Abstract
Milk, a cornerstone of neonatal nutrition and human health, harbors various components with antioxidant capabilities, including oligosaccharides. In this study, we explored the antioxidant potential of acetylated milk oligosaccharides (A-MOs) and deacetylated oligosaccharides (D-MOs) sourced from Rathi cow milk through assays, with a focus on their comparative efficacy. Concurrently, we evaluated the antioxidant activity of Ascorbic Acid (AA) for comparison. Results revealed significant dynamics within the antioxidant profiles of A-MOs and D-MOs. A-MOs demonstrated concentration-dependent antioxidant activity, with higher concentrations correlating with increased efficacy, while D-MOs displayed a distinct pattern, with varying antioxidant potential across concentrations. Notably, both A-MOs and D-MOs exhibited promising antioxidant activity, suggesting their potential as natural antioxidants. In contrast, AA exhibited a decline in antioxidant activity with increasing concentration, indicating a differing pattern from oligosaccharides. These findings underscore the significance of acetylation in modulating the antioxidant properties of milk oligosaccharides. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these observations and to explore the practical implications of A-MOs and D-MOs as functional food components or potential therapeutic agents. Overall, our study contributes to the understanding of milk oligosaccharides’ antioxidant properties and highlights the potential of acetylated and deacetylated oligosaccharides from Rathi cow milk as valuable sources of natural antioxidants with diverse applications in nutrition and healthcare.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.D. and D.D.A.P.S.C.; methodology, A.S.; software, S.K.; validation, A.S., S.C. and S.M.; formal analysis, D.D.A.P.S.C.; investigation, S.K.; resources, V.G.; data curation, D.D.A.P.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.D.; writing—review and editing, D.D.A.P.S.C.; visualization, S.M.; supervision, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
AS thanks support from ICMR (No.52/08/2019-BIO/BMS), DST-PURSE program (SR/PURSE Phase 2/29(C)), UP Higher Education (No. 10/2021/281/-4-Sattar-2021-04(2)/2021 and No. 39/2024/242/Sattar-4-2024-001-4(33)/2023), DBT (BT/PR38505/MED/29/1513/2020) and DST-SERB (CRG/2022/001047), and University of Lucknow.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article. Other related data is unavailable due to privacy and may be available from the authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).