Abstract
River ecosystems are exposed to a multitude of stressors, of which pesticide run-off is increasingly becoming a global environmental concern due to adverse effects on aquatic organisms. Of those, pyrethroids are now the fourth major group of insecticides in use worldwide; however, their sublethal effects on freshwater fish are still largely unknown. The present study aimed to assess the effects of an acute 2 h sublethal exposure to different levels of the pyrethroid pesticide esfenvalerate on the behaviour of two Cypriniformes species: the native Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei) and the non-native invasive bleak (Alburnus alburnus). Fish were previously exposed to three esfenvalerate concentrations (control, 1.2 μg/L (mild), and 2.0 μg/L (severe)), before being placed into a three-artificial-flume channel mesocosm for behavioural trials on (i) routine activity, (ii) shoal cohesion, and (iii) boldness. Significant differences in fish behaviour were detected for the barbel, as individuals were found to spend a higher proportion of time holding their position (i.e., resting) from the control to the severe esfenvalerate concentration. Behavioral changes were also detected for boldness, measured by the proportion of fish attempts to negotiate the upstream ramp, which were significantly higher in the control and in the severe concentration compared to the mild one. For the invasive bleak, there were no significant differences in any of the behavioural parameters upon previous exposure to an increasing esfenvalerate concentration. The present study demonstrated that even a short-term exposure to the pyrethroid esfenvalerate was sufficient to alter the behaviour of a native fish species, while no affecting the non-native, which may confer them greater competitive advantages in the context of global changes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: P.B. and J.M.S., investigation: I.V., M.O., T.L., P.B. and J.M.S., resources: J.M.S.; Coordination: P.B. and J.M.S.; Data Analisys: I.V., M.O. and T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Tamara Leite was supported by a Ph.D. grant from the FLUVIO–River Restoration and Management pro-gramme funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I. P. (FCT),Portugal (UI/BD/15052/2021). Paulo Branco was financed by national funds via FCT, under “Norma Transitória—DL57/2016/CP1382/CT0020”. The study was partially funded by the project Dammed Fish (PTDC/CTA-AMB/4086/2021). Forest Research Centre (CEF) is a research unit funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P. (FCT), Portugal (UIDB/00239/2020).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conduct in line with national and international guidelines of animal welfare.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available upon request to the authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).