Next Article in Journal
A Field-Scale Framework for Assessing the Influence of Measure-While-Drilling Variables on Geotechnical Characterization Using a Boruta-SHAP Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Particle Breakage and Energy Utilization in Ball Mills: An Integrated DEM and SPH Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extracting Lithium from Brazilian α-Spodumene via Chlorination Roasting

by
Paulo F. A. Braga
1,
Caroline R. dos S. Brigido
1,*,
Camila P. Pinto
1,
Silvia C. A. França
1 and
Gustavo D. Rosales
2
1
Center for Mineral Technology—CETEM, Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication, Av. Pedro Calmon, 900, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-908, RJ, Brazil
2
Laboratory for Extractive Metallurgy and Materials Synthesis (MESiMat), Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences (FCEN) UNCUYO, Padre Jorge Contreras 1300, Mendoza CP M5502JMA, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mining 2025, 5(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010019
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 16 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 20 March 2025

Abstract

:
The lithium market has been expanding due to the high demand for lithium-ion batteries, which are essential for electric and hybrid vehicles as well as portable devices. This has driven the search for new lithium ore deposits and the development of more efficient extraction and processing technologies. The main methods used for lithium extraction from hard rock ores include the acid process, the alkaline process, and chlorination roasting. This study investigated a chlorination process applied to α-spodumene extracted in Brazil for lithium chloride (LiCl) production. The ore underwent thermal treatment in the presence of calcium chloride (CaCl2) and magnesium chloride (MgCl2), followed by water leaching at 90 °C. The thermodynamics of the α-Li2O·Al2O3·SiO2 system, combined with calcium and magnesium chlorides, was analyzed using HSC 5.1 software. The main objective of this study was to produce lithium chloride from alpha spodumene and avoid decrepitation of the ore to the beta phase before mixing with the reagents, making the process faster and less expensive compared to traditional extraction methods. Pyrometallurgical tests were conducted in a muffle furnace, varying the molar ratio between chlorides (MgCl2:CaCl2) at 1:0, 0:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 1:2 and the mass ratio of spodumene to chlorides at 1:4, 1:6, and 1:8. The best lithium extraction result was approximately 95%, the conditions for obtaining the result were a spodumene:chloride ratio of 1:6 and a molar ratio between chlorides of 2:1. The results provide a better understanding of the chlorination roasting process and demonstrate the potential of the chlorination technique as a viable alternative to conventional lithium extraction methods.

1. Introduction

The Brazilian government has classified lithium ore as a strategic resource for the development of high-tech products and processes [1]. One of its main applications is the production of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, widely used in electronic devices and electric vehicles. This metal possesses unique properties that ensure superior performance in battery cathodes, such as its low density—being the lightest of all metals—and its high electrochemical potential (−3.04 V), making it essential for the energy efficiency of these devices [2,3].
The largest lithium deposits are concentrated in South America in the Andean Cordillera region known as the “Lithium Triangle.” This area spans three countries and contains significant estimated mineral resources: Bolivia (23 million tons of Li), Argentina (22 million tons of Li), and Chile (11 million tons of Li). Regarding lithium mineral production, in 2023, the leading producers were Australia (86 thousand tons), Chile (44 thousand tons), and China (33 thousand tons). Brazil ranked as the fifth-largest global producer, producing 4.9 thousand tons in 2023, representing an 86.31% increase compared to 2022. This growth was driven by the authorization of lithium mineral and derivative commercialization, granted by Decree No. 11,120, dated 5 July 2022 [4,5].
Therefore, to reach the quantities required by the lithium market, it is important to expand lithium production beyond brine deposits and develop processes to extract lithium from lithium minerals resources as well [6,7,8,9].
In this context, the main sources of lithium in the world include brines and pegmatites. Each has advantages and challenges: brines have lower operating costs but long extraction processes and water supply problems. Pegmatites, on the other hand, have a more stable supply as well as require fewer extraction and purification steps but contain large volumes of ore with no viable commercial value. In addition, pegmatite ores guarantee have higher-security supply as they do not depend on seasonal or geographical conditions, making them a stable alternative for the industry. However, the growing demand for lithium has driven the exploration of both brines and hard rock in order to ensure a continuous and sustainable supply of the metal [10,11,12].
The lithium-bearing minerals reserves are widely distributed around the world (Australia, Chile, Argentina, China, the EUA, Brazil, and other countries) and have high potential for extraction. At present, the extraction of lithium from lithium minerals such as spodumene, lepidolite, and zinnwaldite is an important way of obtaining lithium resources [13,14,15]. Among these lithium minerals, spodumene (LiAlSi2O6) is the most important for the strategic development of the battery industry due to its high theoretical lithium content (8.03% Li2O). The use of spodumene has a relatively lower process cost in comparison with the other minerals mentioned due to spodumene being the main raw material developed and utilized in industrial processes [16,17,18].
In nature, spodumene exists in the α-phase form. With most extraction methods, the α phase is resistant to the action of chemical reagents, either gaseous or liquid. Therefore, α-spodumene is usually first subjected to calcination at 1000–1100 °C for 1–2 h to convert it to β-spodumene, which is much more reactive and less resistant to common chemical agents [17,19,20,21].
Several studies have been conducted with the aim of identifying more efficient ways of extracting lithium from spodumene in order to reduce operational costs [20,22,23]. Among these investigations, different methods stand out, such as the acid process [19,20,24,25], the alkaline process [15,26,27], and chlorination [16,28,29]. The research on various methods employing different reagents and their respective experimental profiles for lithium extraction are summarized in Table 1.
The chlorination roasting process could be an alternative method of extracting metallic elements as chlorides from minerals as lithium chloride. Chlorination roasting is generally applied as a heat treatment for solid materials such as oxides, silicates, sulfides, and other compounds with a chlorinating agent at a suitable temperature [27,28,29,30,31].
As mentioned by Barrios et al. (2022) [31] and Fosu et al. (2022) [29], the chlorination process is efficient in some aspects such as its high rate of chlorination because of the high reactivity of chlorinating agents as well as the beneficial physical and chemical properties of certain metals such the low melting points of its chlorides; chlorination agents are available at reasonable prices. Nevertheless, this process faces some operational challenges such as fugitive emissions and waste. Some solutions have been applied to solve these issues, for example, treating and recovering the waste generated by the chlorination process so that the residual chlorinating agent can be regenerated and reused in the process. In addition, the waste generated can be treated with alkaline reagents and disposed of with minimal environmental impact. For this reason, emission reduction and reagent recovery in the chlorination process are important research development directions [16,29,30,31,32,33,34].
Chlorination roasting followed by water leaching was used by Yan et al. (2012) to extract lithium from lepidolite [35]. The results indicated that the chlorination roasting temperature, time, and mass ratio of the chlorinating agent (CaCl2 and NaCl) affected the lithium leaching efficiency significantly. The conditional experiments indicated that the best mass ratio of lepidolite to NaCl to CaCl2 was 1:0.6:0.4 with a chlorination roasting time of 30 min at a temperature 880 °C. A lithium leaching efficiency of 92.86% was achieved with these parameters.
El-Naggar and Medina (1984) [36] and El-Naggar et al. (1988) [37] showed that it is possible to extract lithium from spodumene via its reaction with mineral tachyhydrite (2MgCl2.CaCl2.12H2O) to produce lithium chloride as the final product. The results indicated that the reactions that occur are as follows: 1. The decomposition of tachyhydrite, followed by MgC12 hydrolyzing to MgO; 2. The transformation of α-spodumene into β-spodumene; and 3. the reaction between β-spodumene, MgO, and CaCl2 of tachyhydrite, according to the chemical reactions presented in Equations (1)–(3).
MgCl2 + H2O → MgO + 2HCl
α-Li2O.Al2O3.4SiO2 → β-Li2O.Al2O3.4SiO2 ∆G°: −10 KJ/mol at 1100 °C
β-Li2O.Al2O3.4SiO2 + CaCl2 + 4MgO → 2LiCl + CaO.MgO.SiO2 + 3SiO2.2MgO + Al2O3.MgO
The thermodynamic effects of the extraction of lithium from mineral α-spodumene by CaCl2 and MgCl2 were determined within the temperature range of 25 to 1200 °C, and the results are presented in Figure 1.
The chlorination reaction with MgCl2 + CaCl2 was thermodynamically favorable in the whole temperature range examined (25–1200 °C) using a molar ratio of 1:1 (α-spodumene: 4MgO + CaCl2). However, it is known that the phase transformation begins above 750 °C, and, at 925 °C, the α phase does not complete the transform to the β phase. Therefore, above 750 °C, there is a mixture of both polymorphs; consequently, lithium chloride (LiCl) could be obtained from both phases, which could increase the recovery of lithium. But, temperatures above 925 °C are necessary to obtain high lithium recovery rates [29]. According to the model generated by HSC software, the product of this reaction is LiCl, which is a solid or liquid product according to the temperature [16,27], calcium and magnesium silicate (CaO.MgO.SiO2), magnesium aluminate (MgO.Al2O3), and silica (SiO2). Based on these results, it is possible to infer that the reaction that occurs during calcination is as shown in Equation (4) [37].
β L i 2 O . A l 2 O 3 . 4 S i O 2 + C a C l 2 + 4 M g O 2 L i C l + C a O . M g O . S i O 2 + 3 S i O 2 . 2 M g O + A l 2 O 3 . M g O
Our results corroborate those of a study of the chlorination of spodumene with tachyhydrite carried out by El-Naggar et al. (1988) [36] as well as the findings of Barbosa et al. (2015) [28].
Barbosa et al. (2014) [16] extracted lithium from β-spodumene with Cl2 gas at temperatures of 1000 to 1100 °C in a fixed-bed reactor. The results of the isothermal chlorination roasting of β-spodumene showed that the sample underwent mass losses, which increased markedly with the increase in the chlorination temperature, which was due to the volatilization of both lithium chloride and the chlorides formed by the impurities present in the spodumene ore. Complete lithium extraction was achieved with a reaction time of 150 min.
According to Jena and Brocchi (1997) [33], CaCl2 is the most effective chloridizing agent in the presence of silica. Barbosa et al. (2015) [28] also carried out experiments involving the chlorination of β-spodumene with CaCl2, finding the optimal extraction conditions to be a temperature of 900 °C and 120 min of chlorination roasting, and they achieved a conversion degree of 90.2% and a LiCl production of 47.2 mg using a molar ratio 1:2 of β-LiAlSi2O6:CaCl2. According to the authors, the reaction strengthens with increasing time and temperature, and the products of the chlorination reaction are lithium chloride, anorthite, and amorphous silica.
Here, we propose a preliminary process to extract lithium chloride from mineral spodumene from Brazil. In this process, lithium chloride is treated in its α-phase form with chlorination torrefaction using calcium chloride and/or magnesium chloride as the chlorinating agent. This study aimed to optimize the lithium extraction process, mainly by reducing energy consumption by joining two stages of the process. The products volatilized during the chlorination reaction were not studied in this phase of this project.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Procedures and Methods

The spodumene concentrate used in this study was supplied by Companhia Brasileira de Lítio, located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Initially, the spodumene was subjected to a grinding process in a ball mill, followed by sieving for particle size classification using Tyler series sieves. The grinding process was carried out until the particle diameter corresponded to the point where 80% of the distribution volume (P80) had a size smaller than 74 µm (200 mesh).
The tests for lithium chloride production were conducted on a bench scale. The methodology of Medina and El-Naggar (1984) [36] was modified by replacing the taquidrite ore (CaMg2Cl6·12H2O) with a combination of salts: magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O) with 99% purity (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2·2H2O) with 99% purity (P.A., Vetec, Speyer, Germany). The block diagram in Figure 2 illustrates the operational procedure adopted.
All chlorination tests were performed in triplicate and on a bench scale. In cases where the variation in the obtained results exceeded 5%, the tests were repeated to ensure the reproducibility of the experimental data.
After the homogenization stage, the spodumene and chloride mixtures were transferred to a porcelain crucible and subjected to heat treatment in a muffle furnace at a temperature of 1150 °C for a period ranging from 30 to 120 min. The clinker resulting from the thermal process was ground and leached with water at 95 °C. After leaching, the residue was sent for X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis to identify the mineral phases, while the rich liquor was characterized by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF).

2.2. Experimental Conditions of Chlorination

The preliminary lithium extraction tests were conducted to evaluate three variables: the molar ratio of MgCl2:CaCl2 (tests 1–5), the mass ratio between spodumene and chlorides (tests 4–9), and the chlorination roasting time (tests 9–12), as presented in Table 2. The goal was to optimize lithium extraction by reducing reagent as well as energy consumption and, consequently, process costs.
In tests 1–5, the influence of the molar ratio between MgCl2 and CaCl2 was investigated, varying it from 0:1, 1:0, 1:2, 2:1, to 1:1, while the ratio between chlorides and spodumene was kept constant at 1:8, with a residence time of 120 min. In tests 4–9, the relationship between spodumene and chlorides was analyzed, adopting mass ratios of 1:8, 1:6, and 1:4, while keeping the chloride ratio (MgCl2/CaCl2) fixed at 2:1 and 1:1, and the residence time in the muffle furnace at 120 min.
To assess the influence of roasting time, tests 9–12 were conducted, for which the duration was adjusted to 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The other parameters were kept constant, with a ratio of 2:1 for chlorides (MgCl2/CaCl2) and 1:6 for the spodumene:chloride ratio.

2.3. Experimental Conditions for Extraction of Lithium

The resulting clinker was crushed with an agate mortar and pestle and leached in water for 240 min at 95 °C. We used a solid–liquid ratio of 10% (w/w) for the aqueous leaching. At the end of the leaching, the liquor and residue were separated by filtration and the chemicals were identified. All the experiments were carried out in triplicate. Based on Fosu et al. (2022) [29], after the lithium extraction tests, the liquor products and residues were analyzed to evaluate the extraction according to Equation (5).
Li extraction (%) = 100.(lithium in pregnant liquor (g))/Lithium in pregnant liquor (g) + Lithium in residue (g)

2.4. Chemical and Physical Analyses

The experiment was monitored with lithium chemical analysis using inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Ultima 2, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), flame emission spectroscopy (FES, 910, Analyser, Surrey, UK), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS, SpectrAA 55B, Varian, Australia), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker-D4 Endeavor diffractometer, Billerica, MA, USA).
The chemical identification was carried out by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) using a Horiba Jobin Yvon spectrometer, with radial plasma observation used for direct determination. For quantitative chemical analysis by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), the samples were fused with lithium tetraborate (Li2B4O7) at 1150 °C in a 1:10 ratio using a PANalytical EAGON 2 fusion machine, Malvern, UK). Lithium iodide (LiI) (0.1 g) was used as the releasing agent, and the samples were analyzed by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) using a PANalytical Axios Max instrument, Malvern, UK.
Mineral identification was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with the powder method on a Bruker-D4 Endeavor diffractometer under the following operating conditions: CoKa radiation (40 kV/40 mA), a step size of 0.02° 2θ, a counting time of 184 s per step, and data collection from 5° to 105° 2θ. The qualitative spectrum interpretation was conducted by comparing the reference patterns from the PDF04 database using Diffrac.Plus software V.7

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Sample

The spodumene sample was analyzed to identify the compounds present, and the results are shown in Table 3. It was observed that Al2O3 (23.265%) and Li2O (5.667%) were the predominant compounds, which was expected since spodumene is a lithium aluminosilicate. These results are similar to those presented by Krishan and Gopan (2024) [38], who found that the spodumene composition was Al2O3 (20.79%) and Li2O (2.14%). Considering that the present study used a spodumene concentrate, it was expected that the concentrated lithium ore would have higher lithium percentages than those found in nature (Li2O 1.9–3.3%) [2,39].
The X-ray diffraction analysis of the spodumene sample is shown in Figure 3. The X-ray diffraction indicated that the sample was initially composed of spodumene (S) and associated minerals, such as albite (NaAlSi3O8), quartz (SiO2), and muscovite (KAl2(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2. This result is similar to that observed by Timich (2021) [40], who characterized a spodumene concentrate and identified the phases of spodumene, quartz, albite, and muscovite.

3.2. Tests of MgCl2/CaCl2 Molar Ratio

In the lithium extraction tests (Figure 4), the influence of the molar ratio of MgCl2:CaCl2 on the recovery of lithium contained in the spodumene was studied. The results (Figure 4) show that the presence of magnesium at a molar quantity greater than or equal to that of calcium (ratios of 2:1 or 1:1) afforded high extraction rates (>96%) of the lithium present in the mineral. This result is in accordance with the reaction in Equation (5), in which 4 mol of MgO to 1 mol of CaCl2 is necessary. According to El-Naggar et al. (1988) [37], this is due to the reaction of β-spodumene with MgO (formed from the hydrolysis of MgCl2, which occurs in the temperature range between 400 and 700 °C) and to the stability of the calcium chloride at elevated temperatures as well as the possible volatilization of this reagent. The tests in which a single chloride species (MgCl2 or CaCl2) was used, low lithium extraction values were observed.
The X-ray diffraction analysis of the clinker produced in the test with a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:8 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1 showed the presence of the minerals forsterite (Mg2SiO4), spinel (MgAl2O4), cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18), tachyhydrite (CaMg2Cl6·12H2O), and sinjarite (CaCl2.2H2O) in the leaching residue (Figure 5). The presence of β-spodumene was not observed. This indicated its transformation into other species.

3.3. Studies on Spodumene:Chloride Mass Ratio

The objective of the complementary tests was to determine the influence of the spodumene:chloride mass ratio on the recovery of lithium. Figure 6 shows that it was possible to maintain high lithium extraction (97.46%) with a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:6 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1. For the test with a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:4 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1, there was a significant reduction in the lithium extraction (34.72%), probably due to the lower quantity of calcium chloride available for the reaction, even in the presence of magnesium. In this case, there was insufficient chloride in the reaction to form lithium chloride (LiCl) according to the stoichiometry presented in Equation (5).
For lithium extraction with a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:8 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1, the X-ray diffractogram in Figure 7 shows the presence of periclase minerals (MgO), forsterite (Mg2SiO4), spinel (MgAl2O4), cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18), brucite (Mg(OH)2), and calcium aluminum oxide chloride ((Al(H2O)6)Cl3). The mineral species tachhydrite (CaMg2Cl6·12H2O) and sinjarite (CaCl2.2H2O) were not identified in the results that are presented in Figure 6. Therefore, it was inferred that these soluble minerals were leached.

3.4. Studies on Roasting Chlorination Time

Figure 8 shows the results of the roasting tests (1150 °C) with different heating durations. It was observed that with increasing time, the extraction of lithium also increased [10,16,27]. However, after 30 min, lithium extraction was 96.89%, and after 60 and 90 min, it was 97.52% and 97.42%, respectively. The 0.63% increase in lithium extraction may not justify energy costs for a duration of 60 min. These tests were carried out with a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:6 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1.

4. Conclusions

According to the model created in HSC software, it was possible to determine that the reaction products between the spodumene and chlorides (MgCl2:CaCl2) were lithium chloride (LiCl), calcium and magnesium silicate (CaO.MgO.SiO2), magnesium aluminate (MgO.Al2O3), and silicon dioxide (SiO2).
In the XRD diffraction pattern of the chlorination roasting product (clinker), α- or β-spodumene was not observed, indicating the transformation into other species. LiCl had an amorphous form; therefore, it was not detected by XRD. LiCl was detected by AAS in the aqueous leach liquor.
Based on the preliminary tests, the lithium extraction rates were greater than 96%, with a mixture of chlorides, proving that magnesium was present in a molar ratio greater than or equal to that of calcium.
The complementary tests showed that it was possible to optimize the process by using a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:6 and a MgCl2:CaCl2 molar ratio of 2:1 for a 30 min duration at a roasting temperature of 1150 °C, achieving lithium extraction of higher than 95%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; methodology, P.F.A.B. and C.P.P.; software, C.R.d.S.B. and G.D.R.; validation, S.C.A.F., P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; formal analysis, C.P.P.; investigation, P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; resources, P.F.A.B. and S.C.A.F.; data curation, P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; writing—review and editing, P.F.A.B. and C.R.d.S.B.; visualization, C.R.d.S.B.; supervision, P.F.A.B.; project administration, P.F.A.B. and S.C.A.F.; funding acquisition, P.F.A.B. and S.C.A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the geologist Reiner Neumann for his collaboration in the X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The authors also thank Cia Brasileira de Lítio for supplying the spodumene concentrate sample.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. BRAZIL Resolution N. 2 of June 18, 2021. Defines the List of Strategic Minerals for the Country, in Accordance with the Criteria Set Out in Art. 2 of Decree No. 10,657, of March 24, 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/mme-lanca-relatorio-anual-do-comite-interministerial-de-analise-de-projetos-de-minerais-estrategicos/resolucao2CTAPME.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2025).
  2. Asif, A.H.; Li, C.; Lim, H.; Sun, H. Australia’s Spodumene: Advances in Lithium Extraction Technologies, Decarbonization, and Circular Economy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 2073–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, D.; Joo, Y.Y.; Shin, D.J.; Shin, S.M. Recovery of Lithium from Beta-Spodumene Through Serial Calcination and Water Leaching with CaO. JOM 2024, 76, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. BRAZIL BRAZIL, Decree No. 11,120, of July 5, 2022. Allows Foreign Trade Operations of Lithium Minerals and Ores and Their Derivatives. Available online: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2022/decreto/d11120.htm (accessed on 19 February 2025).
  5. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2023; USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2023; 200p. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2023/mcs2023-lithium.pdf (accessed on 19 February 2025).
  6. Sun, Z.; Cao, H.; Xiao, Y.; Sietsma, J.; Jin, W.; Agterhuis, H.; Yang, Y. Toward sustainability for recovery of critical metals from electronica waste: The hydrochemistry processes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 5, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C. A promising approach for the recovery of high value-added metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2017, 351, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Cao, H.; Zhao, C.; Lin, X.; Ning, P.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, W.; Sun, Z. A closed-loop process for selective metal recovery from spent lithium iron phosphate batteries through mechanochemical activation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 9972–9980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, J.; He, Y.; Ge, Z.; Li, H.; Xie, W.; Wang, S. A promising physical method for recovery of LiCoO2 and graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries: Grinding flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 190, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meng, F.; McNeice, J.; Zadeh, S.; Ghahreman, A. Review of Lithium Production and Recovery from Minerals, Brines, and Lithium-Ion Batteries. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2019, 42, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tran, T.; Luong, V.T. Chapter 3—Lithium Production Processes. In Lithium Process Chemistry; Chagnes, A., Światowska, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 81–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rögener, F.; Tetampel, L. Electrodialysis for the Concentration of Lithium-Containing Brines—An Investigation on the Applicability. Membranes 2022, 12, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuang, G.; Li, H.; Hu, S.; Jin, R.; Liu, S.; Guo, H. Recovery of aluminium and lithium from gypsum residue obtained in the process of lithium extraction from lepidolite. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dessemond, C.; Lajoie-Leroux, F.; Soucy, G.; Laroreche, N.; Magnan, J.F. Spodumene: The Lithium Market, Resources and Processes. Minerals 2019, 9, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, Y.; Zhao, T.; He, L.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, X. A promising approach for directly extracting lithium from α-spodumene by alkaline digestion and precipitation as phosphate. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 189, 105141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barbosa, L.I.; Valente, G.; Orosco, R.P.; González, J.A. Lithium extraction from β-spodumene through chlorination with chlorine gas. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choubey, P.K.; Kim, M.S.; Srivastava, R.R.; Lee, J.C.; Lee, J.Y. Advance review on the exploitation of the prominent energy-storage element: Lithium. Part I: From mineral and brine resources. Miner. Eng. 2016, 89, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiu, Y.; Wu, D.; Yan, L.; Zhou, Y. Recyclin spodumene slag: Preparation of green polymer composites. RSC Adv. 2016, 43, 36942–36953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kuang, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Xing, S.; Li, F.; Guo, H. Extraction of lithium from β-spodumene using sodium sulfate solution. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 177, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rosales, G.D.; Ruiz, M.D.C.; Rodriguez, M.H. Novel process for the extraction of lithium from -spodumene by leaching with HF. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 147–148, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rezaee, M.; Shihua, H.; Sagzhanov, D.; Hassas, B.V.; Slawecki, T.M.; Agrawal, D.; Akbari, H.; Mensah-Biney, R. Microwave-assisted calcination of spodumene for efficient, low-cost and environmentally friendly extraction of lithium. Powder Technol. 2022, 397, 116992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, H.; Eksteen, J.; Kuang, G. Recovery of lithium from mineral resources: State-of-the-art and perspectives—A review. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 189, 105129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Braga, P.F.A.; França, S.C.A.; Gonçalves, C.C.A.; Ferraz, P.F.V.; Neumann, R. Extraction of lithium from a montebrasite concentrate: Applied mineralogy, pyro- and hydrometallurgy. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 191, 105249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lajoie-Leroux, F.; Dessemond, C.; Soucy, G.; Laroche, N.; Magnan, J. Impact of the impurities on lithium extraction from β-spodumene in the sulfuric acid process. Miner. Eng. 2018, 129, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, Z.; Wu, Y.; Hao, P.; Tan, X.; Wei, M.; Lv, X. Efficient lithium recovery from lithium-containing spent aluminium electrolyte via NaF fluorination roasting and Al2(SO4)3 leaching. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Y.; Tian, Q.; Chen, B.; Shi, X.; Liao, T. Precipitation of lithium carbonate from spodumene by a sodium carbonete autoclave process. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Napier, A.; Griffith, C. Process for Recovering Lithium Phosphate and Lithium Sulfate from Lithium-Bearing Silicates. U.S. Patent Application WO2019227158, 12 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Barbosa, L.I.; González, J.A.; Ruiz, M.d.C. Extraction of lithium from β-spodumene using chlorination roasting with calcium chloride. Thermochim. Acta 2015, 605, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fosu, A.; Kanari, N.; Vaugham, J.; Chagnes, A. Literature review and thermodynamic modelling of roasting processes for lithium extraction from spodumene. Metals 2020, 10, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xing, C.M.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, H. Magmatic-hydrothermal processes recorded by muscovite andcolumbite-group minerals from the Bailongshan rare-element pegmatites in the West Kunlun-Karakorum orogenic belt, NW China. Lithos 2020, 364–365, 105507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barrios, O.C.; González, Y.C.; Barbosa, L.I.; Orosco, P. Chlorination roasting of the cathode material contained in spent lithium-ion batteries to recover lithium, manganese, nickel and cobalt. Miner. Eng. 2022, 176, 107321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dunn, W.E.; Van Jahnke, J. Cyclical Vacuum Chlorination Processes, Including Lithium Extraction. U.S. Patent US7588741B2, 15 September 2009. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7588741B2/en (accessed on 19 February 2025).
  33. Jena, P.K.; Brocchi, E.A. Metal extraction through chlorine metallurgy. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1996, 16, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramos, I.D.E.; Orosco, P.R.; Barrios, O.C.; Jerez, A.L.P.; Sham, E.L.; Tesio, A.Y. Forsterite and magnesium aluminate spinel synthesis and silver extraction by calcination of silicon solar cell from discarded solar Pv panels with bischofite. Silicon 2023, 15, 2581–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yan, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Guo, H.; Hu, Q.; Peng, W.; Wu, X. Extraction of lithium from lepidolite using chlorination roastingíwater leaching process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, 1753–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Naggar, M.M.A.A.; Medina, L.F. An alternative method for the recovery of lithium from spodumene. Metall. Trans. B 1984, 15, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El-Naggar, M.M.A.A.; Medina, L.F.; Espídola, A. The reaction between spodumene and tachyhydrite. Metall. Trans. B 1988, 19, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krishnan, R.; Gopan, G. A comprehensive review of lithium extraction: From historical perspectives to emerging technologies, storage, and environmental considerations. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2024, 20, 100749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meshrama, P.; Pandey, B.D.; Mankhandb, T.R. Extraction of lithium from primary and secondary sources by pre-treatment, leaching and separation: A comprehensive review. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 150, 192–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Timich, M. Process Mineralogy of a Lithium Enriched Pegmatite Combining Mineral Separation and SEM Based Automated Mineralogy. Master’s Thesis, Departamento de Engenharia de Minas e Petróleo, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. HSC model of α-spodumene/MgCl2 + CaCl2 mixture.
Figure 1. HSC model of α-spodumene/MgCl2 + CaCl2 mixture.
Mining 05 00019 g001
Figure 2. Block diagram of the procedures for tests. Source: authors.
Figure 2. Block diagram of the procedures for tests. Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g002
Figure 3. X-ray analysis of the spodumene sample used in this study. Spd: spodumene (S); Ab: albite (A); Qtz: quartz (Q); Mus: muscovite (M). Source: authors.
Figure 3. X-ray analysis of the spodumene sample used in this study. Spd: spodumene (S); Ab: albite (A); Qtz: quartz (Q); Mus: muscovite (M). Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g003
Figure 4. Extraction of lithium with different molar ratios of MgCl2:CaCl2 and a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:8. Source: authors.
Figure 4. Extraction of lithium with different molar ratios of MgCl2:CaCl2 and a spodumene:chloride mass ratio of 1:8. Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patterns of the roasted chlorination sample. Forsterite (F), spinel (S), cordierite (C), tachyhydrite (T), and sinjarite (J). Source: authors.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patterns of the roasted chlorination sample. Forsterite (F), spinel (S), cordierite (C), tachyhydrite (T), and sinjarite (J). Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g005
Figure 6. Extraction of lithium with different spodumene:chloride mass ratios for each molar ratio. Source: authors.
Figure 6. Extraction of lithium with different spodumene:chloride mass ratios for each molar ratio. Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns for the leaching residue: periclase (P), forsterite (F), spinel (S), cordierite (C), brucite (B), and calcium aluminum oxide chloride (O). Source: authors.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns for the leaching residue: periclase (P), forsterite (F), spinel (S), cordierite (C), brucite (B), and calcium aluminum oxide chloride (O). Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g007
Figure 8. Lithium extraction (%) as a function of chlorination roasting time. Source: authors.
Figure 8. Lithium extraction (%) as a function of chlorination roasting time. Source: authors.
Mining 05 00019 g008
Table 1. Main reported methods for lithium recovery from minerals.
Table 1. Main reported methods for lithium recovery from minerals.
MethodMine LiAdditiveReaction TimeTemperatureLithium
Extraction (%)
Acid roasting
[20,21,22,23,24,25]
β-spodumene
(>1050 °C)
H2SO4, HF, HCl20–30 min75–225 °C90–97
Alkaline process
[3,15,19,26,27]
β-spodumene
(>1050 °C)
Na2CO3
CaO, NaOH
60–360 min225–250 °C90.7–96
Chlorination roasting [16,28]α-spodumene
(>25 °C)
CaCl2, Cl2120 min900 °C90.2
Source: authors.
Table 2. Operating conditions of the lithium extraction tests.
Table 2. Operating conditions of the lithium extraction tests.
TestSpodumene:
Chlorides
Molar RatioChlorination Roasting
MgCl2:CaCl2t (min)
11:80:1120
21:81:0120
31:81:2120
41:81:1120
51:82:1120
61:41:1120
71:42:1120
81:61:1120
91:62:1120
101:62:190
111:62:160
121:62:130
Source: authors.
Table 3. Composition (wt/wt%) of the spodumene sample. Source: authors.
Table 3. Composition (wt/wt%) of the spodumene sample. Source: authors.
ComponentAl2O3Li2OK2OMgOMn2O3Fe2O3Na2OP2O5CaO
wt/wt%23.265.671.400.170.141.070.790.650.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Braga, P.F.A.; Brigido, C.R.d.S.; Pinto, C.P.; França, S.C.A.; Rosales, G.D. Extracting Lithium from Brazilian α-Spodumene via Chlorination Roasting. Mining 2025, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010019

AMA Style

Braga PFA, Brigido CRdS, Pinto CP, França SCA, Rosales GD. Extracting Lithium from Brazilian α-Spodumene via Chlorination Roasting. Mining. 2025; 5(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Braga, Paulo F. A., Caroline R. dos S. Brigido, Camila P. Pinto, Silvia C. A. França, and Gustavo D. Rosales. 2025. "Extracting Lithium from Brazilian α-Spodumene via Chlorination Roasting" Mining 5, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010019

APA Style

Braga, P. F. A., Brigido, C. R. d. S., Pinto, C. P., França, S. C. A., & Rosales, G. D. (2025). Extracting Lithium from Brazilian α-Spodumene via Chlorination Roasting. Mining, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop