Previous Issue
Volume 5, June
 
 

Radiation, Volume 5, Issue 3 (September 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 1031 KiB  
Article
Waiting Times for Surgery and Radiotherapy Among Breast Cancer Patients in Switzerland: A Cancer Registry-Based Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis
by Christoph Oehler, Michel Eric Nicolas Zimmermann, Mohsen Mousavi, Kattic Ram Joorawon, Marcel Blum, Christian Herrmann and Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen
Radiation 2025, 5(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation5030023 - 3 Aug 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
Background: Delays in breast cancer treatment negatively affect prognosis and have increased over time. Data on waiting times in Switzerland are limited. Patients and Methods: This study analyzed cancer registry data from 2003 to 2005 (2628 patients) and 2015 to 2017 (421 patients) [...] Read more.
Background: Delays in breast cancer treatment negatively affect prognosis and have increased over time. Data on waiting times in Switzerland are limited. Patients and Methods: This study analyzed cancer registry data from 2003 to 2005 (2628 patients) and 2015 to 2017 (421 patients) to evaluate waiting times for diagnosis, surgery, and radiotherapy; temporal trends; and survival in women with stage I–III invasive breast cancer treated with surgery without chemotherapy. Associations with demographic/clinical factors and overall survival (OS) were assessed using ANOVA, uni-/multivariable regression, Kaplan–Meier, and Cox regression. Results: From 2003 to 2005, mean intervals were biopsy-to-diagnosis 4.3 days, diagnosis-to-surgery 18.8 days, biopsy-to-surgery 26.8 days, and surgery-to-radiotherapy 56.7 days. Longer diagnosis-to-surgery times were associated with metropolitan areas, public hospitals, basic insurance, mastectomy, and older age (all p < 0.001). Radiotherapy delays were also longer in metropolitan areas and after mastectomy (p < 0.001). Between 2003–2005 and 2015–2017, diagnosis-to-surgery times rose in Eastern Switzerland (from 21.3 to 31.2 days), while radiotherapy timing remained stable. Five-year overall survival improved (from 76.7% to 88.4%), but was not significantly impacted by diagnosis-to-surgery intervals. Conclusions: Despite timely surgery in Switzerland (2003–2005), disparities existed, and time to surgery increased by 2015–2017. Reducing waiting times remains important despite no significant short-term OS impact. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 591 KiB  
Brief Report
Deployment of an In Vivo Dosimetry Program with P-Type Diodes for Radiotherapy Treatments
by Miguel Felizardo and Elisabete Dias
Radiation 2025, 5(3), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation5030022 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 316
Abstract
Background: We present the implementation of an in vivo dosimetry program that enhances treatment setups, ensuring high accuracy that is needed globally. This approach proves valuable in smaller departments by helping to detect and prevent errors. Evaluation studies have shown that in vivo [...] Read more.
Background: We present the implementation of an in vivo dosimetry program that enhances treatment setups, ensuring high accuracy that is needed globally. This approach proves valuable in smaller departments by helping to detect and prevent errors. Evaluation studies have shown that in vivo dosimetry is a reliable method for assessing the overall accuracy of treatment delivery. Methods: Comprehensive development and validation of an in vivo dosimetry program using silicon diodes, ionization chambers, and calibrated electrometers for accurate radiation in dose measurements for treatments involving Co-60 or 6 MV X-ray beams. Results: The outcomes demonstrated that all diodes were dependable, with deviations of less than 1% (0.89 ± 0.10 cGy). Calibration curves were generated, showing dose variations of only 0.13% in the diode readings. The overall analysis revealed a mean deviation of up to 1%. Conclusions: These results provide a thorough assessment for patients’ treatment and facilitate timely interventions when needed, helping to ensure that dose variations stay within acceptable limits. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop