Abstract
Identification of larvae of fish is usually based on assembling a developmental series of wild-collected larvae, usually formalin preserved, using pigmentation patterns, morphology and fin meristics. However, for many species, larvae are still undescribed, or there are only limited descriptions of larvae development. Formalin fixation of larval fish was previously thought to prevent genetic sequencing compared to ethanol-preserved larvae. In this poster, we detail the results of an integrative taxonomic approach based on morphology, imaging and DNA barcoding of the mitochondrial (mtDNA) cytochrome c oxidase subunit (COI) gene. We used this approach in both cultured yellow tail kingfish, Seriola lalandi and wild-sourced fish larvae fixed in 5% formalin. DNA barcoding and genetic species identification were 100% successful in S. lalandi fixed in formalin for up to 6 months, while barcoding of wild-caught fish larvae enabled species identification of 93% for up to 8-week formalin-fixed specimens. While COI genetic identifications from the in-field experiments were patchier than the controlled experiments, our study highlights the possibility of recovering suitable DNA from formalin-fixed larvae for up to six months. This was achieved by applying DNA extraction methods that use de-cross-linking steps and species identification based on both full-length reference and mini-barcodes. Our study provides a practical framework for undertaking both morphological and genetic identification to document the larval development of previously undescribed species from historic and current formalin-fixed samples collected around southern Australia.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.G.M., S.A.A., A.L.-L., P.M., S.F. and I.S.; methodology, A.G.M., S.A.A., A.L.-L., P.M. and I.S.; validation, A.G.M., S.A.A. and S.M.; formal analysis, S.A.A.; investigation, A.G.M., S.A.A., A.L.-L. and S.F.; resources, S.A.A. and S.F.; data curation, A.G.M., S.A.A. and S.M.; writing—original, draft preparation, S.A.A.; review and editing, A.G.M., S.A.A., S.M., A.L.-L., P.M., S.F. and I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Sydney Institute of Marine Science and co-funding from the University of New South Wales, NSW Recreational Fishing Trrust and Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS). Data was sourced from IMOS–IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Larval spawning and handling were undertaken at the Port Stephens research institute under the NSW Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries), Animal Care and Ethics Permits 93-1 and 93-3 for Larval Fish Rearing and Marine Fish Breeding respectively. Larval fish collections at the IMOS national reference stations were collected under ethics permit UNSW ACEC 19/96B.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151763 (accessed on 27 May 2022).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).