Next Article in Journal
Rapid and Label-Free Electrochemical DNA Biosensor for Detecting Hepatitis A Virus
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Thermoelectric Generator Module as Body Energy Harvester
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

A Common Assessment Space for Different Sensor Structures †

1
Department of Technology and Aesthetics, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE-371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden
2
Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 11519 Prague 1, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Symposium on Sensor Science (I3S 2017), Barcelona, Spain, 27–29 September 2017.
Proceedings 2017, 1(8), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080782
Published: 11 December 2017
The study of the evolution process of our visual system indicates the existence of variational spatial arrangement; from densely hexagonal in the fovea to a sparse circular structure in the peripheral retina. Today’s sensor spatial arrangement is inspired by our visual system. However, we have not come further than rigid rectangular and, in a minor scale, hexagonal sensor arrangement. Even in this situation, there is a need to be able to directly assess differences between the rectangular and hexagonal sensor arrangements, i.e., without the conversion of one arrangement to another. In this paper, we propose a method to create a common space for directly assessing the differences among any spatial arrangements, e.g., between the rectangular and hexagonal. Such a space is created by implementing a continuous extension of discrete Weyl Group orbit function transform which extends a discrete arrangement to a continuous one. The implementation of the space is demonstrated by comparing two types of generated hexagonal images from each rectangular image with two different methods of the half-pixel shifting method and virtual hexagonal method. In the experiment, a group of ten texture images are generated with variational curviness content using ten different Perlin noise patterns adding to an initial 2D Gaussian distribution pattern image. Then, the common space is obtained from each of the discrete images to assess the differences between the original rectangular image and its corresponding hexagonal image. The results show that the space facilitates an easy tool to assess the changes between different spatial arrangements by which, in the experiment, the hexagonal images show richer intensity variation, nonlinear behavior, and larger dynamic range in comparison to the rectangular images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, W.; Kajínek, O.; Khatibi, S.; Chadzitaskos, G. A Common Assessment Space for Different Sensor Structures. Proceedings 2017, 1, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080782

AMA Style

Wen W, Kajínek O, Khatibi S, Chadzitaskos G. A Common Assessment Space for Different Sensor Structures. Proceedings. 2017; 1(8):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Wei, Ondřej Kajínek, Siamak Khatibi, and Goce Chadzitaskos. 2017. "A Common Assessment Space for Different Sensor Structures" Proceedings 1, no. 8: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080782

APA Style

Wen, W., Kajínek, O., Khatibi, S., & Chadzitaskos, G. (2017). A Common Assessment Space for Different Sensor Structures. Proceedings, 1(8), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080782

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop