Next Article in Journal
Do Successful Researchers Reach the Self-Organized Critical Point?
Next Article in Special Issue
Joint Analysis of the Iron Emission in the Optical and Near-Infrared Spectrum of I Zw 1
Previous Article in Journal
Casimir–Lifshitz Frictional Heating in a System of Parallel Metallic Plates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical Properties of Two Complementary Samples of Intermediate Seyfert Galaxies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Optical Monitoring of Broad-Line AGNs (LoTerm AGN): Case Study of NGC 3516

by
Dragana Ilić
1,*,
Luka Č. Popović
1,2,
Alexander Burenkov
3,
Elena Shablovinskaya
3,
Eugene Malygin
3,
Roman Uklein
3,
Alexei V. Moiseev
3,
Dmitry Oparin
3,
Víctor M. Patiño Álvarez
4,5,
Vahram Chavushyan
4,6,
Paola Marziani
7,
Mauro D’Onofrio
7,8,
Alberto Floris
8,
Andjelka B. Kovačević
1,
Jovana Jovičić
1,
Djordje Miković
1,
Nemanja Rakić
9,
Saša Simić
10,
Sladjana Marčeta Mandić
2,
Stefano Ciroi
8,
Amelia Vietri
8,
Luca Crepaldi
8 and
Ascensión del Olmo
11
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 369167 Nizhnij Arkhyz, Russia
4
Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electronica, Apartado Postal 51-216, Puebla 72000, Mexico
5
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
6
Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
7
Affiliation INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy
8
Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universitá di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
9
Physics Department, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banjaluka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banjaluka, RS, Bosnia and Herzegovina
10
Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
11
Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia, IAA-CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomia s/n, E-18008 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Physics 2024, 6(1), 31-45; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics6010003
Submission received: 6 October 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 28 November 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spectral Line Shapes in Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasma 2023)

Abstract

:
Properties of the broad line region (BLR) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are commonly used to estimate the mass of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) that powers an AGN. However, the understanding of the physics behind the BLR remains incomplete. The AGNs exhibit strong optical variability, observed in the change of the profiles and fluxes of broad emission lines. Utilizing this variability provides an opportunity to constrain the physics of the BLR, and understand the interplay of the BLR with SMBH and surrounding regions. Here, we present the long-term monitoring campaign of a sample of the known broad-line AGNs (identified as LoTerm AGN). The aim of this study is to show the importance of sustained and dedicated campaigns that continually collect spectroscopic data of the known AGNs over extended timescales, providing unique insight into the origin and structure of the BLR. LoTerm AGN is a collaborative network of seven moderate-size telescopes equipped for spectroscopy. We focus on the recent spectral data of the known changing-look AGN, NGC 3516. Specifically, we examine the broad hydrogen Balmer H α line observed in the period 2020–2023, demonstrating that this AGN remains active with the BLR signatures observed in the spectra. No significant change in the broad line profile of H α line is observed during this recent period.

1. Introduction

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are powerful galactic centers, where emissions are driven by the activity of supermassive black holes (SMBH) fueled through the accretion disk [1]. The unified model (e.g., [2]) suggests that the optical broad emission lines originate from the broad line region (BLR) surrounding the SMBH. These lines become visible in the optical spectra when the AGN is oriented such that the obscuring regions are not blocking the observer’s line of sight [3]. AGNs falling into this category are referred to as broad-line AGNs or type 1 AGNs [4].
Some AGNs, called changing-look (CL) AGNs, exhibit dramatic variations in their luminosity and spectral properties over relatively short timescales that are detected in different spectral bands (see, e.g., [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]). They transition from an active to a quiescent phase, or vice versa, challenging existing unified models of AGN structure and behavior [2,13]. Thus, studies of CL AGNs have gained significant attention, as they offer a window into the complex interplay between SMBH, the emitting line regions around it, and the host galaxy (for a review, see [14]). There are several proposed scenarios to explain this extreme transition, such as obscuration, an intrinsic change in accretion disk, the presence of binary SMBH, a tidal disruption event, supernova explosions, or most likely a combination of all listed (e.g., [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]). Understanding the underlying mechanisms driving these transitions will help to characterize the activity process in AGNs [14].
Recent advancements in observational techniques and large-scale sky surveys, along with machine learning algorithms, have significantly expanded the catalogs of CL AGNs (e.g., [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]). This trend is expected to increase even further with new time-domain missions like Vera C. Rubin Legacy Survey in Space and Time (LSST) [32] and its spectroscopic follow-ups. These will certainly help with solving the mystery of CL AGN phenomena. Nevertheless, smaller but dedicated monitoring campaigns of the known type 1 AGNs are continuously providing valuable findings; see, e.g., [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Here, we outline the strategy and advantages of the long-term optical monitoring of the AGN (LoTerm AGN) campaign, initiated in the 1990s by Alla I. Shapovalova. Initially, the campaign aimed to study the size and structure of the BLR in type 1 AGNs and estimate the parameters of the SMBHs, leading to the publication of a number of papers (see [42] and references therein). The focus of the current campaign is to continue the spectroscopic and photometric long-term monitoring of a sample of the most studied type 1 AGNs. The main objective is to identify and characterize long-term trends and extreme variability in broad lines.
LoTerm AGN project is a collaborative network of several international research teams. The project aims to understand the structure of the BLR in AGN, in which properties (i.e., BLR size and gas velocity) are commonly used to estimate the mass of SMBHs; see, e.g., [43,44,45]. Specifically, LoTerm AGN seeks to investigate possible long-term trends and changes in selected objects (e.g., capturing changing-look events as successfully demonstrated for NGC 3516 [42]), contributing to a deeper understanding of the BLR structure of AGNs. Furthermore, LoTerm AGN data could be merged through careful inter-calibration with other campaigns, which could be beneficial for reverberation mapping studies, i.e., the estimation of the time delay between the optical continuum and emission line flux, which, in turn, provides the size of the BLR [46,47]. The reverberation mapping is an highly useful technique to map the inner structure of the emitting regions in AGN (see  [48] for review), and, in particular, the broad-line monitoring is especially useful for constraining the BLR physics and kinematics (e.g., [49]). Finally, the LoTerm AGN campaign will continue to build a legacy database of the type 1 AGN. This initiative has been running for about the last 30 years (see [42] and references therein), collecting data from various medium-size optical telescopes worldwide. A dozen of different sub-types within type 1 AGN, using both spectral and photometric observations, have been analyzed in great detail.
Among the objects in the LoTerm AGN sample is a bright (with the visual magnitude of V∼12.5) nearby (of the redshift z = 0.0088) type 1 AGN NGC 3516, which was one of the first AGN to show a dramatic change in its broad emission lines [50]. Being that bright and strongly variable, this AGN has been intensively observed and studied both optically and by X-ray [38,42,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Within LoTerm AGN monitoring, NGC 3516 has been followed during several decades (1996–2018) [42] when it was discovered that in 2014 optical broad emission lines significantly decreased, i.e., the hydrogen Balmer H β broad line completely disappeared), and later quite a weak broad H β component appeared in 2017. This confirmed the classification of this object as CL AGN. The phase of the arising BLR and increase in weak broad lines continued after 2017; see [38,60]. Peculiar spectral features have been observed in this object, such as the variability and increase in coronal lines [60], and the strong asymmetry in broad line profiles [59]. The object was monitored in the X-ray during this awaking phase, also revealing strong variability [38,57]. Despite intensive observations, it was not possible to well distinguish between the previously proposed two scenarios for this object: (i) changes in line-of-sight obscuration due to dust presence [38], or (ii) intrinsic change in the accretion disk physics [57,59]. This was our motivation to continue to follow this object. Therefore, continuous monitoring of this and other similar objects with dedicated campaigns (such as LoTerm AGN) is crucial in capturing transition events, not only during the rising phase of the activity, but also in the dimming phase, which is more challenging to detect.
This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 provides an overview of the observation facilities, collected data, and data reduction. Section 3 presents the broad line profile analysis and highlights the main findings. Section 4 discusses the results outlines the conclusions and future activities.

2. Observations, Data Reduction and Analysis

LoTerm AGN observations are organized and facilitated in collaboration with the following telescopes located worldwide (Table 1): (1) A 1 m Zeiss telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, equipped with MAGIC focal reducer used in a long-slit spectroscopic mode [61,62]; (2) a 6 m BTA telescope (Big Telescope Alt-azimuth) of SAO, equipped with multi-mode focal reducers, SCORPIO-1 [63] and SCORPIO-2 [64], which are used in the long-slit spectroscopic mode, the latter used occasionally through target of opportunity (ToO) programs in case objects are noticed to show a peculiar variability; (3) a 2.1 m telescope of the Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electronica (INAOE) at the Guillermo Haro Observatory (GHO) at Cananea, Sonora (Mexico), equipped with a Boller & Chivens spectrograph, within the guaranteed time; (4) a 1.8 m Copernico telescope of the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF) Astronomical Observatory of Padova (OAPd) atop Mount Ekar (Italy), equipped with Asiago Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (AFOSC); (5) a 1.2 m Galileo telescope (OAPd) recently refurbished [65], equipped with the Boller & Chivens spectrograph, and within a guaranteed time; (6) a 1.4 m Milanković telescope of the Astronomical Station Vidojevica (ASV) within the Astronomical Observatory Belgrade (Serbia), for which the installation of stellar spectrograph [66] is currently under consideration; and (7) a 1.5 m T150 telescope of the Observatory Sierra Nevada (OSN), Granada (Spain), for which a spectrograph installation is currently under consideration. Table 1 lists the instruments and gratings currently used on the telescope involved in the LoTerm AGN campaign.
The LoTerm AGN observing strategy is to observe in the spectral mode all objects in the sample preferably once per month, in order to capture significant changes in the broad line profile. To note is that, given the often irregular nature of AGNs, particularly when an object is in a highly active state with significant variability (either intrinsically or possibly due to the presence of jets), the low observing cadence increases the risk of overlooking certain details. The selected objects are all bright AGNs, i.e., these AGNs do not require long exposures with available instruments; thus, they could be potentially suggested to fill the observation gaps within other observing programs. The observing strategy is the same at all sites, with the standard star observed separately. The list of current LoTerm AGN targets are: Mrk 6, OI 371, NGC 3516, NGC 4151, NGC 5548, Mrk 817, ARP 102B, E1821 + 643, 3C390.3, Ark 564, NGC 7469, and NGC 7603. This sample has been carefully selected to have a bright type 1 AGN with peculiar and variable broad line profiles.
The CL AGN NGC 3516 has been monitored for almost three decades, from 1996 [42] to 2021 [59]. Details on the instruments, observations, data reduction, spectral calibration, and unification, are extensively described earlier in [42] (see also references therein). In the recent publication [59] by LoTerm AGN on NGC 3516, the analysis of the H β line profile evolution during the long period of 1996–2021 was studied; however, only data from GHO have been included in the analysis. Within this paper, as a case study of LoTerm AGN, we present the latest observations from 2020 to 2023, taken with the instrument configurations described in Table 1, rows 1 to 4.
The spectra have been pre-processed (e.g., corrected for Galactic absorption, cosmological redshift, calibrated to [O III] line fluxes, and shifted) as in Ref. [59]. Since within the current study, the focus is on the evolution of the H α line profile only, we do not correct for the host galaxy contribution, as its contribution to the H α line profile is negligible (see, e.g., Figure 3 in Ref. [60]).
Table 2 lists the observation log of NGC 3516 in the period 2020–2023. Figure 1 presents all calibrated spectra (in the rest frame) covering the H β and H α spectral range. Figure 2 shows the zoom-in of the H α region only. Due to the different spectral resolution of the instruments, as well as different observing conditions in terms of seeing, the contribution of narrow H α and [N II] satellite lines is sometimes hidden in the broad line profile. This is especially observed in the case of the 2.1 m GHO and 1.8 m Copernico observation, which have the poorest spectral resolution (see Figure 2, which shows the zoom-in of the H α line only). These effects somewhat influence the extracted broad line profile. However, considering the large width of the H α profile, one may assume that the effects are not dominant. A similar observation applies for different slit widths, since it is assumed that the broad line profile originates dominantly from the compact parsec-scaled BLR.
For the extraction of the pure broad line profile, we used an open source code fantasy [60,67,68] for the AGN spectra analysis. This code models AGN spectra by simultaneously fitting the underlying broken power-law continuum, emission lines selected from several predefined line lists, and a Fe II model. Recently, in Ref. [68], it was shown that the Fe II emission is also detected redward from the H α line, contaminating the broad H α line wings. Therefore, we modeled the observed H α profile using the narrow H α and satellite lines ([N II], [S II], [O I]), three broad Gaussians for the broad components, and the Fe II model. For details of the AGN spectral modelling and the application of the fantasy code; see [68]. Let us emphasize that the primary goal of the multi-component fittings was not to provide a physical interpretation of the BLR structure, but rather to optimize the extraction of the broad line profile, i.e., subtract the underlying continuum, narrow, and satellite lines. We used three broad Gaussians for reproducing the broad emission line profile, which provided us with the best fitting results based on the minimization of residuals.
Figure 3, left, displays an example of the multi-component fitting of the complex H α line profile for epoch 2021-03-03 obtained with 6 m BTA. The pure broad line profile can be extracted either by subtracting the continuum, narrow, and satellite lines ([N II], Fe II multiplets, H α narrow) from the observed spectrum (referred here as the “observed” profile) or by summing the broad Gaussians used to model the broad component of the lines (referred here as the “modelled” profile). Comparing the observed and modelled pure broad lines profile (Figure 4, right), shows that they are of a similar shape; thus, further on, we use the modelled pure broad profiles (as in Ref. [59]).

3. Results

We study the evolution of the complex broad H α line profile obtained within the LoTerm AGN in the latest period of 2020–2023, searching for the broad line profile variations. The motivation comes from the fact that the significant variability of the broad line profile can indicate the change in the geometry of the BLR.
Figure 4 shows a pure broad line profile, normalized to its maximal intensity, and a wavelength converted to the velocity scale. In the last three years, the broad H α profile preserved a similar shape, in contrast to the significant change in the last three decades detected in the H β profile on similar time scales of a few years (see Figure 3 in Ref. [59]). The most prominent feature of the broad H α profile is the strong blue asymmetry (Figure 4). The profile has the prominent blue peak at the velocity of about −(1100–1200) km/s, where the positions seem to be constant. The same complex and asymmetric profile with a prominent blue peak was reported for the H β line [38,59]. Note that the limitation in spectral resolution does not allow for precise measurements of the radial shift of the peak.
We further calculate the mean and root mean square (RMS) profiles, which are plotted in Figure 5 and normalized to the peak of the mean profile. Again, both the mean and rms profiles are strongly asymmetric with the blue peak located around −1100 km/s velocity (Figure 5, upper.) The RMS profile demonstrates that some variations are present in the broad line profile, especially around the peak. As expected, the mean profile is slightly narrower with the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of 4000 km/s, whereas the FWHM of the RMS profile is 4900 km/s (Figure 5, bottom.) This is consistent with the findings from Ref. [59], where the FWHM were measured mostly in the velocity range around 4000–5000 km/s. In the minimum of activity, the FWHM seems to be larger; however, the uncertainties of these measurements are considerably larger. The comparison of the mean and RMS profiles normalized to the unity (Figure 5, bottom) reveals that their profiles are similar, with quite a small radial displacement of the peaks. Let us notice that this might be the effect of different and, in some cases, quite poor spectral resolution.
In terms of the classification of AGNs to population A or population B (based on broad line width and strength of Fe II emission [69]) objects, and their location on the quasar main sequence (see, e.g., [69] and references therein), in the recent period of 2020–2023, NGC 3516 remains to be the population B object, with the FWHM of broad lines larger than 3000 km/s, and a weak Fe II emission. The mean Eddington ratio, calculated using the continuum flux at 5100 Å  and the SMBH mass of 4.7 × 10 7   M (Sun mass) [42], is L/L Edd = 0.02. We assumed the bolometric correction of ∼10 [70] and used the Planck cosmology to calculate the luminosity distance [71].

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In this paper, we present the study of the LoTerm AGN project that is a long-term monitoring campaign of a sample of intensively studied broad-line AGNs. LoTerm AGN is a network of medium-size (1 m–6 m) observing facilities conveniently located across the world. The primary goal of the campaign is the ongoing spectroscopic follow-up of type 1 AGN with peculiar broad line profiles. This campaign is essential for the understanding of the physics of the BLR and its connection with the accretion disk and surrounding emitting and dusty regions. As an important case study, we present the recent optical spectral data of the CL AGN and NGC 3516. In this study, we focus on the broad H α line from the period of 2020–2023.
In Ref. [42] it is noted that during the long-term (1996–2018, with the gap in 2008–2011) monitoring of NGC 3516, the dramatic transition has been captured in 2014, confirming that this AGN is a CL AGN. The follow-up study [59] that was focused on the H β line only, showed that the H β line was quite intensive at the beginning of the campaign (epoch 1996–1999), followed by the period of variable broad line intensity in 1999–2001, after which (epoch 2002–2003) the H β was weak. From 2004 to 2007, H β became, again, more intensive. The broad H β completely disappeared in period after 2014, i.e., AGN changed its type to almost a type 2 AGN with only a weak broad H α visible. This quite faint state in 2014 was also reported in the optical (B-band) and X-ray monitoring campaign in Ref. [55]. Later, in 2017, quite a weak broad line component started to appear (also indicated in Refs. [38,60]), thus another CL event happened in NGC 3516. In 2020–2021, Ref. [59] has commented that the broad H β becomes stronger, with prominent change in the line profile implying that the BLR geometry is changing after 2020, when the BLR starts again to appear. In Ref. [38], a similar behaviour of H β was recognized in the same period. Similarly, In Ref. [38] it is indicated that during the strengthening of the line, the blue part started to dominate the Balmer lines, giving an asymmetric profile with a blue-shifted peak. After this strong phase, in Ref. [59] it was pointed out that the broad line H β profile remains almost constant.
In this paper, we present spectra of NGC 3516 obtained during 2020–2023 with the LoTerm AGN, focusing on the behaviour of H α . During this recent period, the broad H α line remained almost constant after the increase in 2020–2021 mentioned in Ref. [38]. The H α line is showing a complex profile, which remained strongly asymmetric with the prominent blue peak. The first and last profiles in Figure 4 do not show the prominent blue-shifted peak. This is most likely due to poor quality of the spectra and less successful subtraction of narrow lines with the automated procedure described in Section 2. The observed almost constant line profile during three years is not typical for strongly variable type 1 AGN such as NGC 3516, especially considering the dramatic changes in the line profile in the period just before the one reported in Ref. [38] or in the past [59]. The asymmetric broad line profiles as well as blue-shifted peaks are not common, but are observed in a fraction of AGNs, typically in population B objects [69]. This type of complex profiles suggest the presence of outflowing gas, and they are good candidates for mapping the BLR kinematics (e.g., [72]). The mean and RMS profiles of H α in this period are similar, with the latter being a slightly wider, indicating that the geometry of the BLR remains the same. This may be in favor of the scenario of the intrinsic change in the accretion disk physics being responsible for the BLR transitions, which is a scenario outlined for NGC 3516 in Ref. [59] and suggested for other CL AGN (e.g., for IRAS 23226-3843 [39]); however, other possibilities cannot be ruled out.
One way to probe the state of the accretion disk and the degree of obscuration is through the X-ray monitoring. In Ref. [55], following a one-year intensive campaign, it was suggested that a hot accretion flow and a truncated disk are a preferred scenario over the standard “lampost” corona with a standard disk model. This campaign was conducted during quite a faint state of activity in NGC 3516; however, issues with the X-ray reprocessing model were noted during higher state in 1998 (see [73]). The recent multi-wavelength campaign, including the Swift data [38], revealed that the dramatic change in broad line profiles was actually proceeded with the strong outburst in X-rays in 2020, which showed the increase in a few orders of magnitude. A comparable increase in the X-ray flux has been observed in other CL AGNs, such as NGC 1566 [74] or HE 1136-2304 [75]. As a conclusion, Ref. [38] states that the variability in optical broad line profiles and the X-ray are likely to be the results of temporary obscuration by Compton-thick clumps. However, in Ref. [57] a preference is given to the point that the variability is induced by the change in the ionizing spectral energy distribution, which influences the ionization of the warm-absorber outflows, who later mimic the presence of new obscuring gas. Therefore, there is still debate on which of the scenarios is more relevant for NGC 3516; further monitoring is required to solve the issue for this and other highly variable AGNs.
In summary, the LoTerm AGN project is a coordinated network of observational facilities located across three continents, dedicated to the observations of type 1 AGN and operated by diverse research teams. Currently, LoTerm AGN comprises seven facilities, with five equipped with spectrographs and two awaiting the installation of spectral instruments. The LoTerm AGN consortium is opened for inclusion of new facilities and research teams. The sample of type 1 AGN within LoTerm AGN is optimally selected to contain both bright and peculiar AGNs, to ensure their continuous observations (preferably once per month) mainly in the spectral mode (but also in the photometric mode), with the main objective of capturing long-term and significant changes in their broad line profile. The sample consists of extensively studied type 1 AGN that have been observed for many decades. Their continued monitoring is essential for investigating the formation and structure of the BLR in AGNs. One of the main advantages of LoTerm AGN is its low cadence observing strategy, avoiding the challenging requirement for frequent (high cadence) observations as in reverberation mapping campaigns. Moreover, despite potential differences in observational setups among different facilities, (such as significantly different spectral resolution), the changes in the broad line profile will stil be captured. This is demonstrated in this case study of NGC 3516, where the broad line profiles measured from high and low-resolution spectra are compared. Finally, the LoTerm AGN campaign will continue to build a legacy database of the most known type 1 AGN, a project that has been ongoing for the last three decades, with the future goal of making all observed spectra and data products publicly available.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.I., L.Č.P., E.S., A.B.K., and V.C.; methodology, D.I., L.Č.P., A.B., V.C., N.R., S.C., S.S., and S.M.M.; software, N.R., V.M.P.Á., E.M., L.C., A.F., D.O., A.V., and S.S.; validation, D.I., L.Č.P., A.B., E.S., A.V.M., V.C., P.M., M.D., A.B.K., S.C., and A.d.O.; resources, R.U., V.C., M.D., S.C., and P.M.; data curation, A.B., E.S., E.M., R.U., A.V.M., D.O., V.M.P.Á., P.M., M.D., A.F., S.M.M., A.V., L.C., S.S., S.C., J.J., and D.M.; formal analysis, D.I., A.B., E.S., E.M., R.U., D.O., A.V.M., V.M.P.Á., J.J., D.M., A.V., S.M.M., A.F., L.C., and N.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.I., E.S., P.M., and A.B.K.; writing—review and editing, L.Č.P., E.S., E.M., R.U., A.V.M., V.C., V.M.P.Á., P.M., A.F., A.B.K., S.C., A.V., L.C., and A.d.O.; visualization, D.I., N.R., J.J., D.M., R.U., D.O., S.S., A.V., and S.M.M.; supervision, L.Č.P., A.B.K., V.C., M.D., S.S., S.C., and A.d.O.; project administration, D.I., S.S., E.S., and A.d.O.; funding acquisition, L.Č.P., A.V.M., P.M., M.D., S.C., V.C., and A.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of R. Serbia through projects of Astronomical Observatory Belgrade (contract 451-03-47/2023-01/200002) and the University of Belgrade—Faculty of Mathematics (contract 451-03-68/2023-14/200104). The work provided by the team in SAO RAS (by A.B., E.S., E.M., R.U., A.V.M., and D.O.) was performed as part of the SAO RAS government contract approved by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. This work was supported by CONAHCyT (Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnología) research grants 280789 and 320987 (México), and by the MPIfR-Mexico Max Planck Partner Group led by V.M.P.Á. A.d.O. acknowledges the Severo Ochoa grant CEX2021-001131-S and research grant PID2022-140871NB-C21 funded by the Spanish MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033.

Data Availability Statement

The presented spectra are available from the authors. The LoTerm AGN project aims to make all observed spectra and data products available on the dedicated LoTerm webpage.

Acknowledgments

This work is devoted to our dear colleague Alla Ivanovna Shapovalova, who passed away in January 2019. She worked despite difficulties until the very end on the first published paper [42] as a pioneer and a leader of the reverberation mapping campaign of AGNs at SAO RAS. Observations with the SAO RAS telescopes are supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. The renovation of telescope equipment is currently provided within the national project “Science and Universities”. The work presented is based in part on observations collected by the Copernico 1.82 m telescope (Asiago Mount Ekar, Italy) INAF—Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

    The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AGNsActive galactic nuclei
ASVAstronomical Station Vidojevic
BTABig Telescope Alt-azimuth
BLRBroad line region
CL AGNChanging-look AGN
CopCopernicus
FWHMFull-width half-maximum
GHOGuillermo Haro Observatory
GRGrism
INAFItalian National Institute for Astrophysics
LoTerm AGNLong-term monitoring of AGN
LSSTLegacy Survey in Space and Time
OAPdAstronomical Observatory of Padova
OSNObservatory Sierra Nevada
SAOSpecial Astrophysical Observatory
SMBHSuper massive black hole
SRMroot mean square
VPH/Gvolume phase holographic grating

References

  1. Netzer, H. The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Antonucci, R. Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1993, 31, 473–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Netzer, H. Revisiting the unified model of active galactic nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 53, 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Osterbrock, D.E.; Ferland, G.J. Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, USA, 2006; Available online: https://archive.org/details/astrophysicsofga0000oste (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  5. Lyutyĭ, V.M.; Oknyanskiĭ, V.L.; Chuvaev, K.K. NGC 4151: Sy2 in a deep photometric minimum. Sov. Astron. Lett. 1984, 10, 335–336. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984PAZh...10..803L/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  6. Kollatschny, W.; Fricke, K.J. The fading of the Seyfert galaxy F-9. Astron. Astrophys. 1985, 146, L11–L14. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A%26A...146L..11K/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  7. Matt, G.; Guainazzi, M.; Maiolino, R. Changing look: From Compton-thick to Compton-thin, or the rebirth of fossil active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 342, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Risaliti, G.; Miniutti, G.; Elvis, M.; Fabbiano, G.; Salvati, M.; Baldi, A.; Braito, V.; Bianchi, S.; Matt, G.; Reeves, J.; et al. Variable partial covering and a relativistic iron line in NGC 1365. Astrophys. J. 2009, 696, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Denney, K.D.; De Rosa, G.; Croxall, K.; Gupta, A.; Bentz, M.C.; Fausnaugh, M.M.; Grier, C.J.; Martini, P.; Mathur, S.; Peterson, B.M.; et al. The typecasting of active galactic nuclei: Mrk 590 no longer fits the role. Astrophys. J. 2014, 796, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oknyansky, V.L.; Winkler, H.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Lipunov, V.M.; Gorbovskoy, E.S.; van Wyk, F.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Tyurina, N.V. Discovery of more changing look events in NGC 1566. Odessa Astron. Publ. 2019, 32, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oknyansky, V.L.; Winkler, H.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Lipunov, V.M.; Gorbovskoy, E.S.; van Wyk, F.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Tyurina, N.V. New changing look case in NGC 1566. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 483, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Trakhtenbrot, B.; Arcavi, I.; MacLeod, C.L.; Ricci, C.; Kara, E.; Graham, M.L.; Stern, D.; Harrison, F.A.; Burke, J.; Hiramatsu, D.; et al. 1ES 1927+654: An AGN caught changing look on a timescale of months. Astrophys. J. 2019, 883, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Megan Urry, C.; Padovani, P. Unified schemes for radio-loud active galactic nuclei. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1995, 107, 803–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ricci, C.; Trakhtenbrot, B. Changing-look active galactic nuclei. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2211.05132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stern, D.; McKernan, B.; Graham, M.J.; Ford, K.E.S.; Ross, N.P.; Meisner, A.M.; Assef, R.J.; Baloković, M.; Brightman, M.; Dey, A.; et al. A Mid-IR selected changing-look quasar and physical scenarios for abrupt AGN fading. Astrophys. J. 2018, 864, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elitzur, M. On the unification of active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2012, 747, L33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, T.G.; Zhou, H.Y.; Komossa, S.; Wang, H.Y.; Yuan, W.; Yang, C. Extreme coronal line emitters: Tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes in galactic nuclei? Astrophys. J. 2012, 749, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Campana, S.; Mainetti, D.; Colpi, M.; Lodato, G.; D’Avanzo, P.; Evans, P.A.; Moretti, A. Multiple tidal disruption flares in the active galaxy IC 3599. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 581, A17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Komossa, S.; Grupe, D.; Schartel, N.; Gallo, L.; Gomez, J.L.; Kollatschny, W.; Kriss, G.; Leighly, K.; Longinotti, A.L.; Parker, M.; et al. The extremes of AGN variability. In Proceedings of the New Frontiers in Black Hole Astrophysics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 12–16 September 2016; Gomboc, A., Ed.; International Astronomical Union: Paris, France, 2017; pp. 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noda, H.; Done, C. Explaining changing-look AGN with state transition triggered by rapid mass accretion rate drop. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 480, 3898–3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sniegowska, M.; Czerny, B.; Bon, E.; Bon, N. Possible mechanism for multiple changing-look phenomena in active galactic nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.M.; Bon, E. Changing-look active galactic nuclei: Close binaries of supermassive black holes in action. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 643, L9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, H.; Shen, Y.; He, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Sun, M.; Yang, Q.; Kong, M.; Sheng, Z. Understanding broad Mg II variability in quasars with photoionization: Implications for reverberation mapping and changing-look quasars. Astrophys. J. 2020, 888, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Runco, J.N.; Cosens, M.; Bennert, V.N.; Scott, B.; Komossa, S.; Malkan, M.A.; Lazarova, M.S.; Auger, M.W.; Treu, T.; Park, D. Broad Hβ Emission-line variability in a sample of 102 local active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2016, 821, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. MacLeod, C.L.; Ross, N.P.; Lawrence, A.; Goad, M.; Horne, K.; Burgett, W.; Chambers, K.C.; Flewelling, H.; Hodapp, K.; Kaiser, N.; et al. A systematic search for changing-look quasars in SDSS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 457, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Q.; Wu, X.B.; Fan, X.; Jiang, L.; McGreer, I.; Shangguan, J.; Yao, S.; Wang, B.; Joshi, R.; Green, R.; et al. Discovery of 21 new changing-look AGNs in the Northern Sky. Astrophys. J. 2018, 862, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Graham, M.J.; Ross, N.P.; Stern, D.; Drake, A.J.; McKernan, B.; Ford, K.E.S.; Djorgovski, S.G.; Mahabal, A.A.; Glikman, E.; Larson, S.; et al. Understanding extreme quasar optical variability with CRTS—II. Changing-state quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 491, 4925–4948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sánchez-Sáez, P.; Lira, H.; Martí, L.; Sánchez-Pi, N.; Arredondo, J.; Bauer, F.E.; Bayo, A.; Cabrera-Vives, G.; Donoso-Oliva, C.; Estévez, P.A.; et al. Searching for changing-state AGNs in massive data sets. I. Applying deep learning and anomaly-detection techniques to find AGNs with anomalous variability behaviors. Astron. J. 2021, 162, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hon, W.J.; Wolf, C.; Onken, C.A.; Webster, R.; Auchettl, K. SkyMapper colours of Seyfert galaxies and changing-look AGN - II. Newly discovered changing-look AGN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 511, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. López-Navas, E.; Martínez-Aldama, M.L.; Bernal, S.; Sánchez-Sáez, P.; Arévalo, P.; Graham, M.J.; Hernández-García, L.; Lira, P.; Rojas Lobos, P.A. Confirming new changing-look AGNs discovered through optical variability using a random forest-based light-curve classifier. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 513, L57–L62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Temple, M.J.; Ricci, C.; Koss, M.J.; Trakhtenbrot, B.; Bauer, F.E.; Mushotzky, R.; Rojas, A.F.; Caglar, T.; Harrison, F.; Oh, K.; et al. BASS XXXIX: Swift-BAT AGN with changing-look optical spectra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 518, 2938–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivezić, Ž.; Kahn, S.M.; Tyson, J.A.; Abel, B.; Acosta, E.; Allsman, R.; Alonso, D.; AlSayyad, Y.; Anderson, S.F.; Andrew, J.; et al. LSST: From science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaspi, S.; Smith, P.S.; Netzer, H.; Maoz, D.; Jannuzi, B.T.; Giveon, U. Reverberation measurements for 17 quasars and the size-mass-luminosity relations in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 2000, 533, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bentz, M.C.; Walsh, J.L.; Barth, A.J.; Baliber, N.; Bennert, V.N.; Canalizo, G.; Filippenko, A.V.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Gates, E.L.; Greene, J.E.; et al. The Lick AGN Monitoring Project: Broad-line region radii and black hole masses from reverberation mapping of Hβ. Astrophys. J. 2009, 705, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Rosa, G.; Peterson, B.M.; Ely, J.; Kriss, G.A.; Crenshaw, D.M.; Horne, K.; Korista, K.T.; Netzer, H.; Pogge, R.W.; Arévalo, P.; et al. Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project.I. Ultraviolet observations of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 5548 with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 2015, 806, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barth, A.J.; Bennert, V.N.; Canalizo, G.; Filippenko, A.V.; Gates, E.L.; Greene, J.E.; Li, W.; Malkan, M.A.; Pancoast, A.; Sand, D.J.; et al. The Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2011: Spectroscopic campaign and emission-line light curves. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 2015, 217, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Woo, J.H.; Son, D.; Gallo, E.; Hodges-Kluck, E.; Jeon, Y.; Shin, J.; Bae, H.J.; Cho, H.; Cho, W.; Kang, D.; et al. Seoul National University AGN Monitoring Project. I. Strategy and sample. J. Korean Astron. Soc. 2019, 52, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oknyansky, V.L.; Brotherton, M.S.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Dodin, A.V.; Bao, D.-W.; Zhao, B.-X.; Du, P.; Burlak, M.A.; Ikonnikova, N.P.; Tatarnikov, A.M.; et al. Multiwavelength monitoring and reverberation mapping of a changing look event in the Seyfert galaxy NGC 3516. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 505, 1029–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kollatschny, W.; Grupe, D.; Parker, M.L.; Ochmann, M.W.; Schartel, N.; Romero-Colmenero, E.; Winkler, H.; Burlak, M.A.; Ikonnikova, N.P.; Tatarnikov, A.M.; et al. The outburst of the changing-look AGN IRAS 23226-3843 in 2019. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 670, A103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oknyansky, V.L.; Brotherton, M.S.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Dodin, A.V.; Tatarnikov, A.M.; Du, P.; Bao, D.-W.; Burlak, M.A.; Ikonnikova, N.P.; Lipunov, V.M.; et al. Long-term multiwavelength monitoring and reverberation mapping of NGC 2617 during a changing-look event. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 525, 2571–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Homan, D.; Lawrence, A.; Ward, M.; Bruce, A.; Landt, H.; MacLeod, C.; Elvis, M.; Wilkes, B.; Huchra, J.P.; Peterson, B.M. The long-term broad-line responsivity in MKN 110. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 519, 1745–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shapovalova, A.I.; Popović, L.Č.; Afanasiev, V.L.; Ilić, D.; Kovačević, A.; Burenkov, A.N.; Chavushyan, V.H.; Marčeta-Mandić, S.; Spiridonova, O.; Valdes, J.R.; et al. Long-term optical spectral monitoring of a changing-look active galactic nucleus NGC 3516—I. Continuum and broad-line flux variability. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 485, 4790–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peterson, B.M.; Ferrarese, L.; Gilbert, K.M.; Kaspi, S.; Malkan, M.A.; Maoz, D.; Merritt, D.; Netzer, H.; Onken, C.A.; Pogge, R.W.; et al. Central masses and broad-line region sizes of active galactic Nuclei. II. A homogeneous analysis of a large reverberation-mapping database. Astrophys. J. 2004, 613, 682–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dalla Bontà, E.; Peterson, B.M.; Bentz, M.C.; Brandt, W.N.; Ciroi, S.; De Rosa, G.; Fonseca Alvarez, G.; Grier, C.J.; Hall, P.B.; Hernández Santisteban, J.V.; et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Estimating Masses of Black Holes in Quasars with Single-epoch Spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 2020, 903, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Popović, L.Č. Broad spectral lines in AGNs and supermassive black hole mass measurements. Open Astron. 2020, 29, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cherepashchuk, A.M.; Lyutyi, V.M. Rapid variations of Hα intensity in the nuclei of Seyfert galaxies NGC 4151, 3516, 1068. Astrophys. Lett. 1973, 13, 165–168. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApL....13..165C/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  47. Blandford, R.D.; McKee, C.F. Reverberation mapping of the emission line regions of Seyfert galaxies and quasars. Astrophys. J. 1982, 255, 419–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cackett, E.M.; Bentz, M.C.; Kara, E. Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei: From X-ray corona to dusty torus. iScience 2021, 24, 102557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peterson, B.M.; Horne, K. Echo mapping of active galactic nuclei. Astron. Notes/Astron. Nachr. 2004, 325, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Andrillat, Y.; Souffrin, S. Variations du Spectre du Noyau de la Galaxie de Seyfert NGC 3516. Astrophys. Lett. 1968, 1, 111–119. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApL.....1..111A/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  51. Lyutyi, V.M.; Doroshenko, V.T. Optical variability of the nuclei of the Seyfert galaxies NGC 3516 and NGC 5548 on time scales from 20 years to 20 minutes. Astron. Lett. 1993, 19, 405–415. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AstL...19..405L/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  52. Maoz, D.; Markowitz, A.; Edelson, R.; Nandra, K. X-ray versus optical variations in the Seyfert 1 nucleus NGC 3516: A puzzling disconnectedness. Astron. J. 2002, 124, 1988–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Denney, K.D.; Peterson, B.M.; Pogge, R.W.; Adair, A.; Atlee, D.W.; Au-Yong, K.; Bentz, M.C.; Bird, J.C.; Brokofsky, D.J.; Chisholm, E.; et al. Reverberation mapping measurements of black hole masses in six local Seyfert galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2010, 721, 715–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mehdipour, M.; Branduardi-Raymont, G.; Page, M.J. The warm absorber and X-ray variability of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 3516 as seen by the XMM-Newton RGS. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 514, A100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Noda, H.; Minezaki, T.; Watanabe, M.; Kokubo, M.; Kawaguchi, K.; Itoh, R.; Morihana, K.; Saito, Y.; Nakao, H.; Imai, M.; et al. X-ray and optical correlation of type I Seyfert NGC 3516 studied with Suzaku and Japanese ground-based telescopes. Astrophys. J. 2016, 828, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feng, H.-C.; Hu, C.; Li, S.-S.; Liu, H.T.; Bai, J.M.; Xing, L.-F.; Wang, W.-Y.; Yang, Z.-X.; Xiao, M.; Lu, K.-X. Reverberation mapping of changing-look active galactic nucleus NGC 3516. Astrophys. J. 2021, 909, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mehdipour, M.; Kriss, G.A.; Brenneman, L.W.; Costantini, E.; Kaastra, J.S.; Branduardi-Raymont, G.; Di Gesu, L.; Ebrero, J.; Mao, J. Changing-look event in NGC 3516: Continuum or obscuration variability? Astrophys. J. 2022, 925, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Armijos-Abendaño, J.; López, E.; Llerena, M.; Logan, C.H.A. Broad-line region clouds orbiting an AGN sample. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 514, 1535–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Popović, L.Č.; Ilić, D.; Burenkov, A.; Patiño Alvarez, V.M.; Marčeta-Mandić, S.; Kovačević-Dojčinović, J.; Shablovinskaya, E.; Kovačević, A.B.; Marziani, P.; Chavushyan, V.; et al. Long-term optical spectral monitoring of a changing-look active galactic nucleus NGC 3516. II. Broad-line profile variability. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 675, A178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ilić, D.; Oknyansky, V.; Popović, L.Č.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Belinski, A.A.; Tatarnikov, A.M.; Dodin, A.V.; Shatsky, N.I.; Ikonnikova, N.P.; Rakić, N.; et al. A flare in the optical spotted in the changing-look Seyfert NGC 3516. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 638, A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Afanasiev, V.L.; Amirkhanyan, V.R.; Uklein, R.I.; Perepelitsyn, A.E.; Malygin, E.A.; Shablovinskaya, E.S.; Afanasieva, I.V. Universal focal reducer for small telescopes. Astron. Notes/Astron. Nachr. 2022, 343, e210104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Afanasiev, V.L.; Malygin, E.A.; Shablovinskaya, E.S.; Uklein, R.I.; Amirkhanyan, V.R.; Perepelitsyn, A.E.; Afanasieva, I.V. Small telescopes being effective: MAGIC or not? RAS Tech. Instrum. 2023, 2, 657–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Afanasiev, V.L.; Moiseev, A.V. The SCORPIO universal focal reducer of the 6-m telescope. Astron. Lett. 2005, 31, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Afanasiev, V.L.; Moiseev, A.V. Scorpio on the 6 m telescope: Current state and perspectives for spectroscopy of galactic and extragalactic objects. Open Astron./Balt. Astron. 2011, 20, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ciroi, S.; DiMille, F.; Rafanelli, P.; Cracco, V.; LaMura, G. The scientific use of the 1.2-m Galileo telescope of the Asiago Astrophysical Observatory after its recent refurbishment. Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso 2014, 43, 362–367. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014CoSka..43..362C/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  66. Lalovic, A.; Vince, I. Stellar spectrograph of the Belgrade Astronomical Observatory. Publ. Obs. Astron. Belgr. 2006, 80, 293–297. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006POBeo..80..293L/abstract (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  67. Rakić, N. Kinematics of the H α and H β broad-line region in an SDSS sample of type-1 AGNs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 516, 1624–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ilić, D.; Rakić, N.; Popović, L.Č. Fantastic fits with fantasy of active galactic nuclei spectra: Exploring the Fe II emission near the Hα line. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 2023, 267, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marziani, P.; Dultzin, D.; Sulentic, J.W.; Del Olmo, A.; Negrete, C.A.; Martínez-Aldama, M.L.; D’Onofrio, M.; Bon, E.; Bon, N.; Stirpe, G.M. A main sequence for quasars. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2018, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Richards, G.T.; Lacy, M.; Storrie-Lombardi, L.J.; Hall, P.B.; Gallagher, S.C.; Hines, D.C.; Fan, X.; Papovich, C.; Vanden Berk, D.E.; Trammell, G.B.; et al. Spectral energy distributions and multiwavelength selection of type 1 quasars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 2006, 166, 470–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aghanim, N.; et al. [Planck Collaboration] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Du, P.; Brotherton, M.S.; Wang, K.; Huang, Z.P.; Hu, C.; Kasper, D.H.; Chick, W.T.; Nguyen, M.L.; Maithil, J.; Hand, D.; et al. Monitoring AGNs with Hβ asymmetry. I. First results: Velocity-resolved reverberation mapping. Astrophys. J. 2018, 869, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Edelson, R.; Koratkar, A.; Nandra, K.; Goad, M.; Peterson, B.M.; Collier, S.; Krolik, J.; Malkan, M.; Maoz, D.; O’Brien, P.; et al. Intensive HST, RXTE, and ASCA monitoring of NGC 3516: Evidence against thermal reprocessing. Astrophys. J. 2000, 534, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Oknyansky, V. Changing looks of the nucleus of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1566 compared with other changing-look AGNs. Astron. Notes/Astron. Nachr. 2022, 343, e210080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zetzl, M.; Kollatschny, W.; Ochmann, M.W.; Grupe, D.; Haas, M.; Ramolla, M.; Chelouche, D.; Kaspi, S.; Schartel, N. Long-term optical, UV, and X-ray continuum variations in the changing-look AGN HE 1136-2304. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 618, A83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. NGC 3516 spectra covering both H β λ 4868 Å and H α λ 6562 Å (position marked with vertical dashed line) spectral range in the period 2020–2023. Spectra are normalized to the mean for comparison. See text for details.
Figure 1. NGC 3516 spectra covering both H β λ 4868 Å and H α λ 6562 Å (position marked with vertical dashed line) spectral range in the period 2020–2023. Spectra are normalized to the mean for comparison. See text for details.
Physics 06 00003 g001
Figure 2. The evolution of H α line in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed line marks the position of narrow H α and [N II] λ λ 6548, 6584 doublet. See text for details.
Figure 2. The evolution of H α line in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed line marks the position of narrow H α and [N II] λ λ 6548, 6584 doublet. See text for details.
Physics 06 00003 g002
Figure 3. Left: an example of the multi-component fitting with fantasy software of the H α profile for epoch 2021-03-03 obtained with 6 m BTA. Different components (three broad hydrogen (H) components; narrow H α ; [N II] λ λ 6548, 6584, and [S II] λ λ 6716, 6730 lines; and Fe II multiples) are shown as indicated. The used multi-component model corresponds to the best empirical fit of the complex broad line profile based on the minimization of residuals. The “Obs” denotes the observed spectrum and “Cont” stands for the underlying continuum. Right: comparison of the observed (after the subtraction of continuum, narrow, and satellite lines) and modelled (sum of all Gaussian components, labelled as “Mod”) pure broad lines profile. See text for details.
Figure 3. Left: an example of the multi-component fitting with fantasy software of the H α profile for epoch 2021-03-03 obtained with 6 m BTA. Different components (three broad hydrogen (H) components; narrow H α ; [N II] λ λ 6548, 6584, and [S II] λ λ 6716, 6730 lines; and Fe II multiples) are shown as indicated. The used multi-component model corresponds to the best empirical fit of the complex broad line profile based on the minimization of residuals. The “Obs” denotes the observed spectrum and “Cont” stands for the underlying continuum. Right: comparison of the observed (after the subtraction of continuum, narrow, and satellite lines) and modelled (sum of all Gaussian components, labelled as “Mod”) pure broad lines profile. See text for details.
Physics 06 00003 g003
Figure 4. The evolution of the normalized pure broad H α line profile in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed line marks the position of the narrow H α line at 0 km/s.
Figure 4. The evolution of the normalized pure broad H α line profile in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed line marks the position of the narrow H α line at 0 km/s.
Physics 06 00003 g004
Figure 5. Upper: the mean and root mean square (RMS) profiles of the broad H α line normalized to the peak of the mean spectrum in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed lines denote the position of the peak at −1120 km/s and the position of the line center at 0 km/s. Bottom: comparison of the mean and RMS profiles normalized to unity.
Figure 5. Upper: the mean and root mean square (RMS) profiles of the broad H α line normalized to the peak of the mean spectrum in the period 2020–2023. Vertical dashed lines denote the position of the peak at −1120 km/s and the position of the line center at 0 km/s. Bottom: comparison of the mean and RMS profiles normalized to unity.
Physics 06 00003 g005
Table 1. Telescopes and instruments used within the LoTerm AGN campaign. Here, VPH/G stands for a volume phase holographic grating, GR stands for a grism and @ indicates the central wavelength. See text for more details.
Table 1. Telescopes and instruments used within the LoTerm AGN campaign. Here, VPH/G stands for a volume phase holographic grating, GR stands for a grism and @ indicates the central wavelength. See text for more details.
TelescopeInstrumentGratingsStatus *
1 m Zeiss (SAO)MAGICVPHG600@500Operational
6 m BTA (SAO)SCORPIO-1, SCORPIO-2VPHG550G, VPHG1200@540On demand
2.1 m Telescope (GHO)Boller & Chivens150 l/mmOperational
1.8 m Copernico (Cop)AFOSCGR04, GR07, VPH7Operational
1.2 m Galileo (OAPd)Boller & Chivens150/300/600/1200 l/mmOperational
1.4 m Milanković (ASV)--In plan
1.5 m T150 (OSN)--In plan
* Describes the level of service provided by listed telescope: “Operational”—regularly used through long-term proposal or guaranteed time; “On demand”—applied for additional time within special or other observing programs; “In plan”—spectrograph yet to be installed, currently in use for photometry.
Table 2. Observation log of NGC 3516 in period 2020–2023. Date of observation is given in the format year-month-day. See text for details.
Table 2. Observation log of NGC 3516 in period 2020–2023. Date of observation is given in the format year-month-day. See text for details.
DateTelescopeGratingExposure [s]Slit Width [arcsec]Seeing [arcsec]Weather
2020-02-182.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.2Good
2020-02-212.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.3Medium
2020-07-116 m BTA1200@5404 × 3001.02.0Medium
2020-09-106 m BTA1200@5406 × 3001.01.7Medium
2020-11-076 m BTA1200@5408 × 3001.04.0Medium
2020-11-086 m BTA1200@5408 × 3002.01.3Excellent
2020-11-236 m BTA550G5 × 2401.23.4Medium
2020-12-066 m BTA1200@5407 × 3002.01.4Medium
2021-01-166 m BTA1200@5405 × 2402.04.0Bad
2021-02-112.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.4Medium
2021-02-122.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.9Medium
2021-03-036 m BTA1200@5403 × 1802.02.5Medium
2021-03-086 m BTA550 G6 × 2401.24.5Good
2021-03-122.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.2Medium
2021-03-152.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.0Medium
2021-04-112.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.4Medium
2021-05-112.1 m GHO150 l/mm3 × 18002.52.6Good
2021-08-031 m Zeiss600@5005 × 6002.02.0Bad
2021-10-061 m Zeiss600@5005 × 6002.02.5Medium
2021-11-031 m Zeiss600@50012 × 3002.03.0Good
2021-12-291 m Zeiss600@50016 × 3002.01.7Bad
2022-01-031.8 m CopGR042 × 6002.52.0Good
2022-03-261.8 m CopGR073 × 5401.692.0Medium
2022-03-271.8 m CopGR073 × 5401.692.0Medium
2023-02-181.8 m CopGR072 × 5401.693.0Medium
2023-02-191.8 m CopGR073 × 5401.692.5Medium
2023-03-181.8 m CopVPH73 × 5402.52.0Medium
2023-04-161.8 m CopVPH73 × 5402.53.3Good
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ilić, D.; Popović, L.Č.; Burenkov, A.; Shablovinskaya, E.; Malygin, E.; Uklein, R.; Moiseev, A.V.; Oparin, D.; Patiño Álvarez, V.M.; Chavushyan, V.; et al. Long-Term Optical Monitoring of Broad-Line AGNs (LoTerm AGN): Case Study of NGC 3516. Physics 2024, 6, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics6010003

AMA Style

Ilić D, Popović LČ, Burenkov A, Shablovinskaya E, Malygin E, Uklein R, Moiseev AV, Oparin D, Patiño Álvarez VM, Chavushyan V, et al. Long-Term Optical Monitoring of Broad-Line AGNs (LoTerm AGN): Case Study of NGC 3516. Physics. 2024; 6(1):31-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics6010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ilić, Dragana, Luka Č. Popović, Alexander Burenkov, Elena Shablovinskaya, Eugene Malygin, Roman Uklein, Alexei V. Moiseev, Dmitry Oparin, Víctor M. Patiño Álvarez, Vahram Chavushyan, and et al. 2024. "Long-Term Optical Monitoring of Broad-Line AGNs (LoTerm AGN): Case Study of NGC 3516" Physics 6, no. 1: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics6010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop