Next Article in Journal
Biological Effects of Glucosinolate Degradation Products from Horseradish: A Horse that Wins the Race
Next Article in Special Issue
TLC-Based Bioassay to Isolate Kairomones from Tea Tree Essential Oil That Attract Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann)
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Salicylic Acid on the Metabolism of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seasonal and Antioxidant Evaluation of Essential Oil from Eugenia uniflora L., Curzerene-Rich, Thermally Produced in Situ
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/biom10020342
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum published on 2 June 2020, see Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 847.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimum Inhibition of Amphotericin-B-Resistant Candida albicans Strain in Single- and Mixed-Species Biofilms by Candida and Non-Candida Terpenoids

by
Hidaya F. Z. Touil
1,
Kebir Boucherit
1,2,
Zahia Boucherit-Otmani
1,
Ghalia Kohder
3,4,
Mohamed Madkour
3,5 and
Sameh S. M. Soliman
3,4,6,*
1
Laboratory Antibiotics Antifungals: Physico-Chemical, Synthesis and Biological Activity (LapSab), Tlemcen University, Tlemcen B.P 119, Algeria
2
University Center Belhadj Bouchaïb, Aïn Temouchent BP 284, Algeria
3
Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah PO. Box 27272, UAE
4
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah PO. Box 27272, UAE
5
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Collage of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah PO. Box 27272, UAE
6
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Zagazig, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(2), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020342
Submission received: 28 January 2020 / Revised: 15 February 2020 / Accepted: 18 February 2020 / Published: 21 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perspectives of Essential Oils)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida albicans is one of the most common human fungal pathogens and represents the most important cause of opportunistic mycoses worldwide. Surgical devices including catheters are easily contaminated with C. albicans via its formation of drug-resistant biofilms. In this study, amphotericin-B-resistant C. albicans strains were isolated from surgical devices at an intensive care center. The objective of this study was to develop optimized effective inhibitory treatment of resistant C. albicans by terpenoids, known to be produced naturally as protective signals. Endogenously produced farnesol by C. albicans yeast and plant terpenoids, carvacrol, and cuminaldehyde were tested separately or in combination on amphotericin-B-resistant C. albicans in either single- or mixed-infections. The results showed that farnesol did not inhibit hyphae formation when associated with bacteria. Carvacrol and cuminaldehyde showed variable inhibitory effects on C. albicans yeast compared to hyphae formation. A combination of farnesol with carvacrol showed synergistic inhibitory activities not only on C. albicans yeast and hyphae, but also on biofilms formed from single- and mixed-species and at reduced doses. The combined terpenoids also showed biofilm-penetration capability. The aforementioned terpenoid combination will not only be useful in the treatment of different resistant Candida forms, but also in the safe prevention of biofilm formation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Candida albicans is the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection [1,2]. C. albicans infections are common among hospital patients and elderly people, and are difficult to control [3]. About 50% of adult people have C. albicans yeasts in their mouths, and it is responsible for superficial, easily treated infections. However, C. albicans infections can spread throughout the body and become life-threatening, particularly with immune-compromised patients [4]. Candidiasis represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in a broad range of immune-compromised patients [5]. C. albicans infections are very difficult to treat due to their resistance to antifungal drugs, expression of virulence factors, and ability to form biofilms. C. albicans can switch between two forms, the yeast and hyphae forms. The switch from yeast to hyphae is a recognized virulence factor of C. albicans [6], since it is mainly associated with drug-resistant biofilm formation. Most candidiases are associated with the formation of biofilms at a wide range of implanted medical devices [7].
Biofilm-related infections caused by C. albicans represent a major threat to public health, as these infections are inherently resistant to most antifungal treatments and thus constitute a reservoir for continued infection [8]. Biofilms are usually found on medical devices such as prostheses, cardioverter defibrillators, urinary and vascular catheters, and cardiac devices [9].
C. albicans biofilm exists as complex, diverse, and heterogeneous structures [10] that may be complicated by bacterial infections. These poly-microbial structures (C. albicans/bacteria) can ultimately influence disease severity by promoting intensified pathogenic phenotypes [11], including an increased in resistance to both host defenses and antimicrobial therapies. There are increasingly few antimicrobials available to treat such life-threatening infections [12]. Thus, screening for new antimicrobials is necessary.
Medicinal plants, in particular our daily used plants and condiments, are known sources of antimicrobial terpenoids. Terpenoids are signaling metabolites produced naturally for the purpose of protection. Several terpenoids have been proven to have significant antimicrobial properties [13,14]. Several terpenoids have been shown to exhibit antimicrobial activities by inhibiting morphogenesis, adhesion, and biofilm formation of C. albicans [15], biofilm formation and elastase production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [16], and production of native quorum-sensing compounds [17]. Studies of different terpenoids have revealed that several terpenoid candidates show significant antifungal activity [15], including inhibition of the yeast-to-hyphal transition and biofilm formation in C. albicans. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal inhibition strategy for amphotericin-B-resistant C. albicans strains using natural volatile terpenoids. In this study, we tested the anti-Candida inhibitory effects of three terpenoidal compounds including farnesol, carvacrol, and cuminaldehyde (Figure 1). Farnesol is produced endogenously by C. albicans yeast and exogenously in plant foods such as corn cobs. Carvacrol and cuminaldehyde are produced in plant foods and condiments such as oregano and cumin, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria and Candida Strains

Fifteen clinical C. albicans and 15 clinical bacterial isolates, as listed in Table 1, isolated from medical devices at intensive care department of Tlemcen University Hospital and identified according to Touil et al. (2018), were employed [18]. C. albicans strain ATCC10231 was employed as a reference strain.

2.2. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The antimicrobial susceptibility of C. albicans and bacterial isolates to terpenoidal compounds was determined using the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for yeast [19] and bacteria [20]. Terpenoidal compounds including farnesol, carvacrol, and cuminaldehyde (Figure 1) and antimicrobial agents including amphotericin B, colistin, and vancomycin were purchased from Sigma Company.
C. albicans biofilm was developed according to well-established protocols [21]. Briefly, 200 µL RPMI-1640 containing 5 × 105 cells/mL was incubated in polystyrene, round-bottomed, 96 well microtiter plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) (Costar®). Terpenoids were applied in the concentrations 1, 2, 3, and 4 mg/mL for cuminaldehyde, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mg/mL for carvacrol, and 0.22 mg/mL to 66.7 mg/mL for farnesol [22]. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 4, 24, and 48 h time periods. The microbial growth was measured at OD570 using a microplate reader (BioTekEL × 808, Agilent, Winooski, VT, USA). Clear wells with the lowest terpenoid concentrations and with no visible growth were considered to represent the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).
Amphotericin B was employed as a positive control against C. albicans. Cultures without terpenoids or antimicrobial agents were employed as negative controls.

2.3. Determination of the Minimum Fungicidal/Bactericidal Concentrations (MFC/MBC)

The two wells containing compound concentrations above the MIC were used to determine the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). A measure of 20 µL from each well was spread on Sabouraud dextrose agar and LB agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MFC and MBC were defined as the lowest concentrations that showed no growth [23].

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity of Terpenoidal Compounds Combinations against C. albicans and Bacteria

The efficacy of combinations of terpenoidal compounds including cuminaladehyde/carvacrol and farnesol/carvacrol was analyzed in terms of fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICI) using a checkerboard assay. A measure of 50 µL of each compound was dispensed into a 96 well microtiter plate. A 100 µL yeast and/or bacterial inoculum was added to obtain a final inoculum concentration of 5.0 × 105 CFU/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by reading at OD570. The concentrations of combined compounds used were selected based on their MIC value (~ 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, 1/8 MIC, and 1/16 MIC). Terpenoid interactions were classified as synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic on the basis of FICI [24].

2.5. Inhibition of Single-Species and Mixed-Species Biofilm Formation

Single- and mixed-species biofilms of C. albicans and bacteria were formed in 96 well microtiter plates (Costar®, Taufkirchen, Munich, Germany). An aliquot of 100 μl of yeast cell suspension was added in the case of single-species biofilms, or 50 μl of each yeast and bacterial cell suspension for mixed-species biofilms. The inocula were adjusted in RPMI-1640 to a concentration of 1 to 5 × 106 yeast/mL and 1 to 5 × 108 bacteria/mL [25]. The plates were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The supernatants were removed and the biofilms formed were washed twice with PBS (pH 7.2) to remove non-adherent cells. RPMI medium (100 µL) containing the terpenoidal compounds was added over the adhered cells and the plates were further incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The influence of terpenoids on mature biofilms was assessed as follows: 24 or 48 h biofilms were treated with serial concentrations of the terpenoidal compounds (~MIC, 1.5 MIC, and 2 × MIC) and the plates were further incubated at 37 °C for another 24 h. The supernatant including terpenoidal compounds was removed and the fungal viability was analyzed via 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [14]. The MIC of the terpenoidal compounds that caused 50% and 80% inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation was determined by measuring the metabolic activity of biofilm compared to positive and negative controls.

2.6. MTT Assay

The metabolic activity of C. albicans cells was evaluated using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [26,27] as follows: 96 well microtiter plates were seeded with Candida cells. Terpenoids were applied on the seeded cells. Amphotricin B and DMSO were employed as positive and negative controls, respectively. After treatment, the plates were incubated for 24 or 48 h prior to analysis using MTT cell proliferation assay. A measure of 20 µL MTT reagent was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 24 h and the liquid was then discarded, followed by the addition of 200 µL DMSO. The developed purple color was then measured using a Multiskan Go machine spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ratastie, Finland) at 570 nm. A higher absorbance and color intensity indicated a higher activity and viability of the cells. Each experiment was repeated six times.

2.7. Effect of Terpenoidal Compounds on C. albicans Cell Morphology Using Light Microscopy

In order to assess the compounds’ effects on the architecture of single- and mixed-species biofilms formed by C. albicans and bacteria, biofilms produced by three representative C. albicans strains (ATCC10231, A5, and A6) were visualized under an inverted microscope (Olympus Life Sciences, Amsinckstraße, Hamburg) at 400 × magnification, following 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, and 24 h exposure to terpenoidal compounds.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were graphed using Graph Pad 5.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The statistical significance was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using either Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test or Dunn′s multiple comparison test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

2.9. Ethics Statement

The authors confirm that the adherence to the ethical policies of the journal. Ethical approval and appropriate consent form were obtained as per the Tlemcen University Hospital rules.

3. Results

3.1. Amphotricin-B-Resistant C. albicans Clinical Isolates

Our recent data indicated that the MIC of amphotericin B for the planktonic forms of C. albicans clinical isolates ranges between 0.25–1 µg/mL, and the biofilm formed from all tested strains showed resistance to amphotericin B [18]. High concentrations up to 32 and 64 µg/mL of amphotericin B were required to inhibit the single-species biofilms formed by C. albicans A5 and A6 strains [18], compared to 4 µg/mL required to inhibit the biofilm formed by ATCC10231 strain. On the other hand, we found that the mixed-species biofilm was highly resistant, since > 32 and 64 µg/mL amphotericin B failed to inhibit the biofilms formed by C. albicans A5 and A6 strains when mixed with two co-isolated bacteria; Providencia stuartii 3 and Staphylococcus aureus 6. The SMIC50 values of amphotericin B for C. albicans A5 and A6 strains in mixed species were 45 and 78 µg/mL.
The aim of this study was to develop an optimal inhibition strategy using natural volatile terpenoids for amphotericin-B-resistant C. albicans A5 and A6 strains in either single- or mixed-species biofilms.

3.2. C. albicans Inhibition by Endogenous Terpenoid (Farnesol) Was Hyphae-Phenotype-Specific

Pre-adhered C. albicans A5, either alone (Figure 2A) or mixed with two co-isolated bacteria, Providencia stuartii 3 and S. aureus 6 (Figure 2B), were treated with farnesol at 0, 0.7, and 1.4 mg/mL for 12 h. Farnesol showed selective inhibition of hyphae formed by C. albicans A5 incubated alone (Figure 2C,D), but not when mixed with co-isolated bacteria (Figure 2E,F), suggesting a decreased susceptibility to farnesol in mixed-species biofilms. Although a concentration of 1.4 mg/mL farnesol could inhibit Candida hyphae formation, 12–50 times that concentration was required to stop C. albicans yeast growth (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting a selective activity against C. albicans hyphae formation.

3.3. C. albicans Inhibition by Plant Terpenoids

The effect of two different plant terpenoids, carvacrol and cuminaldehyde (Figure 1), was tested on C. albicans yeast and the MICs were determined (Supplementary Table S2). The MIC and MFC of carvacrol were determined to be 0.25–1 and 0.5–2 mg/mL, respectively, and those of cuminaldehyde were 2–4 mg/mL depending on the Candida isolates (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S1). C. albicans isolates showed higher susceptibility to carvacrol than cuminaldehyde. Carvacrol and cuminaldehyde also showed inhibitory effects on bacteria co-isolated with C. albicans at MIC values of 1 mg/mL and 1–4 mg/mL, respectively (Supplementary Table S3).
The effect of combining carvacrol and cuminaldeyde was also tested on C. albicans yeast and co-isolated bacteria (Supplementary Table S4). Carvacrol and cuminaldehyde were combined in concentrations lower than their individual MIC values, as indicated in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. The growth inhibition was determined and FICs were calculated. The FIC index indicates the nature of an interaction between two compounds [24,28].
The checkerboard assay evaluated at 24 h showed that the combination of carvacrol and cuminaldehyde decreased the SMIC50 values ~8-fold and 4-fold compared to the equivalent concentrations of cuminaldehyde and carvacrol when used alone, respectively (Supplementary Table S4). The MIC values of both terpenoids in combination were reduced to 0.06–0.25 mg/mL for carvacrol and 0.5–2.0 mg/mL for cuminaldehyde. The combination showed synergistic interactions (FICI values ranged 0.36 to 0.5) for 12 strains of C. albicans and indifferent interactions (FICI values between 0.62 and 1.0) for 4 Candida strains (A1, A2, A10, and A12).

3.4. Inhibition of Single- and Mixed-Species (C. albicans/bacteria) Biofilms by Plant Terpenoids

In order to evaluate the effect of terpenoids on microbial biofilm formation, biofilms formed by C. albicans (A5, A6, and ATCC10231) were treated with terpenoids as indicated in the Materials and Methods section. The formed biofilms were significantly reduced in the presence of carvacrol (Supplementary Figure S2) (p < 0.0001) and cuminaldehyde (Supplementary Figure S3), but at higher concentrations than that used in the case of yeast forms (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). Carvacrol caused an 80% inhibition in biofilm formation at 2 mg/mL, while cuminaldehyde caused an 80% inhibition of biofilm formation at 6 mg/mL.
The anti-biofilm activity of terpenoids was also tested on C. albicans mixed with co-isolated bacteria. Mixed-species biofilm formation was significantly inhibited by carvacrol in a concentration-dependent manner, with more than 75% inhibition at 2 mg/mL (Figure 3).
On the other hand, cuminaldehyde at 6 mg/mL caused a 60% inhibition to biofilm formed by C. albicans A6/S. aureus/Acinetobacter baumannii (Figure 4), and at 8 mg/mL caused 62% inhibition to biofilm formed by C. albicans A5/P. stuartii/S. aureus (Figure 4).
The results indicated that carvacrol interrupted the interactions among the mixed species and inhibited the biofilm formation at concentrations lower than that needed for cuminaldehyde. Carvacrol showed better anti-biofilm effect against single- and mixed-species biofilms during the first phases (adhesion phase 4 h and initial colonization 24 h) compared to the maturation phase (48 h).

3.5. Optimum Inhibition of C. albicans by Combination of Yeast and Plant Terpenoids

Carvacrol effectively inhibited both Candida forms in lower doses, and had the capability to penetrate the formed biofilms. Thus, a combination of farnesol, a hyphae-specific inhibitor, and carvacrol showed non-selective inhibition effect on C. albicans either in yeast (Table 2) or hyphae/biofilm forms (Figure 5). The combined treatment was effective against hyphae formed by C. albicans both incubated alone (Figure 5A,C,D) or when mixed with co-isolated bacteria (Figure 5B,E,F). The interaction was synergistic.

4. Discussion

The MIC values for amphotericin B found in this study were much higher than those reported in various studies for Candida species [29,30,31] which may be attributable to the capacity of C. albicans to develop genetic mutations [32,33], leading to biodiversity [34].
The selective inhibition by farnesol of Candida hyphae formation but not the yeast form was in accordance with several reported data [35,36,37]. Farnesol treatment may induce Candida apoptosis, disordered mitochondria due to the production of reactive oxygen species [11,38], change in cell development [39], and necrosis [40]. Although farnesol caused inhibition of biofilm formed by single C. albicans species, as previously reported [41,42], it did not reduce the biofilm formed by mixed species. The presence of bacteria is known to increase the resistance of such biofilms [22].
The higher susceptibility of C. albicans isolates to carvacrol was in accordance with the Raut et al. 2013 study [15] which reported that carvacrol exerts anti-Candida activity by interfering with endoplasmic reticulum integrity [43] and alteration in calcium homeostasis [44], ergosterol biosynthesis [45], and plasma membrane integrity [46]. Furthermore, our data showed that the combination of carvacrol and cuminaldehyde caused synergistic interactions (FICI values ranged from 0.36 to 0.5) to most tested C. albicans strains. The results obtained were in accordance with previous studies confirming the synergistic activity of essential oils, such as lavender oil in combination with Melaleuca alternifolia oil [47] and lavender oil in combination with Pelargonium graveolens oil [48].
Both terpenoids also showed strong inhibition of biofilm formation and penetration capability to formed biofilm. The anti-biofilm activity of terpenoids may be attributed to membrane damage, as well as inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and respiratory chain functions [49]. Terpenoid-mediated changes in membrane permeability and fluidity can result in the degradation of cell walls, and hence affect the adherence of C. albicans to solid surfaces [50]. Furthermore, carvacrol itself at 2 mg/mL showed ~ 75% inhibition of mixed-species biofilm, which was consistent with previous studies of the anti-Candida activity of carvacrol [43,51,52].
Although some studies have shown that mature mixed biofilms of bacteria and Candida exhibit enhanced resistance compared to single-species biofilms [53], the terpenoid compounds used in this study, in particular carvacrol, caused strong inhibition to the biofilm formed by C. albicans A6/S. aureus/A. baumannii, despite the cohabitation of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.
It is important to note that the majority of anti-fungal agents had limited anti-biofilm activity. It was reported that Candida biofilms were 30 to 2000 times more resistant to various antifungal agents compared to their planktonic counterparts [54,55]. The mechanisms by which biofilms develop antimicrobial resistance are complex and multifactorial. These include altered gene expression following surface attachment, reduced growth rates, variable nutrient availability that induces changes in phenotype, and the presence of extracellular polymeric substances that impedes the penetration of antimicrobial agents to biofilm [56].
Some studies have shown that combinations of plant essential oils or their terpenoid components with commercial antimycotics are known to result in synergistic antifungal activities [57,58]. Interestingly, similarly to our synergistic data using carvacrol and farnesol, carvacrol has been reported to have synergistic interactions with fluconazole against the planktonic and biofilm forms of C. albicans [59]. Furthermore, carvacrol has been classified as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) and approved for food use [60], as has cuminaldehyde [61]. The results from this study can be employed both for the prevention of biofilm formation by single or mixed species and for their treatment.

5. Conclusions

As concluding remarks, terpenoids showed effective inhibition of different Candida forms, including yeast, hyphae, and biofilm, based on the type of terpenoid used. Endogenous terpenoid (farnesol) produced by C. albicans yeast effectively inhibited Candida hyphae formation, but this was not the case when C. albicans was mixed with bacteria or existed as Candida hyphae/biofilm, indicative of a lack of biofilm-penetration capability. Furthermore, farnesol required ~12–50 times its hyphae inhibitory concentration to inhibit the yeast form. Exogenous plant terpenoids present in our food and condiments showed non-selective inhibition of Candida forms including yeast and hyphae. Combination of exogenous terpenoids with endogenous terpenoids showed a synergistic non-selective inhibition effect on both C. albicans forms. Furthermore, the combination showed promising reduction of Candida biofilm, indicative of a penetration capability when compared to available antifungal agents. Importantly, the concentration of the combined terpenoids was significantly reduced ~10–20 times, a non-toxic concentration available in regular food and condiments, as reported previously. Thus, the terpenoids from this study, in particular carvacrol in combination with farnesol, can be used as protective and therapeutic agents against C. albicans in its different forms. Moreover, the combined terpenoids can be used as a promising safe preservative for prosthetic devices.

Supplementary Materials

Tables S1–S6 and Figures S1–S3 are available as Supplementary data at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/2/342/s1.

Author Contributions

H.F.Z.T. performed the experiments analyze the data and write the first draft. K.B. and Z.B.-O. help on experiments design and revising the manuscript. G.K. helped on the Candida experiments. M.M. helped on the microscopy work. S.S.M.S. design the experiments; design the manuscript, interpretation of the results, writing the manuscript and final revisions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Tlemcen to HT and University of Sharjah (Grant Number 1601110215-P) to S.S.M.S.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of University Hospital (CHU) of Tlemcen and University of Sharjah for their valuable technical assistance. We also would like to extend our thanks to Amira Mahrous and Islam Altayeb from the University of Sharjah for their valuable help and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geffers, C.; Gastmeier, P. Nosocomial infections and multidrug-resistant organisms in Germany: Epidemiological data from kiss (the hospital infection surveillance system). Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2011, 108, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wenzel, R.P.; Gennings, C. Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species in the Intensive Care Unit: Identifying Especially High-Risk Patients to Determine Prevention Strategies. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sydnor, E.R.M.; Perl, T.M. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control in Acute-Care Settings. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 141–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Elewski, B.E. Onychomycosis: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Edwards, J.E.; Lehrer, R.I.; Stiehm, E.R.; Fischer, T.J.; Young, L.S. Severe Candidal Infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 1978, 89, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brand, A. Hyphal Growth in Human Fungal Pathogens and Its Role in Virulence. Int. J. Microbiol. 2011, 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Choi, J.Y.; Kwak, Y.G.; Yoo, H.; Lee, S.-O.; Kim, H.B.; Han, S.H.; Choi, H.J.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, T.H. Trends in the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of causative pathogens of device-associated infection in Korean intensive care units from 2006 to 2013: Results from the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS). J. Hosp. Infect. 2016, 92, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cavalheiro, M.; Teixeira, M.C. Candida Biofilms: Threats, Challenges, and Promising Strategies. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Elving, G.J.; Van Der Mei, H.C.; Van Weissenbruch, R.; Busscher, H.J.; Albers, F.W.J. Comparison of the microbial composition of voice prosthesis biofilms from patients requiring frequent versus infrequent replacement. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2002, 111, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peleg, A.Y.; Hogan, D.A.; Mylonakis, E. Medically important bacterial–fungal interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 8, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, J.; Krom, B.P.; Sanglard, D.; Intapa, C.; Dawson, C.C.; Peters, B.M.; Shirtliff, M.E.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Farnesol-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans is mediated by Cdr1-p extrusion and depletion of intracellular glutathione. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Alalwan, H.K.A.; Rajendran, R.; Lappin, D.F.; Combet, E.; Shahzad, M.; Robertson, D.; Nile, C.J.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G. The Anti-Adhesive Effect of Curcumin on Candida albicans Biofilms on Denture Materials. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alviano, W.; Mendonca-Filho, R.R.; Bizzo, H.R.; Souto-Padrón, T.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Bolognese, A.M.; Souza, M.M.G. Antimicrobial activity of Croton cajucara Benth linalool-rich essential oil on artificial biofilms and planktonic microorganisms. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 20, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Soliman, S.S.M.; Semreen, M.H.; El-Keblawy, A.A.; Abdullah, A.; Uppuluri, P.; Ibrahim, A.S. Assessment of herbal drugs for promising anti-Candida activity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Raut, J.S.; Shinde, R.B.; Chauhan, N.M.; Mohan Karuppayil, S. Terpenoids of plant origin inhibit morphogenesis, adhesion, and biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Biofouling 2013, 29, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gilabert, M.; Marcinkevicius, K.; Andujar, S.; Schiavone, M.; Arena, M.E.; Bardón, A. Sesqui- and triterpenoids from the liverwort Lepidozia chordulifera inhibitors of bacterial biofilm and elastase activity of human pathogenic bacteria. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amaya, S.; Pereira, J.A.; Borkosky, S.A.; Valdez, J.C.; Bardón, A.; Arena, M.E. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by sesquiterpene lactones. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 1173–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Touil, H.F.Z.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Boucherit, K. In vitro activity of antifungal combinations against planktonic and sessile cells of Candida albicans isolated from medical devices in an intensive care department. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In M27, Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 3rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In M07, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 10th ed.; Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Weerasekera, M.M.; Wijesinghe, G.K.; Jayarathna, T.A.; Gunasekara, C.P.; Fernando, N.; Kottegoda, N.; Samaranayake, L.P. Culture media profoundly affect Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis growth, adhesion and biofilm development. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2016, 111, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fernandes, R.A.; Monteiro, D.R.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, G.L.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Barbosa, D.B. Biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans in the presence of farnesol: A quantitative evaluation. Biofouling 2016, 32, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Espinel-Ingroff, A.; Fothergill, A.; Peter, J.; Rinaldi, M.; Walsh, T. Testing conditions for determination of minimum fungicidal concentrations of new and established antifungal agents for Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS collaborative study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3204–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Johnson, M.; MacDougall, C.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Perfect, J.R.; Rex, J. Combination Antifungal Therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 693–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ibarra-Trujillo, C.; Villar-Vidal, M.; Gaitán-Cepeda, L.A.; Pozos-Guillen, A.; Mendoza-de Elias, R.; Sánchez-Vargas, L.O. Ensayo de formación y cuantificación de biopelículas mixtas de Candida albicans y Staphylococcus aureus. Revista Iberoam. Micol. 2012, 29, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. ATCC.org. MTT Cell Proliferation Assay. Available online: http://www.atcc.org/~/media/DA5285A1F52C414E864C966FD78C9A79.ashx (accessed on 17 March 2019).
  27. Brescia, P.; Banks, P. Quantifying Cytotoxicity of Thiostrepton on Mesothelioma Cells Using MTT Assay and the Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer; BioTek Instruments, INC.: Winooski, VT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. Meletiadis, J.; Mouton, J.W.; Meis, J.F.; Verweij, P.E. In vitro drug interaction modeling of combinations of azoles with terbinafine against clinical Scedosporium prolificans isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cordeiro, R.A.; Teixeira, C.E.C.; Brilhante, R.S.N.; Castelo-Branco, D.; Paiva, M.A.N.; Leite, J.J.G.; Lima, D.T.; Monteiro, A.J.; Sidrim, J.J.C.; Rocha, M.F.G. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin B, azoles and caspofungin againstCandidaspecies are reduced by farnesol. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shanmughapriya, S.; Sornakumari, H.; Lency, A.; Kavitha, S.; Natarajaseenivasan, K. Synergistic effect of amphotericin B and tyrosol on biofilm formed by Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis from intrauterine device users. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bozó, A.; Domán, M.; Majoros, L.; Kardos, G.; Varga, I.; Kovács, R. The in vitro and in vivo efficacy of fluconazole in combination with farnesol against Candida albicans isolates using a murine vulvovaginitis model. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hirakawa, M.; Martinez, D.A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Anderson, M.Z.; Berlin, A.; Gujja, S.; Zeng, Q.; Zisson, E.; Wang, J.M.; Greenberg, J.M.; et al. Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in Candida albicans. Genome Res. 2014, 25, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Monteiro, D.; Arias, L.; Fernandes, R.; Da Silva, L.D.; De Castilho, M.; Da Rosa, T.; Vieira, A.; Straioto, F.; Barbosa, D.B.; Delbem, A.C.B. Antifungal activity of tyrosol and farnesol used in combination against Candida species in the planktonic state or forming biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hittinger, C.T.; Rokas, A.; Bai, F.-Y.; Boekhout, T.; Gonçalves, P.; Jeffries, T.W.; Kominek, J.; Lachance, M.-A.; Libkind, D.; Rosa, C.A.; et al. Genomics and the making of yeast biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2015, 35, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ramage, G.; Saville, S.P.; Wickes, B.L.; López-Ribot, J.L. Inhibition of Candida albicans Biofilm Formation by Farnesol, a Quorum-Sensing Molecule. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5459–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nickerson, K.W.; Atkin, A.L.; Hornby, J.M. Quorum Sensing in Dimorphic Fungi: Farnesol and Beyond. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3805–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Polke, M.; Leonhardt, I.; Kurzai, O.; Jacobsen, I. Farnesol signalling inCandida albicans– more than just communication. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 44, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Langford, M.L.; Atkin, A.; Nickerson, K.W. Cellular interactions of farnesol, a quorum-sensing molecule produced byCandida albicans. Futur. Microbiol. 2009, 4, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Uppuluri, P.; Mekala, S.; Chaffin, W.L. Farnesol-mediated inhibition ofCandida albicansyeast growth and rescue by a diacylglycerol analogue. Yeast 2007, 24, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dumitru, R.; Navarathna, D.H.M.L.P.; Semighini, C.P.; Elowsky, C.G.; Dumitru, R.V.; Dignard, D.; Whiteway, M.; Atkin, A.L.; Nickerson, K.W. In Vivo and In Vitro Anaerobic Mating in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dižová, S.; Bujdáková, H. Properties and role of the quorum sensing molecule farnesol in relation to the yeast Candida albicans. Pharmazie 2017, 72, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fernandes, R.A.; Monteiro, D.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, G.L.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Barbosa, D.B. Virulence Factors in Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans Biofilms Mediated by Farnesol. Indian J. Microbiol. 2018, 58, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chaillot, J.; Tebbji, F.; Remmal, A.; Boone, C.; Brown, G.W.; Bellaoui, M.; Sellam, A. The Monoterpene Carvacrol Generates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Pathogenic Fungus Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4584–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rao, A.; Zhang, Y.; Muend, S.; Rao, R. Mechanism of Antifungal Activity of Terpenoid Phenols Resembles Calcium Stress and Inhibition of the TOR Pathway. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 5062–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ahmad, A.; Khan, A.; Akhtar, F.; Yousuf, S.; Xess, I.; Khan, L.A.; Manzoor, N. Fungicidal activity of thymol and carvacrol by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity against Candida. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 30, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chami, N.; Bennis, S.; Chami, F.; Aboussekhra, A.; Remmal, A. Study of anticandidal activity of carvacrol and eugenol in vitro and in vivo. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 20, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cassella, J. Synergistic antifungal activity of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) and lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) essential oils against dermatophyte infection. Int. J. Aromather. 2002, 12, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Rapper, S.; Kamatou, G.; Viljoen, A.; Van Vuuren, S. The In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Lavandula angustifolia Essential Oil in Combination with Other Aroma-Therapeutic Oils. Evidence Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Pauli, A. Anticandidal low molecular compounds from higher plants with special reference to compounds from essential oils. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 223–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marcos-Arias, C.; Eguia, A.; Madariaga-Torres, L.; Quindós, G. In vitro activities of natural products against oral Candida isolates from denture wearers. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gallucci, M.; Carezzano, M.; Oliva, M.; Demo, M.; Pizzolitto, R.; Zunino, M.; Zygadlo, J.A.; Dambolena, J.S. In vitroactivity of natural phenolic compounds against fluconazole-resistantCandidaspecies: A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Inouye, S.; Takahashi, M.; Abe, S. Inhibitory activity of hydrosols, herbal teas and related essential oils against filament formation and the growth of Candida albicans. Nippon. Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2009, 50, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Adam, B.; Baillie, G.S.; Douglas, L.J. Mixed species biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Med Microbiol. 2002, 51, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Hawser, S.P.; Douglas, L.J. Resistance of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 2128–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Seddiki, S.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Boucherit, K.; Kunkel, D. Fungal infectivities of implanted catheters due to Candida sp. Biofilms formation and resistance. J. Mycol. Med. 2015, 25, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Douglas, L.J. Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Amber, K.; Aijaz, A.; Immaculata, X.; Luqman, K.; Nikhat, M. Anticandidal effect of Ocimum sanctum essential oil and its synergy with fluconazole and ketoconazole. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 921–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Khan, M.S.A.; Ahmad, I. Antibiofilm activity of certain phytocompounds and their synergy with fluconazole against Candida albicans biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 67, 618–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Doke, S.K.; Raut, J.S.; Dhawale, S.; Karuppayil, S.M. Sensitization of Candida albicans biofilms to fluconazole by terpenoids of plant origin. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 60, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Magi, G.; Marini, E.; Facinelli, B. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and carvacrol, and synergy of carvacrol and erythromycin, against clinical, erythromycin-resistant Group A Streptococci. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tsai, K.-D.; Liu, Y.-H.; Chen, T.; Yang, S.-M.; Wong, H.-Y.; Cherng, J.; Chou, K.-S.; Cherng, J.-M. Cuminaldehyde from Cinnamomum verum Induces Cell Death through Targeting Topoisomerase 1 and 2 in Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma COLO 205 Cells. Nutrients 2016, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 10 00342 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures and possible sources of terpenoidal compounds.
Figure 1. Structures and possible sources of terpenoidal compounds.
Biomolecules 10 00342 g001
Biomolecules 10 00342 g002 550
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of farnesol on single- and mixed-species C. albicans biofilm formation. (A) C. albicans biofilm formed after 12 h (single-species biofilm A5) (untreated biofilm). (B) Candida biofilm generated by mixed species including C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (C) Single-species biofilm formed by A5 treated with farnesol at 0.7 mg/mL. (D) Single-species biofilm formed by A5 treated with farnesol at 1.4 mg/mL. (E) The effect of farnesol at 0.7 mg/mL on biofilm formed by mixed species including C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (F) The effect of farnesol at 1.4 mg/mL on biofilm mixed-species biofilm formed by C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6).
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of farnesol on single- and mixed-species C. albicans biofilm formation. (A) C. albicans biofilm formed after 12 h (single-species biofilm A5) (untreated biofilm). (B) Candida biofilm generated by mixed species including C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (C) Single-species biofilm formed by A5 treated with farnesol at 0.7 mg/mL. (D) Single-species biofilm formed by A5 treated with farnesol at 1.4 mg/mL. (E) The effect of farnesol at 0.7 mg/mL on biofilm formed by mixed species including C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (F) The effect of farnesol at 1.4 mg/mL on biofilm mixed-species biofilm formed by C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6).
Biomolecules 10 00342 g002
Biomolecules 10 00342 g003 550
Figure 3. The inhibitory effect of carvacrol on C. albicans/bacteria in mixed biofilm formation at different time points, as determined by MTT viability assays. C. albicans cells were allowed to adhere onto 96 well microtiter plates at time points of 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h, followed by treatment with various concentrations of carvacrol at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 MIC prior to incubation at 37 °C. The anti-biofilm activity of the compound was assessed by measuring the metabolic activity of viable cells by MTT assay. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and statistical significance was calculated with Dunn′s multiple comparison test. Significance level is indicated by asterisks. The data display the mean ± standard error (SEM) of four replicates.
Figure 3. The inhibitory effect of carvacrol on C. albicans/bacteria in mixed biofilm formation at different time points, as determined by MTT viability assays. C. albicans cells were allowed to adhere onto 96 well microtiter plates at time points of 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h, followed by treatment with various concentrations of carvacrol at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 MIC prior to incubation at 37 °C. The anti-biofilm activity of the compound was assessed by measuring the metabolic activity of viable cells by MTT assay. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and statistical significance was calculated with Dunn′s multiple comparison test. Significance level is indicated by asterisks. The data display the mean ± standard error (SEM) of four replicates.
Biomolecules 10 00342 g003
Biomolecules 10 00342 g004 550
Figure 4. The inhibitory effect of cuminaldehyde on C. albicans/bacteria in mixed-species biofilm at different time points, as determined by MTT reduction assays. C. albicans cells were allowed to adhere onto 96 well plates at different times (4 h, 24 h, and 48 h), followed by treatment with various cuminaldehyde concentrations prior to incubation at 37 °C. The anti-biofilm activity of the compound was assessed in terms of metabolic activity by MTT assay. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and statistical significance was calculated with Dunn′s multiple comparison test. Significance level is indicated by asterisks. The data display the mean ± standard error (SEM) of four replicates.
Figure 4. The inhibitory effect of cuminaldehyde on C. albicans/bacteria in mixed-species biofilm at different time points, as determined by MTT reduction assays. C. albicans cells were allowed to adhere onto 96 well plates at different times (4 h, 24 h, and 48 h), followed by treatment with various cuminaldehyde concentrations prior to incubation at 37 °C. The anti-biofilm activity of the compound was assessed in terms of metabolic activity by MTT assay. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and statistical significance was calculated with Dunn′s multiple comparison test. Significance level is indicated by asterisks. The data display the mean ± standard error (SEM) of four replicates.
Biomolecules 10 00342 g004
Biomolecules 10 00342 g005 550
Figure 5. Dual inhibitory effect of farnesol and carvacrol on single- and mixed-species C. albicans biofilm formation. (A) Single-species C. albicans, A5 biofilm formed after 24 h. (B) Mixed-species biofilm formed by C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (C) Single-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.25 mg/mL. (D) Single-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.5 mg/mL. (E) Mixed-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.25mg/mL. (F) Mixed-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.5 mg/mL.
Figure 5. Dual inhibitory effect of farnesol and carvacrol on single- and mixed-species C. albicans biofilm formation. (A) Single-species C. albicans, A5 biofilm formed after 24 h. (B) Mixed-species biofilm formed by C. albicans A5, P. stuartii 3, and S. aureus 6 (A5/Ps3/Sa6). (C) Single-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.25 mg/mL. (D) Single-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.5 mg/mL. (E) Mixed-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.25mg/mL. (F) Mixed-species biofilm treated with farensol at 0.7 mg/mL in combination with carvacrol at 0.5 mg/mL.
Biomolecules 10 00342 g005
Table
Table 1. Candida and bacterial strains employed in the study.
Table 1. Candida and bacterial strains employed in the study.
CandidaBacteria
StrainSymbolStrainSymbol
Candida albicans 1A1Escherichia coliEc2
Candida albicans 2A2Escherichia coliEc4
Candida albicans 3A3Escherichia coliEc13
Candida albicans 4A4Providencia stuartiiPs2
Candida albicans 5A5Providencia stuartiiPs3
Candida albicans 6A6Acinetobacter baumanniiAb7
Candida albicans 7A7Acinetobacter baumanniiAb11
Candida albicans 8A8Proteus mirabilisPm16
Candida albicans 9A9Proteus mirabilisPm18
Candida albicans 10A10Proteus mirabilisPm19
Candida albicans 11A11Proteus mirabilisPm21
Candida albicans 12A12Staphylococcus aureusSa6
Candida albicans 13A13Staphylococcus aureusSa11
Candida albicans 14A14Staphylococcus aureusSa24
Candida albicans 15A15Staphylococcus epidermidisSe3
Candida albicansATCC10231
Table
Table 2. Interactions (indicated by FIC indices) of carvacrol in combination with farnesol against C. albicans after 48 h of incubation.
Table 2. Interactions (indicated by FIC indices) of carvacrol in combination with farnesol against C. albicans after 48 h of incubation.
StrainsMIC (mg/mL)FICI*Interactions
CarvacrolFarnesolCarvacrol/Farnesol
ATCC102310.51500.03 + 0.20.06Synergy
A10.516.80.125 + 1.20.33Synergy
A20.533.60.03 + 1.20.10Synergy
A3133.60.06 + 0.20.06Synergy
A40.2533.60.03 + 0.40.13Synergy
A5133.60.125 + 1.20.17Synergy
A60.533.60.06 + 1.20.16Synergy
A70.533.60.125 + 0.40.26Synergy
A8116.80.25 + 0.40.28Synergy
A9133.60.25 + 0.40.26Synergy
A100.533.60.06 + 0.80.15Synergy
A11133.60.25 + 0.80.28Synergy
A120.533.60.125 + 1.20.29Synergy
A13133.60.25 + 0.80.28Synergy
A140.516.80.125 + 1.20.33Synergy
A15133.60.125 + 1.20.15Synergy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Touil, H.F.Z.; Boucherit, K.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Kohder, G.; Madkour, M.; Soliman, S.S.M. Optimum Inhibition of Amphotericin-B-Resistant Candida albicans Strain in Single- and Mixed-Species Biofilms by Candida and Non-Candida Terpenoids. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020342

AMA Style

Touil HFZ, Boucherit K, Boucherit-Otmani Z, Kohder G, Madkour M, Soliman SSM. Optimum Inhibition of Amphotericin-B-Resistant Candida albicans Strain in Single- and Mixed-Species Biofilms by Candida and Non-Candida Terpenoids. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(2):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Touil, Hidaya F. Z., Kebir Boucherit, Zahia Boucherit-Otmani, Ghalia Kohder, Mohamed Madkour, and Sameh S. M. Soliman. 2020. "Optimum Inhibition of Amphotericin-B-Resistant Candida albicans Strain in Single- and Mixed-Species Biofilms by Candida and Non-Candida Terpenoids" Biomolecules 10, no. 2: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop