Quantitative Assessment of CFD-Based Micro-Scale Renovation of Existing Building Component Envelopes
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Object
2.1.1. Existing Building and Outdoor Air Conditioning Unit Model
2.1.2. Bionic Envelope Model of the Air Conditioner Outdoor Unit
2.2. Research Process
2.3. Research Methods and CFD Simulation Details
2.3.1. Evaluation Criteria
- The street environment at a pedestrian height of 1.5 m is set as the lowest measurement section, and the average wind speed of different floors is analyzed as an evaluation index. Among them, the wind speed of 1–3 m/s, not exceeding 5 m/s, is usually more appropriate.
- According to the specifications and previous research, the wind pressure difference exceeding 3 pa between the windward and leeward sides of the building is used as the evaluation standard for natural ventilation.
- This study uses CFD simulation data of standard building models of 3 m, 9 m, 15 m, 21 m, and 27 m standard floors, combined with a site wind speed map, wind pressure map, and wind speed distribution vector map of 1.5 m pedestrian height as the main evaluation basis.
2.3.2. CFD Simulation Set Up
- The standard turbulence model is a simple industrial flow field and heat transfer simulation, without a large pressure gradient, separation, and strong curvature flow, which is suitable for initial parameter research, and generally applicable to building ventilation. Its formula is shown in Equations (1) and (2):where is the turbulent kinetic energy; is the turbulent dissipation rate; is the fluid density; and is the average velocity gradient generation term.
- 2.
- The turbulence model is an improved variant of the standard model. An additional generation term is added to the transport equation of the dissipation rate, . This additional generation term is designed to accelerate the generation of the dissipation rate, , when the flow energy generation, , suddenly increases, so that the model can respond to flow changes more quickly. The formulas are shown in Equations (3) and (4):where is the turbulent viscosity coefficient; is the turbulent kinetic energy generated by the mean velocity gradient; and is the molecular viscosity coefficient.
- 3.
- The turbulence model applies the renormalization group (RNG) theory to mathematically derive the revised equation. It includes the strain rate’s additional term and optimizes the model constants, which is more accurate in predicting the separated flow, moderate swirl, and shear flow, and the simulation accuracy of the complex flow is significantly higher than that of the standard model and model, and its formula is shown in Equations (5) and (6):where represents the turbulent kinetic energy generated by the average velocity gradient; represents the turbulent kinetic energy generated by buoyancy; is the model correction term; is the turbulent kinetic energy source term; and is the strain rate correction term.
3. Result
3.1. Comparative Study of Bionic Stent Building Units
3.2. Simulation Study of Bionic Bracket Structure in Townhouse Buildings
3.3. Simulation Study of the Bionic Bracket Structure in an Old Community
3.4. Investigation of Velocity Vector Fields for Bionic Enclosure Structures
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- From the perspective of aerodynamic mechanisms, the porous nature of the web-inspired structure significantly influences the development of the boundary layer on the building facade. Its unique grille design creates a distinct fluid–solid interaction interface, allowing the incoming flow to penetrate the pores while simultaneously facilitating the formation of a stable boundary layer on the building surface. This porous medium effect effectively modulates the flow structure in the near-wall region, delays the onset of flow separation, and improves the pressure distribution characteristics on the building surface. Specifically, it results in a more uniform distribution of the high-pressure zone on the windward side and a significant reduction in the pressure gradient, thereby mitigating the formation of localized strong wind areas.
- Regarding the vortex structure in the wake region, the web-inspired structure demonstrates a unique capability for turbulence control. Through the flow-rectifying effect of its porous grille, it promotes the breakdown of large-scale, concentrated vortices into multiple smaller-scale, distributed vortex structures. This vortex reorganization mechanism effectively reduces the turbulence intensity in the wake region and improves the air transport characteristics amongst the building group.
- From the practical standpoint of community micro-renewal, the synergistic effect of multiple web-inspired structures further enhances this outcome, forming a more organized community-scale ventilation network. Quantitative analysis corroborates the above mechanisms: within the typical height range of 1.5–27 m, and benefiting from the optimization of the global flow field organization, the web-inspired structure can increase the average wind speed by approximately 1.1–1.4% at the townhouse building and community scales, with a maximum increase of up to 1.9%. This research confirms the technical feasibility of improving the community wind environment through micro-renewal of attached building enclosures.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tian, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, G.; Hu, C.; Zhang, W.; Feng, J.; Hong, T.; Yu, H. Research on microclimate influencing factors and thermal comfort improvement strategies in old residential areas in the post-urbanization stage. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, C.; Zhuang, Z. Survey on the renewal demand of public area for residential buildings in old communities in Shanghai. Hous. Sci. 2020, 40, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, G.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q. Policy pathways and case studies on the renovation of old residential communities in urban renewal: A case study of Beijing. Urban Dev. Stud. 2023, 30, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Oorschot, L.; De Jonge, W. Progress and stagnation of renovation, energy efficiency, and gentrification of pre-war walk-up apartment buildings in Amsterdam since 1995. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seneviratne, S.I.; Donat, M.G.; Pitman, A.J.; Knutti, R.; Wilby, R.L. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 2016, 529, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Wei, Y.; Hu, D. The impact of the building morphology on microclimate and thermal comfort—A case study in Beijing. Build. Environ. 2022, 223, 109469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allouhi, A.; El Fouih, Y.; Kousksou, T.; Jamil, A.; Zeraouli, Y.; Mourad, Y. Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: Current status and future trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atmaca, A. Life-cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in South East of Turkey: Part 2—A case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2016, 21, 925–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union 2012, L315, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2010/31/EU of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, L153, 13–35. [Google Scholar]
- Xin, L.; Chenchen, W.; Chuanzhi, L.; Guohui, F.; Zekai, Y.; Zonghan, L. Effect of the energy-saving retrofit on the existing residential buildings in the typical city in northern China. Energy Build. 2018, 177, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W.; Xu, Q. Sustainable-driven renovation of existing residential buildings in China: A systematic exploration based on review and solution approaches. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santamouris, M. Energy and Climate in the Urban Built Environment; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, J.; Belcher, R.N.; Tan, H.; Menz, S.; Schroepfer, T. The urban heat island mitigation potential of vegetation depends on local surface type and shade. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 62, 127128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stache, E.E.; Schilperoort, B.B.; Ottelé, M.M.; Jonkers, H.H. Comparative analysis in thermal behaviour of common urban building materials and vegetation and consequences for urban heat island effect. Build. Environ. 2022, 213, 108489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.J.; Ding, L.; Prasad, D. Relationships among local-scale urban morphology, urban ventilation, urban heat island and outdoor thermal comfort under sea breeze influence. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 60, 102289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, M.S.; Nichol, J.E.; To, P.H.; Wang, J. A simple method for designation of urban ventilation corridors and its application to urban heat island analysis. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.J.; Ding, L.; Prasad, D. Urban ventilation and its potential for local warming mitigation: A field experiment in an open low-rise gridiron precinct. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 55, 102028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Zhang, F.; Geng, W.; Li, Z. Research on performance improvement design strategies for urban historic districts and suburban traditional villages in multiple scopes. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 72, 106342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Ma, X. Microclimate-adaptive morphological parametric design of streets and alleys in traditional villages. Buildings 2024, 14, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.Y.; Mak, C.M. Effects of wind direction and building array arrangement on airflow and contaminant distributions in the central space of buildings. Build. Environ. 2021, 205, 108234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, Y.; Hou, F.; Gu, M. Effects of vertical ribs protruding from facades on the wind loads of super high-rise buildings. Wind Struct. 2017, 24, 145–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, K.; Hui, Y.; Chen, Z. Effects of facade appurtenances on the local pressure of high-rise building. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2018, 178, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, G.; Qian, T.; Yang, X.; Fang, H.; Lou, W. Study on wind loads of torsional tall buildings with external hollow decorative structures. J. Build. Struct. 2013, 34, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
- Zari, M.P. Regenerative Urban Design and Ecosystem Biomimicry; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wanieck, K.; Fayemi, P.-E.; Maranzana, N.; Zollfrank, C.; Jacobs, S. Biomimetics and its tools. Bioinspir. Biomim. Nanobiomater. 2017, 6, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco-Torgal, F. Introduction to biotechnologies and biomimetics for civil engineering. In Biotechnologies and Biomimetics for Civil Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UN-HABITAT. Tracking Progress Towards Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements: SDG 11 Synthesis Report—High Level Political Forum 2018; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 18458; Biomimetics—Terminology, Concepts and Methodology. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
- Shahda, M.; Elmokadem, A.A.E.; Abd Elhafeez, M.M. Biomimicry levels as an approach to the architectural sustainability. Port Said Eng. Res. J. 2014, 18, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othmani, N.I.; Mohamed, S.A.; Hamid, N.H.A.; Ramlee, N.; Yeo, L.B.; Yunos, M.Y.M. Reviewing biomimicry design case studies as a solution to sustainable design. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 69327–69340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amer, N. Biomimetic approach in architectural education: Case study of ‘biomimicry in architecture’ course. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2019, 10, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmeligy, D.A. Biomimicry for ecologically sustainable design in architecture: A proposed methodological study. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2016, 161, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Martino, B. Biomimicry in Building Architecture: From Theory to Industry-Standard Construction Practice. University of Colorado Honors Journal 2023, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waheeb, M.I.; Hemeida, F.A.; Mohamed, A.F. Improving thermal comfort using biomimicry in the urban residential districts in New Aswan city, Egypt. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 2, 21–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, X.; Abbas, J.; Al-Sulaiti, K.; Pilař, L.; Shah, S.A.R. The role of digital management and smart technologies for sports education in a dynamic environment: Employment, green growth, and tourism. J. Urban Technol. 2025, 32, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbrugghe, N.; Rubinacci, E.; Khan, A.Z. Biomimicry in architecture: A review of definitions, case studies, and design methods. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Simulation and optimization study on the ventilation performance of high-rise buildings inspired by the white termite mound chamber structure. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skiadopoulos, A.; Elkady, A.; Lignos, D.G. Proposed panel zone model for seismic design of steel moment-resisting frames. J. Struct. Eng. 2021, 147, 04021006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danish, M.; Noor, M.Z.M.; Azeqa, A. Biomimicry in Malaysian architecture: Crafting a modular framework for sustainable design. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2024, 14, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugalenthi, A.M.; Khlie, K.; Hassan Ahmed, F. Harnessing the power of biomimicry for sustainable innovation in construction industry. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 2024, 8, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J. Integrating biomimetic vertical greening systems with plant-cell-inspired design for urban cooling and energy efficiency: A case study in Suzhou. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 2025, 22, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Taylor, J.E.; Pisello, A.L. Toward mitigating urban heat island effects: Investigating the thermal-energy impact of bio-inspired retro-reflective building envelopes in dense urban settings. Energy Build. 2015, 102, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Renterghem, T.; Hornikx, M.; Forssen, J.; Botteldooren, D. The potential of building envelope greening to achieve quietness. Build. Environ. 2013, 61, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castriotto, C.; Giantini, G.; Celani, G. Biomimetic reciprocal frames: A design investigation on bird’s nests and spatial structures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Porto, Portugal, 11–13 September 2019; pp. 613–620. [Google Scholar]
- Regassa, Y.; Lemu, H.G.; Sirabizuh, B.; Rahimeto, S. Studies on the geometrical design of spider webs for reinforced composite structures. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, F.H.F.; Ali, K.A.Y.; Ahmed, S.A.M. Biomimicry as an approach to improve daylighting performance in office buildings in Assiut City. Egypt. J. Daylighting 2023, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stucke, I.; Vedoya, D.E.; Morán, R.G. The sustainable architectural design based on natural processes. Arquitecno 2019, 14, 2–8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, K.; Li, F.; Cai, H.; Yang, Y.; Peng, F.; Chen, L.; Zhuang, J. Experimental and numerical investigation of gas diffusion under an urban underground construction. Energy Built Environ. 2021, 2, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loche, I.; Bre, F.; Gimenez, J.M.; Loonen, R.; Neves, L.O. Balcony design to improve natural ventilation and energy performance in high-rise mixed-mode office buildings. Build. Environ. 2024, 258, 111636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez, M.J.; Sánchez, M.N.; Blanco, E.; Jiménez, M.J.; Giancola, E. A CFD energetic study of the influence of the panel orientation in open joint ventilated façades. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tai, V.C.; Kai-Seun, J.W.; Mathew, P.R.; Moey, L.K.; Cheng, X.; Baglee, D. Investigation of varying louver angles and positions on cross ventilation in a generic isolated building using CFD simulation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2022, 229, 105172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alyahya, A.; Lannon, S.; Jabi, W. Biomimetic opaque ventilated façade for low-rise buildings in hot arid climate. Buildings 2025, 15, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Long, Y. CMAB: A multi-attribute building dataset of China. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 50096-2011; Residential Design Code. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2012.
- GB/T 17986.1-2000; Standard for Real Estate Measurement. China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2000.
- Shirzadeh Germi, M.; Eimani Kalehsar, H. Numerical investigation of interference effects on the critical wind velocity of tall buildings. Structures 2021, 30, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 50378-2019; Green Building Evaluation Standard. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2019.
- GB 50736-2012; Design Code for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning of Civil Buildings. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2012.
- Pendar, M.R.; Esmaeilifar, E.; Roohi, E. LES study of unsteady cavitation characteristics of a 3-D hydrofoil with wavy leading edge. Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 2020, 132, 103415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadeh, M.; Sadrameli, S.M. Numerical modeling and optimization of thermal comfort in building: Central composite design and CFD simulation. Energy Build. 2018, 164, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, Y. PHOENICS-based simulation study on winter wind environment in outdoor space of old communities: Taking Sanlihe community of Beijing as an example. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 560, 012064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Gou, A. Research on wind environment simulation of commercial district based on Phoenics: Taking Shanghai central building group as an example. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 647, 012193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Jin, M.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L. Simulated study on the potential of building energy saving using the green roof. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 1469–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y. A study on the summer ventilation environment of a teaching building in a cold region. Archit. Cult. 2025, 182, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X. Study on Wind Environment Simulation and Optimization Strategy of Blocks on the East Bank of Jiaozhou Bay. Master’s Thesis, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; You, W.; Tan, L.; Jiang, X.; Chen, C. Renewal path of old residential areas based on wind environment simulation evaluation: A case study of Xicheng Street, Ya’an. China Famous City 2024, 38, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
- Song, J.; Meng, X. The improvement of ventilation design in school buildings using CFD simulation. Procedia Eng. 2015, 121, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Pan, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, X.; Long, Z.; Chen, Q. Influence of surrounding buildings on wind flow around a building predicted by CFD simulations. Build. Environ. 2018, 140, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Comprehensive Renovation of Old Buildings | Main Renovation Content | Unilateral Cost (CNY/m2) |
|---|---|---|
| Demolition fee | 150 | |
| Structural reinforcement and transformation | Reinforced for a 30 year service life | 1200 |
| Energy-saving transformation | Exterior wall insulation, roof insulation and waterproofing, replacement of rainwater pipes | 300 |
| Air conditioning beautification | Air conditioning unit blocking and additional condensate pipe | 30 |
| Plastic steel windows and enclosed balconies | Using 60 broken bridge aluminum alloy windows is 280 CNY/m | 180 |
| Installation of elevators | Using 60 broken bridge aluminum alloy windows is 280 CNY/m | 330 |
| Water supply and drainage pipeline transformation | Main pipe and branch pipe renovation, bathroom and kitchen renovation | 400 |
| Strong and weak current transformation | Renovation of public areas and painting of stairwells, railing renewal | 400 |
| Heating system renovation | Riser transformation, household metering, radiator replacement | 300 |
| Expansion of balcony and bay window | Bay window protruding 600 mm from the exterior wall | 700 |
| Total | 3990 |
| Biological Structure | Bionic Examples | Structural Function | Studies | Inspiration Extraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | Termite mound ventilation systems. | [39,40,41] | Indoor ventilation of high-rise buildings. |
![]() | ![]() | Honeycomb structures for thermal and load management. | [42,43] | The building façade is attached to the vertical greening bionic support. |
![]() | ![]() | Leaf-inspired surfaces for heat and noise reduction. | [44,45] | Dynamic structure of building facades. |
![]() | ![]() | Branch-winding layouts for ventilation and lighting. | [46] | The building frame is strong and lightweight. |
![]() | ![]() | Cobweb structures for performance and ventilation. | [47] | Building façade and roof. |
![]() | ![]() | Passive ventilation, solar reflection, and light optimization. | [32,48] | Dynamic structure of building facades. |
![]() | ![]() | Sponge aerodynamics for wind resistance reduction. | [49] | The overall structure of the building. |
| Attribute Type | Attribute Metrics | Property Description |
|---|---|---|
| Geometric properties | Roof shape | Roof profile |
| Height | The vertical height of the single building | |
| Indicates the attribute | Function | Residential, office, commercial service, industrial and other functional classifications |
| Structure | Frame structure, brick concrete, steel structure, etc. | |
| Style | Different architectural styles | |
| Age | Year of construction, 1985–2018 35 categories | |
| Quality | The maintenance status of the façade, whether it is illegal, etc. |
| Grid Level | Element Count | Characteristic Velocity (m/s) | Relative Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Mesh | 33,792 | 1.963 | 23.20% |
| Intermediate Mesh | 73,964 | 2.504 | 2.00% |
| Refined Mesh | 160,113 | 2.553 | Benchmark |
| Height (m) | Unenclosed Single | Leaf Townhouse | Honeycomb Single | Cobweb Single | Scales Single | Bird’s Nest Single |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 2.225416 | 2.224171 | 2.224141 | 2.238302 | 2.224175 | 2.224141 |
| 3 | 2.391976 | 2.390593 | 2.390568 | 2.403999 | 2.390598 | 2.390568 |
| 9 | 2.881883 | 2.880869 | 2.880854 | 2.892646 | 2.880871 | 2.880871 |
| 15 | 3.205680 | 3.203293 | 3.20327 | 3.213783 3.490931 | 3.203300 | 3.203270 |
| 21 | 3.483298 | 3.480831 | 3.480784 | 3.490931 3.994363 | 3.480831 3.983193 | 3.480784 |
| 27 | 3.984794 | 3.983194 | 3.983130 | 3.994363 | 3.983193 | 3.983130 |
| Height (m) | Unenclosed Townhouse | Leaf Townhouse | Honeycomb Townhouse | Cobweb Townhouse | Scales Townhouse | Bird’s Nest Townhouse |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 2.743645 | 2.761254 | 2.768233 | 2.784858 | 2.767262 | 2.766421 |
| 3 | 2.804826 | 2.817279 | 2.830810 | 2.846948 | 2.830820 | 2.828846 |
| 9 | 3.107364 | 3.132993 | 3.143625 | 3.162149 | 3.150492 | 3.140220 |
| 15 | 3.434615 | 3.295229 | 3.469199 | 3.487725 | 3.472168 | 3.465668 |
| 21 | 3.764701 | 3.772811 | 3.78465 | 3.796622 | 3.785625 | 3.785424 |
| 27 | 4.069164 | 4.067633 | 4.070724 | 4.075769 | 4.077345 | 4.071573 |
| Height (m) | 1.5 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unenclosed community | 2.376103 | 2.434309 | 2.713332 | 2.997079 | 3.302519 | 3.713194 |
| Cobweb community | 2.417698 | 2.476919 | 2.763892 | 3.05129 | 3.353679 | 3.698351 |
| Height (m) | Single Scale (Unenclosed) | Single Scale (Cobweb) | Standard Layer Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 2.2254 | 2.2383 | +0.58% |
| 3 | 2.3920 | 2.4040 | +0.50% |
| 9 | 2.8819 | 2.8926 | +0.37% |
| 15 | 3.2057 | 3.2138 | +0.25% |
| 21 | 3.4833 | 3.4909 | +0.22% |
| 27 | 3.9848 | 3.9944 | +0.24% |
| Average lift | +0.36% | ||
| Height (m) | Townhouse Scale (Enclosure) | Townhouse Scale (Cobweb) | Standard Layer Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 2.7436 | 2.7849 | +1.50% |
| 3 | 2.8048 | 2.8469 | +1.50% |
| 9 | 3.1074 | 3.1621 | +1.76% |
| 15 | 3.4346 | 3.4877 | +1.55% |
| 21 | 3.7647 | 3.7966 | +0.85% |
| 27 | 4.0692 | 4.0758 | +0.16% |
| Average lift | +1.15% | ||
| Height (m) | Community Scale (Enclosure) | Community Scale (Cobweb) | Standard Layer Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 2.3761 | 2.4177 | +1.75% |
| 3 | 2.4343 | 2.4769 | +1.75% |
| 9 | 2.7133 | 2.7639 | +1.87% |
| 15 | 2.9971 | 3.0513 | +1.81% |
| 21 | 3.3025 | 3.3537 | +1.55% |
| 27 | 3.7132 | 3.6984 | −0.40% |
| Average lift | +1.39% | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pan, Y.; Zhong, L.; Xu, J. Quantitative Assessment of CFD-Based Micro-Scale Renovation of Existing Building Component Envelopes. Biomimetics 2025, 10, 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10110733
Pan Y, Zhong L, Xu J. Quantitative Assessment of CFD-Based Micro-Scale Renovation of Existing Building Component Envelopes. Biomimetics. 2025; 10(11):733. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10110733
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Yan, Lin Zhong, and Jin Xu. 2025. "Quantitative Assessment of CFD-Based Micro-Scale Renovation of Existing Building Component Envelopes" Biomimetics 10, no. 11: 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10110733
APA StylePan, Y., Zhong, L., & Xu, J. (2025). Quantitative Assessment of CFD-Based Micro-Scale Renovation of Existing Building Component Envelopes. Biomimetics, 10(11), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10110733















