You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
IoT
  • Article
  • Open Access

14 February 2025

Fog-Enabled IoT Robotic System for Efficient Date Palm Monitoring in Moroccan Oases

and
Engineering, Systems and Applications Laboratory, ENSA, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30050, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Date palms are a vital resource in the oases of Morocco, providing economic and ecological benefits to local communities. However, monitoring these trees at scale presents challenges, particularly in rural areas where traditional IoT-based agricultural systems rely on extensive sensor networks. These systems face significant limitations, including high deployment costs, network coverage issues, and energy constraints. To address these challenges, we propose an agricultural robot equipped with multiple IoT sensors to monitor date palm health and environmental parameters, reducing the need for widespread fixed sensors. To overcome the latency, bandwidth, and energy inefficiencies associated with cloud-based solutions, the system integrates the fog computing paradigm. Fog computing brings computational resources closer to the data source, enabling real-time processing and decision-making while reducing network congestion. Using iFogSim, we evaluate the proposed system on key metrics, including latency, energy consumption, and network performance. The results demonstrate significant improvements over traditional approaches, highlighting the potential of IoT-based robotic systems combined with fog computing to revolutionize date palm monitoring in remote oases.

1. Introduction

The advent of smart farming, powered by the Internet of Things (IoT), has brought a paradigm shift in agricultural practices, enabling real-time monitoring and management of crops [1]. Smart farming employs a network of sensors and connected devices to collect vast amounts of data on various parameters such as soil moisture, temperature, humidity, and plant health. This data-driven approach allows for precise and timely interventions, optimizing resource use, enhancing crop yield, and minimizing the environmental impact. The integration of IoT in agriculture provides farmers with actionable insights, paving the way for sustainable and efficient farming practices. However, the widespread deployment of IoT sensors in agricultural fields faces significant challenges, including the high cost associated with purchasing and maintaining a large number of devices, limited network coverage in rural and remote areas, and energy constraints that affect the longevity and reliability of battery-powered sensors. For example, in the Errachidia region of Morocco, which is home to vast date palm plantations [2], the installation and maintenance of numerous IoT sensors across expansive fields can be prohibitively expensive and logistically challenging. The uneven distribution of network coverage in remote areas further exacerbates these challenges, leading to gaps in data collection and delayed interventions. To address these issues, we propose the development of an agricultural robot equipped with IoT sensors, capable of autonomously navigating the plantation to monitor and collect data on key parameters such as soil moisture, temperature, and plant health. This robot would provide an efficient and cost-effective solution for real-time monitoring, reducing the need for a large, fixed network of sensors while ensuring continuous data collection and timely interventions. Furthermore, while some agricultural robots [3,4,5,6] rely on cloud computing to process and analyze the vast amounts of data collected by IoT sensors, this approach faces several limitations. The centralized nature of cloud computing often results in high latency, as data must be transmitted from remote field locations to the cloud for processing and then back to the robot for action. This delay can significantly hinder real-time decision-making, which is critical for tasks such as disease management and irrigation control in agriculture. Additionally, transmitting large volumes of data over long distances can strain network bandwidth, leading to inefficiencies, slower response times, and increased operational costs. To overcome these challenges, we propose the integration of a fog computing architecture tailored for agricultural robots. By utilizing fog nodes deployed at the edge of the network, closer to the data source, data processing and decision-making can occur locally, reducing the need for long-distance data transmission. This architecture significantly decreases latency and alleviates bandwidth strain, ensuring faster, more efficient real-time decision-making. The fog computing paradigm enables local processing on nearby fog nodes, ensuring timely interventions and efficient resource management, which are essential for optimizing agricultural operations and enhancing the performance of IoT-based robots in smart farming and date palm monitoring.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: First, we propose a fog-enabled IoT robotic system for efficient date palm monitoring, which integrates an IoT-based agricultural robot equipped with sensors to autonomously collect data on key parameters such as soil moisture, temperature, and plant health. This system addresses the challenges of deploying and maintaining large, fixed sensor networks in remote agricultural areas. Second, we develop an IoT robot-driven algorithm for fog-enabled environmental monitoring and precision irrigation, which prioritizes tasks based on resource availability and urgency, ensuring efficient operation and energy optimization. Finally, we evaluate the proposed framework using iFogSim, focusing on metrics such as latency, bandwidth utilization, and energy consumption. The results demonstrate the advantages of the fog computing paradigm over cloud-based approaches, particularly in date palm plantations, where cost, network coverage, and energy efficiency are significant concerns.

3. Proposed Fog-Enabled IoT Robotic System for Efficient Date Palm Monitoring

In this section, we present the design and architecture of the proposed fog-enabled IoT robotic system, which aims to enhance the monitoring and management of date palm plantations. This system integrates robotics, IoT sensors, and fog computing to provide efficient real-time data collection, environmental monitoring, and precision irrigation management. The following subsections describe the main components and functionalities of the system in detail.

3.1. Main Componenets of the Proposed System Architecture

3.1.1. IoT Robotic Sensor Layer

The proposed system architecture revolves around an IoT-based robot, as illustrated in Figure 1, equipped with a minimal yet high-efficiency sensor array tailored for monitoring date palm trees in both open plantations and greenhouses. The robot autonomously navigates through fields and greenhouses, where young palm trees require more intensive monitoring. Rather than deploying numerous sensors across vast areas, the robot optimizes data collection by utilizing a focused set of sensors capable of performing key tasks such as monitoring environmental conditions, detecting disease, and managing irrigation. Through its movement and strategic sensor deployment, the robot collects real-time data on parameters like soil moisture, temperature, and humidity, providing crucial insights while minimizing sensor usage. This approach ensures cost-effectiveness, reduces network complexity, and offers precise, high-quality monitoring for both outdoor and greenhouse environments. The robot, therefore, enhances irrigation precision and disease management, especially in high-maintenance settings like date palm greenhouses.
Figure 1. Fog-enabled IoT robot for date palm monitoring.

3.1.2. Fog Computing Layer

As presented in Figure 2, the fog computing layer consists of distributed fog nodes strategically positioned within or near the date palm plantation. These nodes, such as gateways or edge servers, act as intermediaries between the robot’s sensors and the cloud, enabling localized data processing. By handling real-time data analysis at the edge, fog nodes minimize latency and reduce reliance on cloud services, ensuring faster response times for critical tasks such as environmental monitoring and precision irrigation management. Additionally, they support machine learning algorithms for predictive analytics, optimizing irrigation schedules and detecting potential issues like environmental stress or disease risks. In addition, fog computing enhances security and privacy by processing data closer to the source, reducing exposure to cyber threats associated with cloud dependency [26]. Localized data handling minimizes the risk of breaches and unauthorized access while enabling real-time threat detection, authentication mechanisms, and encrypted communication. This decentralized approach strengthens the resilience and security of smart farming systems.
Figure 2. The proposed system architecture.

3.1.3. Cloud Server

The cloud server complements the fog layer by offering scalable storage for the large volumes of data collected from the field. It facilitates tasks such as training and updating deep learning models, which require significant computational resources. Additionally, the cloud provides long-term storage for data, enabling historical analysis and improvements in system performance.

3.1.4. User Interface

The user interface enables farmers and agricultural experts to monitor palm tree health and environmental conditions in real time. It provides timely alerts and notifications about potential issues, such as irrigation needs or disease risks, and displays data in a clear and accessible format. This interface allows users to interact with the system, access relevant information, and make informed decisions, ensuring effective and timely management of date palm cultivation.

3.2. IoT Robot-Driven Algorithm for Fog-Enabled Environmental Monitoring and Precision Irrigation in Date Palm

The proposed fog-enabled system, as detailed in Figure 3, uses IoT robots to monitor and manage date palms in Moroccan oases. Environmental data, including soil moisture, temperature, nutrients, and disease indicators, are collected by the robot and processed through fog nodes. These nodes analyze the data to determine irrigation needs, detect diseases, and identify environmental issues. Based on these analyses, the system generates irrigation schedules, recommends disease treatments, and adjusts environmental conditions. While localized actions are performed by the robot, critical data are sent to the cloud for further processing and storage.
Figure 3. The flowchart of IoT robot driven algorithm for precision irrigation and monitoring.
This setup ensures low-latency decision-making and optimized resource usage, improving the efficiency of date palm management.
The IoT robot-driven algorithm for fog-enabled environmental monitoring and precision irrigation leverages the fog computing architecture to address latency-sensitive needs in agricultural robotics. The system begins by collecting environmental data (soil moisture, temperature, nutrient levels, and disease indicators) through the IoT robot’s sensors. To avoid the increased energy consumption associated with relying on the robot’s limited resources for data processing, the data are instead handled locally by the fog nodes. These nodes efficiently analyze the inputs to identify critical issues, such as irrigation requirements or environmental anomalies. By processing data at the edge, the system minimizes latency, ensuring that time-sensitive actions, such as disease detection, are executed quickly without the need for distant cloud servers. Each fog node assesses the data for predefined thresholds. For instance, if soil moisture falls below a set threshold, an irrigation issue is flagged. Similarly, temperature or nutrient imbalances prompt environmental adjustment flags, and disease indicators trigger alerts for potential outbreaks. The processed data, along with the identified flags, are sent to the Fog Controller (FC), which aggregates the results from all fog nodes and coordinates actions. If a fog node is unable to handle the data load, it forwards the information to the cloud for further processing. The Fog Controller ensures that the data are effectively aggregated to generate irrigation schedules, disease treatment recommendations, and environmental adjustments, which are then communicated to the robot for localized action. Real-time notifications are also sent to the user interface, keeping farmers informed of the system’s status.

4. Results

4.1. Implementation of Fog-Enabled IoT Robotic System for Date Palm Monitoring

The system scenario involves an autonomous robot, as shown in Figure 4, integrated with IoT sensors and a fog computing architecture. The robot traverses date palm plantations, collecting critical data such as soil moisture, temperature, humidity, and visual indicators of disease. These data are processed locally by fog nodes to ensure timely responses and efficient resource management. The robot’s sensing frequency is dynamically adjusted based on monitoring needs, with latency-sensitive tasks, such as real-time plant disease detection, prioritized for immediate processing at the nearest fog node. Routine tasks, like soil moisture monitoring, are scheduled based on resource availability and environmental conditions, optimizing performance and minimizing delays.
Figure 4. Prototype agricultural robot detecting palm trees with irrigation issues.

4.1.1. Case 1: Routine Monitoring of Environmental Parameters

When soil moisture, temperature, and humidity levels are within acceptable thresholds, the system reduces the frequency of data analysis. This conserves computational resources and extends the operational life of sensors. Aggregated data are stored at the fog node for historical reference, demonstrating the system’s adaptability in non-critical scenarios while maintaining efficient data management.

4.1.2. Case 2: Rapid Response to Irrigation Deficiencies

If soil moisture levels fall below critical thresholds, the system immediately flags the issue as high priority and sends it to the fog scheduler. The fog node closest to the problem area processes the data with minimal latency, triggering actions such as activating the irrigation system.

4.1.3. Case 3: Disease Alerts and Mitigation

When disease symptoms are detected by the robot, such as those caused by Bayoud disease, the system prioritizes the data for immediate processing. High-risk cases are handled at the closest fog node to enable quick intervention and reduce the likelihood of disease spreading.

4.2. System Configuration

The performance evaluation was carried out using the iFogSim simulator to test the efficiency of the proposed system. IFogSim [27] is a simulation tool specifically designed for modeling IoT, edge, fog, and cloud computing environments.
The simulation was conducted on a Dell computer equipped with an Intel Core i5 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and running Windows 10 64-bit. Key parameters for each fog node, such as CPU capacity, memory, and network bandwidth, were configured as outlined in Table 2.
Table 2. Configuration details of setup.
The computational hierarchy of the proposed system is organized into five levels to optimize its operation. At the first level are the sensors and actuators integrated into the robotic system, responsible for collecting environmental data and performing actions. The second level consists of fog nodes (FNs) deployed near the plantation to process data locally. The third level comprises Fog Controller Nodes (FCNs), which coordinate the activities of multiple fog nodes. At the fourth level is the proxy layer, which facilitates communication between the FCNs and the cloud. Finally, the fifth level is the cloud server, providing centralized storage and advanced computational capabilities.
In the initial phase of this experiment, the simulation environment was set up with a single Fog Controller Node, three fog nodes, and nine IoT sensors integrated into the robotic system. The performance metrics were evaluated over 200 iterations, and the results were averaged for consistency. Table 3 presents the findings for key metrics such as average latency, network usage, and energy consumption.
Table 3. Simulation results for the proposed system architecture, for AgriFog, and for cloud only.
The simulation results show that the proposed fog-enabled smart farming system outperforms the AgriFog [28] in key metrics such as latency, network usage, and energy consumption.
These improvements are attributed to the efficient utilization of fog nodes for local data processing and the integration of FCNs, which optimize resource coordination and decision-making within the fog architecture.
The proposed fog-enabled architecture for smart farming leverages FCNs to ensure efficient and responsive resource allocation across fog nodes. For example, when soil moisture levels indicate optimal growing conditions, the FCNs adjust data collection and processing intervals to conserve energy and computational resources. In contrast, if soil moisture data reveal drought conditions, the system prioritizes this information for immediate processing at the nearest fog node to promptly activate the irrigation system, preventing potential damage to the crops. Similarly, when the robot detects early signs of pest infestation or plant disease, the data are treated as latency-sensitive and processed with high priority at the nearest fog node to enable rapid interventions, such as activating pest control measures. By dynamically coordinating resources and tasks through FCNs, the system ensures timely and efficient responses to both routine and critical agricultural scenarios.

4.2.1. Changing the Number of the IoT Devices

In this phase of testing, the simulator was configured with one Fog Controller Node, three fog nodes, and nine IoT sensors. To assess the system’s performance under varying loads, additional sensors were incrementally added, with the number of connected sensors set to 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27. This configuration aimed to analyze the impact of sensor scalability on key performance metrics, including latency, energy consumption, and network usage. Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 present the results, highlighting the trends observed for these metrics as the number of sensors increased.
Figure 5. Average latency (ms).
Figure 6. Average network usage (kbps).
Figure 7. Average energy consumption (J).
As the number of connected sensors integrated with the robot increases, cloud-based systems encounter significant latency issues due to the long distances data must travel for processing. Similarly, fog-only architectures like AgriFog, lacking centralized coordination through Fog FCNs, can experience overloaded fog nodes, leading to delays that adversely affect latency-sensitive robotic operations such as real-time monitoring and precision irrigation. Our proposed system addresses these challenges by combining the robot’s local processing capabilities with an optimized fog computing framework, effectively distributing the computational load and enhancing overall system performance.
In terms of network usage, the proposed system places computational modules on fog nodes located near the robot’s sensors, reducing network congestion and improving efficiency. In fog-only architectures without FCNs, modules often rely on cloud resources for processing, which increases network congestion and affects response times.
In terms of energy consumption, our proposed system demonstrates superior performance compared to AgriFog by implementing an optimized module placement strategy that considers both urgency and energy requirements. Tasks deemed critical are prioritized for processing with minimal latency, while moderate tasks are managed to achieve a balance between energy usage and latency. Less urgent tasks are scheduled with a focus on minimizing energy consumption while still meeting their required deadlines. This adaptive prioritization effectively reduces overall energy consumption. Furthermore, expanding the number of fog nodes enhances energy efficiency by distributing tasks more effectively across available resources. This reduces individual node workloads, preventing resource strain and optimizing energy use. Additionally, the proximity of fog nodes to data sources minimizes energy-intensive data transmissions, collectively lowering overall system energy consumption. Future work will incorporate real-world energy metrics to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the system’s overall efficiency and performance.

4.2.2. Changing the Number of Fog Devices

In this phase of the experiments, the system included 20 IoT sensors integrated into the robot, and the number of fog nodes was varied between 9, 11, 13, and 15. This variation was used to evaluate the impact of different fog node counts on performance metrics such as latency, energy consumption, and network usage.
As illustrated in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, the simulation results demonstrate that increasing the number of fog nodes leads to a notable reduction in latency, energy consumption, and network usage across all evaluated models. This improvement stems from the system’s enhanced ability to allocate tasks to the most appropriate fog nodes, thereby reducing the reliance on cloud offloading. The reduced dependency on cloud resources directly contributes to lower latency, decreased energy usage, and optimized network bandwidth. Additionally, the higher number of fog nodes facilitates a more balanced distribution of computational tasks, promoting efficient resource utilization within the fog-based ecosystem of the robotic smart farming system.
Figure 8. Average latency (ms).
Figure 9. Average network usage (kbps).
Figure 10. Average energy consumption (J).

5. Conclusions

This paper proposes and evaluates an IoT-enabled robotic system designed to monitor date palm plantations in Moroccan oases. The system addresses challenges such as high deployment costs, limited network coverage, and energy constraints by integrating fog computing to process data closer to the source. Simulations conducted with iFogSim demonstrate improvements in latency, network usage, and energy consumption compared to traditional approaches like Agrifog. The proposed architecture uses a network of fog nodes managed by a Fog Controller Node to allocate tasks efficiently and reduce dependence on cloud resources. While iFogSim simulations were used to evaluate system performance, future work will include real-world deployments to assess hardware reliability, environmental challenges, and user interactions. Additionally, future work will focus on integrating deep learning models into fog nodes to enable real-time detection of date palm diseases, further enhancing the system’s capabilities for precision monitoring and timely intervention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M.; Methodology, B.M. and E.A.; Software, B.M.; Validation, B.M. and E.A.; Writing—original draft, B.M.; Writing—review and editing, B.M. and E.A.; Supervision, E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Navarro, E.; Costa, N.; Pereira, A. A Systematic Review of IoT Solutions for Smart Farming. Sensors 2020, 20, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Available online: https://www.agriculture.gov.ma/index.php/ar/actualites/aqlym-alrshydyt-zyart-mshary-tnmwyt-flahyt (accessed on 22 November 2024).
  3. Hasan, M.; Uddin, K.N.W.; Sayeed, A.; Tasneem, T. Smart Agriculture Robotic System Based on Internet of Things to Boost Crop Production. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 5–7 January 2021; pp. 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Durmus, H.; Gunes, E.O. Integration of the mobile robot and internet of things to collect data from the agricultural fields. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), Istanbul, Turkey, 16–19 July 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sayed, M.A.; Shams, N.; Zaman, H.U. An IoT based robotic system for irrigation notifier. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Artificial-intelligence and Internet-of-Things (RAAICON), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 29 November–1 December 2019; pp. 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, A.; Aziz, S.; Bashir, M.; Khan, M.U. IoT and wireless sensor network based autonomous farming robot. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST), Karachi, Pakistan, 26–27 March 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohammed, M.; Riad, K.; Alqahtani, N. Efficient IoT-Based Control for a Smart Subsurface Irrigation System to Enhance Irrigation Management of Date Palm. Sensors 2021, 21, 3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raja, M.; Deepa, B.; Nijanthan; Swapna, B.; Divya, B.S.; Chate, P.J. Internet of Things (IoT) Assisted Smart Agriculture Monitoring and Summarization System using NodeMCU and Efficient Sensor Unit. In Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS), Chennai, India, 23–24 November 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raj, A.; Sharma, V.; Rani, S.; Shanu, A.K.; Alkhayyat, A.; Singh, R.D. Modern Farming Using IoT-Enabled Sensors for the Improvement of Crop Selection. In Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), London, UK, 9–11 May 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Placidi, P.; Vergini, C.V.D.; Papini, N.; Ciancabilla, E.; Cecconi, M.; Scorzoni, A. Soil Water Content Sensor in the IoT Precision Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE SENSORS, Vienna, Austria, 29 October–1 November 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Spisic, J.; Balen, J.; Zagar, D.; Galić, V. IoT Based Network Model And Sensor Node Prototype For Precision Agriculture Application. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Yokohama, Japan, 26 October–11 November 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tomar, M.; Patidar, T. Development of a low Cost Soil Moisture Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking (ViTECoN), Vellore, India, 30–31 March 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hossain, F.F.; Messenger, R.; Captain, G.L.; Ekin, S.; Jacob, J.D.; Taghvaeian, S.; O’Hara, J.F. Soil Moisture Monitoring Through UAS-Assisted Internet of Things LoRaWAN Wireless Underground Sensors. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 102107–102118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hur, B.; Eisenstadt, W.R. Progress in development of the low-power wireless multiple temperature sensor pole for pesticide, agriculture, and mosquito research. In Proceedings of the SoutheastCon 2015, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 9–12 April 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malika, N.Z.; Johar, M.G.M.; Alkawaz, M.H.; Hajamydeen, A.I.; Raya, L. Temperature & Humidity Monitoring for Poultry Farms using IOT. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 12th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), Penang, Malaysia, 21–22 May 2022; pp. 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Permana, F.; Kuncoro, C.B.D. Autonomous Temperature and Humidity Wireless Sensor Node for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Application. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS), Semarang, Indonesia, 24–25 November 2021; pp. 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Swapna, B.; Andal, C.; Manivannan, S.; JayaKrishna, N.; Rao, K.S.S. IoT based light intensity and temperature monitoring system for plants. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 3409–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manikandan, P.; Ramesh, G.; Sivakumar, P.; Kumar, J.J.; Krishna, R.L.; Dinesh, G. Soil nutrients monitoring and analyzing system using Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India, 28–29 April 2022; pp. 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aliparo, J.; CSantos, D.; Sese, C.M.; Trinidad, J.V.; Beaño, M.G.; Capuno, M.E.A.; Medina, O.; Sigue, A.-L.; Soriano, A. IoT-based Assessment and Monitoring of NPK Content and Fertility Condition of Soil. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2022—2022 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 1–4 November 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pawar, S.; Tembe, S.; Khan, S. Design of an Affordable pH module for IoT Based pH Level Control in Hydroponics Applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Convergence to Digital World—Quo Vadis (ICCDW), Mumbai, India, 18–20 February 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aliyana, A.K.; Ganguly, P.; Beniwal, A.; Kumar, S.K.N.; Dahiya, R. Disposable pH Sensor on Paper Using Screen-Printed Graphene-Carbon Ink Modified Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 21049–21056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sujitha, B.; Kilaru, M.; Parveen, M.N.J.; Kanikicherla, C.; Gudavalli, A.C.; Perusomula, H. IoT based Smart Water Meter System with Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2023 Second International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), Trichy, India, 23–25 August 2023; pp. 1519–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bagha, H.; Yavari, A.; Georgakopoulos, D. IoT-based Plant Health Analysis using Optical Sensors in Precision Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2021 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), Gold Coast, Australia, 29 November–1 December 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adetunji, K.E.; Joseph, M.K. Development of a Cloud-Based Monitoring System Using 4Duino: Applications in Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD), Durban, South Africa, 6–7 August 2018; pp. 4849–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mekala, M.S.; Mekala, M.S.; Viswanathan, P. A Survey: Smart agriculture IoT with cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2017 International conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICMDCS), Vellore, India, 10–12 August 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Burhan, M.; Alam, H.; Arsalan, A.; Rehman, R.A.; Anwar, M.; Faheem, M.; Ashraf, M.W. A Comprehensive Survey on the Cooperation of Fog Computing Paradigm-Based IoT Applications: Layered Architecture, Real-Time Security Issues, and Solutions. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 73303–73329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, H.; Dastjerdi, A.V.; Ghosh, S.K.; Buyya, R. iFogSim: A toolkit for model-ing and simulation of resource management techniques in the internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2017, 47, 1275–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sucharitha, V.; Prakash, P.; Iyer, G. Agrifog-a fog computing based IoT for smart agriculture. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 7, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.