Scaffolds are one major component in osteochondral tissue engineering (OCTE) applications, acting as a structural support for cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the majority of described scaffolds present planar surfaces, compromising the reproduction of the natural curvature of the tissue (e.g., bone). Mimicking native tissue should be crucial, particularly in OCTE so that mechanical loads could be evenly distributed over the engineered constructs. In this work, a new strategy for the design of scaffolds is presented, using the radius of a sphere to characterize their curvature. Following a parametric design strategy, it becomes a versatile and efficient process to create scaffolds with diverse curvatures. The manufacture of the scaffolds was accomplished by fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique using the biocompatible, biodegradable and FDA-approved poly (lactic acid) (PLA) material. Considering the necessity for each layer to be printed over the bed or previously deposited material, a maximum curvature radius, to be produced by FFF, of 17.0638 mm was calculated for scaffolds with side dimensions of 20.1 mm × 20.1 mm. Curved scaffolds were manufactured with a radius of 17.0638 mm and 20 mm and structural integrity evaluated by micro-CT imaging, confirming the maximum curvature printability limitations. Additionally, finite element analysis (FEA) was used to assess the mechanical behavior of scaffolds to compressive loads. Considering these results, FFF curved scaffold manufacturing holds promising prospects to address the fabrication of scaffolds mimicking the natural curvature of osteochondral tissues.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: P.M, J.C.S., P.P.-F. and F.C.F.; Investigation: P.M., J.C.S., J.M. and C.M.; Software: P.M. and J.M.; Writing—original draft preparation: P.M. and J.C.S.; Writing—review and editing: P.M., J.C.S., P.P.-F. and F.C.F.; Supervision: J.C.S., P.P.-F. and F.C.F.; Funding acquisition: J.C.S., N.A., P.P.-F. and F.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors thank Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia for funding through CDRSP (UIDB/04044/2020 and UIDP/04044/2020), iBB (UIDB/04565/2020 and UIDP/04565/2020), i4HB (LA/P/0140/2020), and through the projects OptiBioScaffold (PTDC/EME-SIS/4446/2020) and InSilico4OCReg (PTDC/EME-SIS/0838/2021).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).