Nutrient Characterization and Mineral Composition of Aruana in a Silvopastoral System with Nitrogen Fertilization
by
, , and
Andressa Radtke Baungratz
1,*
,
Leonardo Piffer de Borba
2,
Bruna Martins de Menezes
3,
Jean Lucas Macari Porsch
4,
Tiago Venturini
1,
Rusbel Raúl Aspilcueta Borquis
2,
Eduardo Eustáquio Mesquita
1,
Ériton Egídio Lisboa Valente
1 and
Vicente de Paulo Macedo
2 1
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Western Parana State University, Marechal Cândido Rondon 85960-000, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Technology–Parana, Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Brazil
3
Postgraduate Program in Zootechnics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil
4
Bachelor’s Degree in Animal Science, Federal University of Technology–Parana, Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Grasses 2024, 3(1), 11-18; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses3010002
Submission received: 16 August 2023
/
Revised: 8 December 2023
/
Accepted: 20 December 2023
/
Published: 3 January 2024
Abstract
:The objective was to characterize the nutrient and mineral composition of M. maximus cv Aruana grazed by lambs in a silvopastoral system or full sun with added nitrogen. The treatments are: (1) Aruana grazed in full sun with nitrogen fertilization, (2) Aruana grazed in full sun without nitrogen fertilization, (3) Aruana grazed in a silvopastoral system with nitrogen fertilization and (4) Aruana grazed in a silvopastoral system without nitrogen fertilization. The nutrient dynamics, urinary excretion of N and the amount returned of the nutrient were determined from four sheep in a Latin square experimental design; the analysis of the mineral composition of the leaves and stalks of the grass was carried out by collecting samples from the plots used, totaling six in each treatment evaluated. The silvopastoral system provided high levels of P and K in forage plants. Urinary N excretion and urine mineral contents were influenced by the systems evaluated and the use of N fertilizer. N did not show differences for leaves and canes.
1. Introduction
Grazing sheep production in subtropical regions has an unexploited potential, despite its favorable characteristics, such as productive forage and precipitation throughout the year, that allow the sustainable production of quality lambs [1].
Tropical forage quality and climatic conditions are limitations for productivity in animal production, affecting animal behavior and grazing [2]. The adoption of integrated systems, such as silvopastoral systems, and management techniques, such as targeted fertilizer application, can increase animal production under these conditions [3].
Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana is an important, economically and ecologically suitable option for sheep production. It has characteristics such as good response to nitrogen fertilization, adaptability to shading, high dry matter yield and nutritive value [4]. However, low soil nitrogen availability is still a limiting factor in tropical and subtropical forage areas [3]. The introduction of the nutrient through chemical fertilization and cycling processes is commonly observed to overcome this limitation [5]. Practices such as fertilization enable the manipulation of mineral nutrients in forage, which can lead to significant improvements in the quality of the pasture provided to grazing animals [6].
Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems occurs through the deposition of animal waste, such as urine and feces, into the soil. Herbivores play an important role as transporters of nutrients, such as nitrogen, as they consume plant material at one site and excrete it at other sites [7,8,9]. Nitrogen cycling is essential to prevent pasture degradation, and its speed and processes of degradation, mineralization and immobilization depend on the carbon:nitrogen ratio in the soil organic matter (SOM) [10].
In situations where fertilizer replacement in pastures is not usual, nutrients contained in animal excreta play an important role for pasture perenniality and sustainability. Of all the forage consumed during grazing, only a small proportion is retained in animal products, and most of it is returned through excretions. N is one of the nutrients with the highest potential for excretion in both feces and urine, raising the dynamics of the system as a whole. The hypothesis tested was that the mineral composition of forage is positively influenced by nitrogen fertilization and the silvopastoral system. The objective was to discover the nutrient characterization and mineral composition of M. maximus grazed by lambs in a silvopastoral system or full sun with added N.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Localization
The experiment was conducted at the Sheep and Goat Raising Teaching and Research Unit of the Federal University of Technology—Paraná, Dois Vizinhos campus. The institution is located in the Southwest region of Paraná, under latitude 25°42′ S and longitude 53°03′ W, with an approximate altitude of 520 m above sea level. The soil is classified as a red dystrophic latosol of clayey texture [11]. The region is characterized by a humid subtropical mesothermal (Cfa) climate, with an average annual precipitation of 1953 mm and average annual temperatures of 25.2 (maximum) and 14.7 °C (minimum) [12] (Figure 1).
2.2. Animals, Diets and Experimental Design
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA-Federal University of Technology–Paraná–protocol no. 2019-34), in accordance with the ethical principles of animal experimentation recommended by the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA).
The treatments were: 1—Aruana pasture in full sun with nitrogen fertilization, 2—Aruana pasture in full sun without nitrogen fertilization, 3—Aruana pasture in silvopastoral system with nitrogen fertilization and 4—Aruana pasture in silvopastoral system without nitrogen fertilization.
The experiment was set up in a total area containing Aruana pasture divided into two systems: 06 pastures in a silvopastoral system (400 m2 of area) with laurel (Cordia trichotoma) and canafistula (Peltophorum dubium) and 06 pastures in full sun (400 m2 of area). The pasture area was established in 2010, and the tree component was implemented in the years 2013/2014 in the silvopastoral system, in the east–west direction with the arrangement of trees in 4 double rows at the ends of each of the paddocks, with an interval of 10 m between them and spacing of 2.00 m (between plants) and 1.50 m (between rows). According to the forest survey conducted in 2019, the C. trichotoma specimens had an average crown diameter of 3.05 m, crown height of 3.10 m and average height of 7.90 m. In 2018, the data concerning P. dubium were surveyed, being: average crown diameter of 2.20 m, crown height of 2.00 m and height of 3.90 m. The shade area provided by each of the trees averaged 36 m2 [13]. Both systems were provided with drinking troughs and troughs for the mineral supplementation of the animals.
Prior to the implementation of the experiment, the soil pH of the total area was corrected using dolomitic limestone (PRNT 95.2%) in order to raise the base saturation to 70% (V%: 55.9%). In the plots treated with nitrogen fertilization, this was performed in the form of agricultural urea (46% total N), with a single application at a dose of 200 kg N ha−1, performed after a uniformization cut to improve fertilization efficiency, approximately 15 days before the beginning of the experimental evaluations.
Twenty-four lambs (Dorper × Santa Ines), uncastrated males with a mean age of 60 ± 15 days and mean weight of 23.00 ± 3.50 kg, were used for grazing, randomly distributed in equal numbers among all the paddocks. To determine the nutrient dynamics, four lambs with the same characteristics and mean weight of 17.75 ± 1.00 kg were used, submitted to the treatments in a 4 × 4 Latin square (4 treatments × 4 periods), kept in each paddock for 5 days of adaptation and 10 days of evaluation. Each of the four animals walked on at least one paddock corresponding to the treatment in question during the experimental period.
The animals were weighed every 15 days, or as soon as they were moved from one enclosure to another during an evaluation period. The animal load (AL), in kg BW ha−1, was calculated from the sum of the body weight of each animal and the area of each paddock.
2.3. Measurement and Sampling Techniques
The forage evaluations were performed at the beginning of each experimental period, aiming to provide a constant supply of 10% forage mass (MF) (10 kg DM/100 kg BW animal/day). The available FC was determined using the double sampling method [13], based on a visual estimate of 12 points and three real estimates of each experimental stand, by cutting the forage close to the ground with the aid of a square (area 0.25 m2) in the real points. The grazing method used was continuous stocking and variable stocking rate, according to the “put and take” technique [14] and according to the available FM. The forage, leaf and stalk samples were collected in order to evaluate the mineral composition.
The soil samples were collected (0–20 cm) using a mug auger at 10 randomly spaced points in each experimental subarea, avoiding areas with the presence of feces. At the end, the sub-samples were concentrated, forming composite samples that were dried in a forced air oven at 55 °C for 72 h, ground in a 1 mm sieve knife mill and later analyzed for organic carbon (OC), organic matter (OCM) and total nitrogen (TN).
Spot urine samples were collected from each animal on day 15 of the experimental period. The four animals were placed in individual hanging pens (0.96 m2 area) with a drinking trough approximately 4 h after the morning feeding in order to collect urine portions by spontaneous urination. After collection, 10 mL urine samples were diluted in 40 mL of H2SO4 (0.036 N) and stored in a freezer (−20 °C).
2.4. Chemical Analysis
The forage and soil samples were dried in an oven with forced air circulation at 55 °C for 72 h and ground in a mill with a 1 mm sieve. Dry matter (DM—method 934.01) was determined according to [15] (2000); P, K, Ca, Mg and S by nitropercloric digestion (P: colorimetry; S: turbidimetry; K: flame photometry; Ca and Mg: atomic absorption spectrophotometry) and N by sulfuric digestion [16]. Organic matter (OM) and organic carbon (OC) contents in the soil samples were determined by the pH method in CaCl2 0.01 mol L−1; OC(1)/OM(1) colorimetric method [17]. The contents of P and K were extracted with a Mehlich-1 solution [18].
The urinary creatinine concentrations were analyzed using a commercial kit (Labtest® Lagoa Santa, Brazil). The daily urinary volume was calculated using the ratio between daily creatinine excretion and its concentration in spot urine samples using the value 19.82 mg creatinine/kg body weight [19].
From the estimated urine productions (UP), animal stocking (AS) and determined N contents, the total urine excretion (TUE) was calculated [20]:
where BW corresponds to the animal’s body weight (kg/ha·day).
TUE = [UP/BW] × AS
The amounts of N returned via urine (NRU) (g/ha·day−1) were determined using the previously calculated excretion and urine N concentration [20]:
where: NC corresponds to nitrogen concentration (g/L).
NRU = NC × TUE
2.5. Statistical Analysis
The OM, OC and N contents of the soil samples and the mineral contents of the leaves and canes were analyzed independently by ANOVA, and when they showed significant difference (p < 0.05), the means were compared by the Tukey test.
The variables BW, stocking density, total urine excretion, urinary N and the amount of N returned via urine were analyzed by ANOVA, and when they showed significant differences, the means were compared by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). The dependent variables were analyzed in the 4×4 split-block Latin square design with fixed effects (period and treatment) and random effect (animal).
The statistical model used was
where Yijk: observation related to i-th animal, j-th period and k-th treatment; µ: general mean; Ai: effect corresponding to i-th animal (1, 2, 3 and 4); Pj: effect corresponding to j-th period (1, 2, 3 and 4); Tk: effect corresponding to the k-th treatment (1—Aruana pasture in full sun with nitrogen fertilization, 2—Aruana pasture in full sun without nitrogen fertilization, 3—Aruana pasture in a silvopastoral system with nitrogen fertilization and 4—Aruana pasture in a silvopastoral system without nitrogen fertilization); eijk: random error associated with i-th animal, j-th period and k-th treatment.
Yijk: µ + Ai + Pj + Tk + eijk
3. Results
The amount of nitrogen returned via urine was not affected (p = 0.4872) by the different treatments. The same was observed for the levels of OC (p = 0.5384), OM (p = 0.5371), P (p = 0.6114) and K (K = 0.9158) (Table 1).
The total amount of urine excreted and the amount of nitrogen excreted in the urine did not differ between the different treatments (Table 2).
The phosphorus (P) contents were higher in the leaves and stalks of the silvopastoral system, indicating a positive influence of shading on its concentration (Table 3). The magnesium (Mg) concentration in the leaves and stems was higher in the full sun treatment with fertilization, while in stems without fertilization, there was no significant difference (Table 3).
4. Discussion
No significant differences were observed in the soil’s organic matter (OM), organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents among the different treatments. This finding suggests that nitrogen fertilization and shading did not have a substantial impact on the soil’s mineral composition, at least during the period of this study. Short-term alterations in soil mineral content may not be easily discernible [21].
The total amount of urine excreted and the amount of nitrogen excreted in urine did not differ significantly between the various treatments. This suggests that neither nitrogen fertilization nor shading had a pronounced effect on nitrogen excretion by grazing animals. This finding contradicts the hypothesis that shading might reduce the stress of the animals and, consequently, influence their nitrogen excretion. Ref. [22] (2018) states that animals that consume higher levels of protein in their diet may present greater excretion of urinary N and greater losses of this nutrient through volatilization; however, this statement was not observed in animals that consumed fertilized pasture, since their nutritional requirements were met according to [23] (2007), expressing the results obtained in this research. Additional long-term studies may be necessary to fully elucidate the relationship between shading and nitrogen cycling in silvopastoral systems. The relationship between shading and nitrogen excretion may be complex and multifaceted [24].
In terms of plant mineral content, the phosphorus (P) levels were significantly higher in the leaves and stalks of the silvopastoral system compared to the full sun treatment, indicating a positive influence of shading on P concentration [25]. While the soil mineral content remained largely unaffected by the treatments, the nutrient composition of the plants showed notable variations [26]. This result may have been influenced by the presence of shading, the type of tree species implanted in the system and the nutritional composition and rate of litter degradation [27,28]. In a study carried out by [29] (2014), comparing the mineral composition of the dry mass of the aerial part (MSPA) of Mombaça grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) in a silvopastoral system with babassu (Attalea speciosa) and in a system without shading, a difference was observed in the P composition of forages between systems, corroborating the information obtained in this study. These findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationships within silvopastoral systems to optimize their productivity and sustainability.
5. Conclusions
Short-term nitrogen fertilization and shading had minimal impact on soil mineral content. Neither treatment significantly altered nitrogen excretion by grazing animals. However, notable differences in plant mineral content were observed: shading increased phosphorus levels, while magnesium concentration was higher in the fully sunlit, fertilized treatment. These findings emphasize the complexity of nutrient dynamics in silvopastoral systems, warranting further research.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; methodology, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; software, A.R.B. and R.R.A.B.; validation, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; formal analysis, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; investigation, A.R.B., L.P.d.B., B.M.d.M., J.L.M.P. and T.V.; resources, V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; data curation, A.R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; writing—review and editing, A.R.B. and L.P.d.B.; visualization, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; supervision, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M., É.E.L.V. and T.V.; project administration, A.R.B., V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V.; funding acquisition, V.d.P.M., E.E.M. and É.E.L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The present work was carried out with the support of the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES)–Financing Code 001.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of Federal University of Technology–Paraná (protocol code 2019-34).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
We thank LabSolos for the help in building knowledge and in the analyses performed for this work.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Poli, C.H.E.C.; Monteiro, A.L.G.; Devincenzi, T.; Albuquerque, F.H.M.A.R.D.; Motta, J.H.D.; Borges, L.I.; MUIR, J.P. Management Strategies for Lamb Production on Pasture-Based Systems in Subtropical Regions: A Review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manno, M.C.; Rodrigues, L.F.D.S.; Lima, K.R.D.S.; Carvalhal, M.V.D.L.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Costa, G.L.D.; Barreto, A.D.N. Behavioral aspects of Santa Inês sheep kept in pasture in a tropical rainforest climate. Cienc. Rural 2019, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernardino, F.S.; Garcia, R. Sistemas silvipastoris. Pesq. Flor. Bras. 2009, 60, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paciullo, D.S.C.; Gomide, C.A.M.; Castro, C.R.T.; Maurício, R.M.; Fernandes, P.B.; Morenz, M.J.F. Morphogenesis, biomass and nutritive value of Panicum maximum under different shade levels and fertilizer nitrogen rates. Grass Forage Sci. 2017, 72, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerdes, L.; Barbosa, C.M.P.; Giacomini, A.A.; Mattos, W.T.D.; Gimenes, F.M.D.A.; Batista, K.; Uzan, B.Z. Introduction of forage legumes into Aruana Guineagrass pasture. Bol. Indústria Anim. 2020, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reps, N.I.F.A.; Baer, C. NC1182: Management and Environmental Factors Affecting Nitrogen Cycling and Use Efficiency in Forage-Based Livestock Production Systems. NCRA, Agricultural Economics, USA. 2023. Available online: https://www.nimss.org/projects/view/mrp/outline/18596 (accessed on 19 December 2023).
- Le Roux, E.; Kerley, G.I.H.; Cromsigt, J. Megaherbivores modify trophic cascades triggered by fear of predation in an African savanna ecosystem. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 2493–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veldhuis, M.P.; Gommers, M.I.; Olff, H.; Berg, M.P. Spatial redistribution of nutrients by large herbivores and dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhang, J.H.E.X.Z.; Hou, F. Different effects of sheep excrement type and supply level on plant and soil C: N: P stoichiometry in a typical steppe on the loess plateau. Plant Soil 2021, 462, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Sá Souza, M.; Jardim, A.M.D.R.F.; Júnior, G.D.N.A.; Silva, J.R.I.; Leite, M.L.D.M.V.; Teixeira, V.I.; Da Silva, T.G.F. Ciclagem de nutrientes em ecossistemas de pastagens tropicais. Pubvet 2018, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—EMBRAPA. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação dos Solos, 1st ed.; EMBRAPA Solos: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Gonçalves, J.L.M.; Sparovek, G. Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2013, 22, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cipriani, H.N.; Salman, A.K.D.; Dos Passos, A.M.A.; Schmitt, E.; Cruz, P.C.; Botelho, F.J.E.; Moraes, K.K.S. Uma planilha Eletrônica Gratuita para Calcular a Sombra Projetada pelas Árvores. n. 145; EMBRAPA: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wilm, H.G.; Costello, D.F.; Klipple, G.E. Estimating forage yield by the 11 double-sampling methods. Agron. J. 1994, 36, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mott, G.O.; Lucas, H.L. The design, conduct, and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pastures. In Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress, State College, PA, USA, 17–23 August 1952. [Google Scholar]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists—AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, F.C. Manual de Análises Químicas de Solos, Plantas e Fertilizantes, 1st ed.; EMBRAPA: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Van Raij, B.; De Andrade, J.C.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A. Análise Química para Avaliação da Fertilidade de Solos Tropicais, 1st ed.; Instituto Agronômico: Campinas, Brazil, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—EMBRAPA. Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação de Solos; Manual de métodos de análises de solo; EMBRAPA: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Saraiva, F.P. Ciclagem de Nutrientes em Pastagens de Gramíneas Tropicais Manejadas sob Diferentes Intensidades de Pastejo. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio, A.C.F.; Silva, E.S.; Júnior, J.F.V.; Silva, E.E.; Santos, B.R.; Oliveira, R.F. Granulometria e teores de carbono e nitrogênio em solo sob sistemas integrados de produção. Agropecuária Científica No Semiárido 2020, 16, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayantunde, A.; Hiernaux, P.; Fernandez-Rivera, S.; Sangare, M. Improving the Profitability, Sustainability and Efficiency of Nutrients Through Site Specific Fertilizer Recommendations in West Africa Agro-Ecosystems. In Improving the Profitability, Sustainability and Efficiency of Nutrients through Site Specific Fertilizer Recommendations in West Africa Agro-Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids, 1st ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sacco, D.; Moretti, B.; Monaco, S.; Grignani, C. Six-year transition from conventional to organic farming: Effects on crop production and soil quality. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 69, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matus, F.J.; Rodríguez, J. A simple model for estimating the contribution of nitrogen mineralization to the nitrogen supply of crops from a stabilized pool of soil organic matter and recent organic input. Plant Soil 1994, 162, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weand, M.P.; Arthur, M.A.; Lovett, G.M.; Sikora, F.; Weathers, K.C. The phosphorus status of northern hardwoods differs by species but is unaffected by nitrogen fertilization. Biogeochemistry 2010, 97, 159–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paciullo, D.S.C.; Carvalho, C.A.B.; Aroeira, L.J.M.; Morenz, M.J.F.; Lopes, F.C.F.; Rossiello, R.O.P. Morfofisiologia e valor nutritivo do capimbraquiária sob sombreamento natural e a sol pleno. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2007, 42, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas, E.C.S.; Oliveira Neto, S.N.; Fonseca, D.M.; Santos, M.V.; Leite, H.G.; Machado, V.D. Deposição de serapilheira e de nutrientes no solo em sistema agrossilvipastoril com eucalipto e acácia. Rev. Árvore 2013, 37, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, M.O.D. Caracterização e Composição Mineral do Capim Mombaça em Diferentes Condições de Pastejo, em Sistema de Integração Pastagem-Floresta. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal do Norte do Tocantins, Araguaína, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Meteorological data (minimum and maximum temperatures, °C and precipitation, mm) observed during field evaluations (November 2019 to March 2020).
Figure 1.
Meteorological data (minimum and maximum temperatures, °C and precipitation, mm) observed during field evaluations (November 2019 to March 2020).
Table 1.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on organic matter, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents and standard error of the mean of soil samples collected at the end of the last experimental period in the different treatments.
Table 1.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on organic matter, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents and standard error of the mean of soil samples collected at the end of the last experimental period in the different treatments.
| Variable | Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Sun | Silvopastoral | ||||
| Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Mean 6 | |
| OM (g/dm3) 1 | 43.37 ± 2.92 | 46.23 ± 1.19 | 47.00 ± 0.72 | 45.33 ± 1.45 | 45.48 |
| OM (kg/ha) 1 | 86.733 ± 5.842 | 92.466 ± 2.384 | 94.000 ± 1.442 | 90.666 ± 2.899 | 90.966 |
| OC (g/dm3) 2 | 25.13 ± 1.71 | 26.83 ± 0.69 | 27.23 ± 0.43 | 26.30 ± 0.84 | 26.37 |
| OC (kg/ha) 2 | 50.266 ± 3.414 | 53.666 ± 1.377 | 54.466 ± 851 | 52.600 ± 1.677 | 52.750 |
| N (mg/kg) 3 | 2356.67 ± 234.21 | 2380.00 ± 122.52 | 2338.00 ± 78.00 | 2090.67 ± 76.93 | 2291.33 |
| N (kg/ha) 3 | 4713.33 ± 488.41 | 4760.00 ± 424.41 | 4676.00 ± 156.11 | 4181.33 ± 153.86 | 4582.67 |
| P (mg/dm3) 4 | 9.20 ± 2.20 | 10.25 ± 1.32 | 9.66 ± 2.42 | 6.89 ± 1.03 | 9.00 |
| P (kg/ha) 4 | 18.40 ± 4.41 | 20.51 ± 2.64 | 19.32 ± 4.85 | 13.79 ± 2.07 | 18.00 |
| K (mg/dm3) 5 | 84.72 ± 29.46 | 112.09 ± 19.20 | 110.78 ± 34.18 | 102.96 ± 37.53 | 102.63 |
| K (kg/ha) 5 | 169.43 ± 58.92 | 224.17 ± 38.40 | 221.56 ± 68.37 | 205.93 ± 75.05 | 205.27 |
1 OM—organic matter; 2 OC—organic carbon; 3 N—total nitrogen; 4 P—phosphorus; 5 K—potassium; 6 Mean—standard error of the mean.
Table 2.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on body weight (kg), stocking rate (kg/ha), total urine excretion (L/ha × day), urinary nitrogen (g/L) and amount of nitrogen returned via urine (g/ha × day) and standard error of the mean of lambs in shaded and full sun system with and without nitrogen fertilization.
Table 2.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on body weight (kg), stocking rate (kg/ha), total urine excretion (L/ha × day), urinary nitrogen (g/L) and amount of nitrogen returned via urine (g/ha × day) and standard error of the mean of lambs in shaded and full sun system with and without nitrogen fertilization.
| Variable | Treatments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Sun | Silvopastoral | |||||
| Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Mean 1 | p Value | |
| Body weight (kg) | 21.31 ± 2.08 | 21.02 ± 1.79 | 21.19 ± 1.65 | 20.81 ± 0.65 | 21.05 | 0.9966 |
| Livestock density (kg/ha) | 23.30 ± 4.79 | 17.26 ± 2.34 | 19.67 ± 3.34 | 17.24 ± 1.93 | 19.37 | 0.5410 |
| Total urine excretion (L/ha × day) | 0.732 ± 0.14 | 0.709 ± 0.16 | 0.695 ± 0.10 | 0.512 ± 0.07 | 0.662 | 0.5949 |
| Urinary nitrogen (g/L) | 0.459 ± 0.08 | 0.473 ± 0.06 | 0.435 ± 0.08 | 0.405 ± 0.09 | 0.443 | 0.9367 |
| Nitrogen returned via urine (g/ha × day) | 0.361 ± 0.12 | 0.334 ± 0.09 | 0.282 ± 0.02 | 0.196 ± 0.05 | 0.293 | 0.4887 |
1 MEAN—standard error of the mean.
Table 3.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on mineral contents (g/kg) and standard error of the mean of leaf and stem samples of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana in the silvopastoral system and full sun with and without fertilization.
Table 3.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and shading on mineral contents (g/kg) and standard error of the mean of leaf and stem samples of Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana in the silvopastoral system and full sun with and without fertilization.
| Leaves | Stems | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Treatments | Mean | Treatments | Mean 1 | ||||||
| Full Sun | Silvopastoral | Full Sun | Silvopastoral | |||||||
| Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Fertilization | Without Fertilization | Fertilization | Without Fertilization | |||
| P | 2.61 ± 0.11 b | 3.27 ± 0.07 a | 2.57 ± 0.19 b | 2.94 ± 0.05 ab | 2.85 | 1.67 ± 0.03 b | 2.12 ± 0.05 a | 1.55 ± 0.14 b | 1.79 ± 0.17 ab | 1.78 |
| K | 17.95 ± 1.00 b | 16.79 ± 1.78 b | 26.17 ± 0.52 a | 24.25 ± 1.29 a | 21.29 | 18.13 ± 1.85 | 15.47 ± 2.46 | 20.99 ± 2.50 | 16.62 ± 1.25 | 17.80 |
| Ca | 6.47 ± 0.18 a | 5.74 ± 0.12 b | 6.38 ± 0.18 ab | 6.25 ± 0.18 ab | 6.21 | 3.53 ± 0.08 | 3.44 ± 0.05 | 3.55 ± 0.05 | 3.42 ± 0.11 | 3.48 |
| Mg | 6.46 ± 0.20 a | 5.17 ± 0.28 b | 5.28 ± 0.31 b | 5.17 ± 0.15 b | 5.52 | 6.06 ± 0.28 a | 5.29 ± 0.32 ab | 4.76 ± 0.35 b | 4.96 ± 0.14 b | 5.27 |
| S | 2.34 ± 0.08 ab | 2.51 ± 0.05 a | 2.19 ± 0.06 b | 2.56 ± 0.04 a | 2.40 | 1.94 ± 0.05 b | 2.56 ± 0.12 a | 1.73 ± 0.05 b | 2.57 ± 0.12 a | 2.20 |
| N | 28.03 ± 2.52 | 27.03 ± 1.46 | 25.34 ± 1.56 | 26.79 ± 0.59 | 26.80 | 12.62 ± 1.60 | 18.96 ± 2.95 | 14.50 ± 1.24 | 12.10 ± 2.17 | 14.54 |
1 Mean—standard error of the mean. Averages followed by different letters in the same row comparing the effect of fertilization and shading are different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Baungratz, A.R.; de Borba, L.P.; de Menezes, B.M.; Porsch, J.L.M.; Venturini, T.; Borquis, R.R.A.; Mesquita, E.E.; Valente, É.E.L.; Macedo, V.d.P. Nutrient Characterization and Mineral Composition of Aruana in a Silvopastoral System with Nitrogen Fertilization. Grasses 2024, 3, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses3010002
AMA Style
Baungratz AR, de Borba LP, de Menezes BM, Porsch JLM, Venturini T, Borquis RRA, Mesquita EE, Valente ÉEL, Macedo VdP. Nutrient Characterization and Mineral Composition of Aruana in a Silvopastoral System with Nitrogen Fertilization. Grasses. 2024; 3(1):11-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses3010002
Chicago/Turabian StyleBaungratz, Andressa Radtke, Leonardo Piffer de Borba, Bruna Martins de Menezes, Jean Lucas Macari Porsch, Tiago Venturini, Rusbel Raúl Aspilcueta Borquis, Eduardo Eustáquio Mesquita, Ériton Egídio Lisboa Valente, and Vicente de Paulo Macedo. 2024. "Nutrient Characterization and Mineral Composition of Aruana in a Silvopastoral System with Nitrogen Fertilization" Grasses 3, no. 1: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses3010002
APA StyleBaungratz, A. R., de Borba, L. P., de Menezes, B. M., Porsch, J. L. M., Venturini, T., Borquis, R. R. A., Mesquita, E. E., Valente, É. E. L., & Macedo, V. d. P. (2024). Nutrient Characterization and Mineral Composition of Aruana in a Silvopastoral System with Nitrogen Fertilization. Grasses, 3(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses3010002
