Next Article in Journal
In Pursuit of Fish-Free Feeds: A Multi-Species Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Variations and Convergence Characteristics of Green Technological Progress in China’s Mariculture
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on the Use of Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence for Fish Recognition, Monitoring, and Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on the Key Success Factors for the Transformation of the Traditional Fishery to Recreational Fishery in Taiwan’s Outlying Islands

1
Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan
2
Department of Marine Leisure Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2022, 7(6), 337; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060337
Submission received: 30 October 2022 / Revised: 13 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aquaculture Economics and Fisheries Management II)

Abstract

:
Outlying islands are affected by the environment and economy, and fishery resources are the first to experience these impacts. Therefore, it is necessary to actively and effectively transform traditional fisheries in outlying islands. This is the case in Penghu County (Penghu Islands), located on the outlying islands of Taiwan. The transformation to recreational fishery can increase the additional income of traditional fisheries during the fishing moratorium through the development of recreational fishery boats by fishermen. Recreational fishery means the fishery using fishing vessels for recreational purposes or for passengers to harvest aquatic organisms on the reef or to engage in sightseeing on the islets. Therefore, this study will explore the key factors for the successful route planning of fishermen who switch to recreational fishery boats to assist the fishermen in successfully transitioning and enabling recreational fishery to flourish. In the research, using the method of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) expert questionnaire, it was found that the key factors affecting the route planning of recreational fishery boats are “boat conditions”, “berthing conditions”, “operating environment”, and “sightseeing potential”. After the expert questionnaire, a weight comparison of each level was performed, and it was found that “operating environment” was the most important factor, followed by “tourism potential”. However, the key factors of the “natural environment” and “cultural environment” are more important under the influence of the “operating environment”. Under the influence of “tourism potential”, “attractiveness” is a key factor, as is the “accessibility” factor. In this study, the four main fishing ports in Penghu County were also used for empirical discussion. The study results showed that Magong Fishing Port was the first choice for transformation, followed by Chikan Fishing Port. The results of this study can be used as a reference for fishermen and officials in developing a subsidy scheme for fishing boat operation, and they can be used as a reference for transforming traditional fisheries in outlying islands into recreational fishing to develop recreational fishery boats and leisure tourism industries. This research can help fishermen to attach importance to the development of recreational fishing activities and promote the stable growth of the fishery industry environment.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the rapid transformation of the social and economic structure and the lack of marine resources have resulted in a gradual decline in fishery development [1]. There is a significant development issue regarding how to revitalize the fishery economy. Approximately 60% of the world’s population is concentrated in coastal areas, but most of them are concentrated in large cities, while small-scale coastal fishing villages relying on traditional fishery and aquaculture are facing the phenomena of fishery economic decline and population exodus [2]. In addition, the impact of climate change on natural fishing grounds and unfavorable factors such as industrial pollution of the coastal fishery environment causes traditional fishery operators to experience operational difficulties [3,4]. Therefore, it is very important to actively guide the transformation of fishermen, fishing ports, and fishing villages and revitalize the declining fishery economy.
The traditional fishery is mainly to maximize the benefits of fishing, but the recreational fishery is primarily based on experience and sightseeing. Based on the necessity of fishery transformation and the development trend of leisure life, the development of traditional fishing can be transformed into recreational fishery with high added value to enhance the economic capacity of fishing villages, improve the living environments of fishing villages and increase the income of fishermen, so that the fishery can move towards sustainable development [5,6]. The definition of recreational fishery mainly refers to the planning and utilization of fishery-related natural and human resources and the provision of services so that the participating individuals can achieve the purpose of sightseeing, recreation, and leisure [7,8]. In North America, Europe and Oceania, it is estimated that approximately 10.52% of these individuals are engaged in recreational fishery activities, which is equivalent to 118 million of the recreational fishery population [9]. Recreational fishery seems to have gradually attracted the attention of many countries and regions, and it has gradually expanded and accelerated the development of fisheries [10]. Furthermore, recreational fisheries are increasingly recognized as having certain economic, socio-cultural, and ecological importance in many countries [11,12].
Because the scope of recreational fishery activities is very broad, all people and entities related to freshwater and marine environments and fishing are included [13,14]. Recreational fishery means the fishery using fishing vessels for recreational purposes or for passengers to harvest aquatic organisms on the reef or to engage in sightseeing on the islets. Penghu County, an outlying island in Taiwan, is also facing the problem of the gradual decline of traditional fisheries. Therefore, if the traditional fishery in Penghu County, an outlying island of Taiwan, can be transformed into a recreational fishery, it may be possible to create vitality for the declining traditional fishery. However, how to transform and what the influencing factors are in the process of transformation are the questions that this research wants to understand. Therefore, this study will explore the key factors affecting the transformation of recreational fishery boats in the recreational fishery to understand how future recreational fishery boats can integrate waypoints and form sailing routes with sightseeing benefits. Let us suppose fishing boats can be transformed into recreational fishery boats, providing tourists with more recreational options. In that case, this could also increase fishermen’s income, change the industrial structure and upgrade the original primary industry to the secondary and tertiary industries. In addition, if there is a complete sightseeing route for recreational fishery boats in outlying islands, this will not only attract large numbers of tourists but also promote the development of the local tourism industry, promote outlying island tourism, boost the economic development of outlying islands and increase the job opportunities for fishermen.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Fisheries Policy

Taiwan’s coastal fish catches once reached 400,000 metric tons, with an average output of about 180,000 metric tons in the past five years, with an output value of about 15.9 billion yuan. The main types of fisheries are pick nets, trawl nets, stick nets, gill nets, and longline fishing. The main reasons for affecting fish catches are overfishing, marine pollution, and global climate change. The formulation of Taiwan’s fishery policy is based on the goal of implementing the vision of sustainable development. The aquaculture industry is an important traditional economic industry in Taiwan, and grouper is an important target financial fish species [15]. Over the last five years, the average aquaculture fisheries output has been 290,000 metric tons, with 36.6 billion New Taiwan Dollars. There are more than 50 cultured species; the bulk comprises tilapia, milkfish, clams, oysters, sea bass, grouper, larvae, and white shrimp, accounting for 92% of the total output of aquaculture fisheries. The Fisheries Agency [16] mentioned the following: “In the coastal waters, in order to maintain the coastal habitat environment and fishery resources, guide the transformation of fisheries, and promote the revitalization and development of fishing village industries through the overall development strategy of the local creation. Through the experience of fishing village production, life, and ecology, as well as the promotion of fishing village industry, celebration culture and tourism fish market visits and consumption, and planning fishing village tourism routes, promoting fishing village tourism, culture, and attractions, hoping to promote the concept of fishery sustainability and assist the industry Transformation, effective, rational and sustainable use of marine resources”.

2.2. Recreational Fishery Boats

Traditional fishing is a very important primary industry in island countries [17]. However, the excessive development of Taiwan’s early fishery has led to the decline of fishery resources in the coastal waters. Therefore, the Council of Agriculture of the Executive Yuan has strengthened the management of fishing boats for the sustainable use of marine resources and guided fishermen to transition towards recreational fisheries so that the marine ecological resources in the coastal waters can be recuperated. The income and transformation willingness of fishermen is maintained when traditional fishing is suspended while, at the same time, providing the general public with more diverse marine leisure activities [6].
It is precisely because the government has promoted the fishery transformation policy, the citizens’ economic level is being gradually improved, the fishery resources in the coastal waters are progressively decreasing, and the public now attaches great importance to the sustainable development of marine resources, etc., that the recreational fishery trend has arisen [8]. The recreational fishery is a recreational activity that combines fishing and ecological tourism [18] and is regulated by the Fisheries Law of the Council of Agriculture of the Executive Yuan, the Regulations for Recreational Fishery and the Law of Ships of the Maritime Port Bureau, MOTC.
Article 41 of Chapter 4 of the Fisheries Act of Taiwan states the following: For this Act, the term “recreational fishery” means the fishery using fishing vessels for recreational purposes or passengers to harvest aquatic organisms on the reef or to engage in sightseeing on the islets. Article 2 of the Regulations for Recreational Fishery of the Council of Agriculture of the Executive Yuan defines recreational fishery as follows: the activities of recreational fishery stipulated in these Regulations mean the following activities that a recreational fishing vessel carries passengers on board or to islands or reefs to engage in: (1) Harvesting aquatic animals or plants; (2) Watching fishing operations; (3) Watching natural environment and wildlife; and (4) Whale watching. Article 4 also states, “A recreational fishing vessel referred in these Regulations means an existing fishing vessel that engages in part-time recreational fishery, or is modified or built as a replacement to engage in the recreational fishery”. Due to the unique positioning of recreational fishery boats, they can carry out fishing operations under specific conditions, allowing tourists to watch the marine ecology and fishing boat operations. Therefore, the recreational fishery boats discussed in this study also belong to the outlying island sightseeing boats, one type of sightseeing boat.

2.3. Sailing Route Planning

The sailing route is an important factor in determining the market value of the product [19]. However, in order to achieve a ship with sightseeing benefits, various suitable travel routes and shore sightseeing itineraries must be arranged according to the needs of tourists in different regions [20]. Therefore, when choosing a port of call, more consideration should be given to the location advantage, tourism economy, and tourism resources of the port city, so as to achieve the joint development of land and sea. The key factors of sailing route planning are listed as follows.

2.3.1. Ship Conditions

Different ship types, sizes, and styles will affect the planning of sailing routes, the number of passengers, and the attributes of passengers. Whether the sailing route is on the main route will also affect the passenger capacity. The shipping company designs the sailing route according to logistical factors (such as fuel and sailing time). It then adjusts the ship’s sailing time according to tourists’ needs for shore excursions to form a route plan that balances marine sailing and shore excursions to achieve effective economic efficiency [21,22].

2.3.2. Berthing Conditions

Port facilities are required to operate ships [23]. Well-developed port facilities attract more sailing routes [24]. The development potential determines whether the port’s location is in the core circle [25]. The length of the distance from each port will affect the design of the nodes of the sailing route [26]. The size of the ship, shoreline, berth and water depth, etc., will also affect the size of the ship that can be berthed and indirectly affect the sailing route, channel, and water depth of the ship’s seats [27]. The berthing facilities can facilitate the approach of ships and whether it is convenient for passengers to embark or disembark, and logistics support capabilities are also very important. Supplementary ship fuel, freshwater supply facilities, food, maintenance, and rescue systems provide marine rescue services for ships and tourists to ensure personal and property safety [28]. However, in a competitive market, inappropriate charging strategies can lead to the suspension of sailing routes. Thus, port charges are also important for ship services. Port charges include terminal fees, port taxes, berthing fees, and fuel consumption [29]. Therefore, the berthing conditions are divided into port conditions, port location, port spacing, wharf length, berth conditions, the port logistics support capability, and the charging strategy. Operating costs include crew wages, repairs and maintenance, insurance premiums, and administrative expenses. Voyage costs include fuel consumption, a freshwater supply, port charges, and pilot fees.

2.3.3. Operating Environment

The natural and human environments are the landscape features presented in the port environment [30]. The management mechanism established and the environmental characteristics created by the port management unit or the operator are the resources and information provided to the users [31]. Funding and policy are considered crucial first steps in sustaining the development of recreational fisheries [32]. The development of recreational fisheries in various regions is closely related to local development—that is, recreational fisheries will promote regional economic development and become a global localized industry [33]. However, the success of its marketing strategy will also affect local development. The cooperation between ship operators and the tourism sector can increase passenger occupancy and economic benefits [34].

2.3.4. Tourism Potential

The term “tourist attraction” is very broad and usually refers to the collection of all attractions that attract tourists to a destination [35]. Gee et al. suggest that attractions can be divided into six categories: natural resources, human resources, recreational facilities, events, innovative activities, and psychological attractions [36]. Cooper et al. pointed out that tourism development is an inter-departmental and inter-disciplinary industry, combining diversified activities such as central and local government departments, private enterprises, non-profit organizations, and communities, and it is also a gathering of a comprehensive industry, where related industries gather and develop together [37]. A successful tourist destination must have six components: attractions, accessibility, amenities, available packages, activities, and ancillary services [38]. Therefore, an island recreational fishery boat with sightseeing benefits also needs to have a tourist attraction.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Areas

The study discussed the key factors of outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats. Therefore, using the literature mentioned above review of the sailing route planning content, Penghu County (Penghu Islands), an outlying island in Taiwan, was selected as the study area. Figure 1 shows that Penghu County (Penghu Islands) is an outlying island located in the western sea of Taiwan. It is approximately 60 km long from north to south and about 40 km wide from east to west, and it has a total land area of roughly 128 square kilometers. The four major fishing ports in Penghu County are Jibei Fishing Port, Chikan Fishing Port, Magong Fishing Port, and Tanmen Fishing Port (as shown in Figure 1). These ports were initially designed as fishing ports. Still, due to the development of tourism in Penghu County, they have provided multi-functional berthing for transportation boats, yachts, and fishing boats.
Table 1 shows the current number of fishing households, number of fishing boats, operating fishing grounds, main fish species, hardware facilities, operating environment, and tourism potential in each fishing port. Magong Fishing Port and Chikan Fishing Port are the largest and second largest. Jibei Fishing Port and Tanmen Fishing Port are crowded due to a lack of fishing port space during the peak tourist season. In addition, it can be seen from Table 1 that Magong Fishing Port can accommodate the most significant number of fishing boats and fishing households. Jibei Fishing Port and Chikan Fishing Port mainly focus on shallow sea aquaculture. Chikan Fishing Port is rich in clove fish. Every year, Chikan Fishing Port hosts clove fish season activities. Jibei and Chikan Fishing Ports were developed earlier and are suitable for water activities, so there are also more packaged itineraries and water activities. In addition, the island and fishing village atmosphere of recreational fishery boat operation field 1 is attractive. In recreational fishery boat operation fields 2 and 3, in the past, fishermen mainly focused on coastal fisheries, and they frequently led fishing and hunting activities. Magong Fishing Port is located in operation field 2, which is rich in cultural relics, military relics, natural landscapes, and coastal beach water activities. Therefore, Penghu fishermen have a strong opportunity to transform traditional fishery into recreational fishery through the conditions and resources mentioned above.

3.2. Research Methods

With regard to the main fishing ports in the study area, local government officials, local ship operators, and scholars specializing in shipping and marine tourism were invited to participate in expert questionnaire surveys. Quantitative questionnaire analysis was carried out with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to clarify the priorities of sailing route planning for future island recreational fishery boats.
An advantage of the AHP method is that it is easy to operate, it can comprehensively capture the opinions of experts or decision makers, and it has a quantitative theoretical basis [39]. The AHP method is tested for consistency, showing whether the consensus of expert groups or decision makers is biased. The disadvantage of the AHP method is that it will increase the complexity of the pairwise comparison between variables when there are many variables [40]. The operational procedure of the AHP method includes three steps, as detailed below [41].
Step 1: Establishing a pairwise comparison matrix. The main diagonal of the pairwise comparison matrix A is the comparison of the factors themselves, so they are all 1. The upper triangular of the pairwise comparison matrix is the comparison result measured by n factors. The value of the lower triangle is the reciprocal of the relative position of the upper triangle. The pairwise comparison matrix is generally given below.
A = 1 a 12 a 13 a 1 n a 21 1 a 23 a 2 n a 31 a 32 1 a 3 n a n 1 a n 2 a n 3 1 = 1 a 12 a 13 a 1 n 1 a 12 1 a 23 a 2 n 1 a 13 1 a 23 1 a 3 n 1 a 1 n 1 a 2 n 1 a 3 n 1
where a i j represents the comparison value obtained by the decision maker after comparing the decision factors i and j in pairs, and a i j = 1/ a i j .
Step 2: Obtaining the largest eigenvalue of the pairwise comparison matrix. After obtaining the pairwise comparison matrix, use the eigenvalue solution method in numerical analysis to obtain the eigenvector and obtain the largest eigenvalue according to the eigenvector. The row geometric mean method (RGMM) is a suitable eigenvector estimation method. The row geometric mean method is defined below.
p i = j = 1 n a i j 1 n i = 1 n j = 1 n a i j 1 n   i ,   j = 1 ,   2 ,   3 , n
where n represents the number of decision factors. The maximum eigenvalue can be obtained by the following formula:
λ m a x = 1 n i = 1 n A p i p i
Step 3: Performing a pairwise comparison matrix consistency test. Saaty suggested the use of the consistency index (C.I.) and consistency ratio (C.R.) to test the consistency of the matrix [42]. The C.I. and C.R. can be calculated as below:
C . I . = λ m a x n n 1
C . R . = C . I . R . I .
where R.I. is the random index (R.I.). The R.I. value is related to the order of the matrix, and the corresponding value can be found according to the order of the matrix [42]. As Saaty (1980) suggested, higher consistency indicates that the value of the matrix is acceptable [42]. Generally, when C.R. is less than or equal to 0.1 and C.I. is less than or equal to 0.1, the model is considered to pass the consistency test.

3.3. Research Variables

First, through in-depth interviews, the respondents were asked to express their opinions and thoughts on possible factors affecting the planning of the sailing route for the outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats, and the suitability of each factor was evaluated. This method enables respondents to answer questions in-depth. It overcomes key information that cannot be obtained through closed questionnaires, thus enabling empirical results to identify specific problems and solutions [43]. In-depth interviews were conducted in this study from 16 September 2021, to 30 September 2021. A total of 6 representatives from industry, government, and academia were interviewed, as shown in Table 2. The key factors collated from the interview content and a literature review of the respondents included four influencing levels (ship conditions, berthing conditions, operating environment, and tourism potential) and 20 influencing factors, as shown in Table 3.

3.4. Expert Questionnaire Design

Through the above research, we investigated and discussed the four influencing levels and 20 influencing factors that affect the sailing route planning of the outlying islands. Then, a complete hierarchical structure was established. Next, the questionnaire design of the AHP method was carried out. The questionnaire mainly included six parts: research description, questionnaire answering description and example, importance intensity standard, and interpretation of influencing factors and items. The AHP method uses the scaling ratio to derive the principal eigenvectors of the paired ratio matrix to find the relative weights among the items at each level. The evaluation scale can be divided into five grades, namely, equal strength, slightly stronger, strong, extremely strong, and absolutely strong, which are assigned values of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, respectively, while intermediate values of 2, 4, 6 and 8 are assigned between the two scales. We then asked the expert group to select the appropriate value. A scale to the left indicates that the items in the left column are more important than the items in the right column. Conversely, a scale to the right indicates that items in the right column are more important than those in the left column.

3.5. Expert Questionnaire Object

The AHP method relies on professional judgment, and this study selected 20 experts, including those from industry, government, and academia. This study conducted the expert questionnaire survey on 15 October 2021. A total of 20 questionnaires were sent out. After collection, five were returned by government officials, five by industry officials, and five by scholars, as shown in Table 4.

4. Results and Discussion

A weighted analysis was performed based on the data from the AHP expert questionnaire. The research results show that the consistency index (C.I.) and consistency ratio (C.R.) of the four impact levels (ship condition, berthing condition, operating environment, and tourism potential) are C.I. = 0.0329 and C.R. = 0.0365, respectively. Both C.I. and C.R. are less than 0.1, indicating that they meet the requirements of the consistency test, and this also shows that the impact level of this study has passed the consistency test. The analysis results of the most important key factors affecting the planning of the sailing route of the outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats are explained as follows and shown in Table 5.

4.1. Analysis Results at the Impact Level

The relative weight value of the impact level that affects the sailing route planning of outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats is the highest in the order of operating environment (0.320), followed by tourism potential (0.256) and ship conditions (0.238), and the lowest is obtained for berthing conditions (0.186). From this, it can be seen that the expert group believes that the operating environment is a necessary condition for the planning of the sailing route of the outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats. Lekakou et al. obtained similar results, where the operational environment was an important income generator for tourist areas [44]. The operating environment includes factors such as nature, culture, policy, society, and marketing. The quality of the operating environment represents an important factor affecting the sailing route planning of recreational fishery boats on outlying islands. The environment includes not only the outlying islands being affected by the northeast monsoon, which may lead to concerns about the safety of ships but also the local government’s policy promotion and implementation, as well as the attitudes of the public and industry, which all affect its weight value. However, if the government formulates relevant regulations in the future or the industry formulates activity plans, we can first investigate their environmental impact factors, and it is very important to prioritize adjustments and improvements to solve the related problems. This study also found that the operating environment has a higher index weight value regarding the impact level, so it has a joint impact on the overall weight value. Therefore, the influencing factors in the operating environment, including the natural environment, cultural environment, and social environment, are all given the highest priority in the overall ranking. In addition to the importance of the natural beauty and cultural connotations of outlying island tourism, it is also important to enhance the attractiveness of the base. Formica and Uysal also found that only attractive resources can attract recreational ships and tourists [45].

4.2. Determination of Key Factors at the Level of Ship Conditions

Among the key factors regarding ship conditions, the ship size (0.279) is the most important, and the ship style (0.140) is the least important. It can be seen that experts believe that the size of the ship is an important factor affecting whether the port can be berthed, so the size of the ship is the most important key factor under the conditions of the ship (Rodrigue and Notteboom [46] also mentioned this argument), followed by the ship facilities that provide related entertainment hardware facilities (0.263). In the case of the transformation of fishing boats, in addition to meeting the basic physiological and safety needs of passengers, comfortable and suitable equipment is also required so that passengers can be satisfied in the recreation process. The index weight value of ship style (0.140) is the lowest, indicating that ships with different characteristics are not valued. In addition, whether it is on the main route (0.166) and the time of sailing (0.151) are not the most important key factors.

4.3. Determination of Key Factors at the Level of Berthing Conditions

Among the key factors in berthing conditions, the most important are the port conditions (0.359), and the least important is the distance between ports (0.051). From this, it can be seen that experts believe that a perfect port can enable ships to berth smoothly and quickly. Hence, port conditions are the most important and necessary for berthing conditions, while the distance between ports is not a key factor.

4.4. Determination of Key Factors at the Level of Operating Environment

In terms of the key factors of the operating environment, there are two indicators with higher weights, namely, the natural environment (0.305) and the cultural environment (0.259), while the lowest is attributed to the marketing environment (0.115). From this, it can be seen that if there is no suitable climate, pleasant scenery, historical sites, or fascinating local culture on the sailing route of the island’s recreational fishery boat, it is impossible to attract the island recreational fishery boat to berth (as shown in [33]). Although local government support, or whether the sailing route has a joint operation alliance with the industry, is the main concern of industry officials at present, the index weight results of the marketing environment (0.069) and the policy environment (0.053) show that their importance is relatively lower. It is worth noting that in terms of the social environment (0.204), residents’ attitudes, the quality of employees, and safety are also key factors.

4.5. Determination of Key Factors at the Level of Tourism Potential

Among the key factors of tourism potential, the most important is an attraction (0.306), and the least important is subsidized services (0.074). Recreational resources with tourism potential need to be relatively attractive. Indeed, whether it is sightseeing, leisure, or recreation, recreational resources depend on the participation of people and their desire to visit an attraction in order to achieve this behavioral pattern. Therefore, it can be seen that the attractiveness of the strongholds included in the sailing route planning of outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats is necessary for route planning in this study. As Huertas et al. noted, a successful tourist destination must have tourist attractions [39]. In terms of subsidized services (0.074), whether services are provided to passengers (including food, internet, consultation, etc.) is not an important key factor. However, this study suggests that if the research object of this questionnaire is adjusted to consumers, different results may be obtained; our findings can also be used as a suggestion and reference for follow-up research. In addition, the index weight value of the accessibility (0.220) of the tourism potential is also high, so it is necessary to pay attention to the accessibility of shore excursions, accommodation, and entertainment at the waypoints where ships are docked. The package itinerary (0.163) and the activities (0.156) are not important factors affecting the planning of the sailing route, including the characteristics of hinterland tourism (including tourism resources and connections) and whether there are water activities, nearshore activities, land activities, etc.
Table 5. AHP weight analysis results.
Table 5. AHP weight analysis results.
LevelFactorIndex WeightIndividual RankingOverall WeightOverall Ranking
Ship Conditions
(0.238)
On the Main Route0.16630.03912
Ship Facilities0.26320.0637
Ship Size0.27910.0665
Ship Style0.14050.03316
Sailing Time0.15140.03615
Berthing Conditions
(0.186)
Port Conditions0.37910.0704
Distance between Ports0.13150.02420
Berth Conditions0.15540.02919
Logistical Support0.17320.03217
Charging Strategy0.16230.03018
Operating Environment
(0.320)
Natural Environment0.30510.0981
Cultural Environment0.25920.0832
Policy Environment0.11740.03813
Social Environment0.20430.0656
Marketing Environment0.11550.03714
Tourism Potential
(0.256)
Attractiveness0.30610.0783
Accessibility0.22020.0568
Subsidized Services0.15450.04011
Package Itinerary0.16330.0429
Activity0.15640.04010

4.6. Discussion of Application Results

The fishing port is the production base of the marine fishery, while the recreational fishing port is the main body of the development of recreational fishery. By carefully assessing the transformation of traditional fishing ports into recreational fishing ports, one can combine fishery development and recreation into recreational fisheries, which is the main policy for the transformation of fishery management methods.
This study selected four major fishing ports in Penghu County (Jibei Fishing Port, Chikan Fishing Port, Magong Fishing Port, and Tanmen Fishing Port, as shown in Figure 1), as the object of the empirical case study. Based on the research results in Table 5 and the evaluation criteria of each key factor, after examining the existing conditions of the four major fishing ports, an evaluation of the transformation of traditional fisheries to recreational fisheries in the four major fishing ports was carried out. The evaluation value of each key factor ranged from 1 to 9. When the existing conditions of the evaluated object are more in line with its key factors, the evaluation value will be larger, and vice versa. After evaluating the four main fishing ports, the evaluation values of each key factor were as listed in Table 6.
It can be seen from Table 6 that the Magong Fishing Port has a higher overall weight value (6.509). Since Magong Fishing Port has strong tourism potential, it is a major fishing port to introduce recreational fishing to develop recreational fishery boat route planning. Magong Fishing Port can conduct island visits on the blue road at sea and create multiple industries and activities, such as box net visits, fishing village life experiences, fishing port construction tours, oyster festivals, and fishing for anglers. The overall weight value (4.615) of Chikan Fishing Port is the second highest. Table 6 shows that the operating environment of Chikan Fishing Port is high, the berthing conditions and ship conditions are acceptable, and the sightseeing potential is low. Therefore, if Chikan Fishing Port can take advantage of its natural environment planning and other conditions and increase its entertainment or package activities through tourism resources, it will also have the opportunity to transform and develop recreational fisheries.
The global fishery resources are depleted, and fishermen’s catches are decreasing daily [1,47]. There are cases in many countries of the transformation of traditional fishing ports—for example, the Haedomari Fishing Port in Nagasaki Prefecture in Japan; the Tobishima Fishing Port in Yamagata Prefecture in Japan; the Tarumi Fishing Port in Kobe City in Japan, which combines yachts and exotic styles; and the Himi Fishing Port in Toyama Prefecture in Japan, which is famous for its fixed-net fisheries and fresh fish festivals [48]. The San Francisco Fisherman’s Wharf and the historic Baltimore Inner Harbor in the United States are both successful cases of transformation [49]. Using fishery transformation, fishermen can increase their incomes, maintain their livelihoods and achieve sustainable fisheries [5]. In order to enable fishermen to develop various recreational fishing activities, it is also necessary to replace older fishing boats through government subsidies to introduce new styles to the fishing port. Therefore, through the research results of Table 5 and the practical application presented in Table 6 in this study, suggestions such as the possibility (feasible) of transforming traditional fishing ports into recreational fishing to develop recreational fishery boats can be effectively put forward.

5. Conclusions

Although ship conditions are important factors that affect the market value of products, their influence is weaker than that of berthing conditions, operating environment, and tourism potential. However, it is worth noting that, under the conditions of the ship, the entertainment facilities provided and the size of the ship are the primary considerations. In addition, in the operational concept of shipping management on the main route, it is necessary to adopt the shortest and most economical route between the two ends as the main route. This study suggests that the sailing range of outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats lies between adjacent islands in the same country. Therefore, whether the planned sailing route lies along the main route and how much time is required to sail are not the primary considerations in sailing route planning.
Outlying islands’ attraction lies in their unique coastal scenery, geological environment, wildlife, and other landscapes. Attraction is a quality that tourists value in a tourist destination. This quality comes from specific characteristics or attributes within the tourist destination, which arouse tourists’ interest and encourage them to visit. An attractive natural and cultural environment is more important than good port conditions. The results of this research show that the weight of attraction in tourism potential ranks second only to the natural and cultural environments in terms of total weight. Thus, some resources are not attractive, and their original natural and cultural resources must be effectively planned and their most important attributes identified so as to appeal to travelers and industry players alike.
The results of this study indicate that the operating environment and tourism potential are important for the planning of the sailing route of the outlying islands’ recreational fishery boats. In the process of interviewing experts, some interviewers stated that the most important factor for sightseeing ships on outlying islands is to allow ships to berth. However, this study suggests that if only the construction of hardware facilities is needed, the benefits of recreational fishery boats that wish to develop recreational fishing cannot be achieved, because a unique environment combining nature and culture is needed to increase the attractiveness of the base and cooperate with a shore excursion, so that guests can easily access it, regardless of whether it is accommodation or entertainment. This argument can also be supported by the empirical case analysis results (that is, the Magong Fishing Port has great potential for tourism and is very suitable for a transition to recreational fishing so as to develop a major fishing port for recreational fishery boat route planning).
However, if the port and ship conditions are good, this is also advantageous for the development of outlying islands’ tourism. In addition, perfect port facilities, berthing facilities, coastlines, berths and water depths, as well as ship size, recreational facilities, tonnage and passenger carrying capacity, are all aspects that need to be paid attention in developing outlying islands for recreational fishery boat tourism. Therefore, if traditional fishing boats are to be transformed into recreational fishery boats, it is necessary to consider the number of tourists that can be carried and whether the entertainment equipment provided is comprehensive. However, the distance between ports, berth conditions and even charging strategies are different from those considered in general cargo route planning, because these are relatively less important when it comes to tourist attractions and recreational activities such as entertainment.
Although this study has made relevant research results through the collection of a lot of literature, expert opinion surveys, and in-depth interviews, the conclusions mentioned above are all completed in a limited number of samples. Therefore, the conclusion proposed in this study is not an entirely closed argument conclusion but an indicative opinion conclusion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-M.L., H.-C.Y. and C.-K.Y.; methodology, H.-C.Y. and C.-K.Y.; formal analysis, H.-C.Y. and C.-K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-C.Y. and C.-K.Y.; review and editing, J.-M.L. and H.-C.Y.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data will be available on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gholami, Z.; Mortazavi, M.S.; Karbassi, A. Environmental risk assessment of harmful algal blooms case study: Persian Gulf and Oman Sea located at Hormozgan Province, Iran. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2019, 25, 271–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. van Putten, I.; Cvitanovic, C.; Fulton, E.A. A changing marine sector in Australian coastal communities: An analysis of inter and intra sectoral industry connections and employment. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2016, 131, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haseena, M.; Malik, M.F.; Javed, A.; Arshad, S.; Asif, N.; Zulfiqar, S.; Hanif, J. Water pollution and human health. Environ. Risk Assess. Remediat. 2017, 1, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mehana, E.-S.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Elblehi, S.S.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Naiel, M.A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A. Biomonitoring of Heavy Metal Pollution Using Acanthocephalans Parasite in Ecosystem: An Updated Overview. Animals 2020, 10, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sowman, M.; Sunde, J.; Raemaekers, S.; Schultz, O. Fishing for equality: Policy for poverty alleviation for South Africa’s small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 2014, 46, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, C.L.; Chang, Y.C. A transition beyond traditional fisheries: Taiwan’s experience with developing fishing tourism. Marine Policy 2017, 79, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elmer, L.K.; Kelly, L.A.; Rivest, S.; Steell, S.C.; Twardek, W.M.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Arlinghaus, R.; Bennett, J.R.; Cooke, S.J. Angling into the Future: Ten Commandments for Recreational Fisheries Science, Management, and Stewardship in a Good Anthropocene. Environ. Manag. 2017, 60, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bower, S.D.; Aas, Ø.; Arlinghaus, R.; Beard, T.D.; Cowx, I.G.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Freire, K.M.F.; Potts, W.M.; Sutton, S.G.; Cooke, S.J. Knowledge Gaps and Management Priorities for Recreational Fisheries in the Developing World. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020, 28, 518–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arlinghaus, R.; Tillner, R.; Bork, M. Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialised countries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2015, 22, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Holder, P.E.; Jeanson, A.L.; Lennox, R.J.; Brownscombe, J.W.; Arlinghaus, R.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Bower, S.D.; Hyder, K.; Hunt, L.M.; Fenichel, E.P.; et al. Preparing for a changing future in recreational fisheries: 100 research questions for global consideration emerging from a horizon scan. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2020, 30, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hughes, R.M. Recreational fisheries in the USA: Economics, management strategies, and ecological threats. Fish. Sci. 2015, 81, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hyder, K.; Maravelias, C.D.; Kraan, M.; Radford, Z.; Prellezo, R. Marine recreational fisheries—Current state and future opportunities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 77, 2171–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gallagher, A.J.; Hammerschlag, N.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Cooke, S.J. Shark recreational fisheries: Status, challenges, and research needs. Ambio 2017, 46, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cooke, S.J.; Twardek, W.M.; Lennox, R.J.; Zolderdo, A.J.; Bower, S.D.; Gutowsky, L.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Arlinghaus, R.; Beard, D. The nexus of fun and nutrition: Recreational fishing is also about food. Fish Fish. 2018, 19, 201–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Y.M.; Kuo, C.E. Study on the Application of Intelligent Farming in the Development Strategy of Grouper Aquaculture Industry. Fish. Ext. Rep. 2019, 49, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisheries Agency. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Long-Term Development Strategy of Fishery Policy. January 2022. Available online: https://www.fa.gov.tw/view.php?theme=web_structure&id=1731 (accessed on 8 November 2022).
  17. Gagern, A.; Bergh, J.V.D. A critical review of fishing agreements with tropical developing countries. Mar. Policy 2013, 38, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fei, J.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Jiang, K.; Li, P.; Ye, G. Spatiotemporal coupling coordination measurement on islands’ economy-environment-tourism system. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 212, 105793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, G. Junks to Mare Clausum: China-Maluku Connections in the Spice Wars, 1607–1622. Itinerario 2020, 44, 196–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Burbano, D.V.; Meredith, T.C. Effects of tourism growth in a UNESCO World Heritage Site: Resource-based livelihood diversification in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1270–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shelmerdine, R.L. Teasing out the detail: How our understanding of marine AIS data can better inform industries, developments, and planning. Mar. Policy 2015, 54, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rong, H.; Teixeira, A.; Soares, C.G. Data mining approach to shipping route characterization and anomaly detection based on AIS data. Ocean Eng. 2020, 198, 106936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okoroji, L.I.; Ukpere, W.I. The effectiveness of the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) in Nigeria. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 5, 1426–1430. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nguyen, P.N.; Woo, S.-H. Port connectivity and competition among container ports in Southeast Asia based on Social Network Analysis and TOPSIS. Marit. Policy Manag. 2021, 49, 779–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cerreta, M.; di Girasole, E.G.; Poli, G.; Regalbuto, S. Operationalizing the Circular City Model for Naples’ City-Port: A Hybrid Development Strategy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kashiha, M.; Thill, J.C.; Depken II, C.A. Shipping route choice across geographies: Coastal vs. landlocked countries. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 91, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, B.; Liu, X.; Jing, Q.; Lyu, H.; Yin, Y. Estimation of berthing state of maritime autonomous surface ships based on 3D LiDAR. Ocean Eng. 2022, 251, 111131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Villa-Caro, R.; Carral, J.C.; Fraguela, J.Á.; López, M.; Carral, L. A review of ship mooring systems. Brodogr. Teor. I Praksa Brodogr. I Pomor. Teh. 2018, 69, 123–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Darbra, R.; Ronza, A.; Stojanovic, T.; Wooldridge, C.; Casal, J. A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andersson, K.; Baldi, F.; Brynolf, S.; Lindgren, J.F.; Granhag, L.; Svensson, E. Shipping and the Environment. In Shipping and the Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 3–27. [Google Scholar]
  31. Silber, G.K.; Adams, J.D. Vessel Operations in the Arctic, 2015–2017. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arlinghaus, R.; Cooke, S.J.; Sutton, S.G.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Potts, W.; Freire, K.D.M.F.; Alós, J.; da Silva, E.T.; Cowx, I.G.; van Anrooy, R. Recommendations for the future of recreational fisheries to prepare the social-ecological system to cope with change. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2016, 23, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ditton, R.B.; Holland, S.M.; Anderson, D.K. Recreational Fishing as Tourism. Fisheries 2002, 27, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaos, S.R.; Pallis, A.A.; Marchán, S.S.; Roca, D.P.; Conejo, A.S.-A. Economies of scale in cruise shipping. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2021, 23, 674–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pantano, E.; Priporas, C.V.; Stylos, N. ‘You will like it!’ using open data to predict tourists’ response to a tourist attraction. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gee, C.Y.; Makens, J.C.; Choy, D.J.L. The Travel Industry, 3rd ed.; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cooper, C.; Fletcher, J.; Fyall, A.; Gilbert, D.; Wanhill, S. Tourism Principles and Practice, 4th ed.; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. Huertas, A.; Moreno, A.; My, T.H. Which destination is smarter? Application of the (SA) 6 framework to establish a ranking of smart tourist destinations. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Tour. (IJIST) 2019, 4, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, L.; Lavagnolo, M.C.; Bai, H.; Pivato, A.; Raga, R.; Yue, D. Environmental and economic assessment of leachate concentrate treatment technologies using analytic hierarchy process. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, A.; Kumar, M. Implementation of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision-making tool for selection of materials for the robot arm. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2019, 14, 2727–2733. [Google Scholar]
  41. Awang, A.; Mohd, W.R.W.; Abdullah, L.; Lee, S.T. Assessing the Sustainable Fishery-based Industry in Malaysia Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Terengganu, Malaysia, 2020; Volume 494, p. 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980; ISBN 0-07-054371-2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yukalang, N.; Clarke, B.; Ross, K. Solid Waste Management Solutions for a Rapidly Urbanizing Area in Thailand: Recommendations Based on Stakeholder Input. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lekakou, M.; Pallis, A.; Vaggelas, G. Which homeport in Europe: The cruise industry’s selection criteria. Tourismos 2009, 4, 215–240. [Google Scholar]
  45. Formica, S.; Uysal, M. Destination attractiveness based on supply and demand evaluations: An analytical framework. J. Travel Res. 2006, 44, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rodrigue, J.-P.; Notteboom, T. The geography of cruises: Itineraries, not destinations. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 38, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan, H.; Chen, P.; Yu, J.; Li, X. Assessment of Quality of Fishery Resources in the Northeastern South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ishikawa, S.; Hori, M.; Kurokura, H. A Strategy for Fisheries Resources Management in Southeast Asia: A Case Study of an Inland Fishery around Tonle Sap Lake in Cambodia. Aqua-BioSci. Monogr. 2017, 10, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kostopoulou, S. On the Revitalized Waterfront: Creative Milieu for Creative Tourism. Sustainability 2013, 5, 4578–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution map of Penghu County (Penghu Islands).
Figure 1. Distribution map of Penghu County (Penghu Islands).
Fishes 07 00337 g001
Table 1. Outline description of the four main fishing ports in Penghu County.
Table 1. Outline description of the four main fishing ports in Penghu County.
Fishing PortJibei Fishing PortChikan Fishing PortMagong Fishing PortTanmen Fishing Port
Fishing Port SpacePort Length (m)1877172862041001
Berth Area (hectare)7.68.69352.72
Water Depth (m)333.5~43
Number of fishing boats that can be accommodated807527044
Number of existing power fishing boats237414181
Number of fishing households14883993746
Fishing boat operation and fishing ground (fish species)Shallow sea aquaculture is mainly used, and the yield of fish includes oysters and other marine fish. The Chikan Fishing Port is rich in clove fish.Dominated by cage net culture and oyster production.Dominated by gill nets; other marine fish production is the highest.
Fishing Port FacilitiesWaterYesYesYesNo
PowerYesYesYesNo
FuelNoYesYesYes
IceNoYesYesNo
Recreational fishery boat operation field (see Figure 1)Operation field 1Operation fields 1 and 2Operation fields 2 and 3Operation field 3
Type of berthed vesselFishing boats, transportation boats, yachts, sightseeing boatsFishing boats, recreational fishing boats, transportation boats, recreational boats, sightseeing speedboatsFishing boats, recreational fishing boats, transportation boats, yachts, sightseeing boatsFishing boats, yachts
Recreational facilitiesVisitor Center, Waiting RoomVisitor Center, Pavilion, Observation Deck, Parking LotVisitor Center, Ticket Booth, Transportation Boat Terminal, Waiting Room, Parking Lot, Convenience StoreWaiting Room, Pavilion, Parking Lot
Table 2. Basic information of respondents in expert interviews.
Table 2. Basic information of respondents in expert interviews.
ExpertIndustry CategoryJob Tenure
Expert 1Travel Agency10 years
Expert 2Bed and Breakfast7 years
Expert 3Port Bureau25 years
Expert 4Penghu National Scenic Area Administration10 years
Expert 5National Penghu University of Science and Technology30 years
Expert 6National Taiwan Ocean University8 years
Table 3. Important factors affecting the sailing route planning of outlying islands’ recreational fishing boats.
Table 3. Important factors affecting the sailing route planning of outlying islands’ recreational fishing boats.
LevelFactorDescription
Ship ConditionsOn the Main RouteTake the shortest and most economical route between the two ends as the main route.
Ship FacilitiesProvide entertainment hardware.
Ship SizeAffects the port of call on the route, including tonnage, number of passengers, etc.
Ship StyleShips with different features are suitable for different sailing routes.
Sailing TimeSailing time at sea.
Berthing ConditionsPort ConditionsPerfect port facilities need to match with operating ship facilities.
Distance between PortsAffects sailing route node design.
Berth ConditionsInclude berthing facilities, shoreline, berth and water depth, etc.
Logistical SupportPort logistics support capabilities (such as fueling and water supply facilities, ship supplies, fresh water supply, rescue system).
Charging StrategyIncludes terminal fees, port taxes, berthing fees, fuel consumption, etc.
Operating EnvironmentNatural EnvironmentClimate, scenery.
Cultural EnvironmentAncient relics, local culture.
Policy EnvironmentLocal government policy
Social EnvironmentResident attitudes, quality of employees, employment opportunities, labor price, population, consumption level, GDP, security.
Marketing EnvironmentSailing routes or business alliances, etc.
Tourism PotentialAttractiveStronghold attraction.
AccessibilityShore excursions, accommodation and entertainment accessibility.
Subsidized ServicesProvide services to passengers (including food, internet, consultation, etc.).
Package ItineraryThe characteristics of hinterland tourism (including tourism resources and connectivity, etc.).
ActivityWater activities, nearshore activities, land activities, etc.
Table 4. Basic information of respondents in AHP expert questionnaire.
Table 4. Basic information of respondents in AHP expert questionnaire.
ExpertIndustry CategoryJob Tenure
Scholar 1Department of Marine Navigation, National Penghu Marine and Fishery Vocational High School10 years
Scholar 2Department of Marine Navigation, National Penghu Marine and Fishery Vocational High School21 years
Scholar 3Department of Hospitality Management, National Penghu University of Science and Technology7 years
Scholar 4Department of Marine Navigation, National Penghu Marine and Fishery Vocational High School6 years
Scholar 5Department of Tourism and Leisure, National Penghu University of Science and Technology20 years
Official 1Department of Recreation, Penghu National Scenic Area Administration4 years
Official 2Department of Recreation, Penghu National Scenic Area Administration7 years
Official 3Port Bureau12 years
Official 4Department of Recreation, Penghu National Scenic Area Administration3 years
Official 5Department of Management, Penghu National Scenic Area Administration6 years
Industry 1Travel Agency6 years
Industry 2Travel Agency1.5 years
Industry 3Travel Agency1 years
Industry 4Fisheries practitioners8 years
Industry 5Bed and Breakfast4 years
Table 6. The weight analysis results of the application of AHP for each factor in the fishing port of Penghu County.
Table 6. The weight analysis results of the application of AHP for each factor in the fishing port of Penghu County.
LevelFactorOverall WeightJibei Fishing PortChikan Fishing PortMagong Fishing PortTanmen Fishing Port
Ship Conditions
(0.238)
On the Main Route (A1)0.0393597
Ship Facilities (A2)0.0631573
Ship Size (A3)0.0663791
Ship Style (A4)0.0333571
Sailing Time (A5)0.0365351
Berthing Conditions
(0.186)
Port Conditions (B1)0.0701573
Distance between Ports (B2)0.0245375
Berthing Conditions (B3)0.0293791
Logistical Support (B4)0.0323771
Charging Strategy (B5)0.0305535
Operating Environment
(0.320)
Natural Environment (C1)0.0987531
Cultural Environment (C2)0.0831535
Policy Environment (C3)0.0385555
Social Environment (C4)0.0653593
Marketing Environment (C5)0.0375793
Tourism Potential
(0.256)
Attractiveness (D1)0.0787153
Accessibility (D2)0.0565391
Subsidized Services (D3)0.0405593
Package Itinerary (D4)0.0425371
Activity (D5)0.0407371
Sum of overall weight value (W)4.0354.6156.5092.639
Ranking3214
Note: Sum of overall weight value (W) = 0.039 × (A1) + 0.063 × (A2) + 0.066 × (A3) + 0.033 × (A4) + 0.036 × (A5) + 0.070 × (B1) + 0.024 × (B2) + 0.029 × (B3) + 0.032 × (B4) + 0.030 × (B5) + 0.098 × (C1) + 0.083 × (C2) + 0.038 × (C3) + 0.065 × (C4) + 0.037 × (C5) + 0.078 × (D1) + 0.056 × (D2) + 0.040 × (D3) + 0.042 × (D4) + 0.040 × (D5).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, C.-K.; Yang, H.-C.; Lee, J.-M. Research on the Key Success Factors for the Transformation of the Traditional Fishery to Recreational Fishery in Taiwan’s Outlying Islands. Fishes 2022, 7, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060337

AMA Style

Yang C-K, Yang H-C, Lee J-M. Research on the Key Success Factors for the Transformation of the Traditional Fishery to Recreational Fishery in Taiwan’s Outlying Islands. Fishes. 2022; 7(6):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Chih-Kai, Han-Chung Yang, and Jie-Min Lee. 2022. "Research on the Key Success Factors for the Transformation of the Traditional Fishery to Recreational Fishery in Taiwan’s Outlying Islands" Fishes 7, no. 6: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060337

APA Style

Yang, C. -K., Yang, H. -C., & Lee, J. -M. (2022). Research on the Key Success Factors for the Transformation of the Traditional Fishery to Recreational Fishery in Taiwan’s Outlying Islands. Fishes, 7(6), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060337

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop