You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

19 February 2024

Weight Gain among Children with Severe Malnutrition in Therapeutic Feeding Programmes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis †

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
2
Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
3
Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), Chilumba P.O. Box 46, Malawi
4
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia
This article belongs to the Proceedings The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023

Abstract

Background: Although 45 million children under five are wasted, the optimal rate of weight gain during treatment for severe malnutrition is unknown. Historically, inpatient treatment programmes focused on rapid weight gain (WG), with the rationale that this would optimise outcomes. However, recent evidence suggests that too rapid WG might be associated with higher cardiometabolic risk. Our objectives are as follows: describe WG in different programme types (e.g., inpatient, outpatient); explore any association between WG, average length of stay, and mortality/recovery; describe heterogeneity in WG reporting. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched three databases: Embase (1947–2023), Global Health (1910–2023), and Medline (1946–2023), running the final search on 2nd May 2023. Papers were included if they reported average WG of children aged 6–59 months with severe malnutrition undergoing treatment. Non-English language and grey literature were excluded, except Emergency Nutrition Network Field Exchange articles. Summary data were extracted, and quality appraisal was done using a NICE Quality Appraisal Checklist. We conducted meta-analysis to describe pooled mean WG by programme type. We conducted meta-regression to investigate potential associations of WG with length of stay and programme outcomes. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023266472). Results: Our search yielded 3001 papers. We reviewed 307 full texts, identifying 127 eligible papers. Of these, 105 papers, with over 240,000 participants in total, reported WG as grams per kilogram per unit time and were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of WG was 9.1 g/kg/d (95%CI 7.9, 10.3) across 19 inpatient programmes, and 3.9 g/kg/d (95%CI 3.5, 4.3) across 58 outpatient programmes. Faster WG was associated with shorter length of stay (p < 0.001), but this was moderated by programme type. There was no association between WG and mortality/recovery in unadjusted analyses. There was high heterogeneity between studies. Lastly, 17% of papers did not report WG as grams per kilogram per unit time. Conclusions: Slower WG can be expected in outpatient programmes, compared to inpatient programmes. However, this is not an immediate cause for concern because we found no important association between WG and mortality. It may even be beneficial considering long-term cardiometabolic risk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.K.; methodology, G.O., D.A., C.O. and M.K.; validation, T.N.-G., K.A., M.A., M.K., L.O. and A.K. (Amir Kirolos); formal analysis, G.O.; investigation, G.O., D.A. and M.K.; resources, M.K.; data curation, G.O.; writing—original draft preparation, G.O., D.A. and M.K.; writing—reviewing and editing, G.O., D.A., T.N.-G., K.A., M.A., A.K. (Amir Kirolos), L.O., D.T., A.K. (Albert Koulman), N.L., A.C.C., CHANGE Study Collaborators Group and M.K.; visualization, G.O.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC)/Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) [grant number MR/V000802/1].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on the project data repository https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2655/ (accessed on 22 January 2024).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.