Next Article in Journal
The Development of a Research Scale for Neuroleadership
Previous Article in Journal
Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurial Proactiveness and Performance: The Perspective of Female Executives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Unveiling the Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comprehensive Exploration through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis †

by
Eleni Tsianaka
1,2,* and
Konstantinos Peramatzis
3
1
Rushford Business School, La Voie-Creuse 16, PC 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
2
Department of Neurosurgery and Quality Department, Kuwait Hospital, Sabah Al Salem 44001, Kuwait
3
School of Aviation, Australian University, West Mishref 13015, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Scientific Conference On Digitalization, Innovations & Sustainable Development: Trends And Business Perspectives, West Mishref, Kuwait, 29 November & 14 December 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 101(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101004
Published: 29 April 2024

1. Objectives

Understanding the impact of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems is vital for improving the efficiency of healthcare administration. This study can offer insights to streamline processes, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance overall healthcare operations by identifying best practices and challenges. Insights gained from the research can help in optimizing healthcare practices, leading to better diagnoses, more accurate treatments, and improved overall patient outcomes. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic.

2. Methodology

We researched related scientific databases to identify studies that investigated outcome indicators associated with EHR implementation. Data were extracted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Quality control was performed using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool—the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS)—in order to assess the risk of bias. We performed the meta-analysis using the appropriate software (RevMan 5, Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

3. Results

According to our current results, we expect to identify an association between EHR systems and reduced documentation time, as well as higher guideline adherence. (The study is still in progress. Detailed results to follow).

4. Implications

This study carries significant implications across various domains in healthcare and beyond. Policymakers and healthcare administrators can use the study’s insights to make data-driven decisions regarding EHR adoption, resource allocation, and policy formulation. Healthcare institutions can optimize their EHR implementation strategies, addressing challenges identified in the study and adopting best practices. Moreover, businesses and governments can conduct cost–benefit analyses based on the study’s findings, evaluating the economic impact of EHR adoption, in terms of efficiency gains, reduced paperwork, and overall cost savings.

5. Originality Value

The originality value of our research study lies in its unique contribution to the existing body of knowledge, by covering a broad spectrum of aspects; it provides a holistic understanding of EHR systems’ influence on healthcare administration. Moreover, by synthesizing diverse studies [1,2,3,4,5,6], the research study can draw nuanced conclusions, identify patterns, and offer evidence-based insights that go beyond the scope of individual studies.

6. Contribution

This research study makes several significant contributions to the field of healthcare administration and digital health technology; by synthesizing diverse studies, it offers a comprehensive understanding of EHR systems’ impact, saving time and effort for professionals seeking evidence-based insights. Additionally, it identifies gaps in the existing research, suggesting avenues for future innovation and exploration. This contribution drives ongoing advancements in EHR technology and healthcare administration practices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.T.; methodology, E.T.; software, K.P.; validation, E.T. and K.P.; formal analysis, K.P.; investigation, K.P.; resources, E.T.; data curation, K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.T.; writing—review and editing, K.P.; visualization, K.P.; supervision, E.T.; project administration, E.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cordero, L.; Kuehn, L.; Kumar, R.; Mekh, H. Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Clinical Practice in a Newborn Intensive Care Unit. J. Perinatol. 2004, 24, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Menendez, M.; Alonso, J.; Racancano, I.; Corte, J.; Herranz, V.; Vazquez, F. Impact of computerized physician order entry on medication errors. Rev. Calid. Asist. 2012, 27, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Menendez, M.; Janssen, S.; Ring, D. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect adverse events after outpatient orthopaedic surgery. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2015, 25, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shelley, D.; Tseng, T.; Andrews, H.; Ravenell, J.; Wu, D.; Ferrari, P.; Kopal, H. Predictors of Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensives in Community Health Centers. Am. J. Hypertens. 2011, 24, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sockolow, P.; Liao, C.; Chittams, J.; Bowles, K. Evaluating the Impact of Electronic Health Records on Nurse Clinical Process at Two Community Health Sites. NI 2012, 2012, 381. [Google Scholar]
  6. Walsh, M.; Yancy, C.; Albert, N.; Curtis, A.; Stough, W.; Gheorghiade, M.; Fonarow, G. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am. Heart Fail. 2010, 159, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsianaka, E.; Peramatzis, K. Unveiling the Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comprehensive Exploration through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Proceedings 2024, 101, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101004

AMA Style

Tsianaka E, Peramatzis K. Unveiling the Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comprehensive Exploration through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Proceedings. 2024; 101(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsianaka, Eleni, and Konstantinos Peramatzis. 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comprehensive Exploration through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Proceedings 101, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101004

APA Style

Tsianaka, E., & Peramatzis, K. (2024). Unveiling the Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems: A Comprehensive Exploration through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Proceedings, 101(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop