Background: Single-Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) has been reported as both a safe and effective surgical procedure. However, these findings have not been directly compared to those of more established and less complex procedures, such as Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), which remains the most commonly performed technique in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS).
Objective: This study aimed to assess and contrast the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent SADI-S and those who underwent SG.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and registered under PROSPERO with the ID CRD42024532504. A comprehensive search strategy was executed on 15 April 2024, covering PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct from the first reports to March 2024. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords, including: “SADI-S” OR “Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal bypass” and “Sleeve Gastrectomy”. We included studies comparing adult patients (≥18 years old) undergoing SADI-S and SG, reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest.
Results: Five studies published between 2019 and 2023, comprising 3593 patients, were included. Of these, 461 patients (12.8%) underwent SADI-S, while 3132 (87.2%) underwent SG. The mean patient age was 42.96 years, with 89.6% female participants. Patients undergoing SADI-S had a significantly higher Body Mass Index (BMI) than those undergoing SG (Mean: 49.73 ± 8.10 vs. 45.64 ± 7.84; Mean Difference [MD]: 3.83, 95% CI: 0.52–7.14;
p = 0.02) and an increased risk of hypertension (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.04–1.84;
p = 0.03). SADI-S also resulted in longer operative times (125.63 ± 51.91 min vs. 49.67 ± 26.07 min; MD: 65.97 min, 95% CI: 61.71–70.25;
p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (2.30 ± 2.76 days vs. 1.21 ± 0.81 days; MD: 1.03 days, 95% CI: 0.70–1.37;
p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who underwent SADI-S demonstrated a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications, such as readmissions and reinterventions (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 2.15–4.67;
p < 0.001), and experienced greater excess weight loss (MD: 12.42%, 95% CI: 0.92–23.92;
p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding age, sex, or the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Conclusions: SADI-S appears to be a promising surgical technique for facilitating substantial weight loss in individuals with severe obesity. Given the higher risk of postoperative complications associated with SADI-S, careful evaluation and personalized decision-making for patient selection and education are essential to optimize clinical and safety outcomes.
Full article