Next Article in Journal
A New L2 Type Difference Scheme for the Time-Fractional Diffusion Equation
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Analysis of Harmonic Mean, Holling Type II, Beddington–DeAngelis, and Crowley–Martin Incidence Rates of a Piecewise Dengue Fever Dynamics Model
Previous Article in Journal
Fractal–Fractional Synergy in Geo-Energy Systems: A Multiscale Framework for Stress Field Characterization and Fracture Network Evolution Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Fixed Point Results for Novel Contractions with Applications in Fractional Differential Equations for Market Equilibrium and Economic Growth

1
School of Science, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572000, China
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University Rangsit Center, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
3
Center for Mathematical Research, University of Sanya, Sanya 572022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2025, 9(5), 324; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9050324
Submission received: 3 May 2025 / Revised: 16 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 May 2025 / Published: 19 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Order Modelling of Dynamical Systems)

Abstract

In this study, we introduce two new classes of contractions, namely enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions and generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions, within the context of normed spaces. These classes generalize several well-known contraction types, including χ -contractions, Banach contractions, enriched contractions, Kannan contractions, Bianchini contractions, Zamfirescu contractions, non-expansive mappings, and ( ρ , χ ) -enriched contractions. We establish related fixed point results for the novel contractions in normed spaces endowed with the binary relations preserving key symmetric properties, ensuring consistency and applicability. The Krasnoselskij iteration method is refined to incorporate symmetric constraints, facilitating fixed point identification within these spaces. By appropriately selecting constants in the definition of enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions, employing a suitable binary relation, or control function χ Θ , our framework generalizes and extends classical fixed point theorems. Illustrative examples highlight the significance of our findings in reinforcing fixed point conditions and demonstrating their broader applicability. Additionally, this paper explores how these ideas guarantee the stability of the production–consumption markets equilibrium and the economic growth model.

1. Introduction

The Banach contraction theorem, introduced in [1], is a fundamental result in metric fixed point theory with widespread implications across various mathematical and applied disciplines. It serves as a powerful tool in solving both linear and nonlinear ordinary and integral equations and has meaningful uses in fields such as image processing, fractal geometry, engineering, physics, and biology. The theorem asserts that if a self-mapping T on a complete metric space ( X , d ) fulfills a contractive condition of the form d ( T ς , T η ) γ d ( ς , η ) for all ς , η X , where 0 γ < 1 ) , then T has a unique fixed point in X. Over time, extensive research has led to various generalizations and refinements of this theorem, including extensions to broader domains [2] and the introduction of more generalized contractive conditions [3,4], further expanding its applicability in both theoretical and practical contexts. Fixed point theory is very important in the study of economics, particularly in the analysis of models of economic growth and production–consumption equilibrium. It provides a mathematical framework within the production–consumption equilibrium framework to guarantee the existence of the equilibrium solutions or locations in markets where supply and demand are equal. Our findings allow economists to study how market forces adjust on their own to reach equilibrium without outside intervention. This technique, which is essential to the study of general equilibrium theory, examines producer–consumer interactions in multiple markets at the same time. Recent studies demonstrate that the Caputo fractional derivative provides a flexible framework for modeling dynamic systems with memory and hereditary properties, capturing long-term dependencies and delayed effects in economic growth more effectively than classical models. This approach has been successfully applied in various fields, such as fractional-order delayed zooplankton–phytoplankton dynamics [5], glycerol hydrogenolysis via heterogeneous catalysis [6], the (SEIrIsR) model with fractional infection stages [7], the seventh-order Caputo fractional KdV equation (including Sawada–Kotera–Ito and Lax applications) [8], the fractal fractional nonlinear coupled Burgers equation using a hybrid transform approach [9], and the dynamical analysis of a novel 4D hyperchaotic system with both integer and fractional-order methods [10].
Recently, Berinde and Pǎcurar [11] initiated an extended class of contractive operators, known as enriched contractions, which extend classical Banach contraction mappings and incorporate various non-expansive operators found in the literature.
A mapping T : X X on a linear normed space ( X , · ) is called an enriched contraction if there exist ρ 0 and γ [ 0 , ρ + 1 ) such that, for all ς , η X , the contractive condition involving ρ and γ holds. Notice that non-expansive mappings do not always guarantee fixed point existence; in contrast, enriched contractions consistently ensure the presence of a unique fixed point. For further insights, we refer to Example 1(2) in [11]. Let K be a convex subset of the normed space X, and consider λ ( 0 ,   1 ] with a mapping T : K K . The operator T λ : K K , defined by T λ ( ς ) = ( 1 λ ) ς + λ T ( ς ) , is the averaged mapping of T. Notably, the set of fixed points of T λ coincides with that of T. Extensive research has been conducted in this domain, with contributions from various scholars; see, for instance, [12,13,14] and the references therein.
Recently, Zhou et al. in [15] discussed the equivalence and convergence of several higher-order iteration schemes, including the Krasnoselskij iteration, under more general conditions. Their work extends classical fixed point results by considering generalized enriched contraction mappings in closed convex Banach spaces, which broadens the applicability of the Krasnoselskij and other iteration schemes. This contribution serves as a key reference for understanding the theoretical foundation of these iterative methods; additionally, see the related developments in [16,17,18].
Alam and Imdad [19] established fixed point results by introducing a weak contractive condition rather than the classical Banach contraction condition. This technique requires the contractive condition to be met only for elements belonging to a specific binary relation, rather than the whole space. Because of this study, fixed point theory has been extensively studied in the context of binary relations. Notably, Din, along with collaborators in [4,20,21], investigated Perov’s classical fixed point theorems under this setting. Their work included illustrative examples and applications within vector-valued spaces, highlighting the adaptability of this approach. Furthermore, Alam et al. [22] expanded the results of [19] by introducing even more instances of weaker conditions, thereby establishing the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for self-mappings governed by binary relations; see [23].

2. Preliminaries

We begin by revisiting some fundamentals of order-theoretic metric fixed point theory.
Definition 1 
([24]). Consider X , and let I X 2 . For all ς , η X , either ( ς , η ) I , that is, ς is related to η under I , commonly denoted as ς I η or ( ς , η ) I , which means that ς is not related to η in I .
By definition, X 2 , ∅, and Δ X = { ( ς , ς ) : ς X } are well-known examples of binary relations on X, called, respectively, the universal relation, empty relation, and diagonal relation.
Throughout the study, I denotes a non-empty binary relation. For simplicity, we will call it “binary relation” instead of explicitly stating “non-empty binary relation”. In the following sections, we introduce essential definitions and propositions that serve as the foundation for metric order-theoretic fixed point theorems. These fundamental notions form the necessary groundwork for further theoretical developments.
Definition 2 
([24]). Suppose I X 2 and ς , η X ; then, ς and η are said to be I -comparative if ( ς , η ) I or ( η , ς ) I . We represent this relation as [ ς , η ] I .
Proposition 1 
([19]). Consider a metric space ( X , d ) with I X 2 , a self-mapping T on X, and γ [ 0 ,   1 ) . The following contractive conditions for all ς , η X are equivalent:
(I) 
( ς , η ) I d ( T ς , T η ) γ d ( ς , η ) ;
(II) 
[ ς , η ] I d ( T ς , T η ) γ d ( ς , η ) .
Definition 3 
([24]). Let X and I X 2 . The inverse relation of I is given by I 1 = { ( ς , η ) X 2 : ( η , ς ) I } . The reflexive closure is denoted as I # = I Δ X , and the symmetric closure is represented as I s = I I 1 .
Proposition 2 
([19,24,25]). If I X 2 and ς , η X , then
[ ς , η ] I ( ς , η ) I s .
Definition 4 
([19]). A sequence { ς j } X is called I -preserving if ( ς j , ς j + 1 ) I , j N 0 .
Definition 5 
([19]). Consider a metric space ( X , d ) with I X 2 . The relation I is said to be d-self-closed if for any I -preserving sequence { ς j } with ς j d ς under the metric d, there exists a subsequence { ς j k } such that ( ς j k , ς ) I for all k N 0 .
Definition 6 
([19]). Let T be a self-mapping on X and I X 2 . The relation I is said to be closed under T if, for all ς , η X , whenever ( ς , η ) I , then ( T ς , T η ) I .
Proposition 3 
([26]). If T is I -closed, then T j for all j N 0 is also I -closed.
Proposition 4 
([19]). Let X, T, and I be defined as per Definition 6. If I is closed under T, then its symmetric closure I s also retains the property of T-closure.
Before proceeding, we discuss the concepts of · -self-closedness and I -completeness in the context of normed spaces as follows:
Definition 7 
([12]). A normed space ( X ,   ·   ) is said to be I -complete if every I -preserving Cauchy sequence converges in norm.
Definition 8 
([12]). A mapping T is termed I -continuous at ς if for any I -preserving sequence { ς j } with ς j ς · 0 implies T ( ς j ) T ( ς ) · 0 . If this condition is met for all ς X , then T is said to be I -continuous.
Every complete metric space is naturally I -complete, irrespective of the chosen binary relation I . In particular, when I corresponds to the universal relation, I -completeness corresponds to the classical notion of completeness in metric spaces. Additionally, any continuous mapping is inherently I -continuous for all I , and if I is universal, I -continuity is equivalent to standard continuity.
Definition 9 
([12]). In a normed space X with norm   ·   , the relation I is said to be   ·   -self-closed if, for any I -preserving sequence { ς j } converging to ς in norm, there exists a subsequence { ς j k } such that [ ς j k , ς ] I for all k N 0 .
Definition 10 
([27]). Let X with I X 2 . A subset A X is known as I -directed if, for every ς , η A , ∃ ω X , which implies ( ς , ω ) I and ( η , ω ) I .
Definition 11 
([28]). Let X with I X 2 . For ς , η X , a path of length k (where k is a natural number) in I from ς to η is a finite sequence { ω 0 , ω 1 , ω 2 , , ω k } X satisfying ω 0 = ς , ω k = η , and ( ω i , ω i + 1 ) I for each i with 0 i k 1 .
Not long ago, Jleli and Samet [3] presented a well-known fixed point theorem in the complete metric space ( X , d ) . It uses the following generalized contraction condition:
χ ( d ( T ς , T η ) ) χ ( d ( ς , η ) ) α , ς , η X ,
where d ( T ς , T η ) > 0 , and χ : ( 0 , + ) ( 1 , + ) is a mapping satisfying specific properties, which are given below, and 0 < α < 1 . The contraction defined above is referred to as a χ -contraction. The set of functions χ : ( 0 , + ) ( 1 , + ) satisfy the following conditions:
( χ 1 )
χ is non-decreasing;
( χ 2 )
For any sequence { c n } R + , lim n + χ ( c n ) = 1 lim n + c n = 0 ;
( χ 3 )
There exist 0 < β < 1 and 0 < μ + such that lim c 0 + χ ( c ) 1 c β = μ .
This is denoted by Θ in [3]. Examples of functions belonging to Θ include
(i)
χ 1 ( ξ ) = e ξ , for all ξ ( 0 , + ) ;
(ii)
χ 2 ( ξ ) = 2 2 π arctan 1 ξ κ , for κ ( 0 , 1 ) and ξ ( 0 , + ) .
It was shown in [3] that any χ -contraction over a Banach space possesses a unique fixed point. Afterwards, numerous generalizations and extensions of this result have been developed, as seen in [29,30,31].
Building upon the work of Rizwan et al. [14] and the contributions of Alam and Imdad with their collaborators [19,22], this study introduces enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions and generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions, which extend the concepts of enriched contractions, χ -contractions, enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contractions, Kannan contractions, and many more. To illustrate the applicability of our findings, we provide examples that validate the theoretical framework. The stability of the production–consumption equilibrium and the economic growth model are also examined in this study.
Finally, we revisit certain fundamentals and useful properties, which are necessary for our next discussions. Throughout this paper, we employ the following notations:
  • Fix ( T ) : The collection of all fixed points of T;
  • I T : = { ς X : ( ς , T ς ) I } ;
  • Paths ( ς , η ; I ) : The set of all paths in I connecting ς and η ;
  • For ρ 0 , we define λ = 1 ρ + 1 ( 0 ,   1 ] .

3. Main Results

In this section, we introduce the notions of enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions and generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions and present fixed point results for these newly defined contractions, accompanied by illustrative examples.
Definition 12. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . A mapping T : A X is called an enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction if there exist ρ [ 0 , + ) , χ Θ , and 0 < α < 1 such that for all ς , η X with ( ς , η ) I , and T ς T η ρ ( ς η ) such that
χ T ς T η + ρ ( ς η ) ρ + 1 χ ( ς η ) α .
To highlight the role of binary relation I , constant ρ , and control function χ in Definition 12, the mapping T is often referred to as an enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction.
Definition 13. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . A mapping T : A X is called a generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction if there exist ρ [ 0 , + ) , χ Θ , and 0 < α < 1 such that for all ς , η X with ( ς , η ) I , and T ς T η ρ ( ς η ) such that
χ T ς T η + ρ ( ς η ) ρ + 1 χ max ς η , ς T ς ρ + 1 , η T η ρ + 1 α .
To highlight the role of binary relation I , constant ρ , and control function χ in Definition 13, the mapping T is often referred to as a generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction.
Remark 1. 
It is important to note that conditions (2) and (3) are not required to hold universally across the entire space X; rather, they apply only to points that are related under a specified binary relation I . Consequently, this formulation provides a weaker variant of the enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contractions introduced by Rizwan et al. [14], offering a more generalized framework for fixed point analysis within relational metric structures. However, if one considers I = X × X = A × A , then both definitions become equivalent, as the condition (2) would hold universally for all pairs of points in X.
By the symmetry property of the norm · , the following result follows immediately. Consequently, we leave the details of the proof to the interested readers.
Proposition 5. 
A mapping T is an ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction if and only if T is also an ( I s , ρ , χ ) -contraction.
We now present the first main result involving the enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions.
Theorem 1. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . Further suppose that
1. 
( X , · ) is I -complete;
2. 
T is an enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction;
3. 
I is T λ -closed, where λ = 1 ρ + 1 ;
4. 
I is   ·   -self-closed, or T λ is I -continuous;
5. 
I T λ .
Then, T has a fixed point in A , and the sequence { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j for all j 0 , converges to some fixed point of T, depending on the choice of initial point ς 0 .
Proof. 
It follows from (2) that for all ς , η X , with ( ς , η ) I and ρ ( ς η ) + T ς T η 0 , we obtain
χ T λ ς T λ η χ ς η α .
This demonstrates that T λ is an enriched ( I , 0 , χ ) -contraction with λ = 1 1 + ρ .
In lieu of assumption (5), there exists an ς 0 X such that ( ς 0 , T λ ς 0 ) I . Define a Krasnoselskij iterative scheme { ς j } starting from the initial guess ς 0 by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j , j N . As ς 0 , T ς 0 I , using the T λ -closedness of I and Proposition 3; then, we obtain
T λ j ς 0 , T λ j + 1 ς 0 I , j N ,
which further implies that
ς j , ς j + 1 I , j N .
This shows that { ς j } is an I -preserving sequence. Next, we suppose that ς j ς j + 1 for all j N . Otherwise, if ς j = ς j + 1 for some j N , it follows that ς j = T λ ς j , and the proof is complete. Therefore, for ς j ς j + 1 for all j N , Equation (4) implies that
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) = χ ( T λ ς j 1 T λ ς j ) χ ( ς j 1 ς j ) α .
Continuing this process, we obtain
1 < χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) χ ( ς j 1 ς j ) α χ ( ς j 2 ς j 1 ) α 2 χ ( ς 0 ς 1 ) α j .
Thus, we have
lim j + χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) = 1 ,
which, together with ( χ 2 ) , implies
lim j + ς j ς j + 1 = 0 .
Moreover, from ( χ 3 ) , there exist t ( 0 , 1 ) and e ( 0 , + ) for which
lim j + χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 ς j ς j + 1 t = e .
Let e < + , and define ε = e 2 > 0 . Then, according to the definition of the limit and (10), there exists n 1 N such that for all j > n 1 ,
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 ς j ς j + 1 t e < ε .
so that we obtain
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 ς j ς j + 1 t > e ε = e 2 = ε .
Equivalently, for all j n 1 , we have
ε j ς j ς j + 1 t < j χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 .
Next, assume e = + , and let ε > 0 . Therefore, there exists n 1 N whereby for all j n 1 ,
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 ς j ς j + 1 t ε .
Then, for all j > n 1 , we obtain
ε j ς j ς j + 1 t j χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 .
Using (8), (11), and (12), we derive
ε j ς j ς j + 1 t j χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) 1 j χ ( ς 0 ς 1 ) α j 1 .
Taking the limit as j + in (13), we obtain
lim j + j ς j ς j + 1 t = 0 .
Thus, from (13), there exists n 0 N such that for all j n 0 ,
j ς j ς j + 1 t 1 .
Hence, for all j n 0 ,
ς j ς j + 1 1 j 1 t .
Next, to show { ς j } is a Cauchy sequence, let m N and n such that m > n n 0 . Then, from (14), we obtain
ς m ς n ς m ς m 1 + ς m 1 ς m 2 + + ς n + 1 ς n .
Thus,
ς m ς n i = n m ς i ς i + 1 i = n m 1 i 1 t i = n 1 i 1 h .
Since the series i = n 1 i 1 t converges, it follows that { ς j } is a Cauchy sequence. Therefore, according to the I -completeness of X, there exists ς * X such that ς j converges to ς * . Finally, from assumption (4), we will show that ς * is a fixed point of T. Since T λ is I -continuous and { ς j } is an I -preserving sequence with ς j ς * in norm, it follows that ς j + 1 = T λ ( ς j ) T λ ( ς * ) in norm. By the uniqueness of the limit, we conclude that T λ ( ς * ) = ς * , meaning ς * is a fixed point of T λ , and thus, also a fixed point of T.
On the other hand, taking into account that I is   ·   -self-closed, and since { ς j } is I -preserving with ς j ς * in norm, there exists a subsequence { ς j k } such that [ ς j k , ς * ] I for all k N . Using assumption (2) with property ( χ 2 ) and Proposition 5, along with the convergence ς j k ς * , we obtain that
ς j k + 1 T λ ς *   =   T λ ς j k T λ ς * ς j k ς * 0 as k .
Hence, lim k ς j k + 1 = T λ ς * . Thus, T λ ( ς * ) = lim k ς j k + 1 = lim j ς j = ς * , which shows that ς * is a fixed point of T λ . Consequently, ς * stands as a fixed point for both T λ and T. □
Next, we focus on the uniqueness of the fixed point for our enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions. To achieve uniqueness, we impose additional conditions on the contraction mapping and the underlying relation. These extra constraints ensure that no two distinct fixed points can exist.
Theorem 2. 
Under all the assumptions of Theorem 1, and additionally supposing that
Paths ( ς , η ; I ) for every ς , η A ,
the self-mapping T admits a unique fixed point.
Proof. 
The existence part follows directly from Theorem 1. We now proceed to demonstrate the uniqueness part. In contrast, assume that T has two fixed points: ς * and η * . Then, there exists a path (denoted as { ω 0 , ω 1 , , ω m } ) of some finite length m in I from ς * to η * such that
ω 0 = ς * , ω m = η * , [ ω i , ω i + 1 ] I for each i ( 0 i m 1 ) .
So, by letting ω j ω j + 1 = j , j N , and using the triangle inequality together with property ( χ 2 ) and (14), we obtain
ς * η * =   T λ ς * T λ η *   =   T λ ω 0 T λ ω m j = 0 m 1 T λ ω j T λ ω j + 1 j = 0 m 1 ω j ω j + 1 = j = 0 m 1 j j = 0 j j = 0 1 j 1 h 0 .
Thus, ς * = η * . □
If I is complete or A is I s -directed, the following result is noteworthy.
Corollary 1. 
If T fulfills the assumptions of Theorem 2, then T possesses a unique fixed point, provided that at least one of the following holds:
( I ) : I is complete ;
( I I ) : X is I s - directed .
Proof. 
Suppose condition ( I ) holds. Then, for all ς , η X , the pair [ ς , η ] belongs to I and, hence, forms a path of length 1 in I s . This guarantees that
Paths ( ς , η , I s ) ,
and the conclusion follows directly from Theorem 2.
Now, suppose that condition ( I I ) holds. Then, for any ς , η X , there exists ω X such that both [ ς , ω ] , and [ η , ω ] belong to I . These pairs form a path of length 2 in I s , ensuring that
Paths ( ς , η , I s ) .
Consequently, Theorem 2 implies that T has a unique fixed point. □
By setting ρ = 0 in Theorem 1, we obtain a fixed point result of theoretic order, which is the main result of Din et al. [21] in normed spaces.
Corollary 2. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . Further, suppose that
1. 
( X , · ) is I -complete;
2. 
T is a theoretic-order χ-contraction;
3. 
I is T-closed;
4. 
I is · -self-closed, or T is I -continuous;
5. 
I T .
Then, T has a fixed point in X, and the iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = T ς j for all j 0 , converges to some fixed point of T, depending on the choice of initial point ς 0 .
By setting the binary relation I = X × X in Theorem 1, our corollary recovers the main result of Rizwan et al. [14].
Corollary 3. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space where
1. 
( X , · ) is complete;
2. 
T is an enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contraction.
Then, T has a unique fixed point in X, and the scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j for all j 0 , converges to a unique fixed point of T for any choice of initial point ς 0 , where λ = 1 1 + ρ .
Setting I = X × X and ρ = 0 in Theorem 1 yields fixed point results for JS-contractions (i.e., χ -contractions), as introduced by Jleli and Samet in [3] in normed spaces.
Corollary 4. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space. Suppose the following conditions hold:
1. 
( X , · ) is complete;
2. 
T is a χ-contraction.
Then, T has a unique fixed point in X, and the Picard iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = T ς j for all j 0 , converges to a unique fixed point of T for any choice of ς 0 .
Similarly, by imposing different conditions on I , ρ , and a subset A of X or the control function χ , many fixed point results available in the literature can be recovered as special cases of our framework. In what follows, we present an illustrative example that demonstrates our definition is a proper generalization of the existing contraction mappings.
Example 1. 
Let X = R be the usual normed space, and set A = [ 0 , 2 ] . Consider the mapping T : A X defined by
T ( ς ) = ς if ς [ 0 , 1 ] ; 2 3 ς if ς 1 , 3 2 ; 1 3 ς if ς 3 2 , 2 ,
and the binary relation
I = { ( ς , η ) : 0 ς 1 and 0 η 3 2 } .
If we set ρ = 3 , then the parameter λ becomes 1 4 , yielding the averaged operator
T 1 4 ( ς ) = ς 2 if ς [ 0 , 1 ] ; 1 2 if ς 1 , 3 2 ; 1 4 if ς 3 2 , 2 .
By routine calculation, we can verify that T is a non-self-enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction, where ρ = 3 and χ ( t ) = e t e t with α = 1 2 . Moreover, note that A = [ 0 , 2 ] , being a closed subset of X, is complete. Next, whenever ( ς , η ) I , we have ς [ 0 , 1 ] and η 0 , 3 2 . Then, for such ς and η, we obtain
  • T 1 4 ς = ς 2 [ 0 , 1 ] ;
  • T 1 4 η = η 2 0 , 3 2 when η 1 , and T 1 4 η = 1 2 0 , 3 2 when 1 η 3 2 .
Thus, in all cases, ( T 1 4 ς , T 1 4 η ) I . Hence, T 1 4 is I -closed, and I T 1 4 (since ( 0 , T 1 4 ( 0 ) ) = ( 0 , 0 ) I ). Finally, it is evident that T 1 2 is not continuous. Let { ς j } be a I -preserving sequence in X such that
ς j   ·   ς ,
with ( ς j , ς j + 1 ) I for all j N . Since ( ς j , ς j + 1 ) I , it follows that ς j [ 0 , 1 ] for every j. As the interval [ 0 , 1 ] is closed in X, we have ( ς j , ς ) I for all j. Therefore, I is   ·   -self-closed. It is also easy to prove that Paths ( ς , η ; I ) for every ς , η A . Consequently, all the assumptions of Theorem 2 are met; therefore, T has a unique fixed point, namely x * = 0 .
The convergence behavior of the Krasnoselskij iteration is clearly illustrated in Table 1, showcasing the numerical results for selected initial points, and this is further visualized in Figure 1, demonstrating the iterations. These representations highlight the method’s efficiency and stability.
Remark 2. 
It should be noted that Example 1 plays a crucial role. In this example, the mapping T is neither a χ-contraction in the sense of Jleli and Samet, (since T is not continuous) nor an enriched contraction, as proposed by Berinde and Pecurar, as it is neither a self-mapping nor continuous. It is also clear that by taking ς = 3 2 and η = 7 4 with ρ = 3 , we observe that
T 1 4 ς T 1 4 η = ς η ,
indicating the absence of any α ( 0 , 1 ) , satisfying (1). Moreover, it does not satisfy the conditions of an enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contraction, as defined by Rizwan et al. [14]. However, within our framework, T qualifies as an enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction. Hence, our results provide a proper generalization of the existing work.
Example 2. 
Let X = R and A = [ 0 , 1 ] with the usual norm | ς η = | ς η | . Let T : A A be a mapping defined by
T ( ς ) = 1 5 , if 0 ς 1 2 , ς 0.4 , if ς { 0.6 , 0.8 } , 1 5 ( 1 ς ) , otherwise , for 1 2 < ς 1
and construct a binary relation I : = { ( ς , η ) X 2 : ς , η [ 0 , 1 2 ] } . Since T is not continuous, it is not a Banach contraction, an enriched contraction, nor even a JS-contraction, as discussed in [1,3,11]. It can be also seen that for ς = 0.6 and η = 0.8 , we have ς η = 0.4 = T ς T η 0 and so we cannot find any α > 0 for any χ Θ such that it satisfies the following inequality with ρ = 0 :
χ T ς T η + ρ ( ς η ) ρ + 1 χ ( ς η ) α .
Therefore, it is not an enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contraction, introduced by Rizwan et al. in [14].
However, taking ρ = 0 implies λ = 1 , and hence the operator T coincides with its averaged operator T λ . Notice that there exists 1 2 X such that ( 1 2 , T 1 2 ) = ( 1 2 , 1 5 ) I ; moreover, whenever ( ς , η ) I , then ( T ς , T η ) = ( 1 5 , 1 5 ) I , showing that the binary relation I is T-closed. Finally, for any ( ς , η ) I , we obtain
| T ς T η | = 1 5 1 5 = 0 ,
and hence the inequality in Definition 12 holds for all χ Θ , that is, T is an enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction. As all assumptions of Theorem 1 are satisfied, T has a fixed point.
Next, we present another fixed point result, which is the generalization of Theorem 1, and it is stated as follows:
Theorem 3. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . Suppose the following conditions hold:
1. 
( X , · ) is I -complete;
2. 
T is a generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction;
3. 
I is T λ -closed, where λ = 1 ρ + 1 ;
4. 
T λ is I -continuous;
5. 
I T λ .
Then, T has a fixed point in A and the Krasnoselskij iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j for all j 0 , converges to some fixed point of T, depending on the choice of initial point ς 0 .
Proof. 
According to the definition of the generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contraction, it follows that for all ς , η X , with ( ς , η ) I and ρ ( ς η ) + T ς T η 0 that
χ T λ ς T λ η χ max { ς η , ς T λ ς , η T λ η } α .
This demonstrates that T λ is a generalized enriched ( I , 0 , χ ) -contraction with λ = 1 1 + ρ .
In lieu of assumption (5), there exists an ς 0 X such that ( ς 0 , T λ ς 0 ) I . Define a Krasnoselskij iterative scheme { ς j } starting from the initial guess ς 0 by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j , j N . As ς 0 , T ς 0 I , by using the T λ -closedness of I and Proposition 3, we obtain
T λ j ς 0 , T λ j + 1 ς 0 I , j N ,
which further implies that
ς j , ς j + 1 I , j N .
This shows that { ς j } is a I -preserving sequence. Next, we suppose that ς j ς j + 1 for all j N . Otherwise, if ς j = ς j + 1 for some j N , it follows that ς j = T λ ς j , and the proof is complete. Therefore, for ς j ς j + 1 for all j N , Equation (15) implies that
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) = χ ( T λ ς j 1 T λ ς j ) χ ( max { ς j 1 ς j , ς j 1 T λ ς j 1 , ς j T λ ς j } ) α = χ ( max { ς j 1 ς j , ς j 1 ς j , ς j ς j + 1 } ) α = χ ( max { ς j 1 ς j , ς j ς j + 1 } ) α .
If for some j N , max { ς j 1 ς j , ς j ς j + 1 } = ς j ς j + 1 . Then, using (18), we obtain a contradiction. Indeed,
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) α < χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) .
Hence, for all j N , we have max { ς j 1 ς j , ς j ς j + 1 } = ς j 1 ς j . Therefore, (18) implies for all j N that
χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) χ ( ς j 1 ς j ) α .
Continuing this process, we obtain
1 < χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) χ ( ς j 1 ς j ) α χ ( ς j 2 ς j 1 ) α 2 χ ( ς 0 ς 1 ) α j .
Thus, we have
lim j + χ ( ς j ς j + 1 ) = 1 ,
which, together with ( χ 2 ) , implies
lim j + ς j ς j + 1 = 0 .
Next, by using the same steps as in the proof of Theorem 1, finally, for all j n 0 , we obtain
ς j ς j + 1 1 j 1 h .
To show { ς j } is a Cauchy sequence, take two natural numbers: m and n such that m > n n 0 . Then, from the triangular inequality and (21), we obtain
ς m ς n ς m ς m 1 + ς m 1 ς m 2 + + ς n + 1 ς n .
Thus,
ς m ς n i = n m ς i ς i + 1 i = n m 1 i 1 h i = n 1 i 1 h .
Since the series i = n 1 i 1 h converges, it follows that { ς j } is a Cauchy sequence. Therefore, according to the I -completeness of X, there exists ς * X such that ς j converges to ς * . Using assumption (4), we show that ς * is a fixed point of T. Since T λ is I -continuous and { ς j } is an I -preserving sequence with ς j ς * in norm, it follows that ς j + 1 = T λ ( ς j ) T λ ( ς * ) in norm. According to the uniqueness of the limit, we conclude that T λ ( ς * ) = ς * , meaning ς * is a fixed point of T λ , and thus, also a fixed point of T. □
By setting ρ = 0 in Theorem 3, we obtain a generalized fixed point result of theoretic order, which is an extension of the main result of Din et al. [21] in normed spaces.
Corollary 5. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, and let I be a binary relation on A , where A X . Suppose the following conditions hold:
1. 
( X , · ) is I -complete;
2. 
T is a generalized theoretic-order ( I , χ ) -contraction;
3. 
I is T-closed;
4. 
T is I -continuous;
5. 
I T .
Then, T has a fixed point in X, and the iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = T ς j for all j 0 , converges to some fixed point of T, depending on the choice of initial point ς 0 .
By setting the binary relation I = X × X in Theorem 3, we obtain the following corollary:
Corollary 6. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a normed space, where ( X ,   ·   ) is complete and T is a generalized enriched ( ρ , χ ) -contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in X, and the Krasnoselskii iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = ( 1 λ ) ς j + λ T ς j for all j 0 , converges to a unique fixed point of T for any choice of initial point ς 0 , where λ = 1 1 + ρ .
Setting I = X × X and ρ = 0 in Theorem 3 yields extended fixed point results for JS-contractions (i.e., generalized χ -contractions) in normed spaces.
Corollary 7. 
Let ( X ,   ·   ) be a Banach space, and let T be a generalized χ-contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in X, and the Picard iteration scheme { ς j } , given by ς j + 1 = T ς j for all j 0 , converges to a unique fixed point of T for any choice of ς 0 .
Similarly, by imposing different conditions on I , ρ , and a subset A of X or the control function χ , many generalized fixed point results can be recovered as special cases from our study.

4. Applications

The purpose of this section is to apply the findings from the preceding section to the analysis of economic issues. We refer to the following references [32,33,34,35] for the detailed study of equilibrium market models and economic growth models.

4.1. Application to the Market Equilibrium

In this part, we use the results from the previous section to build a model and verify the existence and uniqueness of an initial value problem that arises in the dynamic market equilibrium problem, which is a significant issue in the field of economics. Let γ Prod represent production and γ Con represent consumption. Examine daily pricing patterns, prices, and whether prices are rising or falling for γ Prod , and γ Con . These factors have a significant impact on markets. Economists, therefore, try to find out what Q ( t ) is currently worth. Then, by assuming
γ Prod = Φ 1 + λ 1 Q ( h ) + 1 d Q ( h ) d h + Ψ 1 d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 γ Con = Φ 2 + λ 2 Q ( h ) + 2 d Q ( h ) d h + Ψ 2 d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2
initially, Q ( 0 ) = 0 , d P r d h ( 0 ) = 0 , where Φ 1 , Φ 2 , λ 1 , λ 2 , 1 , 2 , Ψ 1 , and Ψ 2 are constants. Dynamic economic equilibrium, or γ Prod = γ Con , is the state in which market forces are balanced, or, to put it another way, the existing prices between production and consumption appear to be stable. Therefore, we obtain the following model:
Φ 1 + λ 1 Q ( h ) + 1 d Q ( h ) d h + Ψ 1 d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 = Φ 2 + λ 2 Q ( h ) + 2 d Q ( h ) d h + Ψ 2 d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 , Φ 1 Φ 2 + λ 1 λ 2 Q ( h ) + 1 2 d Q ( h ) d h + Ψ 1 Ψ 2 d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 = 0 , Ψ d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 + d Q ( h ) d h + λ Q ( h ) = Φ , d 2 Q ( h ) d h 2 + Ψ d Q ( h ) d h + λ Ψ Q ( h ) = Φ Ψ ,
where Φ = Φ 1 Φ 2 , λ = λ 1 λ 2 , = 1 2 , and Ψ = Ψ 1 Ψ 2 .
In addition, our initial value problem can be represented as follows:
Q ( h ) + Ψ Q ( h ) + λ Ψ Q ( h ) = Φ Ψ , with Q ( 0 ) = 0 and Q ( 0 ) = 0
If production and consumption are studied for time H q , problem (22) is clearly the same as
Q ( h ) = 0 H q L h , h * J h * , h , Q ( h ) d h
and the Green function L h , h * is
L h , h * = h e λ 2 h * h , 0 h s H q h * e λ 2 h h * , 0 h * h H q
where J : 0 , H q × Ω 2 R denotes a continuous function.
Consider the function T : Ω Ω to be defined as
T Q ( h ) = 0 H q L h , h * J h * , h , Q ( h ) d h
Moreover, the fixed point of T, as defined in (24), is clearly the solution to the dynamic market equilibrium issue (22). However, (22) actually controls the current price Q ( h ) .
Assume C 0 , H q indicates the collection of all continuous functions over the interval 0 , H q , and subsequently, we denote Ω = C 0 , H q . Further, we take the usual norm on Ω as Ψ = max h [ 0 , H q ] | Ψ ( h ) | , Ψ Ω . Evidently, Ω ,   ·   is a Banach space.
Theorem 4. 
Consider the operator T : Ω Ω , as defined in (24), such that
1. 
L : Ω 2 R is a continuous function with
sup h * 0 , H q 0 H q w h , h * d h 2 λ H q e λ H q 2 ,
where , λ are constants;
2. 
There exists Q 1 Ω such that Q 1 ( h ) + T Q 1 ( h ) 0 ;
3. 
J h * , h , Q 1 ( t ) J h * , h , Q 2 ( h ) λ 2 . h * . H q e λ H q 2 τ q 2 Q 1 ( h ) Q 2 ( h ) ; τ q > 0 with Q 1 ( h ) + Q 2 ( h ) 0 .
Then, there is at least one solution in Ω for the problem (22).
Proof. 
We define the binary relation I on Ω as
( Q 1 , Q 2 ) I Q 1 ( h ) + Q 2 ( h ) 0 , h [ 0 , H q ] .
Then, for any ( Q 1 , Q 2 ) I , with the behavior of the kernel J and Green function L , we simply obtain T Q 1 ( h ) + T Q 2 ( h ) 0 . It implies that T is I -closed. Moreover, assumption (2) implies that there exists Q 1 Ω such that ( Q 1 , T Q 1 ) I . Clearly, T is also continuous, as both J and L are continuous functions. Next, we show that T is an enriched ( I , 0 , exp ) -contraction. From assumptions (1) and (2), we obtain
T Q 1 ( h ) T Q 2 ( h ) = 0 H q L h , h * J h * , h , Q 1 ( h ) d h 0 H q L h , h * J h * , h , Q 2 ( h ) d h 0 H q L h , h * J h * , h , Q 1 ( h ) J h * , h , Q 2 ( h ) d h J h * , h , Q 1 ( h ) J h * , h , Q 2 ( h ) 0 H q L h , h * d h 2 λ H q e λ H q 2 · λ 2 . h * . H q e λ H q 2 τ q 2 Q 1 ( h ) Q 2 ( h ) e τ q 2 Q 1 ( h ) Q 2 ( h ) .
Therefore, we simply imply
T Q 1 ( h ) T Q 2 ( h ) e τ q 2 Q 1 ( h ) Q 2 ( h ) , ( Q 1 , Q 2 ) I .
By considering
χ ( u ) = exp ( u ) , u ( 0 , ) ,
we obtain
χ [ T Q 1 ( h ) T Q 2 ( h ) ] χ [ Q 1 ( h ) Q 2 ( h ) ] α , ( Q 1 , Q 2 ) I ,
where α = e τ q 2 . This shows that T is an enriched ( I , 0 , exp ) -contraction since all hypotheses of Theorem 1 are satisfied. This ultimately ensures a solution to problem (22). □

4.2. Application to the Economic Growth Model

Fractional differential equations are now widely used in many branches of science and engineering. The Caputo fractional in particular has a lot of potential for creating more accurate and perceptive models for economic growth. The Caputo fractional allows for more flexibility and a deeper understanding of economic processes, which helps with well-informed policymaking decisions by taking memory effects into consideration.
The fractional can be written as follows when used in economic growth modeling:
D t c C y h q = b h q , y h q , 0 < h q < 1 , 1 < c 2 .
with the boundary conditions
y ( 0 ) = 0 , I t c R L y ( 1 ) = y ( 0 ) ,
where D t c C b h q represents the Caputo fractional derivative of order c, as defined by
D t c C b h q = 1 Γ ( j c ) 0 h q h q w j c 1 b j ( w ) d w ,
with j 1 < c < j , j = [ c ] + 1 . Here, b : [ 0 , 1 ] × R [ 0 , + ) denotes a continuous function, C denotes the Caputo derivative, h q is an independent variable, and I t c R L b represents the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order c of a continuous function f : R + R described by
I t c R L f h q = 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 f ( w ) d w .
These equations may be used to illustrate various aspects of the economic dynamic and to model it. The gross domestic product (GDP) or another economic parameter that illustrates the economic status of a state or a particular region can be represented by the y h q variable. Additionally, the equation includes a nonlinear function b h q , y h q that accounts for some of the variables that may influence economic growth. This could include government investment, innovation, investment levels, education, and other factors that affect the total amount of economic output. The economic system’s memory and non-local effects are indicated by the fractional order c. Recognizing that historical values may have an impact on how economic indicators evolve over time, it looks at how past economic conditions have affected the current situation. The initial stage of economic activity at the beginning of the review period can be represented as y ( 0 ) = 0 or yield at the start of an under-review period; I t c R L y ( 1 ) = y ( 0 ) describe a relation among the aggregated values of economic variables within a duration (0 to 1), with an initial change in the economic variable with time at the start of the under-review period.
Suppose Ω = { u : u C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) } along the usual norm on Ω as Ψ = max t [ 0 , 1 ] | Ψ | , for all Ψ Ω . Evidently, Ω ,   ·   is a complete normed space. Further, consider the binary relation I as ( υ , ω ) I if and only if υ h q + ω h q > 0 for all h q [ 0 , 1 ] .
Theorem 5. 
Consider the nonlinear fractional differential equation
D t c C y h q = b h q , y h q , 0 < h q < 1 , 1 < c 2 .
Suppose η : R 2 R is a given function. Assume that the following conditions are satisfied:
1. 
b : [ 0 , 1 ] × R R is continuous;
2. 
There exists τ > 0 , for which b : [ 0 , 1 ] × R R satisfies the following inequality for every υ , ω C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) and h q [ 0 , 1 ] ,
b h q , υ b h q , ω Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 e τ 2 | υ ω |
3. 
k * C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) , satisfying k * ( h q ) + F k * h q > 0 for every h q [ 0 , 1 ] , where F : C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) is defined as:
F υ h q = 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 b ( w , υ ( w ) ) d w + 2 h q Γ ( ν ) 0 1 0 w ( w m ) c 1 b ( r , υ ( r ) ) d r d w ,
for each h q [ 0 , 1 ] ;
4. 
For sequence υ n C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) such that υ n υ in C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) with ( υ n , υ n + 1 ) I for all n N ; therefore, ( υ n , υ ) I for every n N .
Then, (29) has a solution.
Proof. 
For each t [ 0 , 1 ] with ( υ , ω ) I implies F υ h q + F ω h q > 0 . That is, ( F υ , F ω ) I , and so F is I -closed. Notice that for υ Ω is the solution of (29) if it satisfies the following for h q [ 0 , 1 ] :
υ h q = 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 b ( w , υ ( w ) ) d w + 2 h q Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w ( w r ) c 1 b ( r , υ ( r ) ) d r d w .
For each ( υ , ω ) I and for all t [ 0 , 1 ] , we obtain
F υ h q F ω h q = 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 b ( w , υ ( w ) ) d w 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 b ( w , ω ( w ) ) d w + 2 h q Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w ( w r ) c 1 b ( r , υ ( r ) ) d r d w 2 h q Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w ( w r ) c 1 b ( r , υ ( r ) ) d r d w 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 | b ( w , υ ( w ) ) b ( w , ω ( w ) ) | d w + 2 h q Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w ( w r ) c 1 | b ( r , υ ( r ) ) b ( r , υ ( r ) ) | d r d w
Using the inequality (30), we can further write
F υ h q F ω h q 1 Γ ( c ) 0 h q | t w | c 1 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 e τ 2 | υ ( w ) ω ( w ) | d w + 2 h q Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w ( w r ) c 1 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 e τ 2 | υ ( r ) ω ( r ) | d r d w = e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) 0 h q h q w c 1 | υ ( w ) ω ( w ) | d w + 2 e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) 0 1 0 w | w r | c 1 | υ ( r ) ω ( r ) | d r d w e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) υ ω 0 h q h q w c 1 d w + 2 e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) υ ω 0 1 0 w | w r | c 1 d r d w e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) υ ω · Γ ( c ) Γ ( c + 1 ) + 2 e τ 2 Γ ( c + 1 ) 8 Γ ( c ) υ ω · Γ ( c + 1 ) Γ ( c ) Γ ( 1 ) = e τ 2 8 υ ω + e τ 2 4 υ ω e τ 2 υ ω .
This ultimately implies
F υ h q F ω h q e τ 2 υ ω .
By choosing
χ ( u ) = exp ( u ) , u ( 0 , ) ,
we obtain
χ [ F υ h q F ω h q ] χ [ υ ω ] α , ( υ , ω ) I ,
where α = e τ 2 . This shows that T is an enriched ( I , 0 , exp ) -contraction since all hypotheses of Theorem 1 are satisfied. This ultimately ensures a solution to problem (32) and, hence, the solution to the original fractional differential Equation (29). □

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

In conclusion, we have introduced two new classes: enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions and generalized enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions over normed spaces connected with a binary relation. Our results expand on prior ideas and offer a more comprehensive contractive structure, which advances the field of fixed point theory. These classes generalize several well-known contraction types, including χ -contractions, Picard–Banach contractions, enriched contractions, Kannan contractions, Zamfirescu contractions, non-expansive mappings, and ( ρ , χ ) -enriched contractions. We establish fixed point results in normed spaces equipped with binary relations, preserving key symmetric properties, ensuring consistency, and applicability. The Krasnoselskij iteration method is refined to incorporate symmetric constraints, facilitating fixed point identification within these spaces. By appropriately selecting constants in the definition of enriched ( I , ρ , χ ) -contractions, employing a suitable binary relation, or control function χ Θ , our framework generalizes and extends classical fixed point theorems. Illustrative examples highlight the significance of our findings in reinforcing fixed point conditions and demonstrating their broader applicability. Additionally, we apply our findings to guarantee the stability of the production-consumption market equilibrium and the economic growth model. This study provides a new direction in this field and expands the scope of applicable solutions.
It would be interesting in future work to explore numerical simulations, as they could help support and illustrate the theoretical results we’ve established in this study. We hope to include such simulations in future work to better understand how the proposed contraction types perform in practice. Moreover, it would be interesting to generalize these results further by combining enriched and generalized enriched contractions with other fixed point techniques, for example, by replacing the Krasnoselskij iteration with Mann or Ishikawa iterations, adopting Suzuki-type contractions, or introducing suitable control functions. These extensions could provide a broader framework and deeper insights into the behavior of iterative schemes in normed spaces.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W., M.D. and M.Z.; formal analysis, M.W., M.D. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W., M.D. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.W., M.D. and M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.W. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is partially supported by Sanya City Science and Technology Innovation Special Project (Grant No. 2022KJCX22); Scientific Research Foundation of Hainan Tropical Ocean University (Grant No. RHDRCZK202521).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on demand from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Banach, S. Sur les opêrations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux quations intêgrales. Fund. Math. 1922, 3, 133–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nadler, S.B. Multivalued contraction mappings. Pacific J. Math. 1969, 30, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jleli, M.; Samet, B. A new generalization of the Banach contraction principle. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Din, F.U.; Din, M.; Ishtiaq, U.; Sessa, S. Perov fixed-point results on F-contraction mappings equipped with binary relation. Mathematics 2023, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, P.; Gao, R.; Xu, C.; Li, Y.; Akgül, A.; Baleanu, D. Dynamics exploration for a fractional-order delayed zooplankton–phytoplankton system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023, 166, 112975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, C.J.; Liao, M.X.; Farman, M.; Shehzade, A. Hydrogenolysis of glycerol by heterogeneous catalysis: A fractional order kinetic model with analysis. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2024, 91, 635–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, C.J.; Farman, M.; Pang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liao, M.X.; Yao, L.; Shehzad, A.; Amilo, D. Mathematical Analysis and Dynamical Transmission of (SEIrIsR) Model with Different Infection Stages by using fractional operator. Int. J. Biomath. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmad, S.; Saifullah, S. Analysis of the seventh-order Caputo fractional KdV equation: Applications to the Sawada–Kotera–Ito and Lax equations. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2023, 75, 085002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bouzgarrou, S.M.; Znaidia, S.; Noor, A.; Ahmad, S.; Eldin, S.M. Coupled fixed point and hybrid generalized integral transform approach to analyze fractal fractional nonlinear coupled Burgers equation. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iskakova, K.; Alam, M.M.; Ahmad, S.; Saifullah, S.; Akgül, A.; Yılmaz, G. Dynamical study of a novel 4D hyperchaotic system: An integer and fractional order analysis. Math. Comput. Simul. 2023, 208, 219–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berinde, V.; Păcurar, M. Approximating fixed points of enriched contractions in Banach spaces. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2020, 22, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ishtiaq, U.; Din, M.; Rohen, Y.; Alnowibet, K.A.; Popa, I.L. Certain Fixed-Point Results for (e, ψ, ϕ)-Enriched Weak Contractions via Theoretic Order with Applications. Axioms 2025, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Berinde, V.; Păcurar, M. Fixed point theorems for enriched Ćirić-Reich-Rus contractions in Banach spaces and convex metric spaces. Carpathian J. Math. 2021, 37, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anjum, R.; Din, M.; Zhou, M. Fractals of two types of enriched (q, θ)-Hutchinson–Barnsley operators. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2024, 181, 114589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, M.; Anjum, R.; Guo, L.; Din, M.; Cho, Y.J. Equivalence and convergence analysis of fixed point iterative schemes using higher order averaged mappings. Numer. Algorithms 2025, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cominetti, R.; Soto, J.A.; Vaisman, J. On the rate of convergence of Krasnoselskii-Mann iterations and their connection with sums of Bernoullis. Israel J. Math. 2014, 199, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reich, S.; Zaslavski, A.J. Convergence of Krasnoselskii-Mann iterations of nonexpansive operators. Math. Comput. Modelling 2000, 32, 1423–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Babu, G.V.R.; Vara Prasad, K.N.V.V. Comparison of fastness of the convergence among Krasnoselskij, Mann, and Ishikawa iterations in arbitrary real Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2007, 2006, 35704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alam, A.; Imdad, M. Relation-theoretic contraction principle. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2015, 17, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Almalki, Y.; Din, F.U.; Din, M.; Ali, M.U.; Jan, N. Perov-fixed point theorems on a metric space equipped with ordered theoretic relation. AIMS Math. 2022, 11, 20199–20212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Din, F.U.; Alshaikey, S.; Ishtiaq, U.; Din, M.; Sessa, S. Single and Multi-Valued Ordered-Theoretic Perov Fixed-Point Results for θ-Contraction with Application to Nonlinear System of Matrix Equations. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alam, A.; George, R.; Imdad, M. Refinements to relation-theoretic contraction principle. Axioms 2022, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shukla, S.; Radenović, S. Prešić-Boyd-Wong Type Results in Ordered Metric Spaces. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Anal. Appl. 2014, 5, 154–166. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lipschutz, S. Set Theory and Related Topics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maddux, R.D. Relation Algebras; Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 150. [Google Scholar]
  26. Alam, A.; Imdad, M. Nonlinear contractions in metric spaces under locally T-transitive binary relations. Fixed Point Theory 2018, 19, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Samet, B.; Turinici, M. Fixed point theorems on a metric space endowed with an arbitrary binary relation and applications. Commun. Math. Anal. 2012, 13, 82–97. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kolman, B.; Busby, R.C.; Ross, S. Discrete Mathematical Structures; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hussain, N.; Al-Mazrooei, A.; Ahmad, J. Fixed point results for generalized (γ-η)-θ-contractions with applications. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 4197–4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Z.; Jiang, S. Fixed point theorems of JS-quasi-contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2016, 2016, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jleli, M.; Samet, B. A generalized θ-contraction and related fixed point theorems. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 4724–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdou, A.A.N. Fixed point theorems: Exploring applications in fractional differential equations for economic growth. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Joshi, M.; Upadhyay, S.; Tomar, A.; Sajid, M. Geometry and application in economics of fixed point. Symmetry 2023, 15, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McTier, A. Fractional Calculus Fundamentals and Applications in Economic Modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, GA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tejado Balsera, I.; Valério, D.; Pérez Hernández, E.; Valério, N. Fractional calculus in economic growth modelling: The Spanish and Portuguese cases. Int. J. Dynam. Control 2017, 5, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geometrical visualization of Krasnoselskij iteration.
Figure 1. Geometrical visualization of Krasnoselskij iteration.
Fractalfract 09 00324 g001
Table 1. Numerical analysis of Krasnoselskij iteration.
Table 1. Numerical analysis of Krasnoselskij iteration.
IterationElement 1Element 2Element 3Element 4Element 5
00.0000000.5000001.0000001.5000002.000000
10.0000000.2500000.5000000.5000000.250000
20.0000000.1250000.2500000.2500000.125000
30.0000000.0625000.1250000.1250000.062500
40.0000000.0312500.0625000.0625000.031250
50.0000000.0156250.0312500.0312500.015625
60.0000000.0078120.0156250.0156250.007812
70.0000000.0039060.0078120.0078120.003906
80.0000000.0019530.0039060.0039060.001953
90.0000000.0009770.0019530.0019530.000977
100.0000000.0004880.0009770.0009770.000488
110.0000000.0002440.0004880.0004880.000244
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Din, M.; Zhou, M. Some Fixed Point Results for Novel Contractions with Applications in Fractional Differential Equations for Market Equilibrium and Economic Growth. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9050324

AMA Style

Wang M, Din M, Zhou M. Some Fixed Point Results for Novel Contractions with Applications in Fractional Differential Equations for Market Equilibrium and Economic Growth. Fractal and Fractional. 2025; 9(5):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9050324

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Min, Muhammad Din, and Mi Zhou. 2025. "Some Fixed Point Results for Novel Contractions with Applications in Fractional Differential Equations for Market Equilibrium and Economic Growth" Fractal and Fractional 9, no. 5: 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9050324

APA Style

Wang, M., Din, M., & Zhou, M. (2025). Some Fixed Point Results for Novel Contractions with Applications in Fractional Differential Equations for Market Equilibrium and Economic Growth. Fractal and Fractional, 9(5), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9050324

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop