Next Article in Journal
VANIR—NextFlow Pipeline for Viral Variant Calling and de Novo Assembly of Nanopore and Illumina Reads for High-Quality dsDNA Viral Genomes
Previous Article in Journal
Structure of the RSV Polymerase Complex Reveals a Tentacular Arrangement of the Viral Phosphoprotein
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

KSHV Activates Unfolded Protein Response Sensors but Suppresses Downstream Transcriptional Responses to Support Lytic Replication †

Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at Viruses 2020—Novel Concepts in Virology, Barcelona, Spain, 5–7 February 2020.
Proceedings 2020, 50(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020050116
Published: 3 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Viruses 2020—Novel Concepts in Virology)

Abstract

:
Herpesviruses usurp host cell protein synthesis machinery to convert viral mRNAs into proteins, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to ensure the proper folding, post-translational modification and trafficking of secreted and transmembrane viral proteins. Overloading the ER folding capacity activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), whereby sensor proteins, ATF6, PERK and IRE1, initiate a stress-mitigating transcription program that accelerates the catabolism of misfolded proteins, while increasing the ER folding capacity. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) can be reactivated from latency through the chemical induction of ER stress, which causes an accumulation of the XBP1s transcription factor that transactivates the viral RTA lytic switch gene. The presence of XBP1s-responsive elements in the RTA promoter suggests that KSHV evolved a mechanism to respond to ER stress. Here, we report that ATF6, PERK and IRE1 were activated upon reactivation from latency and were required for efficient KSHV lytic replication. The genetic or pharmacologic inhibitions of each UPR sensor reduced virion production. Despite UPR sensor activation during KSHV lytic replication, downstream UPR transcriptional responses were restricted: (1) ATF6 was cleaved to activate the ATF6(N) transcription factor but ATF6(N)-responsive genes were not transcribed; (2) PERK phosphorylated eIF2α, but ATF4 did not accumulate; (3) IRE1 caused XBP1–mRNA splicing, but the XBP1s protein did not accumulate and the XBP1s-responsive genes were not transcribed. The complementation of XBP1s deficiency during KSHV lytic replication inhibited virion production in a dose-dependent manner in epithelial cells. Taken together, these findings indicate that, while XBP1s plays an important role in reactivation from latency, it can inhibit virus replication at a later step, which the virus overcomes by preventing its synthesis. These findings suggest that KSHV hijacks UPR sensors to promote efficient viral replication while sustaining ER stress.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Johnston, B.P.; Pringle, E.S.; McCormick, C. KSHV Activates Unfolded Protein Response Sensors but Suppresses Downstream Transcriptional Responses to Support Lytic Replication. Proceedings 2020, 50, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020050116

AMA Style

Johnston BP, Pringle ES, McCormick C. KSHV Activates Unfolded Protein Response Sensors but Suppresses Downstream Transcriptional Responses to Support Lytic Replication. Proceedings. 2020; 50(1):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020050116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Johnston, Benjamin P., Eric S. Pringle, and Craig McCormick. 2020. "KSHV Activates Unfolded Protein Response Sensors but Suppresses Downstream Transcriptional Responses to Support Lytic Replication" Proceedings 50, no. 1: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020050116

APA Style

Johnston, B. P., Pringle, E. S., & McCormick, C. (2020). KSHV Activates Unfolded Protein Response Sensors but Suppresses Downstream Transcriptional Responses to Support Lytic Replication. Proceedings, 50(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020050116

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop