You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Medical Sciences Forum
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

1 November 2022

Ecotoxicological Tools to Assess Cytostatic Effects in Freshwater Environments: Aiding Drug Prioritization †

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
3
CICECO–Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
4
Department of Biology and Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
This article belongs to the Proceedings The 8th International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Given the growing number of cancer diseases, new cytostatic drugs are approved daily, often with concomitant development, or refinement of some of these drugs aimed at decreasing patient discomfort during the administration period (e.g., prodrugs). Classified as highly toxic, they represent a major environmental problem that may potentiate disease occurrences. For newer cytostatic and prodrugs there are no (or few) reported effects to aquatic organisms; therefore, their prioritization is constrained. In light of the points raised, the IonCytDevice project intended to bridge some of these knowledge gaps and has delivered important benchmarks. Predictions have been obtained on the environmental impacts of three cytostatics (cyclophosphamide: CYP; 5-fluoroucil: 5-FU; and mycophenolic acid: MPA) and one prodrug (capecitabine: CAP) on freshwater biota, with a focus on new species and endpoints likely to be also framed in meta-analysis studies. The results reveal that, for now, CYP, 5-FU, and CAP (prodrug) pose no risk, whilst MPA was flagged as a high environmental risk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.V., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; methodology, M.C.N. and I.L.; validation, A.C.A.S. and I.L.; formal analysis, C.V. and B.M.; investigation, B.M., R.F.; resources, M.G.F. and I.L.; data curation, C.V., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V. and B.M.; writing—review and editing, C.V., R.F., M.C.N.; M.G.F., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; visualization, C.V., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; supervision, M.G.F., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; project administration, M.G.F., A.C.A.S. and I.L.; funding acquisition, M.G.F. and I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES grant number POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031106 (IonCytDevice—PTCD/BTA-BTA/31106/2017).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.