Next Article in Journal
Abstracts of the 4th Coatings and Interfaces Online Conference
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Educational Aspect of Testing and Diagnostics of Drones †

Institute of Logistics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary
Presented at the Sustainable Mobility and Transportation Symposium 2025, Győr, Hungary, 16–18 October 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 113(1), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025113080
Published: 4 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Sustainable Mobility and Transportation Symposium 2025)

Abstract

Nowadays, everybody can hear about different drone technologies, as they continuously appear in everyday life. It is easy to see on the internet how many possibilities are available with a drone. The hobby use of aerial photography can be regarded as basic, but this photographic feature can also be used for professional purposes, such as at different festivals, weddings, and by the police. However, operating a drone is still not a toy-like activity. Especially for larger drones, but also for smaller ones, several steps are necessary to operate them safely. Sometimes it occurs, especially for older or slightly damaged drones, that testing and diagnostic are necessary to obtain information about the malfunctions. Educational purposes are also important in engineering education, and basic drone education should be extended with diagnostic viewpoints. This paper introduces different diagnostic techniques for drones, our own experiences, and their usability in education.

1. Introduction

In recent years, drone technologies have rapidly appeared in various aspects of everyday life. From social media platforms to the professional world, the usability and accessibility of drones are widely recognized. Initially popularized through hobbyist aerial photography, drones are now employed in more specialized forms, including event documentation (such as weddings and festivals), industrial inspections, and public safety operations by law enforcement agencies. Despite their increasingly user-friendly features, drones are complex systems that require careful handling, particularly when operating larger or more advanced models.
Safe and effective drone operation involves a series of technical steps and considerations, highlighting the need for proper training and knowledge. Moreover, as drones age or incur minor damage, the likelihood of functional issues increases. In such cases, diagnostic processes become essential to identify and address malfunctions, ensuring continued performance and safety.
In the context of engineering education, it is important not only to teach the basics of drone operation but also to incorporate diagnostic techniques into the curriculum. This fosters a deeper understanding of drone systems and better prepares students for real-world technical challenges. This paper presents a review of diagnostic methodologies applicable to drone systems, shares practical experiences, and explores their integration into educational programs.
After this introduction, the second section gathers different studies within this topic. The third section briefly introduces the two drones used for research, and their features with the focus on testing and diagnostics. This chapter collects the author’s experience as well. Finally, the last section summarizes this study.

2. Literature Background of Diagnostics

Drone technology has rapidly evolved, finding applications across various sectors, including agriculture, construction, healthcare, and military operations [1]. These unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are equipped with advanced technologies such as GPS, cameras, and specialized sensors, enabling precise positioning and real-time data communication [2]. The drone market is projected to grow by 15% annually, with different models designed for specific tasks [1]. In agriculture, drones assist farmers in decision-making, increasing productivity and profitability [2]. However, the integration of drones into the national airspace raises safety and security concerns. To cope with these challenges, key enabling technologies have been identified, categorized into U-space capabilities, system functions, payloads, and tools [3]. As drone technology continues to improve, it offers increasingly adaptable solutions for a wide range of applications [1].
If diagnostics are generally in focus, automated diagnostics play a crucial role in enhancing the performance and efficiency of machines, particularly in building HVAC systems and CNC machines [4,5]. These systems can reduce energy consumption, extend equipment life, and improve occupant comfort [4]. For CNC machines, diagnostics are essential in detecting wear and breakage, especially in minimally manned operations [5]. Various technologies are available for automated machinery condition evaluation, including statistical analysis, parametric and non-parametric model diagnosis, and rule-based diagnostics [6]. The implementation of diagnostic systems can significantly improve the efficiency of machine-building enterprises [7]. However, to be effective, automated diagnostics must focus on relevant issues, present information, identify root causes, and avoid false alarms [4]. The design of machines should be adapted to incorporate diagnostic features for efficient monitoring and evaluation [7].
Recent research on drone diagnostics has focused on developing advanced methods for fault detection and diagnosis. Indoor testing environments using co-simulation have been proposed to evaluate drone performance and predict failures [8]. Hardware-in-the-loop simulators connected via CAN bus have been used to implement and test control and diagnostic algorithms for quadrotor drones [9]. Machine learning approaches, such as Support Vector Machines, have shown promise in classifying faulty and nominal flight conditions using simulated sensor data [10]. More recently, a novel method called Multiverse Augmented Recurrent Expansion combined with Uncertainty Bayesian Optimization has demonstrated superior accuracy and efficiency in diagnosing propeller and motor failures based on acoustic emissions [11]. These advancements aim to improve drone reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and enhance mission success rates through early fault detection and diagnosis.
Drones are being increasingly integrated into education, offering innovative ways to engage students and develop critical thinking skills across various subjects and grade levels [12,13]. Their applications range from simple coding for young children to complex remote sensing in higher education and research [12]. Drones have shown promise in enhancing engineering education and preparing students for future careers [14]. However, educators may face challenges in effectively incorporating this technology into their curricula and keeping up with rapid advancements [14]. While studies indicate positive effects on student engagement and learning outcomes, limitations exist, and there is a need for a unified framework to guide drone implementation in educational settings [15]. All in all, drones present exciting opportunities for transforming teaching and learning practices, but further research and development are needed to fully realize their potential in education.
Mention must also be made of the author’s contribution. The author has contributed significantly to the field of drone-based logistics through three key research publications. In 2021, he co-authored a paper examining the effective use of drones within indoor manufacturing environments, emphasizing energy-efficient route planning and logistical task automation in proximity to production lines [16]. This work provides practical insights into integrating UAVs into smart manufacturing systems to enhance operational efficiency. More recently, in 2024, he collaborated as main co-author on a paper discussing the broader application of drones in logistics, covering both civil and military domains. The study also addresses current challenges such as legal regulations, cybersecurity concerns, and system integration issues in supply chain contexts [17]. Together, these works reflect the author’s focused engagement with the evolving role of drones in industrial and logistical settings. Another source [18] introduces an innovative application of drones in industrial settings by utilizing them for inventory checks and monitoring the movement of Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) in a logistics system, thereby enhancing tracking accuracy and reducing the need for multiple tracking systems.

3. Overview of Testing and Diagnostic of Two Drones

This section collects background information of diagnostics aspects of two drones. At University of Miskolc, in Institute of Logistics, the Laboratory of Logistics 4.0 basically focuses on automated material handling machines, like an automated stacker machine, a conveyor, and an AGV. However, recently, two drones were purchased to improve the lab’s features. For the older and larger drone, in the over 1 kg category, a DJI Phantom 2 was acquired, while for the smaller but newer drone under 250 g, a DJI Mini 4 Pro was obtained. The older drone is used purely for educational purposes, since its size is too big for indoor use, but the newer drone is also capable for research purposes, as can be seen in [18]. Both drones can be categorized into a most typical quadcopter form with four propellers. The two drones together can be seen in Figure 1.
In case of drones, the testing and diagnostic field can be divided into two parts:
  • Aerial testing: during flying, with a screen, the operator can check and monitor the different functions, like altitude, vertical and horizontal speed, battery level, and horizontal angles.
  • Ground testing: manual inspection of the drone and using software for checking like battery level, condition of propellers, and different electronic modules.

3.1. Diagnostic of Older and Bigger Drone

As mentioned beforehand, the older and bigger drone is from DJI brand, and the type is the Phantom 2. Although this drone is appr. 8–9 years old, when it appeared, it was one of the most advanced drones. At that time, the personal use of quadcopters lasted only 1–2 years. This drone can perform semi-autonomous flight as well.
For aerial diagnostics, the OSD (On-Screen Display) function can be used. Initially, this function was not implemented into the drone; however with an additional iOSD device, the data can be read from main panel of drone through CAN-bus system. From the iOSD, the data is converted to video signal transmitter. The communication and implementation of OSD system is illustrated in Figure 2 based on [19].
The video signal can be received in three different ways:
  • By a 7” or similarly sized LCD monitor, as shown at the bottom of Figure 1.
  • By an FPV goggle, like Eachine EV100, as shown in Figure 3a.
  • By an OTG receiver, which can be connected to a smartphone, like Eachine ROTG01, as illustrated in Figure 3b.
The software approach to ground diagnostic can be performed by the genuine DJI Assistant software version 3.8., provided by the manufacturer. The manual [19] shows different information about how to use the features, as detailed in Figure 4.

3.2. Diagnostic of Newer and Smaller Drone

The newer drone is also from DJI, and the type is the Mini 4 Pro. It is one of the newest and most advanced drones currently available in the 250 g category. It can perform fully autonomous movements, like following different objects, including humans and vehicles. In the laboratory, the research goal is to create an inventory management system, as initiated and described in [17].
The aerial diagnostic can be screened on a smart device, like a smartphone or tablet. The manufacturer has its own DJI Fly application, but for a new DJI SDK has also been available for programming for the last few months. Similarly to the previously introduced drone, the most important data can be read, such as distances, angles, speeds, signal strengths, battery level, and video capture settings, as shown in Figure 5.

3.3. Ground Diagnostic of Battery

In case of drones, besides other data, the most important data is the battery level. If this is not considered, the drone can fall and damage the environment. This data can be read not only in the aerial mode, but also in ground mode. Both drones have built-in check function with a push button and 4 LEDs. The batteries can be seen on Figure 6.

3.4. Educational Viewpoint of Diagnostic

At the University of Miskolc, within the frame of logistics engineering BSc and MSc, the drones have already been implemented in education. So far, the general theoretical introduction has been made, and parts and functions of the drones were shown. However, from the next semester, the diagnostics and testing functions will be included in the educational material.
The parts of drones shown to students can be listed as follows:
  • Actuators, like motors, for propellers gimbal system.
  • Sensors, like a camera, a visual obstacle avoidance system, a GPS, and a compass.
  • Control of the drone.
These parts will be extended by the previously introduced diagnostics and testing function as a fourth module.

4. Summary and Future Directions

As drone technology continues to expand into a wide range of industrial, educational, and logistical applications, the importance of robust diagnostic methods becomes increasingly evident. While drones are becoming more user-friendly, their internal complexity and potential for mechanical or electronic failure necessitate structured approaches to testing and maintenance. This paper has highlighted the dual importance of aerial and ground diagnostics, showcasing practical implementations using two DJI drones: the Phantom 2 and Mini 4 Pro.
By integrating these diagnostic practices into engineering education, students gain not only theoretical knowledge of drone components and control systems but also practical skills in fault detection and system evaluation. This hands-on approach prepares future engineers for real-world challenges in drone operations, where performance, safety, and reliability are crucial.
Additionally, the author’s prior research and contributions in drone-based logistics provide further context for the real-world applicability of drone diagnostics. As technology and usage expand, future efforts should aim to refine diagnostic tools, enhance automation, and develop standardized educational modules to keep state-of-the-art with the industry’s rapid advancements.
Ultimately, the integration of testing and diagnostics into both drone systems and academic curricula represents a crucial step toward safer, more efficient, and more intelligent UAV operations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

First of all, many thanks concern István Lakatos, who has invited the author to the conference. This research is supported by the University Research Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund. During the preparation of this manuscript, the author used ChatGPT version 3.5. for grammar check and formatting references, and eliciting for literature review. The author has reviewed and edited the output and takes full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Engproc 113 00080 i001

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Choi, H.-W.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, S.-K.; Na, W.S. An Overview of Drone Applications in the Construction Industry. Drones 2023, 7, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agrawal, J.; Arafat, M.Y. Transforming Farming: A Review of AI-Powered UAV Technologies in Precision Agriculture. Drones 2024, 8, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Politi, E.; Purucker, P.; Larsen, M.; Reis, R.J.D.; Rajan, R.T.; Penna, S.D.; Boer, J.-F.; Rodosthenous, P.; Dimitrakopoulos, G.; Varlamis, I.; et al. Enabling Technologies for the Navigation and Communication of UAS Operating in the Context of BVLOS. Electronics 2024, 13, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, V.; Mistry, V. Automated Fault Detection and Diagnostics in HVAC Systems. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2023, 10, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikitin, Y.; Abramov, I. CNC machines diagnostics. In Proceedings of the 13th Mechatronika 2010, Trencianske Teplice, Slovakia, 2–4 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, J. A Review of Statistical-Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis with Probabilistic Models. Symmetry 2024, 16, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aleksandrovich, K.D.; Gennadyevich, D.I.; Viktorovna, H.Y.; Vladimirovich, T.A.; Mikhailovich, S.A. Integration of the system of diagnostics of industrial equipment and enterprise asset management systems using FIWARE framework. Proc. Polotsk State Univ. 2021, 4, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rose, C.; McMurray, R.; Usman Hadi, M. Enhancing fault detection and performance for UAVs with digital twin systems in search and rescue missions. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2025, 194, 105186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prochazka, F.; Krüger, S.; Stomberg, G.; Bauer, M. Development of a hardware-in-the-loop demonstrator for the validation of fault-tolerant control methods for a hybrid UAV. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 2021, 12, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, T.; Lu, Y.; Deng, H.; Chen, J.; Tang, X. Acquisition and Processing of UAV Fault Data Based on Time Line Modeling Method. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berghout, A.; Benbouzid, M. Fault Diagnosis in Drones via Multiverse Augmented Extreme Recurrent Expansion of Acoustic Emissions with Uncertainty Bayesian Optimisation. Machines 2024, 12, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yeung, R.C.U.; Sun, D.; Yeung, C.H. Integrating drone technology in STEM education: Curriculum, pedagogy and learning outcomes. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2025, 30, 14237–14272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bolick, M.M.; Mikhailova, E.A.; Post, C.J. Teaching Innovation in STEM Education Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Educ. Sci. 2012, 12, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marzuki, O.F.; Teo, E.Y.L.; Zanariah Zainol @ Abdullah, W.N.; Khairuddin, N.; Inai, N.H.; Saad, J.M.; Aziz, M.H.A.; Asmawi, N.M.M. Drone STEM Education: Revolutionizing Learning for the Future. Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev. 2025, 14, 1416–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pergantis, P.; Drigas, A. The Effect of Drones in the Educational Process: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Veres, P.; Chuvilina, O.; Cservenák, Á.; Illés, B. Effective Usage of Drones in Indoor Manufacturing Sites. Adv. Logist. Syst. Theory Pract. 2021, 15, 5–12. Available online: https://als.uni-miskolc.hu/index.php/als/article/view/127 (accessed on 22 July 2025). [CrossRef]
  17. Boncsér, L.; Cservenák, Á.; Kröpfl, P.; Landschützer, C. Drones and Their Application in Logistics. Adv. Logist. Syst. Theory Pract. 2024, 18, 5–16. Available online: https://als.uni-miskolc.hu/index.php/als/article/view/196 (accessed on 22 July 2025). [CrossRef]
  18. Cservenák, Á. Sustainability in Drone Technology—Tracking Using Drone. Tehnički Glas. 2025, 14, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. DJI. PHANTOM 2 User Manual; Version 1.02. DJI: Shenzhen, China, 2014. Available online: https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom_2/de/PHANTOM2_User_Manual_DE_v1.02.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2025).
Figure 1. DJI drones used for research purposes (self-made photo).
Figure 1. DJI drones used for research purposes (self-made photo).
Engproc 113 00080 g001
Figure 2. Implementing OSD and wireless diagnostic function for DJI Phantom 2 drone (self-made photo).
Figure 2. Implementing OSD and wireless diagnostic function for DJI Phantom 2 drone (self-made photo).
Engproc 113 00080 g002
Figure 3. Wireless diagnostic possibility of FPV goggle or OTG receiver for smartphones (self-made photos) (a) FPV goggle for receiving video signal (b) OTG video signal receiver for smartphone.
Figure 3. Wireless diagnostic possibility of FPV goggle or OTG receiver for smartphones (self-made photos) (a) FPV goggle for receiving video signal (b) OTG video signal receiver for smartphone.
Engproc 113 00080 g003
Figure 4. Ground diagnostic possibility of DJI Phantom 2 Assistant software ver 3.8 (self-made screenshot).
Figure 4. Ground diagnostic possibility of DJI Phantom 2 Assistant software ver 3.8 (self-made screenshot).
Engproc 113 00080 g004
Figure 5. OSD by DJI Mini 4 Pro (self-made screenshot).
Figure 5. OSD by DJI Mini 4 Pro (self-made screenshot).
Engproc 113 00080 g005
Figure 6. Battery of DJI Mini 4 Pro and DJI Phantom 2 (self-made photo).
Figure 6. Battery of DJI Mini 4 Pro and DJI Phantom 2 (self-made photo).
Engproc 113 00080 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cservenák, Á. Educational Aspect of Testing and Diagnostics of Drones. Eng. Proc. 2025, 113, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025113080

AMA Style

Cservenák Á. Educational Aspect of Testing and Diagnostics of Drones. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 113(1):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025113080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cservenák, Ákos. 2025. "Educational Aspect of Testing and Diagnostics of Drones" Engineering Proceedings 113, no. 1: 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025113080

APA Style

Cservenák, Á. (2025). Educational Aspect of Testing and Diagnostics of Drones. Engineering Proceedings, 113(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025113080

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop