiei, L.; Margulies, D. A Molecular Secret Sharing Scheme. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Srilatha, N.; Murali, G. Fast three level DNA Cryptographic technique to provide better security. In Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology, iCATccT 2016, Bangalore, India, 21–23 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  129. Malathi, P.; Manoaj, M.; Manoj, R.; Raghavan, V.; Vinodhini, R.E. Highly Improved DNA Based Steganography. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 115, 651–659. [Google Scholar]
  130. Cherian, A.; Raj, S.R.; Abraham, A. A Survey on different DNA Cryptographic Methods. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 2013, 2, 167–169. [Google Scholar]
  131. Roy, P.; Dey, D.; De, D.; Sinha, S. DNA cryptography. In Cyber Security and Threats: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781522556350. [Google Scholar]
  132. Halvorsen, K.; Wong, W.P. Binary DNA Nanostructures for Data Encryption. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Marwan, S.; Shawish, A.; Nagaty, K. DNA-based cryptographic methods for data hiding in DNA media. BioSystems 2016, 150, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Huynh, C.; Brunelle, E.; Halámková, L.; Agudelo, J.; Halámek, J. Forensic Identification of Gender from Fingerprints. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11531–11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Brunelle, E.; Huynh, C.; Le, A.M.; Halámková, L.; Agudelo, J.; Halámek, J. New Horizons for Ninhydrin: Colorimetric Determination of Gender from Fingerprints. Anal. Chem. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Brunelle, E.; Le, A.M.; Huynh, C.; Wingfield, K.; Halámková, L.; Agudelo, J.; Halámek, J. Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 Dye: An Application for Forensic Fingerprint Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Brunelle, E.; Huynh, C.; Alin, E.; Eldridge, M.; Le, A.M.; Halámková, L.; Halámek, J. Fingerprint Analysis: Moving Toward Multiattribute Determination via Individual Markers. Anal. Chem. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Agudelo, J.; Huynh, C.; Halámek, J. Forensic determination of blood sample age using a bioaffinity-based assay. Analyst 2015, 140, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Agudelo, J.; Halámková, L.; Brunelle, E.; Rodrigues, R.; Huynh, C.; Halámek, J. Ages at a Crime Scene: Simultaneous Estimation of the Time since Deposition and Age of Its Originator. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 6479–6484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Huynh, C.; Brunelle, E.; Agudelo, J.; Halámek, J. Bioaffinity-based assay for the sensitive detection and discrimination of sweat aimed at forensic applications. Talanta 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hair, M.E.; Gerkman, R.; Mathis, A.I.; Halámková, L.; Halámek, J. Noninvasive Concept for Optical Ethanol Sensing on the Skin Surface with Camera-Based Quantification. Anal. Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Brunelle, E.; Halámek, J. Biocomputing approach in forensic analysis. Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distrib. Syst. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Moore, S.; Stein, W.H. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1948, 178, 367–388. [Google Scholar]
  144. Meyer, H. The ninhydrin reaction and its analytical applications. Biochem. J. 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Walker, J.M. Protein Protocols Handbook; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  146. Halámek, J.; Bocharova, V.; Chinnapareddy, S.; Windmiller, J.R.; Strack, G.; Chuang, M.C.; Zhou, J.; Santhosh, P.; Ramirez, G.V.; Arugula, M.A.; et al. Multi-enzyme logic network architectures for assessing injuries: Digital processing of biomarkers. Mol. Biosyst. 2010, 6, 2554–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sakaguchi, S. A new method for the colorimetric determination of arginine. J. Biochem. 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Gibson, L.E.; Cooke, R.E. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics 1959, 23, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Hair, M.E.; Mathis, A.I.; Brunelle, E.K.; Halámková, L.; Halámek, J. Metabolite Biometrics for the Differentiation of Individuals. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 5322–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Agudelo, J.; Privman, V.; Halámek, J. Promises and Challenges in Continuous Tracking Utilizing Amino Acids in Skin Secretions for Active Multi-Factor Biometric Authentication for Cybersecurity. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 1714–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. McGoldrick, L.K.; Weiss, E.A.; Halámek, J. Symmetric-Key Encryption Based on Bioaffinity Interactions. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Park, S.K.; Miller, K.W. Random number generators: Good ones are hard to find. Commun. ACM 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Leier, A.; Richter, C.; Banzhaf, W.; Rauhe, H. Cryptography with DNA binary strands. BioSystems 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Cox, J.P.L. Long-term data storage in DNA. Trends Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Gahlaut, A.; Bharti, A.; Dogra, Y.; Singh, P. DNA based cryptography. In Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 750. [Google Scholar]
  156. Cui, G.; Wang, Y.; Han, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y. An encryption scheme based on DNA microdots technology. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, Q.; Guo, L.; Wei, X. Image encryption using DNA addition combining with chaotic maps. Math. Comput. Model. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Generic enzymatic assay example.
Figure 1. Generic enzymatic assay example.
Sensors 20 05974 g001
Table 1. Recent biosensor analysis techniques for sweat.
Table 1. Recent biosensor analysis techniques for sweat.
ProtocolDescriptionTechniqueAnalyteLOD/RangeRef.
TattooWearable skin tattoo for wireless signal transductionPotentiometrySodium0.1–100 mM[71]
TattooWearable skin tattoo for pH monitoringPotentiometrypHpH 3–7[89]
TattooWearable skin tattoo for lactate monitoringPotentiometryLactate1–20 mM[70]
TattooWearable skin tattoo for monitoringPotentiometryAmmonium10−4–0.1 M[90]
Superwettable bandsMultiplex method for on-body samplingColorimetricpHpH 4.5–7[91]
chloride0–100 mM
glucose0–15 mM
calcium0–15 mM
Screen-printed electrodeMonitoring of cystic fibrosis patientsPotentiometryChloride2.7 × 10−5 mol/L[92]
Janus textile bandsMultiplex method for on body samplingPotentiometryGlucose18–40 µM[93]
Lactate10 mM
Potassium0.3–6.3 mM
Sodium60 mM
Wearable sensorStretchable, skin-attachable sweat sensorPotentiometry,
Carbon nanotubes, gold nanosheets
Glucose10.89 µA mM−1 cm−2[94]
pH71.44 mV pH−1
Graphene electrochemicalDiabetes monitoringGold-doped grapheneGlucose10 µM–0.7 mM[95]
Microfluidic wearable sensorMultiplex analysis for sensing in sweatColorimetric Lactate0–100 mM[96]
Chloride0–mM
Creatine0–1000 µM
pHpH 5–8.5
Glucose0–25 mM
liquigelOrganic electrochemical transistorTransistorLactate0.3–1.3 mM[97]
Direct iontophoresisSweat extraction and electrochemical analysis using smartphonePotentiometryGlucose 0–100 µM[98]
Chloride 20–80 mM
Free amino acid analysisEccrine sweat amino acid compositionCation chromatography and amino acid analyzer, GC-MSAmino acids-[99]
Wearable SensorChemical electrocardiogram and simultaneous metabolite monitoringAmperometryLactate0–28 mM[100]
microfluidicSweat collection and analysis for kidney disordersColorimetricCreatine0–0.5 mM[101]
Urea0–250 mM
pHpH 5–7
Wearable sensorIntegrated multiplex array for sweat analysisAmperometrySodium20–120 mM[102]
Potassium2–16 mM
Glucose0–200 µM
lactate2–30 mM
Wearable sensorMonitoring for cystic fibrosis patients for sodium concentrationPotentiometry
Atomic Absorption
Sodium20–100 mM[103]
Watch sensorMonitoring of sodium levelsPotentiometry Sodium10−4 –10−1 M[104]
TattooWearable skin tattoo for alcohol monitoring in sweatAmperometryAlcohol0–36 mM[74]
Wearable sensorDrug monitoring via differential pulseVoltammetry Caffeine0–40 x µM[105]
Wearable sensorDetection of THC and AlcoholVoltammetry
Amperometry
THC0.5 µM[76]
Alcohol0.1–1 mM
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McGoldrick, L.K.; Halámek, J. Recent Advances in Noninvasive Biosensors for Forensics, Biometrics, and Cybersecurity. Sensors 2020, 20, 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20215974

AMA Style

McGoldrick LK, Halámek J. Recent Advances in Noninvasive Biosensors for Forensics, Biometrics, and Cybersecurity. Sensors. 2020; 20(21):5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20215974

Chicago/Turabian Style

McGoldrick, Leif K., and Jan Halámek. 2020. "Recent Advances in Noninvasive Biosensors for Forensics, Biometrics, and Cybersecurity" Sensors 20, no. 21: 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20215974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop