Next Article in Journal
First Report of Ixodes scapularis Ticks Parasitizing a North American Porcupine in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Parasites as Disruptors: From Ecology and Evolution, through Cell and Molecular Biology to Clinical and Veterinary Medicine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, 300645 Timis, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Parasitologia 2021, 1(2), 36-44; https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia1020005
Submission received: 13 February 2021 / Revised: 14 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 25 March 2021

Abstract

:
Toxoplasma gondii infections in sheep and goats are important economically and for public health for many countries, including Romania. In this study, seroprevalence and associated risk factors for T. gondii infection were determined in 2500 sheep and 500 goats from three counties in the Banat region of Romania. Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 1266 of 2500 (50.64%) sheep and in 375 (75%) of 500 goats, by using a commercial (IDEXX) ELISA. To evaluate the epidemiological status of the infection, some risk factors for ovine and caprine T. gondii infections were assessed. The main risk factors associated with T. gondii infections were breed, age, and the presence of cats in the farm. Seroprevalence was higher in animals older than three years and in purebred versus mixed breed animals. This is the first detailed study of risk factors associated with T. gondii seroprevalence in sheep and goats in Romania.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii infections are common in humans and animals worldwide. The ingestion of water and/or food, mainly undercooked meat, contaminated with oocysts, are the major sources of T. gondii infection in humans [1]. Sheep and goats are important sources of infection for humans worldwide, representing an important role in public health, as the consumption of infected milk or meat can facilitate the zoonotic transmission and ingestion of undercooked infected lamb is recognized as risk factor for T. gondii infection in Europe, especially pregnant women. Additionally, toxoplasmosis is an important cause of neonatal mortality in sheep and goats, resulting in reproductive and economic losses worldwide [2,3,4,5].
The number of sheep and goats in Romania is around 10 million heads [6]. In the Banat region, there are 1,201,135 sheep and 24,390 goats, according to the National Food Safety and Animal Health Authority [6]. Mutton is commonly consumed by Romania’s citizens, and also exported to other European countries [7]. Thus, the produced meat may be a source of T. gondii infection for consumers both in Romania and abroad. Although T. gondii seroprevalence in sheep and goats has been previously reported in Romania [8,9,10], here we provide detailed epidemiological data, including the infection risk factors. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to present a seroepidemiological survey for T. gondii infection in sheep and goats raised in the Banat region of Romania. The importance of this study consists of identifying the main favorable factors that predispose small ruminants to T. gondii infection, and the results obtained to be working tools in the prevention and control of this parasitosis in sheep and goats.

2. Results

2.1. Toxoplasma Gondii Seroprevalence

Seropositive animals were found in all sheep and goat farms. Seroprevalence was different in those two species: 1266 of 2500 sheep (50.64%; 95% CI = 0.48–0.52) and 375 of 500 goats (75%; 95% CI = 0.71–0.78) were seropositive. Seropositivity in sheep varied among the 3 counties; 49.7% (95% CI = 0.47–0.52) in Timis county, 42.45% (95% CI = 0.37–0.47) in Arad county, and 61.33% (95% CI = 0.56–0.65) in Caras-Severin county. Comparing the two species, the seroprevalence was higher in goats (75%; 95% CI = 0.71–0.78) than in sheep (50.8%; 95% CI = 0.46–0.55).

2.2. Risk Factors

The seroprevalence of T. gondii was correlated with age, sex, and breed as risk factors (Table 1 and Table 2). Seroprevalence was higher in adult (3–6 years) sheep (62.99%) and goats (93.28%) than in younger ones (30.06% and 51.15%, respectively). Higher seroprevalence was also recorded in males compared to females, the difference being more obvious in sheep (63.2% > 42.26%) than in goats (78.4% > 71.6%). Significant differences were also observed between small ruminant breeds, identifying a higher susceptibility in pure breed animals (58.74% in sheep and 82.74% in goats) than in mixed breeds (38.76% in sheep and 71.08% in goats).
The presence of cats on the farm was an important determinant factor; cats were present in over 90% of sheep farms (94%) and goats (90%). The presence of cats could be observed even in feed storage in 84% of sheep farms and in 70% of goat farms. The free movement of cats in the area also had consequences on the degree of contamination of drinking water for animals, identifying a higher seroprevalence (53.91% in sheep and 78.5% in goats) in farms that used surface water as a source of watering for sheep and goats. The use of the extensive and semi-extensive rearing system in Romania seems to be a favorable factor in transmitting T. gondii infection to sheep and goats (Table 2).
The logistic regression analysis indicated that age (3 to 6 years), breed, and cat access to grazing lands, feed storage facilities, and housing conditions were the most significant risk factors associated with T. gondii seroprevalence, both in sheep and goats (Tables S1 and S2).

3. Discussion

The median seroprevalence identified in small ruminants in the Banat region shows that more than half of the overall number of the study animals tested positive for the T. gondii infection. The distribution of ovine seropositivity in western Romania indicated that Caras-Severin county had the highest levels of Toxoplasma seroprevalence, followed by Timis county, with Arad county having the lowest seroprevalence. The median prevalence in sheep from the Banat region (50.64%) is comparable to the prevalence determined in central Romania in 2009 by Titilincu et al. (50%), using the IFAT technique [11]. The prevalence shown in our study is slightly higher than the one found in 2008 by Iovu et al. (45.7%) and in 2008 by Militaru et al. (27.85%) in sheep from southern Romania [12,13]. The levels of prevalence in western Romania are lower than those detected in central Romania by Titilincu et al. in two separate studies (64.34% and 64.9%, respectively) conducted in 2009, using the same commercial kit (Chekit Toxotest, Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland) [11].
Relief and climate may account for the differences in prevalence in the three Romanian counties. The ability of sporulated oocysts to survive up to 12 months in favorable environmental conditions (temperature, humidity) is well-documented [1]. In this study the highest seroprevalence was found in Caras-Severin county, which has a predominantly mountainous relief and where the mean annual precipitation is over 1000 mm per square meter. A seroprevalence of approximately 50% was identified in Timis county, where the relief is mainly low and flat, with mean annual temperature higher than in the other two counties, but with higher mean annual precipitation. The lowest seroprevalence was determined in Arad county where all forms of relief are present, and where the mean annual temperature is close to those in the other two counties. However, the mean annual precipitation is lower, which indicates that seroprevalence of T. gondii infection and oocyst survival in the environment are influenced mainly by atmospheric humidity, though atmospheric temperature is also a relevant influencing factor. The correlation between climate factors and oocyst survival in the environment and therefore the incidence of T. gondii seroprevalence in sheep has been described by numerous specialists [14,15].
Seropositivity in goats was found to be higher than in sheep. The selective feeding habits of goats do not explain the high seroprevalence detected in this species. Prevalence identified in this study in goats from western Romania (75%) is significantly higher than in goats from central Romania, as reported in 2009 by Titilincu et al. (64.15%) and in 2012 by Iovu et al. (52.8%) [11,16].
The association of Toxoplasma seropositivity with biological characteristics of animals has shown that age, gender, and breed can influence ovine and caprine vulnerability to T. gondii infection. High values of seroprevalence both in sheep and in goats have been obtained in animals aged more than three years, in male animals, and in pure breeds. Seroprevalence increases with age, which is attributable to an increased cumulative chance of exposure to environmental contamination [1,17,18]. In Romania, a study in lambs revealed a low seroprevalence of 6.5% [19]. The gender of the animals may influence genetically their susceptibility to Toxoplasma infection. In our study, male sheep and goats had higher seroprevalence than females. In 2010, in Brazil, Lopez et al. identified a prevalence higher in rams (64%) than in ewes (31%) [20]. In Romanian literature, there is just one study that presents the seroprevalence in rams as being 65.7% [21].
Since small ruminants are exclusively herbivorous, the main source of contamination with T. gondii is the ingestion of oocysts shed in the environment by felids. The presence of other wild felids that could be shedding oocysts into the environment can be considered as a risk factor for small ruminants [1,7]. Thus, environmental factors associated with the infection are extremely important, especially because of the individual farming practices meet in the studied farms. The main risk factors identified were: direct or indirect contact with cat faeces, contaminated feeds, contaminated drinking water, and flock management practices. Analysis of epidemiological data revealed that on most farms, included in this study, cat activities are not monitored and are allowed access to pastures, pens, and barns. Oocyst shedding is thus widespread, which creates increased opportunity of exposure to T. gondii. The access of cats to feed storage units further increases the risk of contamination due to the cats’ habit of burying their faeces; these places are ideal for such unsavory feline activities. A small number of farmers declared that they did not own cats, but that does not ensure a parasite-free environment, since contamination can be caused by their neighbours’ cats or by feral cats [22]. Feline presence near or on sheep and goats farms, classified as risk factor associated with T. gondii infection, has been studied extensively by other authors too, and increased seroprevalence levels have been found in small ruminants that have come in direct or indirect contact with cats [23,24]. The presence of abortions caused by Toxoplasma gondii in small ruminants, and the felines that can consume the aborted tissues with cysts of the parasite, can be also an important way of transmission [1].
Surface waters (rivers, lakes) used by animals may become sources of infestation if cats deposit their faeces in their vicinity. Not even underground sources of water (fountains, wells) are risk-free due to the widespread practice of leaving the water in the watering troughs for several days and simply filling them up as they empty. If this water is accessible to cats, it becomes another source of infestation, which has been proved by the negligible differences (p > 0.001) between the seroprevalence levels found in animals drinking surface water on the one hand, and those drinking underground water on the other. Vesco et al. (2007) suggest that the use of surface waters as a source of drinking water for small ruminants may be regarded as a risk factor for T. gondii infection [24].
Extensive and semi-extensive farming are the most used types of sheep and goats rearing in Romania. Increased seroprevalence in animals reared in this way confirms the fact that the free and unmonitored circulation of cats is the main risk factor associated with Toxoplasma infection in animals in our country. Other studies report similar seroprevalence in small ruminants raised in the extensive production system [25,26].
It is common knowledge that the prevalence of toxoplasmosis varies according to the degree of the population’s awareness of the disease. In Romania, small ruminants are slaughtered at 5 or 6 years of age, close to the end of their economic rentability. High seroprevalence identified in animals older than 3 years increases the risk of infection for humans, especially pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems, the main route of transmission being ingestion of raw or undercooked meat/meat products and unpasteurized milk. A seroprevalence of 57.6% found in women of child-bearing age and of 55.8% in pregnant women in Timis county supports this assumption [27,28]. While cat presence on farms is difficult to control, personal hygiene and adequate cooking of meat (67⁰C in the center of the piece of meat) can reduce the risk of infection [1,29].
Increased seroprevalence in small ruminants poses a risk to the cats themselves, which become infected after eating the placenta or the raw meat of seropositive animals, thus allowing the parasite to resume its life-cycle. This fact is highly relevant in relation to the high Toxoplasma seroprevalence levels in cats in the Arad and Timis counties (80.6% and 62.8%, respectively) [26,30], hence the need for the general population, and especially for animal breeders to be aware of the epidemiological data regarding this parasitic infection.
Public health is the goal of the ongoing research on Toxoplasma infection in farm animals, including small ruminants, from western Romania and on its zoonotic transmission to humans. This research will benefit veterinarians and animal breeders because it will enable them to take adequate steps to protect these species i.e. small ruminants, which are highly vulnerable to T. gondii infection. It will also help specialists involved in food safety programs and finally, human epidemiologists.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area

In Romania, sheep and goats are mainly reared in extensively and semi-extensively system. The extensive system farming is based on the maintenance of sheep, especially in pastures and feeding them only green mass during the grazing period or with other occasional sources of feed. In the semi-extensive breeding system, the alternation between the maintenance of sheep in pastures and their maintenance in shelters is practiced, and the feeding is based on green mass through grazing, fibrous fodder of culture, and cereals. This study was conducted on sheep and goats from 60 farms, in 50 locations, in three counties of the Banat region: Timis, Arad, Caras-Severin (Figure 1, Table 1).
Timis county has a predominantly low and flat terrain (relief), with a transitional climate with sub-Mediterranean influences. The mean annual temperature is 10.8 ℃, and the mean annual precipitation is 873.6 mm per square meter. Arad county has a varied relief i.e. plains, mountainous hills, and low mountains, and the climate is moderate continental with sub-Mediterranean influences. The mean annual temperature is 10.5 ℃ and the annual precipitation averages 759.4 mm per square meter. In Caras–Severin county, the relief is mostly mountainous, with a moderate continental climate with sub- Mediterranean influences. The mean annual temperature is 10.3 ℃ and annual precipitation is 1012.3 mm per square meter, on average [10].

4.2. Animals and Serum Collection

For this study, blood samples were collected during serological surveillance campaigns for sheep health. These campaigns are carried out at the national level, annually, in compliance with veterinary sanitary norms regarding the assurance of animals’ welfare and avoidance of causing harm to animals. Thus, the collection of blood samples was carried out with the consent of the animal owners and in compliance with the national legislation in force regarding animal protection.
The study was conducted on 2500 sheep and 500 goats from 3 counties involving 50 farms in the Banat region, Romania (Table 3). From 10 farms, both sheep and goats were sampled. The animals, both male and female, were reared on privately owned farms. The age of the animals ranged from 1.3 to 6 years in sheep and 1.5 to 6 years in goats. They were pure breeds (Merinos, Țigaie, Țurcană—indigenous Romanian sheep breeds; Carpathian and Banat’s White goat—indigenous Romanian goat breeds), as well as mixed breed, all animals being for mixed production—meat and milk. The flock holdings were 200 to 1700 sheep or 75 to 400 goats.
Blood samples (5 mL each) were collected by a jugular venipuncture in vacutainers, from 50 animals from each flock. After separating the sera, the serum samples were stored at −20 ℃ until tested in the Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases Laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Timisoara.

4.3. Serology

The indirect ELISA method (CHEKIT TOXOTEST—IDEXX Laboratories, Switzerland, Liebefeld-Bern) was employed to detect IgG antibodies to T. gondii infection in the serum samples. This kit has been previously used by others to test sheep sera [9]. The 96-well plate is coated with the T. gondii antigen, and the antigen-antibody complex forms when a peroxidase conjugate is added. The addition of the conjugate followed by the addition of the substrate will cause the positive samples to turn blue and, subsequently, with the addition of the stop solution, they will turn yellow. The microplate was read by a Tecan reader, and based on optical density readings (OD), the S/P values were calculated. The interpretation of the results was based on these values: percentage values under 30% was considered negative; percentage values of 30 to 100% or higher than 100% were classified as positive.

4.4. Risk Factors

In order to correlate the incidence of T. gondii infection with potential risk factors, two types of risk factors were tested: firstly, those related to biological characteristics of the animals (age, sex, and breed) (Table 3) and secondly, those related to rearing conditions (cat contact and cat access to grazing pastures, feed storage facilities, barns and pens; water sources, and type of animal husbandry) (see Table 2).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The Minitab 15 and EpiInfo 7 programmes were used to perform the statistical analysis of the data. There were calculated values of p (≤0.05), which highlight the relevant differences in seroprevalence values. The association of risk factors with T. gondii infection was done by logistic regression, by calculating the confidence interval (CI 95%) and the likelihood of the occurrence of the association (odds ratio, OR).

5. Conclusions

This study brings news regarding the epidemiology of T. gondii infection in small ruminants. The seroprevalence of toxoplasmic infection in Romania is increased both in sheep, but especially in goats. Adulthood, male sex, and pure breed are the individual factors that predispose small ruminants to T. gondii infection. The uncontrolled movement of cats on pastures, in animal shelters, as well as in feed storage, contributes massively to the spread of oocysts and to the increase of the oral infection rate of farm animals. The rearing systems in Romania seem to be favorable factors for the transmission of this parasite. Highlighting the high seroprevalence and risk factors in the transmission of toxoplasmosis in small ruminants in this study may be a starting point in raising farmers’ awareness of the importance of the problem and the needs to implement control measures to prevent the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available as supplementary materials https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/parasitologia1020005/s1: Table S1. T. gondii seroprevalence in the studied sheep farms; Table S2. T. gondii seroprevalence in the studied farms, from which both sheep and goats were sampled.

Author Contributions

I.H., conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, revision; V.H. and E.T., resources; O.C., writing—original draft preparation; I.B., statistical analysis; C.S., investigation; G.D. conceptualization, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UEFISCDI (CNCSIS), grant number PNCD II Nr. 51-013.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Dubey JP for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rocha, D.D.S.; Moura, R.D.S.; Maciel, B.; Guimaraes, L.A.; O’Dwyer, H.; Munhoz, A.D.; Albuquerque, G.R. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in naturally infected sheep’s milk. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 8658–8662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saad, N.M.; Hussein, A.A.A.; Ewida, R.M. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii in raw goat, sheep, and camel milk in Upper Egypt. Veter. World 2018, 11, 1262–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Belluco, S.; Mancin, M.; Conficoni, D.; Simonato, G.; Pietrobelli, M.; Ricci, A. Investigating the Determinants of Toxoplasma gondii Prevalence in Meat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Opsteegh, M.; Maas, M.; Schares, G.; van der Giessen, J. Relationship between seroprevalence in the main livestock species and presence of Toxoplasma gondii in meat (GP/EFSA/BIOHAZ/2013/01) an extensive literature review. EFSA Supporting Publ. 2016, 13, 996E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Available online: http://www.ansvsa.ro (accessed on 23 September 2020).
  7. Available online: http://www.wikipedia.org (accessed on 21 May 2020).
  8. Dubey, J.; Murata, F.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.; Kwok, O.; Su, C. Economic and public health importance of Toxoplasma gondii infections in sheep: 2009–2020. Veter. Parasitol. 2020, 286, 109195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dubey, J.; Murata, F.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.; Kwok, O. Public health and economic importance of Toxoplasma gondii infections in goats: The last decade. Res. Veter. Sci. 2020, 132, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dubey, J.P.; Hotea, I.; Olariu, T.R.; Jones, J.L.; Darabus, G. Epidemiological review of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Romania. Parasitology 2013, 141, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Titilincu, A.; Mircean, V.; Iovu, A.; Blaga, R.; Onac, D.; Cozma, V. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Small Ru-Minants from Romania; World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology: Calgary, AB, Canada, 9–13 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Iovu, A.; Titilincu, A.; Mircean, V.; Blaga, R.; Bejan, A.; Cozma, V. Serosurvey of Toxoplasma Gondii in Sheep for Human Con-Sumption in Two Slaughter-House. Bull. UASMV 2008, 65, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Militaru, D.; Ştirbu-Teofănescu, B.; Militaru, M.; Ciobotaru, E. Serological detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in abattoir slauhgtered pigs and sheep. Rev. Română de Parazitol. 2008, 18, 145. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jokelainen, P.; Näreaho, A.; Knaapi, S.; Oksanen, A.; Rikula, U.; Sukura, A. Toxoplasma gondii in wild cervids and sheep in Finland: North-south gradient in seroprevalence. Veter. Parasitol. 2010, 171, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Meerburg, B.G.; Kijlstra, A. Changing climate—changing pathogens: Toxoplasma gondii in North-Western Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iovu, A.; Györke, A.; Mircean, V.; Gavrea, R.; Cozma, V. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dairy goats from Romania. Veter- Parasitol. 2012, 186, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Katzer, F.; Brülisauer, F.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Bartley, P.M.; Burrells, A.; Gunn, G.; Maley, S.W.; Cousens, C.; A Innes, E. Increased Toxoplasma gondii positivity relative to age in 125 Scottish sheep flocks; evidence of frequent acquired infection. Veter. Res. 2011, 42, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lundén, A.; Näsholm, A.; Uggla, A. Long-term study of Toxoplasma gondii infection in a Swedish sheep flock. Acta Veter. Scand. 1994, 35, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hotea, I.; Ilie, M.; Imre, M.; Sorescu, D.; Dărăbus, G. Determining of toxoplasmosis seroprevalence, by ELISA, in lambs in Timis County. Lucr. Ştiinţifice Med. Vet. Iasi 2011, 54, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lopes, W.D.Z.; Dos Santos, T.R.; Silva, R.D.S.D.; Rossanese, W.M.; De Souza, F.A.; Rodrigues, J.D.D.F.; De Mendonça, R.P.; Soares, V.E.; Da Costa, A.J. Seroprevalence of and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii in sheep raised in the Jaboticabal microregion, São Paulo State, Brazil. Res. Veter. Sci. 2010, 88, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hotea, I.; Oprescu, I.; Ilie, M.; Imre, K.; Balint, A.; Dărăbus, G. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection, by ELISA, in rams in Timis County. Lucr. Stiint. Med. Vet. 2011, 54, 325–328. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zedda, M.T.; Rolesu, S.; Pau, S.; Rosati, I.; Ledda, S.; Satta, G.; Patta, C.; Masala, G. Epidemiological Study of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Ovine Breeding. Zoonoses Public Health 2009, 57, e102–e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oncel, T.; Vural, G. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sheep in Instanbul, Turkey. Vet. Arhiv. 2006, 76, 547–553. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vesco, G.; Buffolano, W.; La Chiusa, S.; Mancuso, G.; Caracappa, S.; Chianca, A.; Villari, S.; Currò, V.; Liga, F.; Petersen, E. Toxoplasma gondii infections in sheep in Sicily, southern Italy. Veter. Parasitol. 2007, 146, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hotea, I.; Dărăbus, G.; Ilie, M.; Imre, K.; Oprescu, I.; Morariu, S.; Mederle, N. The identification of Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep by ELISA from Arad County. Lucr. Stiint. Med. Vet. 2009, 42, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hotea, I.; Ilie, M.S.; Imre, M.; Sorescu, D.; Indre, D.; Brudiu, I.; Colibar, O.; Dărăbus, G. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in cats and sheep from Caras-Severin County, Romania. Lucr. Stiint. Med. Vet. 2012, 45, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  27. Olariu, R.T.; Dărăbuş, G.h.; Cretu, O.; Jurovits, O.; Giura, E.; Erdelean, V.; Marincu, I.; Iacobiciu, I.; Petrescu, C.; Koreck, A. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies among women of childbearing age in Timis County. Lucr. Şt. Med. Vet. Timişoara 2008, 41, 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  28. Olariu, T.R.; Ursoniu, S.; Hotea, I.; Dumitrascu, V.; Anastasiu, D.; Lupu, M.A. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pregnant Women from Western Romania. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Stelzer, S.; Basso, W.; Silván, J.B.; Ortega-Mora, L.; Maksimov, P.; Gethmann, J.; Conraths, F.; Schares, G. Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: Risk factors and economic impact. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Darabus, G.; Hotea, I.; Oprescu, I.; Morariu, S.; Brudiu, I.; Olariu, R. Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in cats and sheep from Western Romania. Rev. Méd. Vét. 2011, 162, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study area (a) including 50 locations (b) in Banat Region, Romania.
Figure 1. Study area (a) including 50 locations (b) in Banat Region, Romania.
Parasitologia 01 00005 g001
Table 1. Risk factors associated with biological characteristics of animals.
Table 1. Risk factors associated with biological characteristics of animals.
Positive 1 Negative 2 % of Positivityp *CI ** 95%OR ***Positive 1 Negative 2 % of Positivityp *CI ** 95%OR ***
SHEEPGOAT
AGE (years)
1.3–328265630.060.000.24–0.340.29 11110651.150.000.04–0.130.08
3–698457862.99 0.64–1.230.89 2641993.28 0.07–0.220.13
GENDER
Female63486642.260.000.36–0.500.43 1797171.60.0800.46–1.040.69
Male63236863.2 1.99–2.762.35 1965478.4 0.96–2.161.44
BREED
Pure87361358.740.001.91–2.652.25 1392982.730.0051.22–3.101.95
Mixed39362138.75 0.38–0.520.44 2369671.08 0.32–0.820.51
TOTAL1266123450.64 37512575.00
1—Positive animals from total tested; 2—Negative animals from total tested. * p-value; ** CI—confidence interval; *** OR—odds ratio.
Table 2. Risk factors associated with the rearing environment.
Table 2. Risk factors associated with the rearing environment.
Risk FactorPositive 1Negative 2 % of Positivityp*CI ** 95%OR ***Positive 1Negative 2 % of PositivityP *CI ** 95%OR ***
SHEEPGOATS
Cat presence on pastures and in pens/barns
Yes1220113051.910.000 1.71–3.492.443529878.220.000 2.32–7.684.22
No4610430.660.29–0.590.41232746.000.13–0.430.24
Cat presence in feed storage facilities
Yes115894255.140.000 2.62–4.213.323123889.140.000 7.10–18.111.34
No10829227.000.24–0.380.30638742.000.06–0.140.09
Source of drinking water
Surface62053053.910.003 1.09–1.491.271574378.500.141 0.90–2.091.37
Underground64670447.850.67–0.920.782188272.660.48–1.110.73
Production system
Extensive16113953.660.264 0.90–1.461.15712971.000.303 0.47–1.260.77
Semi-extensive1105109550.220.68–1.110.873049676.000.79–2.111.29
TOTAL1266123450.64 37512575.00
1—Positive animals from total tested; 2—Negative animals from total tested. * p-value; ** CI—confidence interval; ***OR—odds ratio.
Table 3. Studied animals and their biological characteristics.
Table 3. Studied animals and their biological characteristics.
SHEEPNo. Of SamplesAge 1.33 YearsAge 36 YearsFemalesMalesPure BreedMixed Breed
Timis16506191031900750981668
Arad40015124835050237162
Caras-Severin450168283350100268184
TOTAL SHEEP250093815621500100014861014
GOATS Timis      
500217283250250168332
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hotea, I.; Herman, V.; Tîrziu, E.; Colibar, O.; Brudiu, I.; Sîrbu, C.; Dărăbuș, G. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania. Parasitologia 2021, 1, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia1020005

AMA Style

Hotea I, Herman V, Tîrziu E, Colibar O, Brudiu I, Sîrbu C, Dărăbuș G. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania. Parasitologia. 2021; 1(2):36-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia1020005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hotea, Ionela, Viorel Herman, Emil Tîrziu, Olimpia Colibar, Ileana Brudiu, Cătălin Sîrbu, and Gheorghe Dărăbuș. 2021. "Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania" Parasitologia 1, no. 2: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia1020005

APA Style

Hotea, I., Herman, V., Tîrziu, E., Colibar, O., Brudiu, I., Sîrbu, C., & Dărăbuș, G. (2021). Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania. Parasitologia, 1(2), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia1020005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop