Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Bacillus and Actinomycetes Isolated from the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Agroecological Zones of Peru
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling Sites and Biological Material
2.2. Isolation and Morphological Characterization of Bacteria
2.3. Phenotypic Characterization
2.4. Lytic Enzyme Characterization
2.5. PGPR Activity Assays
2.6. In Vitro Germination Assays
2.7. Antagonistic Activity Assays
2.8. Greenhouse Evaluation
2.9. Molecular Identification
2.10. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Isolation and Morphological Characterization of Bacterial Strains
3.2. Phenotypic Characterization: Growth at Different Temperatures and pH
3.3. Lytic Enzyme Activity
3.4. Plant Growth-Promoting Traits
3.5. In Vitro Germination Assays
3.6. Antagonistic Activity Against Rhizoctonia solani and Alternaria alternata
3.7. Greenhouse Evaluation of Biocontrol Potential
3.8. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Diversity and Adaptation of Native PGPR Isolated from Potato Agroecosystems
4.2. Enzymatic and Functional Traits Supporting Biocontrol Activity
4.3. Plant Growth-Promoting Capacity and Germination Enhancement
4.4. In Vitro and In Vivo Biocontrol Performance Against Fungal Pathogens
4.5. Taxonomic Identity and Biotechnological Potential of Selected Strains
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zaeen, A.A.; Sharma, L.K.; Jasim, A.; Bali, S.; Buzza, A.; Alyokhin, A. Yield and Quality of Three Potato Cultivars under Series of Nitrogen Rates. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. 2020, 3, e20062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadu, T.; Abdullahi, A.; Ahmad, K. The Role of Crop Protection in Sustainable Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Production to Alleviate Global Starvation Problem: An Overview. In Solanum Tuberosum—A Promising Crop for Starvation Problem; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Devaux, A.; Goffart, J.-P.; Petsakos, A.; Kromann, P.; Gatto, M.; Okello, J.; Suarez, V.; Hareau, G. Global Food Security, Contributions from Sustainable Potato Agri-Food Systems. In The Potato Crop; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 3–35. [Google Scholar]
- Flores, H.E.; Walker, T.S.; Guimaraães, R.L.; Bais, H.P.; Vivanco, J.M. Andean Root and Tuber Crops: Underground Rainbows. HortScience 2003, 38, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz, O.; Mares, V. The Historical, Social, and Economic Importance of the Potato Crop. In The Potato Genome; Chakrabarti, S.K., Xie, C., Tiwari, J.K., Eds.; Springer Nature: London, UK, 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- De la Cruz, G.; Miranda, T.Y.; Blas, R.H.; Neyra, E.; Orjeda, G. Simple Sequence Repeat-Based Genetic Diversity and Analysis of Molecular Variance among on-Farm Native Potato Landraces from the Influence Zone of Camisea Gas Project, Northern Ayacucho, Peru. Am. J. Potato Res. 2020, 97, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Haan, S.; Núñez, J.; Bonierbale, M.; Ghislain, M. Multilevel Agrobiodiversity and Conservation of Andean Potatoes in Central Peru. Mt. Res. Dev. 2010, 30, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, G.J. Plants, People, and the Conservation of Biodiversity of Potatoes in Peru. Nat. Conserv. 2011, 9, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adolf, B.; Andrade-Piedra, J.; Bittara Molina, F.; Przetakiewicz, J.; Hausladen, H.; Kromann, P.; Lees, A.; Lindqvist-Kreuze, H.; Perez, W.; Secor, G.A. Fungal, Oomycete, and Plasmodiophorid Diseases of Potato. In The Potato Crop; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 307–350. [Google Scholar]
- Kvasko, O.; Kolomiiets, Y.; Buziashvili, A.; Yemets, A. Biotechnological Approaches to Increase the Bacterial and Fungal Disease Resistance in Potato. Open Agric. J. 2022, 16, e187433152210070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiptoo, J.; Abbas, A.; Bhatti, A.M.; Usman, H.M.; Shad, M.A.; Umer, M.; Atiq, M.N.; Alam, S.M.; Ateeq, M.; Khan, M.; et al. Rhizoctonia Solani of Potato and Its Management: A Review. Plant Prot. 2021, 5, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husain, A.; Rashid, M.M.; Akhtar, N.; Muin, A.; Ahmad, G. In-Vitro Evaluation of Fungicides at Different Concentrations against Alternaria Solani Causing Early Blight of Potato. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 1874–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseka, D.L.; Gudmestad, N.C. Spatial and Temporal Sensitivity of Alternaria Species Associated with Potato Foliar Diseases to Demethylation Inhibiting and Anilino-Pyrimidine Fungicides. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1848–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsror, L.; Peretz-Alon, I. The Influence of the Inoculum Source of Rhizoctonia Solani on Development of Black Scurf on Potato. J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, S.; Pesaresi, P.; Mizzotti, C.; Bulone, V.; Mezzetti, B.; Baraldi, E.; Masiero, S. Game-Changing Alternatives to Conventional Fungicides: Small RNAs and Short Peptides. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 320–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ons, L.; Bylemans, D.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.A. Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M.; Tarafdar, A.; Ghosh, R.; Gopalakrishanan, S. Biological Control as a Tool for Eco-Friendly Management of Plant Pathogens. In Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects; Adhya, T., Mishra, B., Annapurna, K., Verma, D., Kumar, U., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 4, pp. 153–188. [Google Scholar]
- Gowtham, H.G.; Hema, P.; Murali, M.; Shilpa, N.; Nataraj, K.; Basavaraj, G.L.; Singh, S.B.; Aiyaz, M.; Udayashankar, A.C.; Amruthesh, K.N. Fungal Endophytes as Mitigators against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Crop Plants. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McLaughlin, M.S.; Roy, M.; Abbasi, P.A.; Carisse, O.; Yurgel, S.N.; Ali, S. Why Do We Need Alternative Methods for Fungal Disease Management in Plants? Plants 2023, 12, 3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshahat, M.R.; Ahmed, A.A.; Enas, A.H.; Fekria, M.S. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Their Potential for Biocontrol of Phytopathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 10, 486–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeyanthi, V.; Kanimozhi, S. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)—Prospective and Mechanisms: A Review. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 12, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Hameed, S.; Shahid, M.; Iqbal, M.; Lazarovits, G.; Imran, A. Functional Characterization of Potential PGPR Exhibiting Broad-Spectrum Antifungal Activity. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 232, 126389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Iftikhar, Y.; Mubeen, M.; Ali, H.; Ahmad Zeshan, M.; Asad, Z.; Zafar-ul-Hye, M.; Abdul Rehman, M.; Abbas, M.; Rafique, M.; et al. Antagonistic Potential of Bacterial Species against Fungal Plant Pathogens (FPP) and Their Role in Plant Growth Promotion (PGP): A Review. Phyton 2022, 91, 1859–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijeysingha, S.; Walpola, B.C.; Kang, Y.-G.; Yoon, M.-H.; Oh, T.-K. Practical Significance of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Korean J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 50, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velasco-Jiménez, A.; Castellanos-Hernández, O.; Acevedo-Hernández, G.; Aarland, R.C.; Rodríguez-Sahagún, A. Rhizospheric Bacteria with Potential Benefits in Agriculture. Adv. Mod. Agric. 2022, 3, 2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousa, W.K.; Raizada, M.N. Biodiversity of Genes Encoding Anti-Microbial Traits within Plant Associated Microbes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Anand, G.; Gaur, R.; Yadav, D. Plant–Microbiome Interactions for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Finkel, O.M.; Castrillo, G.; Herrera Paredes, S.; Salas González, I.; Dangl, J.L. Understanding and Exploiting Plant Beneficial Microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 38, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, U.; Rehmani, M.S.; Wang, L.; Luo, X.; Xian, B.; Wei, S.; Wang, G.; Shu, K. Toward a Molecular Understanding of Rhizosphere, Phyllosphere, and Spermosphere Interactions in Plant Growth and Stress Response. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2021, 40, 479–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumawat, K.C.; Razdan, N.; Saharan, K. Rhizospheric Microbiome: Bio-Based Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture Development and Future Perspectives. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 254, 126901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haddad, F.; Maffia, L.A.; Mizubuti, E.S.G.; Teixeira, H. Biological Control of Coffee Rust by Antagonistic Bacteria under Field Conditions in Brazil. Biol. Control 2009, 49, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurung, T.D.; Sherpa, C.; Agrawal, V.P.; Lekhak, B. Isolation and Characterization of Antibacterial Actinomycetes from Soil Samples of Kalapatthar, Mount Everest Region. Nepal. J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 10, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergey, J.; Hendriks, D.; Holt, J. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology; Sneathy Stanley, J.T., Ed.; The Williams and Wilkins Co. Philadelphia: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Calvo, P.; Zúñiga, D. Physiological Characterization of Bacillus spp. Strains from Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Rhizosphere. Ecol. Apl. 2010, 9, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Espejo, C.N.; Mamani-Mamani, M.M.; Chávez-Lizárraga, G.A.; Álvarez-Aliaga, M.T. Evaluación de La Actividad Enzimática Del Trichoderma Inhamatum (BOL-12 QD) Como Posible Biocontrolador. J. Selva Andin. Res. Soc. 2016, 7, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedroza-Padilla, C.J.; Romero-Tabarez, M.; Orduz, S. Actividad Lipoítica de Microorganismos Aislados de Aguas Residuales Contaminadas Con Grasas. Biotecnol. En El Sect. Agropecu. Y Agroindustrial 2017, 15, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodas-Junco, B.A.; Quero-Bautista, M.; Magaña-Sevilla, H.F.; Reyes-Ramírez, A. Selección de Cepas Nativas Con Actividad Quitino-Proteolítica de Bacillus sp. Aisladas de Suelos Tropicales. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2009, 11, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
- Avalos-Zavaleta, R.; Llenque-Diaz, L.; Segura-Vega, R. Aislamiento y Selección de Cultivos Nativos de Bacillus sp. Productor de Amilasas a Partir de Residuos Amiláceos Del Mercado La Hermelinda, Trujillo, Perú. REBIOL 2016, 36, 16–26. [Google Scholar]
- Panchal, K.J. Identification of Cellulase Enzyme Involved in Biocontrol Activity. In Practical Handbook on Agricultural Microbiology; Humana Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 317–322. [Google Scholar]
- Harikrishnan, H.; Shanmugaiah, V.; Balasubramanian, N.; Sharma, M.P.; Kotchoni, S.O. Antagonistic Potential of Native Strain Streptomyces aurantiogriseus VSMGT1014 against Sheath Blight of Rice Disease. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 3149–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nautiyal, C.S. An Efficient Microbiological Growth Medium for Screening Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, D.B.; Zuberer, D.A. Use of Chrome Azurol S Reagents to Evaluate Siderophore Production by Rhizosphere Bacteria. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1991, 12, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- French, E.R.; Hebert, T.T. Métodos de Investigación Fitopatológica; Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agrícolas: San Jose, Costa Rica, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Kiige, J.K.; Kavoo, A.M.; Mwajita, M.R.; Mogire, D.; Ogada, S.; Wekesa, T.B.; Kiirika, L.M. Metagenomic Characterization of Bacterial Abundance and Diversity in Potato Cyst Nematode Suppressive and Conducive Potato Rhizosphere. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0323382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Serquén, A.L.; Chumbe-Nolasco, L.D.; Navarrete, A.A.; Girón-Aguilar, R.C.; Gutiérrez-Reynoso, D.L. Traditional Potato Tillage Systems in the Peruvian Andes Impact Bacterial Diversity, Evenness, Community Composition, and Functions in Soil Microbiomes. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sessitsch, A.; Reiter, B.; Berg, G. Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Field-Grown Potato Plants and Their Plant-Growth-Promoting and Antagonistic Abilities. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfeiffer, S.; Mitter, B.; Oswald, A.; Schloter-Hai, B.; Schloter, M.; Declerck, S.; Sessitsch, A. Rhizosphere Microbiomes of Potato Cultivated in the High Andes Show Stable and Dynamic Core Microbiomes with Different Responses to Plant Development. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fiw242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dussarrat, T.; Latorre, C.; Barros Santos, M.C.; Aguado-Norese, C.; Prigent, S.; Díaz, F.P.; Rolin, D.; González, M.; Müller, C.; Gutiérrez, R.A.; et al. Rhizochemistry and Soil Bacterial Community Are Tailored to Natural Stress Gradients. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2025, 202, 109662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, S.A.; Khaliq, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ashraf, N.; Ghauri, M.A.; Anwar, M.A.; Akhtar, K. Application of Combined Irradiation Mutagenesis Technique for Hyperproduction of Surfactin in Bacillus velezensis Strain AF_3B. Int. J. Microbiol. 2025, 2025, 5570585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uesugi, J.H.E.; dos Santos Caldas, D.; Coelho, B.B.F.; Prazes, M.C.C.; Omura, L.Y.E.; Pismel, J.A.R.; Bezerra, N.V. Morphological Diversity of Actinobacteria Isolated from Oil Palm Compost (Elaeis guineensis). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2024, 55, 455–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Tang, S.; Yang, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, W.; Li, S.; Chen, T.; Liu, G.; Dyson, P. Streptomyces dangxiongensis sp. Nov., Isolated from Soil of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 2729–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palaniyandi, S.A.; Yang, S.H.; Zhang, L.; Suh, J.-W. Effects of Actinobacteria on Plant Disease Suppression and Growth Promotion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9621–9636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de los Santos Villalobos, S.; Robles, R.I.; Parra Cota, F.I.; Larsen, J.; Lozano, P.; Tiedje, J.M. Bacillus cabrialesii sp. Nov., an Endophytic Plant Growth Promoting Bacterium Isolated from Wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 3939–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvo, P.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Zúñiga, D. Characterization of Bacillus Isolates of Potato Rhizosphere from Andean Soils of Peru and Their Potential PGPR Characteristics. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kari, A.; Nagymáté, Z.; Romsics, C.; Vajna, B.; Tóth, E.; Lazanyi-Kovács, R.; Rizó, B.; Kutasi, J.; Bernhardt, B.; Farkas, É.; et al. Evaluating the Combined Effect of Biochar and PGPR Inoculants on the Bacterial Community in Acidic Sandy Soil. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2021, 160, 103856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilks, J.C.; Kitko, R.D.; Cleeton, S.H.; Lee, G.E.; Ugwu, C.S.; Jones, B.D.; BonDurant, S.S.; Slonczewski, J.L. Acid and Base Stress and Transcriptomic Responses in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, H. Whole-Genome Analysis Revealed the Growth-Promoting and Biological Control Mechanism of the Endophytic Bacterial Strain Bacillus halotolerans Q2H2, with Strong Antagonistic Activity in Potato Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1287921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Thomloudi, E.-E.; Delis, C.; Nifakos, K.; Zambounis, A.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Compatible Consortium of Endophytic Bacillus Halotolerans Strains Cal.l.30 and Cal.f.4 Promotes Plant Growth and Induces Systemic Resistance against Botrytis Cinerea. Biology 2023, 12, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, F.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Liu, L.; Deng, J. Biocontrol Ability and Action Mechanism of Bacillus Halotolerans against Botrytis Cinerea Causing Grey Mould in Postharvest Strawberry Fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, S.; Safaie, N.; Sadeghi, A.; Shamsbakhsh, M. Streptomyces Strains Induce Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Race 3 in Tomato Through Different Molecular Mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nozari, R.M.; Ramos, L.M.; da Luz, L.A.; Almeida, R.N.; Lucas, A.M.; Cassel, E.; de Oliveira, S.D.; Astarita, L.V.; Santarém, E.R. Halotolerant Streptomyces spp. Induce Salt Tolerance in Maize through Systemic Induction of the Antioxidant System and Accumulation of Proline. Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbari, A.; Gharanjik, S.; Koobaz, P.; Sadeghi, A. Plant Growth Promoting Streptomyces Strains Are Selectively Interacting with the Wheat Cultivars Especially in Saline Conditions. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contesini, F.J.; de Rodrigues, R.; Sato, H.H. An Overview of Bacillus Proteases: From Production to Application. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guleria, S.; Walia, A.; Chauhan, A.; Shirkot, C.K. Molecular Characterization of Alkaline Protease of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens SP1 Involved in Biocontrol of Fusarium Oxysporum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 232, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, S.P.; Hartmann, A.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Biocontrol Mechanism by Root-Associated Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens FZB42—A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, E.; Saad, M.; Hassan, H.; Zeidan, E. Purification and Characterization of Alkaline Protease Produced by Streptomyces flavogriseus and Its Application as a Biocontrol Agent for Plant Pathogens. Egypt. Pharm. J. 2019, 18, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimi-Zarandi, M.; Bonjar, G.H.S.; Riseh, R.S.; El-Shetehy, M.; Saadoun, I.; Barka, E.A. Exploring Two Streptomyces Species to Control Rhizoctonia solani in Tomato. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Esmail, G.A.; Ghilan, A.-K.M.; Arasu, M.V. Isolation and Screening of Streptomyces sp. Al-Dhabi-49 from the Environment of Saudi Arabia with Concomitant Production of Lipase and Protease in Submerged Fermentation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Park, J.; Choi, S.; Bui, D.-C.; Kim, J.-E.; Shin, J.; Kim, H.; Choi, G.J.; Lee, Y.-W.; et al. Genetic and Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanisms of Lipase Activity in the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium Graminearum. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e05285-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Deng, J.-J.; Mo, Z.-Q.; Zhang, M.-S.; Yang, Z.-D.; Zhang, J.-R.; Li, Y.-W.; Dan, X.-M.; Luo, X.-C. Synergic Chitin Degradation by Streptomyces sp. SCUT-3 Chitinases and Their Applications in Chitinous Waste Recycling and Pathogenic Fungi Biocontrol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotb, E.; Alabdalall, A.H.; Alghamdi, A.I.; Ababutain, I.M.; Aldakeel, S.A.; Al-Zuwaid, S.K.; Algarudi, B.M.; Algarudi, S.M.; Ahmed, A.A.; Albarrag, A.M. Screening for Chitin Degrading Bacteria in the Environment of Saudi Arabia and Characterization of the Most Potent Chitinase from Streptomyces variabilis Am1. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Viaene, T.; Langendries, S.; Beirinckx, S.; Maes, M.; Goormachtig, S. Streptomyces as a Plant’s Best Friend? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoaib, A.; Shehla, H.; Sheikh, H.; Hassan, M. Screening, Isolation, and Enzyme Kinetics of Bacterial Amylase Collected from Rhizosphere Soil. J. Sustain. Environ. 2023, 2, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashkandi, M.; Baz, L. Function of CAZymes Encoded by Highly Abundant Genes in Rhizosphere Microbiome of Moringa Oleifera. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 30, 103578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olanrewaju, O.S.; Babalola, O.O. Streptomyces: Implications and Interactions in Plant Growth Promotion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torres-Rodriguez, J.A.; Reyes-Pérez, J.J.; Quiñones-Aguilar, E.E.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G. Actinomycete Potential as Biocontrol Agent of Phytopathogenic Fungi: Mechanisms, Source, and Applications. Plants 2022, 11, 3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheshwari, D.K.; Dheeman, S.; Agarwal, M. Phytohormone-Producing PGPR for Sustainable Agriculture. In Bacterial Metabolites in Sustainable Agroecosystem; Springer: London, UK, 2015; Volume 12, pp. 159–182. [Google Scholar]
- Sansinenea, E. Bacillus spp.: As Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. In Secondary Metabolites of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizomicroorganisms: Discovery and Applications; Singh, H., Keswani, C., Reddy, M., Sansinenea, E., García-Estrada, C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 225–237. ISBN 9789811358623. [Google Scholar]
- Idris, E.E.; Iglesias, D.J.; Talon, M.; Borriss, R. Tryptophan-Dependent Production of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) Affects Level of Plant Growth Promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ren, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, B.; Li, E.; Chen, S. Siderophore and Indolic Acid Production by Paenibacillus Triticisoli BJ-18 and Their Plant Growth-Promoting and Antimicrobe Abilities. PeerJ 2020, 2020, e9403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chouyia, F.E.; Romano, I.; Fechtali, T.; Fagnano, M.; Fiorentino, N.; Visconti, D.; Idbella, M.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O. P-Solubilizing Streptomyces roseocinereus MS1B15 with Multiple Plant Growth-Promoting Traits Enhance Barley Development and Regulate Rhizosphere Microbial Population. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chouyia, F.E.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O. Diversity, Mechanisms and Beneficial Features of Phosphate-Solubilizing Streptomyces in Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1035358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimkpa, C.O.; Merten, D.; Svatoš, A.; Büchel, G.; Kothe, E. Metal-Induced Oxidative Stress Impacting Plant Growth in Contaminated Soil Is Alleviated by Microbial Siderophores. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, P.; Zhao, B.; Sun, X.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, C.; Zhang, J. Effects of Bacillus Subtilis HS5B5 on Maize Seed Germination and Seedling Growth under NaCl Stress Conditions. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katiyar, D. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria-an Efficient Tool for Agriculture Promotion. Adv. Plants Agric. Res. 2016, 4, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslennikova, V.S.; Tsvetkova, V.P.; Shelikhova, E.V.; Selyuk, M.P.; Alikina, T.Y.; Kabilov, M.R.; Dubovskiy, I.M. Bacillus Subtilis and Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Mix Suppresses Rhizoctonia Disease and Improves Rhizosphere Microbiome, Growth and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, N.S. Bacillus spp.: A Bio-Inoculant Factory for Plant Growth Promotion and Immune Enhancement. Biofertilizers 2021, 1, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, J.; Sui, W.W.; Bai, X.Y.; Qiu, Z.L.; Li, X.G.; Zhu, J.Z. Characterization and Biocontrol Mechanism of Streptomyces olivoreticuli as a Potential Biocontrol Agent against Rhizoctonia Solani. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 197, 105681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, Q.; Khan, A.R.; Tao, S.; Rajer, F.U.; Ayaz, M.; Abro, M.A.; Gu, Q.; Wu, H.; Kuptsov, V.; Kolomiets, E.; et al. Broad-spectrum Antagonistic Potential of Bacillus spp. Volatiles against Rhizoctonia solani and Xanthomonas oryzae Pv. oryzae. Physiol. Plant 2023, 175, e14087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergnes, S.; Gayrard, D.; Veyssière, M.; Toulotte, J.; Martinez, Y.; Dumont, V.; Bouchez, O.; Rey, T.; Dumas, B. Phyllosphere Colonization by a Soil Streptomyces sp. Promotes Plant Defense Responses Against Fungal Infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomloudi, E.-E.; Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Baira, E.; Papadimitriou, K.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Genomic and Metabolomic Insights into Secondary Metabolites of the Novel Bacillus Halotolerans Hil4, an Endophyte with Promising Antagonistic Activity against Gray Mold and Plant Growth Promoting Potential. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsalgatidou, P.C.; Thomloudi, E.-E.; Baira, E.; Papadimitriou, K.; Skagia, A.; Venieraki, A.; Katinakis, P. Integrated Genomic and Metabolomic Analysis Illuminates Key Secreted Metabolites Produced by the Novel Endophyte Bacillus Halotolerans Cal.l.30 Involved in Diverse Biological Control Activities. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Wu, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Farzand, A.; Yang, X.; Semenov, M.; Borriss, R.; et al. Genomic Features and Molecular Function of a Novel Stress-Tolerant Bacillus Halotolerans Strain Isolated from an Extreme Environment. Biology 2021, 10, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law, J.W.-F.; Ser, H.-L.; Khan, T.M.; Chuah, L.-H.; Pusparajah, P.; Chan, K.-G.; Goh, B.-H.; Lee, L.-H. The Potential of Streptomyces as Biocontrol Agents against the Rice Blast Fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae (Pyricularia oryzae). Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Srivastava, S.; Karnwal, A.; Malik, T. Streptomyces as a Promising Biological Control Agents for Plant Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1285543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J. Streptomyces Strains and Their Metabolites for Biocontrol of Phytopathogens in Agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 2077–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bubici, G. Streptomyces spp. as Biocontrol Agents against Fusarium Species. CABI Rev. 2018, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aremu, B.R.; Alori, E.T.; Kutu, R.F.; Babalola, O.O. Potentials of Microbial Inoculants in Soil Productivity: An Outlook on African Legumes. In Microorganisms for Green Revolution. Microorganisms for Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 53–75. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/PAVSNNR201813050 (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- Adeniji, A.; Fadiji, A.E.; Li, S.; Guo, R. From Lab Bench to Farmers’ Fields: Co-Creating Microbial Inoculants with Farmers Input. Rhizosphere 2024, 31, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Strain | Proteolytic Activity (%) | Lipolytic Activity (%) | Chitinolytic Activity (%) | Amylolytic Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillus | ||||
| BPP4 | 17.83 ± 0.90 | 25.41 ± 0.27 | 0 | 70.81 ± 0.16 |
| 2BPP8 | 32.47 ± 0.46 | 40.2 ± 0.05 | 0 | 68.65 ± 0.39 |
| 3BPP7 | 54.3 ± 0.43 | 30.43 ± 0.18 | 0 | 60.64 ± 0.42 |
| 4BPP4 | 58.87 ± 0.58 | 29.14 ± 0.24 | 0 | 60.67 ± 0.27 |
| 4BPP6 | 63.28 ± 0.35 | 23.26 ± 0.27 | 0 | 0 |
| 4BPP8 | 21.62 ± 0.19 | 32.74 ± 0.26 | 0 | 42.72 ± 0.22 |
| Actinomycetes | ||||
| ACPP2 | 65.5 ± 0.4 | 48.7 ± 0.38 | 14.6 ± 0.32 | 78.7 ± 0.19 |
| ACPP3 | 63.3 ± 0.08 | 57.51 ± 0.03 | 22.4 ± 0.07 | 78.59 ± 0.44 |
| 2ACPP2 | 57.36 ± 0.27 | 52.32 ± 0.44 | 27.69 ± 0.27 | 75.09 ± 0.04 |
| 2ACPP4 | 68.4 ± 0.34 | 59.53 ± 0.27 | 32.65 ± 0.05 | 76.32 ± 0.12 |
| 2ACPP8 | 63.44 ± 0.19 | 60.57 ± 0.25 | 35.48 ± 0.39 | 71.47 ± 0.1 |
| 3ACPP3 | 27.79 ± 0.08 | 37.72 ± 0.23 | 39.8 ± 0.24 | 63.63 ± 0.3 |
| 4ACPP7 | 45.57 ± 0.36 | 56.68 ± 0.35 | 24.95 ± 0.04 | 67.68 ± 0.12 |
| 5ACPP5 | 0 | 55.30 ± 0.39 | 42.78 ± 0.2 | 74.36 ± 0.22 |
| 5ACPP6 | 21.41 ± 0.31 | 48.49 ± 0.27 | 0 | 66.66 ± 0.27 |
| Strains | Hours | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 | 168 | |
| Bacillus | |||||||
| BPP4 | 0 | 46.56 | 34.11 | 27.44 | 37.67 | 46.11 | 9 |
| 2BPP8 | 0 | 53.44 | 95.44 | 48.78 | 60.33 | 61.44 | 40.56 |
| 3BPP7 | 0 | 24.11 | 18.33 | 23.22 | 17.44 | 38.56 | 9.22 |
| 4BPP4 | 0 | 50.33 | 47 | 29.67 | 59.22 | 67 | 17.44 |
| 4BPP6 | 0 | 46.11 | 39.44 | 32.11 | 33.89 | 47.44 | 21.89 |
| 4BPP8 | 0 | 72.33 | 39.44 | 55.44 | 70.11 | 66.11 | 17.67 |
| C+ | 0 | 47.22 | 26.78 | 15.89 | 36.56 | 47.44 | 29.89 |
| Actinomycetes | |||||||
| ACPP2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.33 | 11.67 | 13.44 |
| ACPP3 | 0 | 0 | 12.11 | 13.89 | 23.22 | 19.44 | 17.89 |
| 2ACPP2 | 0 | 30.56 | 36.56 | 44.33 | 53.89 | 48.78 | 47.89 |
| 2ACPP4 | 0 | 15.44 | 25.22 | 28.78 | 35.89 | 22.78 | 10.33 |
| 2ACPP8 | 0 | 16.33 | 19.67 | 23 | 32.33 | 25.67 | 7.44 |
| 3ACPP3 | 0 | 6.11 | 7.22 | 17.67 | 19.89 | 12.11 | 0 |
| 4ACPP7 | 0 | 13.22 | 13.22 | 23.44 | 48.78 | 44.33 | 47.67 |
| 5ACPP5 | 0 | 12.33 | 23 | 30.11 | 54.56 | 57.22 | 50.11 |
| 5ACPP6 | 0 | 28.56 | 16.11 | 43.22 | 83.44 | 67 | 53.22 |
| C+ | 0 | 47.22 | 26.78 | 15.89 | 36.56 | 47.44 | 29.89 |
| Strains/Days | Bi-Calcium Phosphate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 13 | 19 | 23 | 30 | |
| 5ACPP5 | 0 | 116.68 | 116.79 | 118.28 | 119.56 | 120.6 |
| C+ | 0 | 223.34 | 327.12 | 328.29 | 333 | 337.04 |
| Tri-calcium phosphate | ||||||
| 5ACPP5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 109.44 | 119.28 | 122.34 |
| C+ | 0 | 156.55 | 205.59 | 302.84 | 319.65 | 322.43 |
| Strains | Hours | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 120 | |
| Bacillus | |||||
| BPP4 | 0 | 0 | 139.55 | 143.72 | 159.98 |
| 2BPP8 | 0 | 0 | 115.01 | 120.61 | 141.01 |
| 4BPP4 | 0 | 0 | 132.48 | 150.99 | 169.86 |
| 4BPP6 | 0 | 0 | 128.85 | 122.13 | 117.43 |
| 4BPP8 | 0 | 0 | 192.21 | 223.29 | 254.55 |
| 3BPP7 | 0 | 0 | 133.43 | 149.75 | 175.83 |
| C+ | 0 | 0 | 155.09 | 167.3 | 202.22 |
| Actinomycetes | |||||
| ACPP2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.88 | 166.55 |
| ACPP3 | 0 | 228.92 | 241.58 | 247.5 | 270.03 |
| 2ACPP4 | 0 | 340.71 | 356.81 | 364.11 | 406.76 |
| 2ACPP8 | 0 | 278.68 | 273.73 | 296.06 | 282.27 |
| 5ACPP5 | 0 | 356.15 | 379.86 | 397.24 | 412.43 |
| 5ACPP6 | 0 | 251.56 | 269.83 | 298.36 | 314.89 |
| 2ACPP2 | 0 | 0 | 116.44 | 184.31 | 165.11 |
| 3ACPP3 | 0 | 0 | 111.25 | 176.17 | 189.88 |
| 4ACPP7 | 0 | 0 | 107.31 | 212.05 | 227.26 |
| C+ | 0 | 0 | 155.09 | 167.3 | 202.22 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Mamani-Rojas, L.; Rengifo, R.; Velarde-Apaza, L.; Ramírez-Rojas, M.; Cántaro-Segura, H. Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Bacillus and Actinomycetes Isolated from the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Agroecological Zones of Peru. Appl. Microbiol. 2026, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol6010002
Mamani-Rojas L, Rengifo R, Velarde-Apaza L, Ramírez-Rojas M, Cántaro-Segura H. Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Bacillus and Actinomycetes Isolated from the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Agroecological Zones of Peru. Applied Microbiology. 2026; 6(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol6010002
Chicago/Turabian StyleMamani-Rojas, Lizbeth, Raihil Rengifo, Leslie Velarde-Apaza, Max Ramírez-Rojas, and Hector Cántaro-Segura. 2026. "Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Bacillus and Actinomycetes Isolated from the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Agroecological Zones of Peru" Applied Microbiology 6, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol6010002
APA StyleMamani-Rojas, L., Rengifo, R., Velarde-Apaza, L., Ramírez-Rojas, M., & Cántaro-Segura, H. (2026). Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Potential of Bacillus and Actinomycetes Isolated from the Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Agroecological Zones of Peru. Applied Microbiology, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol6010002

