Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Extended Abstract
  • Open Access

17 October 2019

Keratin Extraction from Wool and Feathers Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents †

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculties of Biotechnologies, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Blvd. Mărăști, nr. 59, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 15th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development” PRIOCHEM, Bucharest, Romania, 30th October–1st November 2019.
This article belongs to the Proceedings Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development-PRIOCHEM
The wool of Țurcana sheep, the Romanian national breed, has not been fully investigated and valorized up to now. This can be achieved by applying the approach of cascade processing and closing the loop for this value chain: lanolin and keratin are extracted from raw wool for the cosmetic industry, and the exhausted fibers can be used as agricultural fertilizers for new food crops. This work is focused on keratin extraction from two types of lateral agroeconomical flows: raw wool from Țurcana sheep and chicken feathers. The process is based on a pretreatment with dithiothreitol (DTT) or Na2S [1,2] for breaking the disulfide crosslinks [3] and subsequent keratin extraction with a natural deep eutectic solvent (NaDES), reline (choline chloride:urea, 1:2 molar ratio).The extraction from chicken feathers gives at least ten times more keratin than from Țurcana wool. This can be explained by the differences in protein structure, β-sheets (feathers) being easier to denature than α-helix (wool). High concentration of Na2S (0.5 M) completely dissolves both feathers and wool. At lower concentrations (0.05 M) of Na2S or DTT applied during pretreatment, the keratin structures are only partially dissolved and the subsequent extraction with NaDES shows no difference between the Na2S and DTT pretreatment. In conclusion, the pretreatment agent and its concentration, but also the keratin structure, have a significant influence on keratin extraction yield. The process for keratin extraction from Țurcana wool needs to be optimized, including by testing other NaDESs.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Government of Romania, Ministry of Research and Innovation, Project PFE 31/2018, MCI Core Programme in the frame of Project PN 19.23.01.03 and Project 10PCCDI/2018 Closing the loop into bioeconomy value chains by manufacturing innovative bioproducts—PRO-SPER, funded by UEFISCDI – Ministry of Research and Innovation.

References

  1. Sinkiewicz, I.; Śliwińska, A.; Staroszczyk, H.; Kołodziejska, I. Alternative Methods of Preparation of Soluble Keratin from Chicken Feathers. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2017, 8, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pourjavaheri, F.; Pour, S.O.; Jones, O.A.; Smooker, P.M.; Brkljača, R.; Sherkat, F.; Blanch, E.W.; Gupta, A.; Shanks, R.A. Extraction of keratin from waste chicken feathers using sodium sulfide and l-cysteine. Process Biochem. 2019, 82, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shavandi, A.; Carne, A.; Bekhit, A.A.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. An improved method for solubilisation of wool keratin using peracetic acid. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.