Comparison of the CMT Test Results Carried Out on Camels and Bovines †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material & Methods
2.1. Farms and Animals
2.2. CMT
2.3. Prevalence
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results & Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Durel, L.; Faroult, B.; Lepoutre, D.; Brouillet, P.; Le Page, P. Cattle mastitis (clinical and subclinical). Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Technical supplement. Dépêche Vétérinaire 2004, 87, 42. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Hanzen, C. Propaedeutics of the Mammary Gland, Semiology and Individual Diagnosis of the Herd; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege: Liège, Belgium, 2009; pp. 1–28. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Harmon, R.J. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2103–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guerin, P. Staphylococcal mastitis in cows: Epidemiological aspects. In Proceedings of the Staphylococci and Public Health, Ninth GTV Rhône-Alpes Meetings, National Veterinary School of Lyon, Lyon, France, 18 June 1998; pp. 1–21. (In French). [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Deora, A.; Himanshu, S.; Sharma, S.; Mittal, D.; Bhanot, V.; Prakash, A.; Yadav, R.; Diwaka, R.P. Bovine Mastitis: A Review. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2020, 28, 497–507. [Google Scholar]
- Khelifa, Z. Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis by CMT and Electroconductivity in the Camel; Higher National Veterinary School: Algiers, Algeria, 2014. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Aljumaah, R.S.; Almutairi, F.F.; Ayadi, M.; Alshaikh, M.A.; Aljumaah, A.M.; Hussein, M.F. Factors influencing the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in lactating dromedary camels in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011, 43, 1605–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdurahman, O.A.S. The detection of subclinical mastitis in the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) by somatic cell count and California mastitis test. Vet. Res. Commun. 1996, 20, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saleh, S.K.; Faye, B. Detection of subclinical mastitis in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedaries) using somatic cell counts, California mastitis test and udder pathogen. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2011, 23, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
Stage of Lactation | Age | Udders | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning | End | Primiparous | Middle | Old | Post | Ant | |
Camelins (%) [6] | 14 (25) | 43 (75) | 40 (70) | 12 (21) | 5 (9) | 71 (33) | 80 (37) |
Bovins (%) | 74 (71) | 30 (29) | 18 (17) | 79 (76) | 7 (17) | 34 (16) | 13 (6) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bouchoucha, B.; Zeghilet, N.; Bouaziz, O. Comparison of the CMT Test Results Carried Out on Camels and Bovines. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 22, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2023022016
Bouchoucha B, Zeghilet N, Bouaziz O. Comparison of the CMT Test Results Carried Out on Camels and Bovines. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2023; 22(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2023022016
Chicago/Turabian StyleBouchoucha, Brahim, Noureddine Zeghilet, and Omar Bouaziz. 2023. "Comparison of the CMT Test Results Carried Out on Camels and Bovines" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 22, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2023022016
APA StyleBouchoucha, B., Zeghilet, N., & Bouaziz, O. (2023). Comparison of the CMT Test Results Carried Out on Camels and Bovines. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 22(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2023022016