Abstract
More than one in five children in New Zealand live in food poverty, meaning that they live without access to sufficient wholesome food for good health. Evidence suggests that Māori mothers are more likely to experience food insecurity due to inequities in income, education, employment, and housing security. The aim of the study was to explore the perspectives, experiences, and strategies employed by Māori mothers to meet food access needs for their whānau. In-depth unstructured interviews were conducted with twenty Māori mothers living in Kaitaia in the far north of New Zealand who had at least one child aged two years or younger. An inductive approach was undertaken to allow findings to emerge from the data. Interviews investigated dietary habits and routines, methods of food procurement, nutrition knowledge, skills, and perceptions towards healthy food. Recorded interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis using NVivo was undertaken to identify, analyse, and report themes. Three key themes were identified. Firstly, ensuring whānau are fed using inexpensive but less nutritious foods, they reported missing meals, and feeding tamariki was prioritised. Secondly, accessing food from multiple avenues is a time-consuming journey. Participants reported accessing food grants and food banks to ensure adequate food for the household, which required time and effort, increasing stress and anxiety. Finally, the need to cope with the unexpected and unplanned, such as health and housing issues, influenced food access needs. Being well-connected to whānau, community groups, support services, and online digital access was pivotal for Māori mothers to meet whānau food needs. Māori mothers placed priority on ensuring that their whānau were fed, despite understanding healthy food choices, cost, and taste of food were driving factors in food purchase decisions. Connections were key to navigating multiple avenues to access food and cope with unexpected and unplanned circumstances.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.W., G.K. and J.U.; methodology, C.W. and G.K.; formal analysis, J.U.; investigation, J.U.; G.K. and C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.U.; writing—review and editing, C.W.; G.K. and J.U.; supervision, C.W.; G.K.; project administration, J.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Human Ethics Committee, Northern Region of Massey University (NOR20/17), May 2020.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request due to restrictions e.g., privacy or ethical The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and permission of participants.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).